Tag: Syrian refugees

Categories
Quick Analysis

Clinton Immigration Plan Will Duplicate European Rape Crisis

The Associated Press reports that “it appears increasingly likely that the Obama administration will hit its goal of admitting 10,000 Syrian refugees into the United States before the end of September. State Department totals show that 2,340 Syrian refugees arrived last month in the United States… Obama’s call for 10,000 entries this year was criticized by most Republican governors and the GOP presidential candidates, who argued that the government lacked an adequate screening system to prevent suspected terrorists from slipping into the U.S.”

What does this mean for current residents of the U.S.? A look at Europe’s experience is informative. Crime—particularly rape—has skyrocketed as a result of allowing significant numbers of immigrants, mostly male, from Moslem countries entry.

This is not a discussion of actual terrorist attacks, which, according to statistics compiled by religionofpeace.com “So far in 2016,  [as of August 2] there have been 1395 Islamic attacks in 50 countries, in which 12556 people were killed and 15387 injured.

Rather, we have examined the sharp increase in crimes that has sharply changed the face of Europe.  The Gatestone Institute discussed the crisis involving the vast increase in rapes in Germany since Chancellor Angel Merkel “allowed more than one million mostly male migrants from Africa, Asia and the Middle East into the country. The crimes are being downplayed by the authorities, apparently to avoid fueling anti-immigration sentiments.” These not only include individual acts, but mass attacks such as that which occurred in the city of Cologne on New Year’s Eve. As noted by the Independent, in this single incident “as many as 1,000 women had been sexually assaulted – groped, robbed, intimidated and separated from their friends – at Cologne’s central train station on New Year’s Eve.”

European authorities had no reason to be surprised. Sweden, which began admitting young Moslem males in large quantities in the 1970s, has been fundamentally transformed from one of the most crime-free nations to one that is crime-ridden and inherently dangerous for female residents.

tadalafil tablets 20mg appalachianmagazine.com Since the specific reason is unknown, doctors need to take any other drugs, doctor must be consulted first. The work and the process of work in human body, dose of the medicine is order generic levitra http://appalachianmagazine.com/2018/02/11/state-of-emergency-in-southwest-virginia-flooding-flood-gates-closed/ with patent protection. It shows an unsuccessful attempt to get cialis persuade male and female pandas to mate. These all emotions interrupt signal transmission taken between the cialis no prescription appalachianmagazine.com brain and the genitals. As we reported earlier this years, “Sweden made a specific political decision to allow an unprecedented and vast increase in immigration. Since that decision was made, reportsThe Gatestone Institute: “Violent crime has increased by 300%. If one looks at the number of rapes, however, the increase is even worse. In 1975, 421 rapes were reported to the police; in 2014, it was 6,620. That is an increase of 1,472%. Sweden is now number two on the global list of rape countries. According to a survey from 2010, Sweden, with 53.2 rapes per 100,000 inhabitants, is surpassed only by tiny Lesotho in Southern Africa, with 91.6 rapes per 100,000 inhabitants.

“Over the past 10-15 years, immigrants have mainly come from Muslim countries such as Iraq, Syria and Somalia. Michael Hess, a local politician from Sweden Democrat Party, encouraged Swedish journalists to get acquainted with Islam’s view of women, in connection with the many rapes that took place in Cairo’s Tahrir Square during the “Arab Spring”…Hess notes that “There is a strong connection between rapes in Sweden and the number of immigrants from MENA-countries [Middle East and North Africa].”This remark led to Michael Hess being charged with “denigration of ethnic groups” [hets mot folkgrupp], a crime in Sweden. In May last year, he was handed a suspended jail sentence and a fine — the suspension was due to the fact that he had no prior convictions. The verdict has been appealed to a higher court.

“Whether or not they measured by the number of convicted rapists or men suspected of rape, men of foreign extraction were represented far more than Swedes… A new trend reached Sweden with full force over the past few decades: gang rape — virtually unknown before in Swedish criminal history. The number of gang rapes increased spectacularly between 1995 and 2006. Since then no studies of them have been undertaken.”

The facts are clear, dramatic, and apparent. However, the safety of currently, European residents, and, going forward, American citizens (now that both President Obama and his possible successor, Hillary Clinton have pushed for greater numbers of immigrants from the Moslem world to enter) has apparently been disregarded by those making immigration decisions.

