It has become commonplace for Americans to wonder why the level of political discourse has turned so hostile, and why we have become so divided as a nation.
There are a number of factors involved, including a dramatically changed news landscape that allows each individual to tailor his information intake exclusively to those sources that bolster his or her pre-existing beliefs. There has also been a tendency (almost exclusively on the left) to politicize everything, including the most mundane entertainment venues. Additionally, academic curriculum, from grammar school straight through university, is increasingly utilized to deliver progressive viewpoints, and ignore objective educational goals.
But as disturbing and dangerous as those trends are, the most recent irritant—the outright willingness, predominately observed in left-leaning news sources and politicians, to unblushingly and blatantly lie, has caused the national mood to sour to levels not seen since the Civil War era.
To be clear, politicians of all parties have not generally been known to share a reputation for absolute veracity, and news reporters had, in the past, on occasion abused their position for partisan purposes. But over the past decade or so, the extent of this unfortunate trait has risen dramatically, again mostly on the left. The progressive media has engaged in a militant and unbridled drive to use their platform as a key element of the left’s political and policy ambitions. This has occurred, far too often, to the exclusion of an emphasis on actual reporting.
Both of the nation’s premier newspapers, the Washington Post and the New York Times, have fired their own internal watchdogs whose responsibility it was to insure honest reporting. Within the past several weeks, CNN, AP and the New York Times have had to admit partisan wrongdoing after other sources made it clear that they published information which was clearly inaccurate.
The news media’s offenses exist in misreporting facts, making up facts tied to no truth whatsoever, and in failing to report at all news which compromises their partisan biases. The growth in the depth and number of these journalistic misdeeds began to grow exponentially in 2008, and have continued to accelerate thereafter.
Some observers have claimed that much of the partisan misdeeds of the media are merely a reaction to its intense dislike of President Trump’s brash style. Trump has been a significant target of the media for several reasons. Unlike his predecessors, the 45th President of the United States doesn’t even pretend to kowtow to the news establishment, and commits what to it is the unpardonable sin of speaking directly to the American people without the filter of the Washington press corps. Of course, Ronald Reagan and Franklin D. Roosevelt did much the same, but before existence of the internet and social media, the 32nd and the 40th presidents had only a limited ability to do so. President Trump’s press staff have become famous for calling out the self-serving comments of the establishment media at White House briefings, further alienating a group that had become accustomed to being catered to, not challenged.
It is an anti-impotent pill cialis properien deeprootsmag.org which has made a good place in the market and there is no hurry to catch the current marker. Always seek the advice of your physician(s) or other qualified healthcare cialis free shipping provider(s). Apart from taking the medications regularly, it low cost levitra is generally recommended for sticking to the chosen routine. So why exactly are there no successful attempts of female Sildenafil Citrate? Discovering such female libido enhancer is a certain turn-on! For some women, though, having a little bit of such feelings is taken in the right way and that men who use the medication have been cheap levitra approved by the FDA. The growing division of the American electorate was accelerated by the growth of news sources that allowed the inherent left-wing biases and cover-ups of the major media to be exposed. This ability has given voice to a large spectrum of the public that has been deeply concerned about the dramatic loss of the middle class’s financial stability, the frequently warped curriculum offered in grammar and high schools and universities, and the nation’s sharply decreased national security, much of which occurred during the eight years of the Obama presidency, which the left-wing media unfailingly supported.
While the nation’s divisions had been growing for some time, 2012 may be seen as the dividing line between what was a simmering discontent and the outright fury that has characterized the years since. Two salient events that year caused the fault line between the majority of the American people and the journalistic/academic/political elites to finally erupt, and the volcanic results have yet to subside.
The 2012 attack on the U.S. facility in Benghazi followed the as-yet unexplained moves by the Obama Administration to bring down regimes in Libya and Egypt that essentially shared the West’s opposition to Islamic extremism. The Clinton State Department had been warned by its own personnel in the field that an attack was probable. Again, for reasons that remained unexplained, not only did Obama and Clinton fail to heed the warnings, they actually reduced the level of protection. In the aftermath of the tragic event which resulted in the death of several Americans including Ambassador Stevens, Secretary Clinton, President Obama, and their respective staffs lied to the American public about the causes of the incident, their negligent failure to provide a proper defense, and their bizarre refusal to attempt a rescue.
Throughout this entire matter, the media, desperate to preserve the reputations of both Obama and Clinton, assisted the government in covering up its misdeeds by first failing to report on the obvious lies and later by ignoring the whole incident to the extent possible. However, the increasingly mature alternative media outlets prevented that obfuscation from being successful. The doubt many Americans had about the integrity of the establishment media and the political philosophy it had prostituted itself to turned into open contempt.
That anger was further inflamed by the media’s role in the 2012 presidential debates, in which media moderators, especially CNN’s Candy Crowley, became partisans on behalf of the Obama candidacy. By the election of 2016, the news establishment had essentially dropped all but the slightest pretense of objectivity and essentially served as an adjunct of the Clinton campaign.
Moderate and conservative Americans, already enduring tough times due to failed leftist policies, faced an environment in which media, education. political and entertainment moguls worked against middle class interests, U.S. national security, and traditional U.S. values. Those moderates and conservatives watched with growing anger as those opposed to the growing progressive monopoly were banned from newsrooms, chased off college campuses, and defamed by Hollywood.
Their fury continues to grow.