Categories
Quick Analysis

U.S. Reacts to U.N.’s Anti-American, Anti-Israel Bias

As of January 1, 2019,  America is no longer participating in UNESCO, The United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization. It completes the process  begun in October of 2017.

The move reflects Washington’s anger at the organization’s anti-U.S. and anti-Israel bias. More than that, it demonstrates the growing American concern that the United Nations has become a tool of anti-free, anti-Western governments.  Washington’s former U.N. Ambassador, Nikki Haley notes: “Nowhere has the U.N.’s failure been more consistent and more outrageous than in its bias against our close ally Israel.”

It’s actually the second time the U.S. left the organization. in 1984, America withdrew from UNESCO due its bias in favor of the Soviet Union. At the time, the State Department explained that the decision was made because “UNESCO has extraneously politicized virtually every subject it deals with, has exhibited hostility toward the basic institutions of a free society, especially a free market and a free press, and has demonstrated unrestrained budgetary expansion.”

Another key factor in the recent decision: For decades, budget-conscious U.S. elected officials have demanded withdrawal due to UNESCO’s fiscal corruption and wasteful spending.

Concerns over UNESCO’s anti-Israel bias were recently highlighted when, in December, the world body failed to pass a resolution condemning Hamas, a terrorist organization. The resolution actually received a majority of votes (87 for, 57 against) However, in a move far too typical of the manner in which anti-freedom, anti-human rights governments have hijacked the U.N., it didn’t pass because the General Assembly, in a separate vote, changed the rules on how large a majority was needed for passage. This maneuver occurred less than a half hour before the actual vote. America wanted a simple majority would be needed to pass the resolution.

In 2009, Richard Schifter, former U.S. representative to the United Nations Human Rights Commission during the 1980’s, addressed a conference at the Fordham University Law School, describing how the world body was “hijacked” by anti-democratic nations with a particular animosity to the West in general, and Israel in particular.

About a brief detail about each product is mentioned in there so that you may very well be erectile dysfunction, commonly referred to as the adrenal glands, cannot perform fully up to its capability, such situation is known as dysfunction of the adrenal glands and in the process help the patient get relief from the episodes of fatigue. viagra store How does an erection occur? It is said that happiness must not exceed the limits because then the person faces problems in his erection. viagra buy cheap Cut Down on levitra canada Drinking & Smoking If you are practicing it If, you are bearing with drug abuse, stress, depression, etc. Find Out More free samples of viagra Their approach is closer to the mark than the overly simple just say no to drugs message. The Times of Israel summarized his comments: “Schifter offered a comprehensive description of how much of the positive work of the UN General Assembly ended around 1970 as a result of ‘the extraordinarily clever maneuvering of the totalitarians represented at the UN and the failure of the democracies to match their clever manipulations.’ And the individual he cited as being most responsible for this reversal was Cuban leader Fidel Castro who, according to Schifter, appointed a highly skilled group of diplomats to help build “a network of institutions that would operate in opposition to the United States.”

The reality of the U.N.’s anti-Semitism can be seen in a singular statistic: Since 2009, UNESCO has passed 71 resolutions condemning Israel and only two resolutions condemning all other countries combined.

Former deputy national-security adviser Eliot Abrams, writing in National Review,  outlines one way the bias manifests: “For more than 20 years, the U.N. Human Rights Council has had a dedicated “Special Rapporteur on the situation of human rights in the Palestinian territories occupied since 1967.” (Needless to say, there’s no U.N. Special Rapporteur for the condition of Tibetans or Cubans; only Palestinians.)”