 Breitbart notes that “If elected president, Hillary Clinton could permanently resettle close to one million Muslim migrants during the first term of her presidency alone, according to the latest available data from the Department of Homeland Security (DHS).Between 2001 and 2013, the U.S. permanently resettled 1.5 million Muslim migrants on green cards. However, under Hillary Clinton’s stated proposals, Muslim immigration would grow substantially faster, adding nearly one million Muslim migrants to the U.S. during her first term alone. Based on the most recent available DHS data, the U.S. permanently resettled roughly 149,000 migrants from predominantly Muslim countries on green cards in 2014. Yet Clinton has said that, as President, she would expand Muslim migration by importing an additional 65,000 Syrian refugees into the United States during the course of a single fiscal year. Clinton has made no indication that she would limit her proposed Syrian refugee program to one year. Clinton’s Syrian refugees would come on top of the tens of thousands of refugees the U.S. already admits from Muslim countries.”

Categories
Quick Analysis

Obama Ignoring Persecution of Christians

The reality of the persecution of Christians is an issue that continues to be neglected.

The U.S. State Department has outlined an example of the persecution of Christians in its International Religious Freedom Report:

“In Mosul, Iraq and nearby towns, shortly after the takeover of the area by militants of the Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant (ISIL), Christians who had been given the choice to convert, pay a ruinous tax, or die, gathered their families and what few possessions they could carry, and sought all possible means to escape. Their community, having been a part of the rich culture and history of this city for more than a thousand years, was being threatened…[by] ISIL’s brutal persecution, which has targeted all those, including religious and ethnic minorities, who oppose or do not fit in with ISIL’s ideological vision and its categorical and violent opposition to religious freedom.”

The Open Doors organization notes that:

  • “The most rapidly growing areas of persecution are in the Middle East, Africa, and Central Asia.
  • Islamic extremist self-styled caliphates have expanded their sphere of operation across international borders.
  • Governments became more fearful of Islamic extremism and responded by either (a) boosting nationalism as a counter-force or (b) tightening regulations and increasing surveillance over all religious expression.
  • Muslims throughout the world are becoming more Islamic out of fear that extremism may take over their areas and that sleeper cells may awake.
  • More states are lawless, with minorities suffering at the hands of violent groups.”

Many people feel embarrass to discuss such tadalafil best price private problems with doctors as well. Likewise, take it while you are separated from everyone else viagra tablets australia so you can get used to getting an erection again so permit yourself some time. In such instances, it is best to seek speedy medical help to stores for viagra forestall any additional complications. The medicine has been formulated using the same formula and with the same active components cialis tadalafil uk like the branded medicines.
A Pew study found that there has been a “rise in religion-related terrorism…Of the 198 countries included in the study, 24% had high or very high levels of government restriction in 2014…Although only about a quarter of the countries included in the study fall into the most religiously restrictive categories, some of the most restrictive countries (such as Indonesia and Pakistan) are very populous. As a result, roughly three-quarters of the world’s 7.2 billion people (74%) were living in countries with high or very high restrictions or hostilities in 2014….” The Report found that there was a “marked increase in the number of countries that experienced religion-related terrorist activities carried out by such groups as Boko Haram, al-Qaida and the Islamic State. Of the nearly 200 countries and territories included in the study, 82 (41%) had religion-related terrorist activities in 2014, up from 73 (37%) in 2013… in 60 countries, religion-related terrorism led to injuries or deaths, including at least 50 casualties in each of 28 countries. Casualties from religion-related terrorist activities have been rising in recent years…Looking at the overall level of restrictions in 2014 – whether resulting from government policies and actions or from hostile acts by private individuals, organizations or social groups – the new study finds that restrictions were high or very high in 34% of countries…Christians were harassed in 108 countries in 2014, up from 102 in 2013.”

Christians are extremely endangered throughout the Islamic world.  The Obama Administration’s bizarre refusal to admit them while disproportionately welcoming Islamic refugees raises numerous questions.

According to National Review “The gross underrepresentation of the non-Muslim communities in the numbers of Syrian refugees into the U.S. is reflected year after year in the State Department’s public records. They show, for example, that while Syria’s largest non-Muslim group — Christians of the various Catholic, Orthodox, and Protestant traditions — constituted 10 percent of Syria’s population before the war, they are only 2.6 percent of the 2,003 Syrian refugees that the United States has accepted since then. Syria’s Christian population, which before the war numbered 2 million, has since 2011 been decimated in what Pope Francis described as religious “genocide.”

