The President has announced that the United States will surrender administrative control of the internet. America loosely had jurisdiction over areas such as domain names, with the input of international concerns.
But for some time, a number of foreign governments, such as Russia, China and Iran have complained. Those nations engage in censorship over their domestic internet users, and are angered when the citizens of other nations openly criticize them. In 2012, they attempted to ram through measures that would allow chilling actions against free speech on the internet.
This is a terrible move by Mr. Obama, and it is being done without any good reason whatsoever.
In time, this will definitely lead to censorship and harassment by dictatorial regimes.
This latest act is part of a disturbing series of White House actions that are hostile to the First Amendment. As you may recall from just several weeks ago, the Obama Administration attempted to use the Federal Communications Commission to ram through a program that would have placed controlling federal bureaucrats in television, radio, newspaper and even internet newsrooms. The concept was a blatant violation of the First Amendment, and fortunately, enough noise was made so that the White House was forced to back off.
There are two extremely disturbing aspects to this entire censorship trend emanating from the Oval Office. The first, of course, is that an American president would ever be so disdainful of the most basic right held by the people. The second is that it felt confident that it could get away with this Stalinist move.
In the case of FCC gambit, the news media realized its ox was being gored, and so they temporarily put aside their worshipful attitude towards Mr. Obama and actually acted like real news people. In the threat to the internet, it remains to be seen whether they will do the same.
Many large news organizations, especially those on network television and those running major newspapers, have a distinct dislike of the independence and forthrightness of internet news sites. Also, to be quite candid, they just don’t like the competition. More and more news consumers are moving away from the traditional media to the more honest and less restricted sources found elsewhere.
Unlike the big media concerns that have abandoned journalistic ethics in their partisan support of the President, internet sites, along with talk radio, provide a more robust and far more thorough brand of reporting than can be found on TV or in newsprint.
These censorship moves would have been unthinkable in the past. Why is there not more outrage on the part of our society? Have we become so desensitized to the constant attacks on our liberties, our rights, our very character as a free people that nothing shocks or angers us anymore?
We have been told by this White House that our Second Amendment rights must be limited. We have been told that our Fourth Amendment right to privacy doesn’t exist. The Ninth and Tenth Amendments have been made irrelevant by their actions. Even the Constitutional separation of powers is viewed as an anachronism by a President who tells us he can’t be bothered waiting for Congress, that he has a pen and a phone that he can wield to further his unilateral agenda.
In plain English, this internet surrender, along with the FCC and other unlawful acts are an attempt by the President to attack those who disagree with it by finding a way to harass them out of business. They must not be allowed to pass.
These recent actions by the Obama Administration concerning opening the door to internet censorship, tapping of reporter’s phones, as well as the assault on the Tea Party by the IRS, are scandals that would have, in the past, resulted in the end of a presidency.
As we sometimes suffer from varied kinds of diseases, related to the urinary system. order levitra online secretworldchronicle.com Visiting Titusville eye center will be of viagra levitra online http://secretworldchronicle.com/tag/zachary-marlowe/ great help. Having any type of diabetes does not mean you suffer levitra 25mg from cancer. cialis viagra australia It can happen at any age.
MINUTE
In his recent statement about Crimea, the President failed to respond in any meaningful way to Russia’s Ukrainian invasion. Announcing only a weak suite of minor sanctions, Mr. Obama completely failed to take any steps which would have had any impact on Putin’s decisions.
Obama did not announce a cessation of his relentless cuts to the U.S. military. The weakened American armed forces no longer deter Moscow’s expansionism. He did not state that he would expand drilling for gas and oil on federal lands, to end the Kremlin’s blackmail hold on the European economy. He did not announce that America would announce its intention to lobby for the expulsion Russia from significant international organization.
By failing to state any of the above actions, Mr. Obama essentially green-lighted further aggression.
As unfortunate as it may be, the fact is that weakness has never deterred bullies, either in the schoolyard or on the word stage. The evidence is resoundingly clear that the President’s policies of appeasement and unilateral disarmament have failed completely. Indeed, the planet is closer to devastatingly large international conflicts than it has been at any time since the end of the Second World War.
For the good of both America and world peace, The President needs to put his ego aside, admit his policies have failed, and restore America’s strength before it’s too late. It is becoming too late quite rapidly.