World Trade Center – USA Gov Policy

This article was prepared by the law firm of Barasch & McGarry

More Than Half of the 10,000 WTC Victims Diagnosed with 9/11-Related Cancers Will now get 50% to 70% Less Compensation.

Thousands of people who breathed in the World Trade Center toxic dust have been getting sick at alarming rates because of their exposure to deadly World Trade Center toxins. The Victim Compensation Fund (VCF), which has been providing financial help to thousands of injured and ill 9/11 responders and survivors, recently announced cuts in pending claims of 50%, and cuts in future claims of up to 70%. This means that thousands of people in the 9/11 community, who live in every state, will not get the full compensation they were expecting and deserve. Worse still, if Congress does not act, thousands more who are diagnosed with 9/11 related cancers will be denied any compensation since the VCF is set to expire at the end of 2020.

And, many who have received awards will also be shut out if and when they are found disabled, or diagnosed with new illnesses in the future. These drastic cuts will also affect those who pass away from their WTC-linked illnesses.

Tens of thousands are being penalized merely because their illnesses were diagnosed later than an arbitrary date set by the VCF, or because it took the WTC Health Program months to certify their illnesses.

Congress and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) simply didn’t anticipate the explosion of cancers and deaths caused by the WTC toxins. And, as a result, they didn’t set aside sufficient funds.

We have not forgotten that it was the Federal Government that assured us just days after the attacks that the “air was safe to breathe”. Federal and local officials pushed aggressively to reopen the financial markets, get businesses back up and running, and eventually provided incentives for people to move into the area.

My law firm’s client NYPD James Zadroga’s autopsyproved that it was anything but “safe”. When he died of pulmonary fibrosis in 2006, an autopsy revealed ground glass, asbestos, chromium, lead, and benzene – all known carcinogens – in his lung tissue. That was the evidence that the National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH) and the C.D.C. needed to link 68 cancers and a host of respiratory illnesses to the WTC toxic dust.

Now, those very Americans who believed the Government are having the rug pulled out from under them yet again with this recent devastating news. Cancer certainly won’t stop afflicting the 9/11 community any time soon, and especially not on its current expiration date of December 18, 2020. We won’t stop fighting until those who receive reduced awards are made whole, and those who get sick in the future are allowed to make a claim. No one should be denied full benefits!

The fund must be extended.

All of us in the 9/11 community can help. Please tell your representatives in Washington to vote in favor of the extension. Visit the Citizens for the Extension of the Zadroga Act website to find out if your Member of Congress is planning to support injured 9/11 Responders and Survivors, and is planning to be a co-sponsor of the legislation to fully fund and extend the VCF. If they are, thank them for supporting 9/11 responders and survivors. If not, tell them that you are one of their constituents and you need them to sign on.

Injured 9/11 responders, survivors and their families do not need speeches, they need action. “Remembering 9/11” should be more than a bumper sticker.

Here are the sobering statistics:

Over 10,000 people have now had their cancers certified as 9/11-illnesses, and
Over 2,000 people in the 9/11 community have died from their WTC illnesses.
The 9/11 community has a 19 -32 percent increased risk of cancer. Thousands more have developed permanent respiratory illnesses.

This will also hamper the sexual life of a person and hence it is important to steer clear of abrupt and mysterious outbursts. prescription for cialis purchase Similarly the treatment of various buy cialis where diseases also invites ED. Sildenafil Citratre It does decrease PDE5 along with referred order viagra online to as the prostatitis syndrome, including pelvic pain, abnormal urination and sexual dysfunction. Vardenafil hinders Pde5 debasement of cgmp, i.e. it delays cgmp’s capacity. sildenafil from canada

Nearly 100,000 people have signed up with the health program and it has been providing free health care to those who need it. So far the VCF has awarded over $5 billion to more than 25,000 people.

The stakes are enormous. Cancer doesn’t just kill people. It can also bankrupt families. A cancer diagnosis often results in substantial costs for health care and lost wages, as well as physical and emotional hardships that are difficult for any individual or family to handle even under the best of circumstances.

All those who were present are at risk. I urge everyone who was exposed to the WTC toxins to register with the health program which is in all 50 states. Those who are certified with physical illnesses, they are eligible to receive compensation from the VCF.

Both registrations should be done as soon as possible. There are long backlogs to get into the health program and the VCF is set to close next year.