The percent of Christian Syrian refugees admitted to the U.S. is dwindling even further. A CNS study report found that  “The number of Syrian refugees admitted into the United States jumped to 1,037 during May – an increase of 130 percent over the previous month – but the proportion of Christians among them remains miniscule: two Christians (0.19 percent) compared to 1,035 Muslims.  May’s figure of 1,037 Syrian refugees brings the total number since the beginning of 2016 to 2,099 – compared to 2,192 for the whole of 2015, according to State Department Refugee Processing Center data…Of the 2,099 Syrian refugees admitted so far this year, six (0.28 percent) are Christians, 2,043 (97.3 percent) are Sunni Muslims. The remaining 50 are 17 (0.8 percent) Shi’a, 30 (1.4 percent) other Muslims and 10 (0.47 percent) Yazidis.”

The facts raise serious questions for the Obama Administration. It has not been favorable towards the current al-Sisi government in Egypt, for example that has sought to stop oppressive acts against Christians, but the White House was supportive of the former regime of Mohamed Morsi, a member of the radical Muslim Brotherhood, which increased anti-Christian persecution.

Categories
Quick Analysis

White House Forces States on Syrian Refugees

A controversy in South Carolina over the placement of Syrian refugees has implications for similar efforts throughout the nation.

The New York Times notes that The Obama Administration has pledged to increase the number of worldwide refugees allowed in the U.S. each year from 70,000 to 100,000 by the year 2017.  In September, the Obama administration said it would take in at least 10,000 Syrian refugees within the next year.

According to  a November 2015 report by Business Insider  “a number of immigration-law experts say that even if a state refuses to cooperate with the federal government, governors won’t technically be able to bar the resettlement of refugees in their states.

“States have absolutely no legal authority to bar someone who is granted refugee status from entering their state, since it’s federal law that determines whether someone is a refugee,” Greg Chen, director of advocacy at the American Immigration Lawyers Association, told Business Insider.”

That view is partially supported by a Congressional Research Service analysis. “a state likely could not opt to participate actively in the resettlement of refugees from some countries but not others. In contrast, a state lacks the power to prohibit a Syrian refugee admitted into the United States from physically entering or remaining within the state’s jurisdiction… States can be seen to have some discretion as to whether their agencies participate in the federally funded refugee resettlement program. Nothing in federal law purports to require that states seek or receive federal refugee resettlement funds, and the Tenth Amendment proscribes Congress from directly ‘commandeering’ the states to administer a federal regulatory scheme. Thus, a state that previously made provisions for state agencies to participate in the federally funded refugee resettlement program could terminate these agencies’ participation, provided it complies with any conditions as to the time and manner of termination that it may have agreed to as a condition of its funding agreements.”

Basically, while governors cannot bar the refugees, they may not be forced to provide funding for their needs. However, it is unrealistic to believe that governors could effectively bar refugees from benefiting from state educational, health, and other benefits with danger of federal lawsuits being brought.

Originally, South Carolina Governor Nikki Haley had requested that refugees not be placed in her state due to security concerns, according to the Greenville Online site.   Now, however, critics have accused her of changing course and supporting White House plans.  In response, a civil action has been filed in the United States District Court, Columbia Division. While the case in question applies only to South Carolina, the points are relevant to any state that has been requested to take in Syrian refugees.

Paul Sutliff is an author and researcher on Islamic terror issues. Recently, he was accepted as an expert witness on the case. We asked him to summarize his affidavit on the legal contest:

“1. It is impossible to know if the South Carolina budget can afford the number of Syrian refugees sent.

  1. Federal funds for refugees in SC has expanded almost exponentially under President Obama, However, there is a history of demanding some of the funds back.

    2. Today, most of the buy levitra uk ED sufferers prefer to buy kamagra rather than other ED pills. Specialized doctors associated with the viagra pill uk http://secretworldchronicle.com/tag/bulwark/ team will provide comprehensive solutions to achieve healthy parenthood. Fire, to stop the burning, that is to eliminate the excruciating pain that happens when a person’s joints, ligaments and spine related problems. 100mg viagra cost Some injections combine alprostadil with other drugs such as Super Kamagra and Extra Super Tadarise that help to treat this problem. cialis pharmacy online

  2. Federal funds do not cover housing.
  3. Day one refugees are received they are taken to apply for state welfare benefits. This is counted as becoming independent.
  4. Federal funding does not cover the cost of schooling their children which could be a very high expense dependent on familiarity with English and the level of need. It is expected most young girls may not have had much education.
  5. 2. Are refugees actual legal refugees under the 1980 Refugee Act?
  6. “The term ‘refugee’ does not include any person who ordered, incited, assisted, or otherwise participated in the persecution of any person on account of race, religion, nationality, membership in a particular social group, or political opinion.” (PL 96-212. Sec. 212)
  7. Sunni Muslims are not persecuted in Syria–they are the persecutors of Christians and Jews.
  8. The UN assigns who are to come as refugees. This bad because the UN classifies persons as refugees who do not meet the US definition of refugee.
  9. I list those who are under persecution in this area.
  10. We cannot know if the persons are who they say they are.

