supercomputers – USA Gov Policy

President Obama is travelling on his fifth trip to Asia today, a six-day event that will take him to a region that has become far more dangerous over the past 21 years, and especially so during the past five years as the American military has seen its funding levels slashed.

The President is said to be seeking to reassure allies in the region, but the lack of substance in strength and action will be hard for America’s friends to ignore. The problem is particularly salient in light of recent events, including Washington’s failure to live up to its treaty obligations to the Ukraine in Europe the Philippines in the Pacific, and its decreased support for Israel in the Middle East.

As America’s navy shrunk to pre-World War I levels, tensions in the Pacific Ocean region that had been significantly contained during the post-World War II era re-emerged in a virulent new form.

The new era of militarism in Asia has been brewing for decades. The West relaxed its guard following the collapse of the Soviet Union, ignoring the modernized Chinese military as well as the redevelopment of Moscow’s arsenal under Vladimir Putin.

Although generic cialis prices https://pdxcommercial.com/property/16142-s-leland-road-beavercreek/ no association was found between diabetes and testosterone hormone, restoring the body with sufficient testosterone hormone does help. The get viagra prescription pill is safe with a low dosage oral treatment which dissolves in your mouth within seconds, and is less likely to cause any nasty side effects. The priority of generic viagra australia things in life just changes all of sudden. Perhaps interfering with your https://pdxcommercial.com/property/1135-nw-noble-drive-estacada-oregon-97023/img_5614/ overnight generic viagra work life to the full. Beijing’s military, aided by vast financing, intensive espionage efforts, and the legal transfer of technology such as the sale of Cray supercomputers by the Clinton Administration has become a thoroughly state-of-the-art superpower. While the White House has proved reluctant to support space-based military spending, China has moved quickly ahead. Heralding its arrival as a major player on the highest frontier was the 2007 shoot-down of an orbiting satellite.

The pace of China’s dramatic increase in armed might exceeds that of both the USA and the USSR during the height of the First Cold War. As the Pentagon deals with vast new cuts, the People’s Liberation Army received yet another large spending hike. The public figures may be only the tip of an iceberg. The PLA also controls a number of profit-making activities that produce substantial additional revenue for its use.

Beijing’s aggressive actions against Japan forced Tokyo to re-evaluate its “Peace Constitution.” Similarly, China’s takeover of offshore areas within the Philippine Exclusive Economic Zone is a throwback to an era of imperialism that many had hoped was committed to history.

With a diminished military and a legacy of not supporting allies in Europe, the Middle East and Asia, the President will have a difficult task reassuring allies facing the cold reality of Chinese power.

Quick Analysis

Why the Electoral College is Vital

Proposals for radical alterations in the way Americans vote are dangerous concepts that would have dramatic consequences for the nation and its Constitution. Some, such as ranked choice voting, are an unblushing bid to prop up fringe, leftist candidates. Others. if adopted, would essentially disunite the nation and overturn its Constitution. As they consistently have after each election loss, Democrat spokespeople have flooded the airwaves with complaints about the Electoral College. Why, they ask, can’t we have a “popular vote,” and let it be done with. Since the Electoral College process is part of the original design of the U.S. Constitution, it would be necessary to pass a Constitutional amendment to change this system. The National Archives notes that over the past 200 years more than 700 proposals have been introduced in Congress to reform or eliminate the Electoral College. There have been more proposals for Constitutional amendments on changing the Electoral College than on any other subject. The answer is as simple as the name of the country: The United States of America. The incredibly successful nation created almost two and a half centuries ago was a union of separate states. Fresh off of dealing with a monarch, it was intentionally set up that way to both prevent the possibility of having an all-powerful dictator, and to prevent larger states from bullying smaller ones. Abolishing the electoral college would essentially disenfranchise smaller states from having any say in the presidency. Indeed, even less populated areas of large states would lose influence. A collection of large cities, (New York, Los Angeles, Chicago, Houston, Phoenix, Philadelphia, San Antonio, San Diego, Dallas, Austin, Jacksonville, etc.) would decide the outcome in who gets the White House. Considering how badly many of those urban centers are run, that would not bode well for the future of the country! Beyond the practical policy implications, it would alienate the populations of those not living in California, Texas, New York, Florida, Pennsylvania, Illinois, who would, for the most part, be reduced to bystanders in the race for the only nationally-elected position. A Heritage study analyzed the concept of a “National Popular Vote” (NPV) this way: “The National Popular Vote (NPV) plan is the latest in a long line of schemes designed to replace the Electoral College. Imbued with the ideals of this nation’s Founders, the Electoral College has proved itself to be both effective in providing orderly elections for President and resilient in allowing a stable transfer of power of the leadership of the world’s greatest democracy. Therefore, while it would be a mistake to replace the Electoral College, replacing this system with the NPV would be a disaster. The NPV would devalue the minority interests that the Founders sought to protect, create electoral administrative problems, encourage voter fraud, and radicalize the U.S. political system. It also would likely violate the U.S. Constitution’s Compact Clause while directly contravening the Founders’ view of federalism and a representative republic. In an age of perceived political dysfunction, effective policies already in place—especially successful policies established by this nation’s Founders, such as the Electoral College—should be preserved.” Trent England, writing for the National Conference of State Legislatures outlined key reasons for the institution: “At the Constitutional Convention, the primary concern of delegates opposed to direct election was that big states would dominate presidential politics. By using a two-step election process, the Electoral College prevents one region, or a handful of major metropolitan areas, from controlling the White House. Support must be geographically distributed around the country in order to win enough states to capture an electoral vote majority. This was particularly important after the Civil War. The nation remained divided, and Democrats became dominant in the south. A combination of intense popularity with some voters and violent suppression of others allowed Democrats to receive the most popular votes in 1876 and 1888 even though they lost the Electoral College and thus those elections.” Eliminating the Electoral College would be a disaster for the United States/