Trump accomplishments – USA Gov Policy

Despite the exoneration provided by the Mueller Report, it is clear that Donald Trump will not rank as one of the most universally liked presidents. There should, however, be no dispute that he is one of the most courageous and consequential chief executives of the past hundred years.

In an era when so many get their news from rantings on Facebook and the absurd monologues of late-night comedians, a commander in chief that deals with sometimes painful facts, with no nod towards the mantra of political correctness, comes as a rather shocking change of pace. It’s political equivalent of having icy water splashed on your face when caught dozing on the job.

Whether or not one agrees with his solutions, the 45th President has attacked vital issues that his predecessors have not had the political guts to pursue. China’s unfair trade policies, Europe’s failure to pay its fair share for its own defense, a bureaucracy that seeks to wrest power away from the elected government, the defiance of free speech on college campuses and the unjustifiable and unconscionable tuition hikes by those same institutions, taxes and regulations that hamstrung American business and harmed the middle class, a media that abandoned its ethics and became a partisan participant in campaigns rather than an honest reporter of them, and a wholly ridiculous and broken immigration system are key areas that Trump has focused on which have intimidated other politicians into silence.

Add to those topics his quest to rebuild a shockingly weakened military, the revival of a manned space program virtually mothballed by the Obama Administration, and his willingness to meet face-to-face with the North Korean leadership. Include also his stand against the rising tide of anti-Semitism, and his confrontation against the anti-traditional values moves by a growing portion of the Left.

Chronic cervical endometrial inflammation, ovarian dysfunction, vaginal adenosis and high differentiation adenocarcinoma of cervix: the patient’s leukorrhea is achromatic and hyaline mucus, like albumen. viagra 100mg no prescription purchasing this Jelly viagra on line order is the advanced version of Kamagra. Adebowale generic levitra uk Adefuye, Ambassador of the Embassy of the Federal Republic of Nigeria and Dr. What is needed, specifically, is drugs that can relax the muscles cute-n-tiny.com cialis 20 mg found in the walls of veins, favoring varicose veins. He has done this despite an unprecedented level of criticism from the press and, in many instances, without the assistance or support of many leaders of his own party. He has refused to back down even in the face of harsh and probably unlawful legal assaults by corrupted leaders of the FBI and the CIA, as well as the astounding rulings of the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals, which ignored the Constitution and statutory law in its bid to overturn the legal prerogatives of the Trump Administration.

It’s still early to determine the results, but the outlook is promising. Examples: The economy has improved significantly, not just for Wall Street but for Main Street as well. Blacks now have the lowest level of unemployment in history. ISIS’s territorial caliphate, which Obama seemed unable to tackle effectively, has been eliminated. The spate of terrorist attacks on US soil has been reduced. America, to the shock of many, has become virtually energy independent. Types of jobs once thought permanently in decline are coming back. Confidence in the military is reviving. Allies are regaining trust in Washington. America will soon regain the lead in human space flight. China is realizing that it will not be able to continuously rob American jobs and steal intellectual property. North Korea has pulled back from the brink of war.

Trump’s failings are largely in unquantifiable areas. His red-meat rhetoric, blunt speeches, and hard-nosed refusal to ignore any slight has not allowed him to win over those who were inclined to dislike him. This includes some who even agree with his policies. His refusal to back out of unnecessary fights has produced more harm than good for him in far too many instances.

His accomplishments would be exceptional for an eight-year presidency. For an administration of less than three years, in the face of vicious, unwarranted, and extraordinary attacks from its enemies and without much help from its own party, they are little short of miraculous.

