The political scandals of 2017 are unlike anything seen before in American history. They include the continued lack of indictment concerning the personal enrichment of a sitting Secretary of State via the provision of key nuclear weapons material to a hostile nation; the unaddressed abuse of federal intelligence agencies to surveil political rivals in the 2016 campaign; and the apparently baseless charges of “Russian Collusion” against the current president being investigated (despite a lack of any substance to the allegation) by a politically biased special prosecutor who has hired supporters of the defeated candidate to do the research.
Liability for the acts in question are not limited to the direct perpetrators. It extends to an entire network of federal officials who facilitated, through assistance, acquiescence, or neglect, the crimes in questions. Former FBI Director James Comey, despite the obvious nature of Clinton’s acts regarding both the uranium deal and her mishandling of emails, completely failed in his duty. Revelations that he prepared to exonerate the former Secretary of State before a formal investigation was even partially completed have provided even greater weight to the increasingly abundant body of evidence that he replaced his loyalty to the FBI and the American people with partisanship. Despite that reality, the media severely criticized President Trump for firing him.
While misdeeds by government are frequently exposed through the media, in this case, a very substantial portion of the press, through its refusal to provide honest journalistic practices, has become a party to them.
Some outlets, however, have done exceptional due diligence. The Hill deserves particular credit for its ongoing expose of events surrounding Hillary Clinton’s uranium-related transactions with Moscow—and the complicity of Obama Administration officials. John Solomon and Alison Spann recently wrote: “the FBI had gathered substantial evidence that Russian nuclear industry officials were engaged in bribery, kickbacks, extortion and money laundering.” Their report notes that there was a “violation of the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act,” according to official document. “Russian nuclear officials had routed millions of dollars to the U.S. designed to benefit the Clinton Foundation during the time Secretary of State Hillary Clinton served on a government body that provided a favorable decision to Moscow, sources told The Hill…Rather than bring immediate charges in 2010, however, the Department of Justice (DOJ) continued investigating the matter for nearly four more years, essentially leaving the American public and Congress in the dark about Russian nuclear corruption on U.S. soil during a period when the Obama administration made two major decisions benefiting Putin’s commercial nuclear ambitions.”
Evidence of anxiety masked by physical symptoms Stress is closely linked side effects from viagra to a biological mechanism called “flight-or-fight” instinct. purchasing this cheapest cialis uk Research has found that a few natural ways of lowering your blood pressure, which can also help prevent hardships from arising. To enhance one’s understanding about different medications that impact male’s fertility, the current article enlists some of the medications that you are taking. cialis pills for sale The dosage pattern is quite easy and not so complicated so make sure you consult your doctor to change your drug therapy. cost of prescription viagra Eventually, Moscow, despite its clear hostility to the United States, its dramatic strengthening of its conventional and nuclear military strength, and its invasion of Ukraine, gained control of 20% of all American uranium.
Despite the Obama/Clinton Administration’s tenure-wide tilt towards Moscow, including giving Russia, for the first time in history, a lead in nuclear weapons, providing only weak sanctions in response to the invasion of Ukraine, and giving in to Putin’s demands about America’s missile defense, a myth was propagated that Trump’s campaign colluded with the Kremlin to win the 2016 election. The desperate to find something—anything—to provide some substance to the charge has been an embarrassment both to those who first propagated the story and to those journalists who ignored the lack of evidence and continue to tout it.
Cheryl K. Chumley, writing for the Washington Times notes that “The tables have turned and what was once the media’s favorite message — President Donald Trump colluded with Russia to steal the election — has now grown silent. Apparently, it’s Bill and Hillary Clinton who’ve been doing the behind-scenes and suspicious dealings with Russia all along. Oh, and perhaps others in the Barack Obama administration, too.”
While official Washington has dragged its heels on indicting Hillary Clinton for any of the misdeeds she is implicated in, James Comey may have to worry about action from an unexpected direction. Stephen Dinan of The Washington Times reports that Ty Clevenger, a New York attorney, has filed a grievance with his state’s bar association on the grounds that Comey lied to Congress and allowed the destruction of evidence in the Clinton email investigation. Clevenger’s actions could result in Comey losing his license to practice law.