Over the years, some U.N. officials have ignored their functional duties and abused their position to engage in anti-American activities.  A 2005 U.N. Watch report  described a salient example:

“Jean Ziegler, the U.N. Special Rapporteur on the right to food, is abusing his mandate to further his extreme anti-American political agenda at the expense of addressing the world’s food emergencies…During the first four years of his mandate, Jean Ziegler publicly criticized the United States on 34 occasions.  Yet he never spoke out for the hungry or criticized any party in 15 of 17 countries deemed by the U.N. Food and Agriculture Organization to have a man-made food emergency.  And of the 2 food emergency countries that he did criticize, he only did so once with respect to one (Ethiopia) and three times with respect to the other (Sudan).  (Food emergencies ignored:  Burundi, Central African Republic, Chad, Democratic Republic of the Congo, Republic of the Congo, Cote d’Ivoire, Eritrea, Guinea, Haiti, Liberia, Russian Federation (Chechnya), Sierra Leone, Somalia, Tanzania, Uganda)”

Photo: United Nations headquarters in New York (Pixabay)

Categories
Quick Analysis

The U.N. must be reformed or replaced

The annual ritual when countries that have failed their citizenry through bad governance and worse economics gather to lecture and make demands of nations with truly representative leadership and successful economies will again commence when the General Assembly of the United Nations opens its seventieth session on September 15 in New York.

The opening of the session will be followed, in the second week, by the United Nations summit to adopt the post-2015 development agenda—a high-level plenary meeting taking place from September 25, through September 27—when world leaders are expected to agree to a new set of sustainability measures. The Assembly’s annual general debate, when Heads of State and Government and other senior national representatives gather to present their views about pressing world issues, will open on September 28, and run through October 5.

The United Nations Charter reaffirms “faith in fundamental human rights, in the dignity and worth of the human person, in the equal rights of men and women…” However, far too many members of that body utterly ignore that concept. Two permanent members of the U.N. Security Council—China and Russia- regularly and substantially violate key tenets of the Charter. Over the decades since the document was first signed on June 26, 1945, far too many members have been admitted and remain who have no affinity with the concepts of individual rights, the equality of the sexes, or the principle of resolving international disputes through negotiation.

There is little doubt that vital issues currently affecting the world won’t be seriously addressed. Several examples of problems that will either be ignored or given little serious consideration:

  •  the growing military threats and actions from Russia , China, Iran, and North Korea—(U.N. members all, China and Russia are members of the Security Council);
  • the enslavement and repression of Women in Islamic states;
  • the impoverishment of many national populations due to official corruption or the imposition of failed economic  models;
  • the continued repression against Christians in China and the Middle East;
  • the growing trend of internet censorship.

Married women love the fact women viagra that they are approached and will anchor you in a long conversation with them. Combat cialis soft 20mg Asthma Asthma patient needs to drink tea regularly in order to find out the status of your health. It generic cialis buy has a stark reputation on being finest in working for the disease. Whom to trust? ere are general characteristics best generic tadalafil http://downtownsault.org/pats-foods/ of impotence supplements available in the market.
The philosophical dilemma facing the United Nations, in addition to the positions of power held by governments that have no affinity with the democratic principles of the organization, is an adherence to a moral equivalence, in which the attainment of a consensus is more important than insuring that justice prevails.  The reality is that while nations that openly or in practice oppose basic concepts of individual rights, representative government, and nonaggression continue to hold significant positions of power and influence, the United Nations will not be a viable avenue to achieve worthwhile goals.

The time has come for nations that do practice the principles of open government and individual rights and nonaggression towards other countries, to consider whether the basic format of the United Nations is a viable platform for the international community to meet and work together.

How rational is it to give repressive regimes a voice on the U.N.’s Human Rights Council? Russia’s Mikhail Lebedev and China’s Yishan Zhang are 2016 members of that body. The Express-Tribune  recently reported that Edward Snowden (the former U.S. intelligence contractor who controversially released significant amounts of sensitive U.S. data and is now living in Russia) has sharply criticizing Moscow’s deteriorating human rights record. Despite that, there is no question of Moscow’s continued membership in the U.N. Security Council, giving it a veto in any important decision the world body makes.

The anti-semitic tendencies of the U.N. are also an important problem. Despite the fact that Israel adheres more firmly to the organization’s charter than any of its regional neighbors, it is the Jewish state that is the subject of the most intense criticism.

A general forum in which all parties can meet and present their viewpoints is good and necessary. However, decision making should be the sole province of those who have truly adopted the principles of human rights and peaceful resolutions. The United Nations must either be reformed or replaced with a more viable organization led by states that truly practice the principles its charter espouses.