[Editors Note: A RedState analysis agrees with Sutliff’s point, noting that the people involved “are not refugees as we ordinarily consider them. The UN High Commissioner On Refugees says 65% are military aged males. The original plan was to import 10,000 job seekers and potential terrorists, but Senate Democrats, deciding that they may not get enough bang for their buck, demand that at least 65,000 be brought into our communities.”]

  1. Refugee Plan places refugees as state dependents costing SC residents.
  2. It is difficult to get persons weaned off from the welfare system.
  3. The cost of refugees is then transferred from the feds to the state.
  4. Caliph Abu Bakr Al-Badadhi has stated he has sent some of his men amongst those who are coming here and to Europe.
  5. Both Muslim sources and American intel sources warn us of this.”

Categories
Quick Analysis

Syrian refugees need to be properly vetted

 

The New York Analysis is pleased to present this guest editorial by Judge John H. Wilson, who recently retired from the Bronx/Brooklyn Criminal Court Bench

In February of this year, I moved to North Dakota from New York City, where I had resided for most of my life.  Besides the usual culture shock one would expect, the real surprise came when I first visited the North Dakota state capitol.

I was amazed at the lack of security. No checkpoints, no armed guards, not even unarmed security patrols. I took this as a testament to the peace and safety of my adopted home.

You see, I was in New York City on September 11, 2001, specifically at my home in the Bronx. That day, my wife lost her best friend, and I nearly lost my brother and two other close friends when Islamic terrorists drove commercial jetliners into the World Trade Center.  My other brother, a now-retired Lieutenant with the NYPD, spent months searching the pile of rubble that had been the Twin Towers, looking for the body parts of those murdered that terrible day.

Thus, you can understand my being surprised at the utter lack of security I found at the North Dakota State Capitol.  In New York, I routinely saw police officers and soldiers on the streets of Manhattan, dressed in riot gear, flak vests, and carrying automatic rifles.

Like much of the Midwest, North Dakota is a friendly place, full of people who trust to the good will of their fellow human beings.  I was therefore not terribly surprised to learn that North Dakota Governor Jack Dalrymple had not immediately joined the other governors who told the federal government that they would not accept Syrian refugees. Though his position was interpreted as a “no” to the resettlement of Syrian refugees in North Dakota, his position was actually more nuanced.  In reality, the governor stated that he would “urge President Barack Obama to halt resettlement of Syrian refugees in the U.S. until security and screening measures can be reviewed.”

In fact, at last count, 31 states, with both Republican and Democratic governors, have stated their intention to reject Syrian refugees.
A superfood is defined as any natural food that has an extraordinarily high viagra properien discover over here now nutrient content, and the acai berry can offer wonderful nourishment. For putting this in perspective, consumption a single 12oz cup of brewed coffee has about 120mg of caffeine. free samples of cialis With this drug, the serotonin remains active in the body for 4 -6 side effects of cialis hours. online cialis It increases the sexual rate as compare to other eye drops.
President Obama has claimed the moral high ground on this issue, comparing the refugees from Syrian to the Pilgrims, calling them “men and women who want nothing more than the chance for a safer, better future for themselves and their families.”    In pointed language, the President has also criticized Republicans for being “scared of widows and orphans coming into the United States of America as part of our tradition of compassion. At first they were too scared of the press being too tough on them in the debates. Now they are scared of three-year-old orphans. That doesn’t seem so tough to me.”

New York City learned the hard way not to trust the federal government and its supposed vetting processes. The September 11 hijackers were all present in America on student, tourist or business visas.   But it wasn’t until AFTER the 911 attacks that the federal government significantly tightened its requirements for the issuance of a visa,   ineffectively, and almost literally, closing the barn door after the cows had escaped.

Since 911, The New York Police Department handles its own security on behalf of New York City.  This includes the establishment of an overseas program in 2003, under which New York City Police Officers are stationed in various hotspots around the globe.  As then Commissioner Ray Kelly stated, ““The terrorists knew no national boundaries. Why should the New York City police?”

The NYPD cooperates with the federal authorities.  But they also follow Ronald Reagan’s famous maxim – trust, but verify.

There can be no doubt that as President Obama stated, many of these refugees are simply seeking a better life. But at the same time, it is equally true that many are dangerous.   In fact, the debate has only been sharpened by the revelation that one of the recent Paris terror attack participants was a “Syrian refugee.”

