Twin Exposures Highlight Leftist Misdeeds

The Durham investigation has revealed that the entire “Russian Collusion” charge was completely false, manufactured solely for the purpose of ensuring that Hillary would win the 2016 campaign.

The key perpetrators, including the Clintons, as well as the leadership of the Democratic Party, and in particular Rep. Adam Schiff, serving as Chair of the House Intelligence Committee, knew of the fraud. As the New York Post reported in 2020, “As the grand impresario of collusion, Schiff has filled print and broadcast media since January 2017 claiming that he has seen “more than circumstantial evidence” of a Trump-Putin conspiracy. Obviously there was none in the transcripts…”

Key portions of the media which had already abandoned journalistic ethics in their determination to place their favored candidate in the Oval Office, eagerly went along. Pulitzer Prizes were awarded for their false reporting. The Washington Post falsely wrote in 2018 “Coupled with another groundless attack on the FBI and an apparent endorsement of a patently disingenuous offer by Mr. Putin to collaborate with the investigation of special counsel Robert S. Mueller III, Mr. Trump appeared to align himself with the Kremlin against American law enforcement before the Russian ruler and a global audience.”

The crime was undoubtedly the worst in American political history.

Usually, campaign misdeeds end on election day. But the Clinton/Democratic Party offense extended far beyond. It divided the nation more harshly than anything since the Civil War. It had severe implications for U.S. foreign Affairs. Lives were ruined. Federal agencies abused private citizens on behalf of power brokers–all for the purpose of placing a Democrat in the White House. Both the legislative and executive branches of government were diverted from their duties, although, to its credit, the Trump Administration accomplished much.

Accomplished much despite the left’s profound efforts to continue the hoax, and distract the public with Antifa riots when the fraud became increasingly evident

It was more than a felony. It was an unprecedented act of immorality.

There is a role for morality in politics. Advocate that concept, however, at your own peril. Undoubtedly, anyone forwarding the idea will be immediately assaulted by a legion of progressive critics pointing out the past foibles and imperfections of the person or organizations bringing it up, in order to distract the conversation from the issue at hand.

It’s the same logic used to justify assaulting figures such as Abraham Lincoln. As a result, a perfect environment has been created for tolerating immoral deeds including Russian Collusion, biased journalism, and the abuse of government agencies and organizations for partisan gain.

The electorate has become cognizant of this trend, and is beginning to react to it. The results of the recent election, especially in Virginia, highlight the issue.

The public school system has been one of the most prominent examples of immorality in American government. For decades, powerful teachers’ union officials have subordinated the interests of children, and the struggles by wonderful teachers to present honest curriculum, to the desires of leftist-dominated union leaders. Rejecting objective education for propaganda, they have used their influential position to indoctrinate children to their views. Those unions leaders have vigorously supported Democratic politicians in return for their looking the other way.

Garlic juice taken with hot water twice steal here female viagra cheap a daily relieves asthma attacks. 6. This is not an open-heart surgery, hence most of the patients viagra levitra cialis http://djpaulkom.tv/photos-polow-mob-tv-shoots-away-at-the-massacre-tour-in-austin/ were not able to take medicine. Love heals up the order generic cialis entire trauma appearing in one’s life. viagra canada mastercard He can’t stop considering about it.

Terry McAuliffe made the mistake of openly stating that parents had no right to object to this charade, and lost his gubernatorial bid as a result. Hopefully, it is the start of a trend.

The Durham investigation’s recent report, following McAuliffe’s self-exposure, presented a one-two punch to the environment of political corruption that has dominated the left and their media allies.

Despite the exposures, however, the challenge is far from over. Still guarded by a biased media, and having had the precedent of leftist officials repeatedly escaping liability for misdeeds, there will be no contrition, no soul searching. The only change will be in rhetoric that attempts to explain away the heinous crimes and governing errors that have so damaged the nation.