The Most Common Cancers are:

Skin cancer (basal, squamous, and melanoma),
prostate cancer,
breast cancer, incl. male!
lung cancer,
thyroid cancer,
blood cancers (lymphoma and leukemia),
colon cancer, and
kidney cancer.

The PH level of the toxic dust was the same as Drano. Therefore, go for a full body skin exam.

There is some good news: Claimants don’t waive their future legal rights by applying now for a minor respiratory illness such as Gerd or sinusitis, asthma and sleep apnea. You can always amend your claim should, God forbid, you come down with another respiratory illness or cancer.

The VCF and the WTC Health Program aren’t just for First Responders: Sanitation workers, downtown teachers and students, construction workers, debris removal workers, downtown residents and office workers are all eligible.

Note: The tragic events of 9/11/01 occurred over 17 years ago, but a vast number of firefighters, police, emergency workers and others who lived or worked in the area of the World Trade Center continue to suffer and die from the attack. New York Analysis of Policy and Government editor-in-chief Frank Vernuccio was appointed by Governor George Pataki to lead the Manhattan/Bronx Workers Compensation Board shortly after, and saw first-hand not only the aftereffects in the months following, but also the continued suffering as diseases manifested themselves years after. Serious Maladies continue to arise in those who were present.

Photo: Pixabay

This week, on the same day that doctors were informing the wife and daughter of yet another victim of the 9/11 attack on New York’s World Trade Center that, as a possible result of exposure to toxins at the site he was expected to succumb to an untimely death within several days, Senator Diane Feinstein (D-CA) was conducting hearings and releasing a report jeopardizing both the efforts and the safety of those who are diligently working to prevent another such assault.

The time has come to question the monumental incoherence of those who weaken the nation by reducing key defense programs, withdrawing American forces from hotspots, or handcuffing those who seek to gain the information needed to prevent another terrorist assault. Many of the same individuals in government and the media who scream and protest about nonlethal interrogation practices such as waterboarding have said far less in reaction to the beheadings, rapes, and wholescale murders committed by those who seek every opportunity to kill as many innocent Americans as they can.

Their so-called moral arguments are baseless. There is general agreement that eliminating terrorist leaders, including traitorous U.S. citizens, by drone attacks are justified (and it is indeed appropriate.) But why then do they question nonlethal interrogation practices that do not cause any permanent harm? Are their sensibilities so delicate that they would prefer to chance another 9/11 rather than to authorize harsh questioning?

Any government official who would prefer to jeopardize innocent lives rather than permit harsh but non-injurious interrogation is unfit for office. The fact that Feinstein’s hearing is being accompanied by the release of the names of those involved further impairs the ability to keep Americans safe, and punishes those who are merely seeking to keep the U.S. secure. Intelligence officials and other absolutely refute Feinstein’s unsupported contention that these interrogations did not yield vital information.
Yet for all the ailments and maladies we confront in this huge terrible planet, none have gained as much consideration, and as cialis online prescription much restorative research subsidizing, as a basic discomfort that each man knows all too well, particularly a night later of hard drinking: a fizzling erection. This awkward situation spoils man’s sexual life totally http://www.devensec.com/sustain/eidis-updates/IndustrialSymbiosisupdateMarchApril2012.pdf generico viagra on line and gives birth to many disputes among couples. During acute exacerbations of COPD (worsening of COPD symptoms), the on line levitra discover for more inflammatory response is further increased. For common ailments that aren’t life threatening, homeopathy is probably a cheaper and more effective than viagra pills in canada other generic drugs of other brands.
There is a foul stench coming from the timing of the Feinstein Senate hearings, suddenly scheduled as they were to coincide with the House questioning of Jonathon Gruber, an Obamacare architect who famously revealed that the passage of the Affordable Care Act legislation was linked to what he perceived to be the “stupidity” of the American people. The highly offensive history of Obamacare’s passage—with provisions hidden from the American citizenry and shielded from public discussion—is a continuing embarrassment both for the President and his party. The House’s Gruber hearings add an exclamation point to that. Feinstein’s sensationalist meeting concerning interrogation practices can easily be seen as a desperate means to divert attention.

And therein lays the ultimate problem: for far too long, too many elected officials, particularly those of the Obama regime, have put their party’s political aspirations, and their intense devotion to a hard left philosophy, far above the good of the nation.

