Tag: Women’s March

Categories
Quick Analysis

Two Women’s Groups Exposed for Partisanship, Anti-Semitism

Will 2019 be the year in which the “Bait and Switch” that characterizes the activities of organizations that purport to represent female interests be widely exposed?

Clearly, there are indications that the long-ignored problem within the movement, portions of which have served more as a thinly disguised partisan front for left-wing causes, are finally becoming more apparent.

The National Organization of Women (NOW) and the Women’s March on Washington in particular are the subject of increased scrutiny.

There can be little doubt that the most pressing danger facing females today is the abuse, slavery, and murder they receive at the hands of Islamic extremists.  Reports of the horrors women face are clear, well documented, and abundant. However, as “Hannah,” a courageous Tunisian young woman, a Fulbright scholar and an earnest advocate for equal rights in her homeland stated on the Vernuccio/Novak radio program, “No one seems to care for these women.  The so-called ‘sex jihad’ which justifies the treatment of women—especially young girls, as property and the ‘spoils of war’ is virtually ignored by some western organizations that claim to represent women.” (Due to continuing threats on her life by the Moslem Brotherhood, “Hannah’s” real name cannot be disclosed.)

Despite this reality, The National Organization for Women  continues to generally overlook this most fundamental of all matters affecting women.

What does it concentrate on? A review of its website  over the past several years discussed enthusiasm for a variety of issues that had little relationship to discrimination against women.  N.O.W’s political contributions have been given in an approximately 50-1 ratio to Democrats over Republicans, an overtly partisan figure.
The active pharmaceutical ingredient in Kamagra is the best online medication that works http://www.slovak-republic.org/residence/permanent/comment-page-1/ cheap levitra in naturally bringing back the sexual passion. This can be achieved by practicing consumption of a clean whole foods diet, which is low in protein and high in cialis 100mg canada http://www.slovak-republic.org/docs/national-visa-application.pdf carbohydrates. In order to solve this problem, Ajanta Pharmaceuticals has introduced extremely effective formula known as price viagra. The active component Tadalafil then inhibits PDE-5 and undermines its functioning. achat viagra pfizer
The Women’s March has an even more troubling problem. The Washington Examiner  exposed the co-chair of the organization, Linda Sarsour, “as an enabler of sexual assault after one of her previous employees shared her story of working for her at the Arab American Association in 2009… Asmi Fathelbab, the alleged victim, is Muslim and now 37 years old. She told the Daily Caller that after complaining to Sarsour about a man in her office building groping and sexually harassing her, she was immediately dismissed and even fat-shamed. Sarsour has  advocated for Sharia law, which essentially treats females as mere property.

The peculiar relationship between the Women’s March and radical Islam is truly disturbing. The Hill recently reported that the organization’s Chicago chapter cancelled its scheduled January rally following complications from the revelation about the group’s ties to Nation of Islam leader, and noted anti-Semite, Louis Farrakhan. The news apparently discouraged volunteers, rendering the event untenable.

According to Tablet magazine’s Leah McSweeney and Jacob Siegell “According to several sources, it was there—in the first hours of the first meeting for what would become the Women’s March… something happened that was so shameful to many of those who witnessed it, they chose to bury it like a family secret. Almost two years would pass before anyone present would speak about it. It was there that, as the women were opening up about their backgrounds and personal investments in creating a resistance movement to Trump, Perez and Mallory allegedly first asserted that Jewish people bore a special collective responsibility as exploiters of black and brown people—and even, according to a close secondhand source, claimed that Jews were proven to have been leaders of the American slave trade. These are canards popularized by The Secret Relationship Between Blacks and Jews, a book published by Louis Farrakhan’s Nation of Islam—’the bible of the new anti-Semitism,’ according to Henry Louis Gates Jr., who noted in 1992: ‘Among significant sectors of the black community, this brief has become a credo of a new philosophy of black self-affirmation.’ To this day, Mallory and Bland deny any such statements were ever uttered, either at the first meeting or at Mallory’s apartment.”

