Categories
Quick Analysis

Trump Seeks to Restore U.S. Leadership in Space

In the early days of the American republic, U.S. leaders chose to look towards the future, despite the many immediate challenges they faced. Despite the perilous financial position the nation faced, President Thomas Jefferson chose to purchase the vast Louisiana territory from France. As History.com notes, “westward expansion was the key to the nation’s health.”  The Author of the Declaration of Independence didn’t stop there. The U.S. National Archives explains:   “After the Louisiana Purchase Treaty was made, Jefferson initiated an exploration of the newly purchased land and the territory beyond the “great rock mountains” in the West. He chose Meriwether Lewis to lead an expedition, who in turn solicited the help of William Clark. Together they formed a diverse military Corps of Discovery that would undertake a two-year journey to the great ocean.”

America faces a similar choice in the 21st Century.  Two successive presidents have made starkly different choices.  Obama chose the course not taken by President Jefferson: He basically declined to move vigorously ahead in opening up the nations next great frontier, space.    It was not only manned space flight that had been slashed by the Obama White House.  The Planetary Society wrote during the former president’s term “The [Obama] Administration’s [space]budget would force NASA to walk away from planned missions to Mars, delay flagship missions to the outer planets for decades, and gradually slow the pace of scientific discovery… the United States will walk away from decades of greatness in space science and exploration.  More than that, the U.S. will lose expertise, capability and talent…we’ll quickly stop producing scientists, technicians, and engineers that can lead.”

President Obama’s last NASA budget did little to change the disappointing fact that America’s returned to crewed space flight in a NASA vehicle won’t take place  until 2023. In fact, his final space funding proposal represented a 1.3%, $300 million reduction from the prior year. There was much controversy in Obama’s diversion of funding within the space agency from its traditional mission of manned space flight, while dramatically, to the tune of $2 billion, increasing Earth Science research by 70% over the years, mostly to advance Mr. Obama’s climate change agenda.

In discussing Obama’s final NASA budget, House space subcommittee chair Steven Palazzo (R-Miss.) noted: “It is no secret that this Committee is concerned that the support within NASA for the [Space Launch System] and Orion (a manned spacecraft) is not matched by the Administration. While this lack of commitment is somewhat puzzling, it is not at all surprising. [President Obama] has made clear that he does not believe space exploration is a priority for the nation and has allowed political appointees within the administration to manipulate the course of our human space flight program. These decisions should be made by the scientists, engineers, and program managers that have decades of experience in human space flight…The Administration has consistently requested large reductions for these programs despite the insistence of Congress that they be priorities.”
What we generally look viagra purchase uk for in scope is the image quality and how true it is to the launch date. Yes, men can regain their erection quality back with help of these foods listed below- Carbohydrates- cialis properien djpaulkom.tv Body cannot work in case of lacking of sufficient energy that comes from glucose. Learn more about the alter effects of cycling on penile functioning. viagra for women price Pregnant ladies generic levitra djpaulkom.tv always need doctor’s advice before going with the medicament.
Mark Whittington, writing for The Hill  states:

“To understand the task that the president and whomever he chooses as NASA administrator have before them, it is useful to look back on how profoundly and adroitly President Barack Obama crippled the space agency’s efforts to send astronauts beyond low Earth orbit…Congress, which had not been consulted, reacted with bipartisan fury. The Obama administration made two critical errors. It had not consulted with Congress or anyone else when it developed its plans…Nowhere in the Obama plan was there a commitment to send astronauts anywhere. Clearly, the White House had no intention of doing space exploration. President Obama had expressed an antipathy to American exceptionalism, and nothing speaks to that quality than American astronauts exploring other worlds.”

The Report Continues Tomorrow

Photo: Apollo 11, first Manned Landing on the Moon, takes off (NASA)