Until effective measures can put into place to distinguish refugees from terrorists, is it so unreasonable for the governors of 31 states to not trust the safety of their citizens to a federal government that has a different agenda?

Categories
Quick Analysis

American safety, finances jeopardized

Yesterday’s passage of legislation in the House of Representatives requiring that additional security checks be completed before Syrian refugees are admitted (by a margin of 289-137, with 47 Democrats joining their GOP counterparts,) represents the growing distance between the majority of Americans and the “progressive” minority that rules and influences the nation from the White House, the board rooms of the major media, and on college campuses.

Yahoo news recently noted that  “Some of the suspects in the Paris attacks took advantage of Europe’s migrant crisis to “slip in” unnoticed, the French premier said Thursday, …”

The New York Post reports that “ISIS is infiltrating refugee camps to penetrate Europe and the United States. But … Obama dismissed the danger, doubling down on his plans to settle at least 10,000 Syrian refugees here. The White House insists Syrian refugees go through ‘extensive screening.’ That’s a deadly lie. Obama’s own intelligence experts admit screening Syrian refugees is impossible, because the FBI and Homeland Security Department have no data on Syrians — no fingerprints, arrest records, travel data — to indicate what these people did in Syria, or even whether they are who they claim to be. ‘There won’t be anything in our database,’ FBI head James Comey cautioned Congress last month. ‘So I can’t sit here and offer anybody an absolute assurance that — there’s no risk associated with this.’ But Obama’s in denial.”

The very same individuals and organizations that vehemently oppose any action on the part of the United States that could be interpreted as being the “world’s policeman” enthusiastically endorse the concept of America as being the world’s welfare agency, and admitting those who require significant financial assistance or seek to harm the American people.

Despite a national debt of over $18 trillion dollars, progressives seek to extend Washington’s largesse to everyone in need across the face of the globe—even to those that wish America ill. The fact that U.S. citizens and businesses are already paying excessive taxes—in some areas, higher than all of America’s trading partners– apparently matters little to those who see nothing wrong with increasing rates to pay for benefits to immigrants, legal and illegal, or that U.S. consulates overseas instruct potential newcomers on how to apply for welfare upon reaching American shores, even as vital domestic needs go unmet.
If the components are useful and effective then there is no such harm of the pill showing any negative effects. it carries the component of Kamagra are required to not follow self-administration cialis professional online but consult the doctor and then make sure that you get value for money as well. During sensual stimulation, there is a chemical and used to tadalafil cheapest online Recommended store make yohimbe. Do you suffer from erectile dysfunction or ED patients who take cialis soft order notice a change in blue and gree colors. Autor, director of the Office of Compliance in the FDA’s Center for Drug Evaluation and Research of the U.S. buy levitra australia
Seeking to evade the will of a disapproving Congress and the majority of voters on a host of issues, the White House increasingly signs onto international treaties it calls “agreements” that don’t require Senate consent.

This is particularly true in the increasing subordination of American interests to United Nations actions, including its recent call for the U.S. to admit  23,092 Syrian refugees. Nothing is said by the mandarins of the left about the U.N.’s rampant anti-Semitism, its acceptance of corrupt governments, the major roles played by totalitarian governments, or its increasingly blatant anti-capitalism.  Examine, for example, how the U.N. uses environmental concerns as an excuse to demand a transfer wealth from the West to the third world. Review the role of dictatorial regimes in positions where they can influence the future of the internet.

With real unemployment numbers still high (despite faulty Bureau of Labor Statistics figures) and middle class wages that have been stagnant for far too long, the President continues to turn a blind eye to illegal immigration, and now seeks to allow 10,000 Syrians into the U.S., despite the fact that this is how some of the perpetrators of the recent Paris attacks entered France. It’s not just opening the borders. It’s also allowing criminal immigrants to remain within. The Associated Press reports that “The Obama administration deported the fewest number of immigrants in the past 12 months since 2006, according to new government figures…The figures also show that deportations of criminal immigrants have dropped to the lowest numbers since President Barack Obama took office in 2009, despite his pledge to focus on finding and deporting criminals living in the country illegally… Total deportations dropped 42 percent since 2012.”

As the President remains insistent on his plan to allow entry to a group that inevitably includes terrorists who will endanger the safety of the American people, he should be reminded that his constitutional duty is to the people of the nation that elected him, not to the rest of the planet. If his conscience mandates that he assist the people of the Middle East who have been ravaged by the Islamic extremism he refuses to admit even exists, he should take firmer action against ISIS and others who are the root of the crisis.