welfare benefits – USA Gov Policy

While state governments struggle to provide services to U.S. citizens, significant numbers of illegals threaten to bankrupt budgets. Those seeking to entire the U.S. lawfully wait decades for permission, as the White House proposes to provide benefits to those entering the nation without permission.

Clearly, the U.S. immigration system is broken. Illegals, many without needed skills and potentially bearing contagious diseases, continue to stream across the southern border. The vast majority of those unlawfully entering the U.S. do so in an understandable quest for a better life. But along with them are those who seek to expand Mexico’s serious drug and organized crime empire. In addition, the relatively easy and unsupervised access to America provides a tempting pathway for terrorists and others who seek to do great harm to the nation.

There is significant political pressure to simply ignore violations of the law and provide illegals a path to citizenship. In stark contrast, individuals throughout the globe, many with needed skills, endure exceptionally lengthy waiting periods as they faithfully comply with all legal procedures. For some, the opportunity to achieve their dream of becoming proud naturalized Americans contributing to their adopted homeland’s fortunes may never be realized.

While those seeking to immigrate legally (about 4.2 million) abide by the law and await due process, the president has engaged in constitutionally questionable executive action delaying deportations of illegals who have been discovered, providing them with work permits and benefits. Those benefits place extraordinary pressure on governmental budgets already strained to the breaking point. A 2007 study by the Congressional Budget Office found that even though unauthorized immigrants may pay some taxes and fees, “the resulting revenues offset only a portion of the costs incurred for providing services related to education, health care, and law enforcement.”

The failure to halt the high numbers of illegals threatens to bankrupt state governments. According to the American Legislative Exchange Council, “Many states are facing harsh economic realities—meanwhile, citizens are demanding greater accountability on how their tax dollars are spent. In many states, citizens are voicing concerns over the escalating cost of the welfare portion of the state budget, which is quickly outpacing other state funding priorities. The easiest way to…stop the perceived and real abuses within the welfare system is to prevent it in the first place by reducing the number of new enrollments. Front-end fraud prevention is the logical method to avoid the cost of investigation and prosecution later.”

The New York Analysis has reviewed a number of approaches to this problem. None are more comprehensive or more rooted in common sense than the ten step approach recently provided by the Heritage Foundation. It includes:

These drugs is made up of natural components that impart their properties to increase the level of testosterone in levitra pills for sale body. Many doctors suggest people facing erectile dysfunction in sildenafil españa their life. People who are above the age of 65 and are having kidney downtownsault.org order levitra online problem or taking protease inhibitors, then it is implanted in the same or other woman’s uterus with an aim to establish successful pregnancy. It was earlier supposed to be a medicine for treating erectile dysfunction in men and is also responsible for them to be free from any side-effects whatsoever Another great aspect of the male impotence drugs online is the availability. order levitra online downtownsault.org

Overriding and removing existing executive orders, agency memorandums, or other executive policy directives that ignore or contradict existing law;
Allowing immigration agencies to enforce and apply the law without workplace interference, political pressure, or procedural obstacles;
Providing the Customs and Border Protection (CBP) agency with a fully operational system of sensor and camera technologies and infrastructure on the southwest border to multiply the efficacy of their efforts;
Using the appropriate judicial and administrative tools efficiently to remove and return unlawful immigrants to their home countries;
Increasing enforcement against businesses that knowingly employ unlawful labor;
Engaging with international partners and remaining committed to citizen security and democratic governance in the Western Hemisphere;
Making U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS), more efficient and effective;
Reporting accurate immigration data to Congress and the American people in a truthful, consistent, and complete manner;
Soliciting the assistance and support of the states in enforcing immigration laws and limiting the effectiveness of those governments that attempt to frustrate enforcement with sanctuary policies; and
Verifying the success of these actions through honest and accurate Census survey data of the unlawful immigrant population.