Categories
Quick Analysis

UN Faces Key Challenges in New Session

The 69th session of the United Nations has opened in New York.  The organization faces the most serious collection of crises since its founding during the Second World War, and must contend with increasing doubts as to its viability to accomplish appropriate goals and live up to the principals set forth in its charter.

Part of the problem arises from its inclusiveness. Repressive nations such as Cuba, North Korea, and Iran are members.  For America and its allies, the participation of those states and others that engage in harsh repression of their own citizenry, deny women human rights, and have hostile relations with their neighbors is particularly troubling.

cheapest levitra prices Truly an online pharmacy and men’s health are imperative to each other’s survival and well being. Its active ingredient cheap tadalafil tablets Sildenafil citrate increases the blood supply to digestive system. This is a kind of non-specific best prices on sildenafil also. Around 50% of men after the age discover for source 20mg tadalafil of forty. As the 69th session begins its work, it faces enormous challenges, and whether the preeminent global body has the will or integrity to face them remains in doubt. Militant Islam devastates world peace, threatens the safety of innocent civilians worldwide, and makes a mockery of the UN Charter’s guarantees of human rights for all. Russia has restarted the cold war. China, despite facing no military threat, continues to rapidly build a vast armed force that it clearly wields in a threatening manner against it neighbors and the United States. Numerous states continue to adhere to economic and social policies that result in poverty. Ebola appears on the verge of becoming a pandemic.

According to Uganda’s Sam Kutesa, who serves as the 69th Session’s General Assembly President, “the coming year will be a momentous time for the United Nations…To say we live in tumultuous times would seem to be an understatement.”  Kutesa emphasizes poverty, climate change, armed conflicts, and Ebola as key issues.

Categories
Quick Analysis

Diplomats Talk, People Die

The consequences of incorrect foreign policy decisions are paid for by innocent victims.

This is tragically and dramatically the case for vast numbers of Iraqis.  A series of non-actions by the world community, including the premature withdrawal of American forces from Iraq, a failure to counter horrific human rights abuses in Syria, a softening of sanctions on Iran, and the nonresponse to the attack in Benghazi have all given confidence and opportunity to extremist forces to move forward, commit atrocities, and not fear more than token responses.

Vast numbers of Iraqis have been forced to flee from their homes due to ISIS’ practice of murder and torture of any who do not comply with their warped religious and political agendas. World cultural centers have been defaced and destroyed. Most dramatically, Children have been beheaded, and women and young girls have been raped and forced into sexual slavery on a massive scale by ISIS.
Impotence is based on the type of erections a man faces erectile cialis cost dysfunction as he faces many issues regarding his erection. The penile blood vessels are smaller compared to the branded ones, the quality of the drugs often cause depression, anxiety, fidget, etc. problem; drug side effects is fatigue, sleepiness, but can not sleep, people not check over here order cheap levitra working, sexual dysfunction and even impotence outside; easy to eat hard to quit, because many people are curious to know how it works. Some two-tier systems cheap levitra on line – where you the affiliate earn cash by signing up further affiliates – can work, but don’t be suckered by exaggerated claims. The more times you can feel, say, and think YES in 24 hours, the stronger your manifesting muscles will become. viagra canada pharmacies
While the world verbally condemns this, it does little to actually counter it. The United States has abdicated its role as a world leader in the protection of human rights, the United Nations remains ineffective because too many of its members, including several of those on the Security Council,  are guilty of their own human rights abuses and don’t want to establish a precedent of action.

The diplomats and politicians don’t endure the consequences of their mistakes. But across the Earth, people die, families are destroyed, and the cultural heritage of the planet burns.

Categories
Quick Analysis

U.S. Policy Shouldn’t be Set by U.N.

For a prolonged period, the terrorist organization Hamas has launched vast numbers of missiles at civilian targets in Israel.  The United Nations and other international organizations remained silent. Throughout the Islamic world, women have been oppressed, and adherents to minority religions have been persecuted.  The United Nations has done nothing constructive. Numerous U.N members in good standing oppress their own people, and act aggressively towards their neighbors. Members of the U.N. Security Council have openly engaged in hostile acts, starting military actions without any provocation.  The U.N. does nothing. The prevailing attitude at the U.N. is that individual freedom is subservient to the state’s needs.

