In the fractious climate that has always existed in the American body politic, there was, at least, one idea that most agreed on whatever their ideological orientation: the preeminence of the First Amendment.
Aside from an occasional scuffle about pornography or national security-related information, the concept of freedom of speech, particularly political speech, seemed sacrosanct.
That has changed dramatically, and there are serious causes for concern about the future.
There are two federal areas where this growing crisis can be most readily seen. One is the independence of the internet, another is in attempts to control how Americans interact financially with the electoral process. There are also state-by-state problems, arising from attempts mostly arising from political bosses seeking to keep everyday Americans without any links to incumbents or party chieftains from participating in the election process.
President Obama has announced a bizarre move to surrender control of the internet, which has been the greatest forum for free speech in history, to a United Nation’s telecommunications organization. A number of U.N. members with influence on the committee have called for censorship of internet political speech, as well as punitive measures against those who criticize government policies. Russia, China, Iran and others have spearheaded this move.
The other group of bulk email marketers is a more genuine overnight cialis lot that actually get the permission of the government. It can occur with couples who treat sex as rx generic viagra midwayfire.com a reminder of quarrels and conflicts during the day. When a man tends to suffer from the imbalance, he can go through many emotional changes as he can feel more emotional or more india tadalafil tablets frustrated. Motor vehicle accident along with sports incidents tend to be the most prevalent cause of whiplash. http://www.midwayfire.com/required-reporting-information/ buy cialis pill
Domestically, legislation has been introduced in the United States Senate that would amend the Constitution to allow greater federal control over political donations. Forty-six Democrat senators, led by majority leader Harry Reid, are vigorously supporting the concept. While the concept may sound inviting to some who are concerned with the influence of money, the reality is that it would be used to ban books, pamphlets, and other expressions that a bureaucrat deems to be partisan and assisting one candidate or another. It would open up every expression of political speech to review by a bureaucracy that would determine whether it had an influence in electoral matters. It would clearly be a complete end to free speech as practiced by Americans since the founding of the country.
The problem isn’t limited to the federal government. Some individual states have acted to restrict the First Amendment, as well. New York is a prime example.
The New York State Board of Elections adopted a so-called “emergency rule” which mandates that any citizen who prints and distributes 500 or more flyers, pamphlets, or other similar material to comply with complex reporting and registration requirement, or be subjects to penalties.
These unprecedented federal and state moves threaten the very foundation of American free speech.