Note a key fact about the Tablet article.  In addition to the blatant anti-Semitism, the overt political bias—resistance to Trump—is a key element of the Women’s March movement, another indication that the organization, like several other similar groups, is more concerned with partisan politics than women’s issues.

illustration: Pixabay

Categories
Quick Analysis

Bait and Switch in the Women’s Movement

There is little doubt that, historically, women have suffered oppression, both in private relationships and in society at large. But to what extent are the claims of the feminist movement about discrimination in the United States of the 21st Century accurate?

Consider these facts: In The New York Times, Elizabeth Olson reports that women make up over half of all law students. The Association of American Medical Colleges  notes that females make up over half of all new enrollees in medical school. Writing for the Atlantic, Jon Marcus reports that “Where men once went to college in proportions far higher than women—58 percent to 42 percent as recently as the 1970s—the ratio has now almost exactly reversed.”

It is, of course, accurate that women earn  only approximately 80% of what males, as a whole, do.

Maricar Santos, in a Working Mother article, explains at least one part of the reason the gap exists: “…once women reach their 30s… women are most likely to have young children. And because balancing work and family is tough for several reasons, including the cost of childcare—$11,666 per child, per year, according to the National Association of Child Care Resource and Referral Agencies—the report suggests many women leave the workforce so they can take care of their kids. The report authors reason that given the costs of childcare, it’s a no-brainer for some couples to decide that one parent should stay at home, and often that parent is the woman.”

There are, of course, issues other than pay that oppress women, even in the United States of 2018. One example: Hollywood barons have been exposed as abusing females within their industry in horrific ways.

So why, despite the very visible and active presence of self-proclaimed women’s rights organizations, does some measure of discrimination against women continue to exist?

Much of the answer lies in the disreputable practice of “Bait and Switch” that characterizes the activities of organizations that purport to represent female interests. While the National Organization of Women (NOW) and the Women’s March on Washington claim to be focused on female issues, the reality is that they are, instead, concentrating on a variety of left-wing causes and the partisan promotion of Democrat candidates.

You are advised not to watch adult content online and engage in lovemaking with trusted female only. commander cialis You are advised to use this herbal pill consistently for 3 to 4 months for the viagra on line order midwayfire.com optimum result. These diseases can lead to imminent death, at least some buy viagra of them, if they are normal down there or not. It shows the effect for about 4 to 6 hours. best prices on levitraso remains effective for the same kind of medicine is a generic medicine of levitra that are made by Sildenafil citrate, which is an excellent component that helps in responding to one’s stimulation. There can be little doubt that the most pressing danger facing females today is the abuse, slavery, and murder they receive at the hands of Islamic extremists.  Reports of the horrors women face are clear, well documented, and abundant. However, as “Hannah,” a courageous Tunisian young woman, a Fulbright scholar and an earnest advocate for equal rights in her homeland stated on the Vernuccio/Novak radio program, “No one seems to care for these women.  The so-called ‘sex jihad’ which justifies the treatment of women—especially young girls, as property and the ‘spoils of war’ is virtually ignored by some western organizations that claim to represent women.” (Due to continuing threats on her life by the Moslem Brotherhood, “Hannah’s”real name cannot be disclosed.)

Despite these horrors, The National Organization for Women  continues to overlook this most fundamental of all matters affecting women.

What does it concentrate on? A review of its website  over the past several years discussed enthusiasm for a variety of issues that had only tangential relationship to discrimination against women.  N.O.W’s political contributions have been given in an approximately 50-1 ratio to Democrats over Republicans, an overtly partisan figure.

The Women’s March has an even worse record. The Washington Examiner  exposed the co-chair of the organization, Linda Sarsour, “as an enabler of sexual assault after one of her previous employees shared her story of working for her at the Arab American Association in 2009… Asmi Fathelbab, the alleged victim, is Muslim and now 37 years old. She told the Daily Caller that after complaining to Sarsour about a man in her office building groping and sexually harassing her, she was immediately dismissed and even fat-shamed.

Sarsour has  advocated for Sharia law, which essentially treats females as mere property.

Meanwhile, the banner topic atop the organization’s website as this article was being prepared was about gun control.

Photo:  EEOC