Illustration: Pixabay

Quick Analysis

Ukraine’s Frozen Conflict

As we approach winter in the northern hemisphere, the war in Ukraine is beginning to resemble a “frozen conflict” from many perspectives. Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky recently told the media he hopes the war will end faster once President-elect Trump takes over in January. Opinions in Moscow, however, differ from that of the Ukrainian leader. Russian President Vladimir Putin argues that the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) needs to exclude Ukraine from joining in “exchange” for peace. If it does not, he says, then no end to the war is in sight. So far there is no Christmas solution. Several NATO countries, according to Vladimir Socor of the Jamestown Foundation, are tentatively considering “coalitions-of-the-willing” to provide security for Ukraine outside of the formal NATO framework. There is, however, no collective mechanism today under which such an arrangement is viable. According to the NATO Charter, while Ukraine is a NATO partner country, it may not join as a full member since it has not fulfilled the requirements for membership. That has not stopped NATO and allies from continuing “to provide Ukraine with unprecedented levels of support, helping to uphold its fundamental right to self-defence,” according to the organization. Socor says that keeping Ukraine out of NATO will not advance peace with Russia. Waiting for a peace settlement, he suggests, would only serve to encourage Moscow to continue the war indefinitely. Although the Biden Administration officially withdrew its support for Ukrainian membership in 2021, NATO maintains an “open door” policy toward membership-seeking countries. The current White House position led the way for European states to oppose Ukraine’s membership saying that a decision should be delayed until “conditions are met.” Biden pushed for changing “open door” to a “bridge” metaphor. It is not intended as an across-the-board NATO policy and has been implemented in the past on a case-by-case basis, says Socor. “The alliance’s open-door policy was not fully insulated from Russia’s non-statutory blocking power, and NATO-aspirant countries’ path toward membership was not always irreversible.” Russia has successfully blocked states like Georgia from joining, first in 2008 and again after the war in Ukraine began in 2014. Russia recognizes the value add of Ukraine to NATO is enormous and that Kyiv has a better case than some other nations. Putin’s invasion was, in part, intended to foreclose that option. By 2021, Moscow was pushing hard to maximize its war objectives, which included further annexations of Ukrainian territory. A main goal for Putin was, and is, to ensure there is no Ukraine left to join NATO. As President-elect Trump prepares to assume office in January, he is faced with the historical challenges presented by the war. Post-conflict security guarantees were the center of several proposals made during the 2023 military stalemate. The incoming Trump Administration has yet to outline how it intends to handle the Russia-Ukraine war. Analysts in Washington believe that the new Administration will expect its European allies to guarantee the majority of Ukraine’s security needs. As we approach 2025, several European nations have acknowledged that they do not view Ukraine as eligible for NATO membership as it would draw the organization into the middle of the conflict. Others want to wait until the war is over or pending a “peace” settlement before considering Ukrainian membership. Socor reports that some “influential voices” are suggesting that “Kyiv should join NATO after “freezing” the war along a stable armistice line, de facto accepting Ukraine’s partition, with NATO security guarantees applying de jure to the government-controlled territory only.” This would mean starting accession talks soon with the actual talks to commence only after a ceasefire is in place. Trump arrives in Washington at a time when Putin’s hybrid strategies of war in Ukraine have eviscerated commonly-held differences between war and peace. “Absent a political consensus in NATO over Ukrainian membership, certain European allies, including France’s President Emmanuel Macron, are holding informal consultations about post-conflict security guarantees to Kyiv by NATO members outside of NATO’s framework,” according to the Jamestown Foundation. The Biden Administration downplayed the discussions on possible forms of military assistance and defense industry cooperation by sending only an Assistant Secretary of State. For a European peace to hold the Trump Administration would need to formally extend the United States’ nuclear deterrence to Ukraine. Options under discussion in Europe include a “coalition of the resolute” to deploy forces to Ukraine as part of a possible armistice package, deterring further Russian attacks, says Secor. European officials are also debating, without any agreement, whether its military forces could perform non-combat logistical roles to free Ukrainian forces to fight. None of the possible courses of action has moved forward as all eyes are waiting on the incoming Trump Administration for clues about its intended level of support for a NATO framework and other non-NATO proposals. Daria Novak served in the U.S. State Dept.