Photo: Official portrait (U.S. Govt. Printing Office)

Quick Analysis

Ukraine’s Frozen Conflict

As we approach winter in the northern hemisphere, the war in Ukraine is beginning to resemble a “frozen conflict” from many perspectives. Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky recently told the media he hopes the war will end faster once President-elect Trump takes over in January. Opinions in Moscow, however, differ from that of the Ukrainian leader. Russian President Vladimir Putin argues that the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) needs to exclude Ukraine from joining in “exchange” for peace. If it does not, he says, then no end to the war is in sight. So far there is no Christmas solution. Several NATO countries, according to Vladimir Socor of the Jamestown Foundation, are tentatively considering “coalitions-of-the-willing” to provide security for Ukraine outside of the formal NATO framework. There is, however, no collective mechanism today under which such an arrangement is viable. According to the NATO Charter, while Ukraine is a NATO partner country, it may not join as a full member since it has not fulfilled the requirements for membership. That has not stopped NATO and allies from continuing “to provide Ukraine with unprecedented levels of support, helping to uphold its fundamental right to self-defence,” according to the organization. Socor says that keeping Ukraine out of NATO will not advance peace with Russia. Waiting for a peace settlement, he suggests, would only serve to encourage Moscow to continue the war indefinitely. Although the Biden Administration officially withdrew its support for Ukrainian membership in 2021, NATO maintains an “open door” policy toward membership-seeking countries. The current White House position led the way for European states to oppose Ukraine’s membership saying that a decision should be delayed until “conditions are met.” Biden pushed for changing “open door” to a “bridge” metaphor. It is not intended as an across-the-board NATO policy and has been implemented in the past on a case-by-case basis, says Socor. “The alliance’s open-door policy was not fully insulated from Russia’s non-statutory blocking power, and NATO-aspirant countries’ path toward membership was not always irreversible.” Russia has successfully blocked states like Georgia from joining, first in 2008 and again after the war in Ukraine began in 2014. Russia recognizes the value add of Ukraine to NATO is enormous and that Kyiv has a better case than some other nations. Putin’s invasion was, in part, intended to foreclose that option. By 2021, Moscow was pushing hard to maximize its war objectives, which included further annexations of Ukrainian territory. A main goal for Putin was, and is, to ensure there is no Ukraine left to join NATO. As President-elect Trump prepares to assume office in January, he is faced with the historical challenges presented by the war. Post-conflict security guarantees were the center of several proposals made during the 2023 military stalemate. The incoming Trump Administration has yet to outline how it intends to handle the Russia-Ukraine war. Analysts in Washington believe that the new Administration will expect its European allies to guarantee the majority of Ukraine’s security needs. As we approach 2025, several European nations have acknowledged that they do not view Ukraine as eligible for NATO membership as it would draw the organization into the middle of the conflict. Others want to wait until the war is over or pending a “peace” settlement before considering Ukrainian membership. Socor reports that some “influential voices” are suggesting that “Kyiv should join NATO after “freezing” the war along a stable armistice line, de facto accepting Ukraine’s partition, with NATO security guarantees applying de jure to the government-controlled territory only.” This would mean starting accession talks soon with the actual talks to commence only after a ceasefire is in place. Trump arrives in Washington at a time when Putin’s hybrid strategies of war in Ukraine have eviscerated commonly-held differences between war and peace. “Absent a political consensus in NATO over Ukrainian membership, certain European allies, including France’s President Emmanuel Macron, are holding informal consultations about post-conflict security guarantees to Kyiv by NATO members outside of NATO’s framework,” according to the Jamestown Foundation. The Biden Administration downplayed the discussions on possible forms of military assistance and defense industry cooperation by sending only an Assistant Secretary of State. For a European peace to hold the Trump Administration would need to formally extend the United States’ nuclear deterrence to Ukraine. Options under discussion in Europe include a “coalition of the resolute” to deploy forces to Ukraine as part of a possible armistice package, deterring further Russian attacks, says Secor. European officials are also debating, without any agreement, whether its military forces could perform non-combat logistical roles to free Ukrainian forces to fight. None of the possible courses of action has moved forward as all eyes are waiting on the incoming Trump Administration for clues about its intended level of support for a NATO framework and other non-NATO proposals. Daria Novak served in the U.S. State Dept.