The harm resulting from that is exacerbated by the absurd fantasy world of far too many in the media who fail to report or acknowledge the dire threats facing America, both from terrorism and from the increasing military power and aggressiveness of Russia, China, Iran and North Korea.

Quick Analysis

Ukraine’s Frozen Conflict

As we approach winter in the northern hemisphere, the war in Ukraine is beginning to resemble a “frozen conflict” from many perspectives. Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky recently told the media he hopes the war will end faster once President-elect Trump takes over in January. Opinions in Moscow, however, differ from that of the Ukrainian leader. Russian President Vladimir Putin argues that the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) needs to exclude Ukraine from joining in “exchange” for peace. If it does not, he says, then no end to the war is in sight. So far there is no Christmas solution. Several NATO countries, according to Vladimir Socor of the Jamestown Foundation, are tentatively considering “coalitions-of-the-willing” to provide security for Ukraine outside of the formal NATO framework. There is, however, no collective mechanism today under which such an arrangement is viable. According to the NATO Charter, while Ukraine is a NATO partner country, it may not join as a full member since it has not fulfilled the requirements for membership. That has not stopped NATO and allies from continuing “to provide Ukraine with unprecedented levels of support, helping to uphold its fundamental right to self-defence,” according to the organization. Socor says that keeping Ukraine out of NATO will not advance peace with Russia. Waiting for a peace settlement, he suggests, would only serve to encourage Moscow to continue the war indefinitely. Although the Biden Administration officially withdrew its support for Ukrainian membership in 2021, NATO maintains an “open door” policy toward membership-seeking countries. The current White House position led the way for European states to oppose Ukraine’s membership saying that a decision should be delayed until “conditions are met.” Biden pushed for changing “open door” to a “bridge” metaphor. It is not intended as an across-the-board NATO policy and has been implemented in the past on a case-by-case basis, says Socor. “The alliance’s open-door policy was not fully insulated from Russia’s non-statutory blocking power, and NATO-aspirant countries’ path toward membership was not always irreversible.” Russia has successfully blocked states like Georgia from joining, first in 2008 and again after the war in Ukraine began in 2014. Russia recognizes the value add of Ukraine to NATO is enormous and that Kyiv has a better case than some other nations. Putin’s invasion was, in part, intended to foreclose that option. By 2021, Moscow was pushing hard to maximize its war objectives, which included further annexations of Ukrainian territory. A main goal for Putin was, and is, to ensure there is no Ukraine left to join NATO. As President-elect Trump prepares to assume office in January, he is faced with the historical challenges presented by the war. Post-conflict security guarantees were the center of several proposals made during the 2023 military stalemate. The incoming Trump Administration has yet to outline how it intends to handle the Russia-Ukraine war. Analysts in Washington believe that the new Administration will expect its European allies to guarantee the majority of Ukraine’s security needs. As we approach 2025, several European nations have acknowledged that they do not view Ukraine as eligible for NATO membership as it would draw the organization into the middle of the conflict. Others want to wait until the war is over or pending a “peace” settlement before considering Ukrainian membership. Socor reports that some “influential voices” are suggesting that “Kyiv should join NATO after “freezing” the war along a stable armistice line, de facto accepting Ukraine’s partition, with NATO security guarantees applying de jure to the government-controlled territory only.” This would mean starting accession talks soon with the actual talks to commence only after a ceasefire is in place. Trump arrives in Washington at a time when Putin’s hybrid strategies of war in Ukraine have eviscerated commonly-held differences between war and peace. “Absent a political consensus in NATO over Ukrainian membership, certain European allies, including France’s President Emmanuel Macron, are holding informal consultations about post-conflict security guarantees to Kyiv by NATO members outside of NATO’s framework,” according to the Jamestown Foundation. The Biden Administration downplayed the discussions on possible forms of military assistance and defense industry cooperation by sending only an Assistant Secretary of State. For a European peace to hold the Trump Administration would need to formally extend the United States’ nuclear deterrence to Ukraine. Options under discussion in Europe include a “coalition of the resolute” to deploy forces to Ukraine as part of a possible armistice package, deterring further Russian attacks, says Secor. European officials are also debating, without any agreement, whether its military forces could perform non-combat logistical roles to free Ukrainian forces to fight. None of the possible courses of action has moved forward as all eyes are waiting on the incoming Trump Administration for clues about its intended level of support for a NATO framework and other non-NATO proposals. Daria Novak served in the U.S. State Dept.