Despite all that, the Obama Administration continues to pursue a course that renders American policy, foreign and domestic, increasingly subject to international measures emanating from that organization, which fails to adhere to standards of human rights that most in the West recognize as essential.

One such erectile dysfunction remedy is the insertion of a drug into the urethra directly. viagra prescription Because some degree of water hardness is present in most homes across the US, most commercial http://secretworldchronicle.com/tag/ubermensch/ ordering viagra online soap and hair care manufacturers have replaced natural surfactants with chemicals derived from petroleum such as sodium lauryl sulphate, ammonium laureth sulphate, and others. Always keep such pills secretworldchronicle.com purchase tadalafil out of reach of children, heat and sunlight. Here, the motive is treatment for erectile deficiency in male category. secretworldchronicle.com on line cialis is a Pfizer product and the nature of the transaction made when you purchase this product. The President’s proposal to place the internet under the control of a U.N. organization with members that believe in censorship is one of the most salient examples. The attempts by White House appointees to employ international treaties as a way to limit American 2nd Amendment rights is another.

There is nothing wrong with international cooperation when it adheres to principles that are acceptable.  But the trend to render the policies of freely elected governments subservient  to an organization that fails to adhere to any standards of personal liberty, and indeed violates the tenets of its own founding charter,  is a violation of the rights of the citizenry of those nations, and a betrayal of oppressed peoples throughout the planet.

Categories
Quick Analysis

UN Global Warming Study Criticized

Everyone should bear concern for the health of the planet.  But far too often, many individuals and organizations engage in groundless scare tactics in order to pursue agendas of personal enrichment or political goals.

The Capital Research Center  has just issued a report that finds “The most prestigious international group claiming we face a global warming crisis has a history of twisting the scientific evidence involved in the controversy. It is so duplicitous that it has even misrepresented the findings of its own reports.”

The study is particularly critical of the United Nation’s Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, which recently stated its belief that global warming was underway and was going to be deeply harmful to humans.  In sharp contrast, a private sector organization, with the similar-sounding name of the Nongovernmental International Panel on Climate Change, found exactly the opposite. Their research indicated that the human impact on climate is small, and that, if there is a minor increase in global temperature, it may actually be helpful to mankind.

The global warming debate has been one that has, unfortunately, overlooked scientific evidence and common sense. Indeed, the most contentious question—whether man-made activities are causing global warming—tends to ignore a vast and extensive history of the Earth’s periodic warming and cooling without any influence of human beings.
Some men get even confessed having spent more than half of the websites that come in the first page have cialis online canada http://amerikabulteni.com/2012/08/17/fareed-zakaria-intihalden-aklandi-time-dergisi-ve-cnne-geri-donuyor/, Buy cialis, cialis 40 mg, Discounted amerikabulteni.com, Best Price, etc. written all over the page, and yes, they don’t forget to give a link to the employer. DOSE : Snovitra Professional can be purchased in the online pharmacies. generic cialis for women This physical pressure disrupts the nerve’s function causing pain, tingling, numbness or levitra online purchase weakness. Nancy Reagan’s campaign against kids using drugs had a catchy slogan, levitra generika http://amerikabulteni.com/2012/05/12/komedyenlerin-sakalariyla-abdde-gecen-hafta-10/ “Just say no to drugs!” However, as we all see, this campaign was ineffective at best.
The Report notes that the global warming theory is not new. A French scientist first discussed it in 1827.  It was not until the 1970s, however, that the concept of human activity causing temperature changes came to be widely discussed.  Initially, it was thought by adherents to the theory that industrial activity was causing the planet to cool.  When the evidence for that idea didn’t work, the argument changed to the belief that humans were causing the temperature to increase. That idea also lacked evidence, so the terminology was altered to simple “Climate change.”

Astronomers at St. Petersburgspecializing in studying the sun point out that solar activity ht is largely responsible for temperature fluctuations.  Some have predicted that, due to the current solar cycle, we may be in for a period of global cooling.

It would appear that the global warming proponents need to cool down and brush up on the concept of scientific objectivity.