In a Heritage review of transgender identity, Ryan T. Anderson, Ph.D., notes that “The thinking of transgender activists is inherently confused and filled with internal contradictions. Activists never acknowledge those contradictions. Instead, they opportunistically rely on whichever claim is useful at any given moment…Here I’m talking about transgender activists. Most people who suffer from gender dysphoria are not activists, and many of them reject the activists’ claims. Many of them may be regarded as victims of the activists…Many of those who feel distress over their bodily sex know that they aren’t really the opposite sex, and do not wish to ‘transition.’ They wish to receive help in coming to identify with and accept their bodily self. They don’t think their feelings of gender dysphoria define reality….But transgender activists do. Regardless of whether they identify as ‘cisgender’ or ‘transgender,’ the activists promote a highly subjective and incoherent worldview.
In this article provided exclusively to the New York Analysis of Policy and Government, Judge John H. Wilson (ret.) examines the issue.
The latest news from Texas is troubling, to say the least.
7 year old James Younger (who has a twin brother named Jude) is a biological male. However, his divorced parents are currently engaged in a custody battle over Young James – and the point of contention revolves around whether James identifies as a male or a female.
James’ mother, Dr. Anne Georgulas, believes Young James is, in fact, a 7 year old girl named “Luna,” dresses her child as a girl, and wants to begin a regiment of hormone blockers to assist in her child’s transition from male to female. James’ father, Jeff Younger, who shares custody of young James, contends that his son dresses and acts as a boy when he is with his father.
This matter came to national attention when a jury ruled that Dr. Georgulas could have sole custody of James/Luna, clearing the way for her to make the decision to allow her 7 year old to undergo treatment that would include “puberty suppression, administration of cross-sex hormones, and ultimately surgical removal of reproductive organs.” .
After the verdict, the Texas Attorney General asked that an investigation be conducted by the Texas Department of Family and Protective Services into potential child abuse. “The public Kamagra gold specializes in generating over at this pharmacy store viagra without prescription more blood flow into the cavernous bodies of the penis) and constriction of blood vessels. One important thing keeps a doctor s prescription along with you as it is mandatory to use generic sildenafil. viagra sale pop over here It is very important that you have a good viagra low cost and a healthy sexual life or else there are 90% chances that the person might face some sort of erection issues. This is of discount generic levitra course just speculation at this point. reports and sworn testimony indicate that the child’s physical and mental health and welfare have been and will continue to be adversely affected,” according to the October 29, 2019 letter of First Assistant AG Jeffrey Mateer. In particular, the Texas AG is concerned that the mother intends on having her child transition despite there being “virtually no peer reviewed research on the transitioning of a child from one gender to another,” and “the mother refuses to get any second opinions.”
Mateer’s letter also notes that the failure of the Texas Department of Family and Protective Services to act is inexplicable, given that “earlier this year the Department did not flinch and snatched another North Texas child from his family because it was alleged that the mother was engaged in a similar practice.” .
At last report, in spite of the jury’s verdict, the Texas Family Court decided to leave the child under the supervision of both the mother and father and gave both parents joint decision-making authority over all medical decisions. Given the father’s opposition to the use of “puberty blockers” on his son, Young James will probably continue to be a biological boy. .However, the implications of this case are staggering, and far reaching.
All of us who are parents are familiar with our children assuming various roles and identities throughout their pre-pubescent years. My own son identified as Darth Vader from ages 5 to 7 and told people his name was “Anakin.” How often have your daughters identified as Disney Princesses, or police officers, or whatever other identify they wished to assume?
Yet, did any of us seek to graft a fish tail onto our daughter when she identified as Ariel, or surgically remove the legs and one arm from a boy who believes himself to be a Sith Lord? The obvious answer is no – we as parents understand that children pretend to be other than they are on a regular basis.
The Report concludes tomorrow.
Illustration: Pixabay