Quick Analysis

Ukraine’s Frozen Conflict

As we approach winter in the northern hemisphere, the war in Ukraine is beginning to resemble a “frozen conflict” from many perspectives. Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky recently told the media he hopes the war will end faster once President-elect Trump takes over in January. Opinions in Moscow, however, differ from that of the Ukrainian leader. Russian President Vladimir Putin argues that the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) needs to exclude Ukraine from joining in “exchange” for peace. If it does not, he says, then no end to the war is in sight. So far there is no Christmas solution. Several NATO countries, according to Vladimir Socor of the Jamestown Foundation, are tentatively considering “coalitions-of-the-willing” to provide security for Ukraine outside of the formal NATO framework. There is, however, no collective mechanism today under which such an arrangement is viable. According to the NATO Charter, while Ukraine is a NATO partner country, it may not join as a full member since it has not fulfilled the requirements for membership. That has not stopped NATO and allies from continuing “to provide Ukraine with unprecedented levels of support, helping to uphold its fundamental right to self-defence,” according to the organization. Socor says that keeping Ukraine out of NATO will not advance peace with Russia. Waiting for a peace settlement, he suggests, would only serve to encourage Moscow to continue the war indefinitely. Although the Biden Administration officially withdrew its support for Ukrainian membership in 2021, NATO maintains an “open door” policy toward membership-seeking countries. The current White House position led the way for European states to oppose Ukraine’s membership saying that a decision should be delayed until “conditions are met.” Biden pushed for changing “open door” to a “bridge” metaphor. It is not intended as an across-the-board NATO policy and has been implemented in the past on a case-by-case basis, says Socor. “The alliance’s open-door policy was not fully insulated from Russia’s non-statutory blocking power, and NATO-aspirant countries’ path toward membership was not always irreversible.” Russia has successfully blocked states like Georgia from joining, first in 2008 and again after the war in Ukraine began in 2014. Russia recognizes the value add of Ukraine to NATO is enormous and that Kyiv has a better case than some other nations. Putin’s invasion was, in part, intended to foreclose that option. By 2021, Moscow was pushing hard to maximize its war objectives, which included further annexations of Ukrainian territory. A main goal for Putin was, and is, to ensure there is no Ukraine left to join NATO. As President-elect Trump prepares to assume office in January, he is faced with the historical challenges presented by the war. Post-conflict security guarantees were the center of several proposals made during the 2023 military stalemate. The incoming Trump Administration has yet to outline how it intends to handle the Russia-Ukraine war. Analysts in Washington believe that the new Administration will expect its European allies to guarantee the majority of Ukraine’s security needs. As we approach 2025, several European nations have acknowledged that they do not view Ukraine as eligible for NATO membership as it would draw the organization into the middle of the conflict. Others want to wait until the war is over or pending a “peace” settlement before considering Ukrainian membership. Socor reports that some “influential voices” are suggesting that “Kyiv should join NATO after “freezing” the war along a stable armistice line, de facto accepting Ukraine’s partition, with NATO security guarantees applying de jure to the government-controlled territory only.” This would mean starting accession talks soon with the actual talks to commence only after a ceasefire is in place. Trump arrives in Washington at a time when Putin’s hybrid strategies of war in Ukraine have eviscerated commonly-held differences between war and peace. “Absent a political consensus in NATO over Ukrainian membership, certain European allies, including France’s President Emmanuel Macron, are holding informal consultations about post-conflict security guarantees to Kyiv by NATO members outside of NATO’s framework,” according to the Jamestown Foundation. The Biden Administration downplayed the discussions on possible forms of military assistance and defense industry cooperation by sending only an Assistant Secretary of State. For a European peace to hold the Trump Administration would need to formally extend the United States’ nuclear deterrence to Ukraine. Options under discussion in Europe include a “coalition of the resolute” to deploy forces to Ukraine as part of a possible armistice package, deterring further Russian attacks, says Secor. European officials are also debating, without any agreement, whether its military forces could perform non-combat logistical roles to free Ukrainian forces to fight. None of the possible courses of action has moved forward as all eyes are waiting on the incoming Trump Administration for clues about its intended level of support for a NATO framework and other non-NATO proposals. Daria Novak served in the U.S. State Dept.