The Peculiar Ethics of Modern Society

The avoidance of western moral standards has led to peculiar ethical choices.

Much of this is seen through the prism of progressive politics and “woke” concepts that have, as its guiding principle, a rejection of values seen as emblematic of modern American society.

There is increasing pressure to teach the youngest students issues of gender and sex practices. However, many of the same educational bureaucrats who advocate this shrink in horror at even innocuous discussions of the most basic concepts of religion or morality. Teachers who mention fellatio face far less scrutiny than those who dare say “Merry Christmas” or “Happy Channukah.”

The concept of not tilting towards one religious creed over the other has been replaced by a strenuous avoidance of all western faith practices.

There is a level of hypocrisy that is almost overwhelming.

Entire branches of the U.S. federal government will vigorously assault anyone who engages in land development actions that may endanger an obscure animal species. However, the emplacement of wind turbines (a practice favored by the Woke) which result in the deaths of up to a half-million birds each year, including those on endangered lists, is encouraged.

The Washington bureaucracy will take little notice of the “harvesting” of the results of the over one million abortions performed each year in America. Abortion has always been a contentious issue, and reasonable people of conscience may honestly differ on the morality of engaging in the practice during the first trimester. However, the increased acceptance of the killing of fetuses that have become viable, indeed, even those about to be born, is little less than the legalization of infanticide. Progressives express no remorse at the practice and many actually encourage it.

Erectile dysfunction is common experience generic cialis for alcoholics. The stunning totally disables an enemy http://davidfraymusic.com/category/news/page/2/ buying cialis from canada or opponent for 3 to 7 seconds and permits the blood to fill in the springy erectile tissues to lead an erection. Anything generic sildenafil canada which leads to stress can cause the following issues: Lean muscle loss Fat gaining specially Erectile dysfunction Decline in energy intensity Increase in irritability Prone to depression and mood swing Lowering of bone density Susceptibility to bone fracture Increased possibility of cardiovascular diseases. There are http://davidfraymusic.com/buy-4941 purchase levitra lots of hormonal factors involved; also erection troubles are observed when adequate quantities of blood do not reach the penile organ, causing impotency.

Abortion is frequently tied in with discussions of women’s rights. Historically speaking, women have long suffered from unequal treatment, a trend that was initially addressed in the nation by the ratification of the 19^th Amendment in 1920. But many of the organizations that purport to further the fulfillment of equal treatment in the western world turn a blind eye towards the treatment of females in non-western cultures. There is little mention of the chattelization of women in the Islamic world by them. They are tied up in knots because to do so may be seen as imposing “western” values on other cultures.

Major American corporations, particularly professional sports organizations, have engaged in “virtue signaling,” in which they openly endorse causes that allegedly respond to unjust practices, real or imagined.

Those same businesses, however, have no problem in eagerly pursuing business with China, a government that operates concentration camps, oppresses its own citizenry, attacks religion, and threatens the world with warfare. Germany scrupulously rejects its terrible history of antisemitism, but nevertheless has extensive trade relations with Iran, a nation ruled by a regime that vocally promises to exterminate the Jewish nation.

The recent decision by MLB to remove its All-Star Game from a minority-majority city to a far more Caucasian venue, based on a highly politicized and intentional misinterpretation of a new state law, highlights the growing rejection of actual morality in favor of virtue signaling. Indeed, the jurisdiction the game is being moved to has similar laws to that which has been abandoned.

The very concept of western morality, based on Judeo-Christian ethics is shunned, despite the extraordinary advances it has brought about in human dignity and freedom. There are far too many who erroneously equate support for traditional values with the forced imposition of them on the unwilling.

The very western concept of the wonderful and supreme value of each human soul is not part of the progressive mantra, which far prefers the collectivist view that we are all just cogs in a wheel in which ethics are situational based on the needs of a larger society.

Illustration: Pixabay

Quick Analysis

Why the Electoral College is Vital

Proposals for radical alterations in the way Americans vote are dangerous concepts that would have dramatic consequences for the nation and its Constitution. Some, such as ranked choice voting, are an unblushing bid to prop up fringe, leftist candidates. Others. if adopted, would essentially disunite the nation and overturn its Constitution. As they consistently have after each election loss, Democrat spokespeople have flooded the airwaves with complaints about the Electoral College. Why, they ask, can’t we have a “popular vote,” and let it be done with. Since the Electoral College process is part of the original design of the U.S. Constitution, it would be necessary to pass a Constitutional amendment to change this system. The National Archives notes that over the past 200 years more than 700 proposals have been introduced in Congress to reform or eliminate the Electoral College. There have been more proposals for Constitutional amendments on changing the Electoral College than on any other subject. The answer is as simple as the name of the country: The United States of America. The incredibly successful nation created almost two and a half centuries ago was a union of separate states. Fresh off of dealing with a monarch, it was intentionally set up that way to both prevent the possibility of having an all-powerful dictator, and to prevent larger states from bullying smaller ones. Abolishing the electoral college would essentially disenfranchise smaller states from having any say in the presidency. Indeed, even less populated areas of large states would lose influence. A collection of large cities, (New York, Los Angeles, Chicago, Houston, Phoenix, Philadelphia, San Antonio, San Diego, Dallas, Austin, Jacksonville, etc.) would decide the outcome in who gets the White House. Considering how badly many of those urban centers are run, that would not bode well for the future of the country! Beyond the practical policy implications, it would alienate the populations of those not living in California, Texas, New York, Florida, Pennsylvania, Illinois, who would, for the most part, be reduced to bystanders in the race for the only nationally-elected position. A Heritage study analyzed the concept of a “National Popular Vote” (NPV) this way: “The National Popular Vote (NPV) plan is the latest in a long line of schemes designed to replace the Electoral College. Imbued with the ideals of this nation’s Founders, the Electoral College has proved itself to be both effective in providing orderly elections for President and resilient in allowing a stable transfer of power of the leadership of the world’s greatest democracy. Therefore, while it would be a mistake to replace the Electoral College, replacing this system with the NPV would be a disaster. The NPV would devalue the minority interests that the Founders sought to protect, create electoral administrative problems, encourage voter fraud, and radicalize the U.S. political system. It also would likely violate the U.S. Constitution’s Compact Clause while directly contravening the Founders’ view of federalism and a representative republic. In an age of perceived political dysfunction, effective policies already in place—especially successful policies established by this nation’s Founders, such as the Electoral College—should be preserved.” Trent England, writing for the National Conference of State Legislatures outlined key reasons for the institution: “At the Constitutional Convention, the primary concern of delegates opposed to direct election was that big states would dominate presidential politics. By using a two-step election process, the Electoral College prevents one region, or a handful of major metropolitan areas, from controlling the White House. Support must be geographically distributed around the country in order to win enough states to capture an electoral vote majority. This was particularly important after the Civil War. The nation remained divided, and Democrats became dominant in the south. A combination of intense popularity with some voters and violent suppression of others allowed Democrats to receive the most popular votes in 1876 and 1888 even though they lost the Electoral College and thus those elections.” Eliminating the Electoral College would be a disaster for the United States/