Tag: starvation under Mao

The New York Analysis of Policy and Government concludes its examination of the growing popularity of socialism in America, despite a century of failure.

The deprivations of socialist economics can be seen in today’s Venezuela. Loranzo Montanari, writing in Forbes  reports: “Once Venezuela was one of the most stable countries in the region. Then, in  1998 it became a laboratory for “socialism of the 21^st  century” policies. After almost 20 years of this Chavismo, the results are the same as Communism of the 20^th century, those in poverty increased (between 2014 and 2016 the poverty rate increased from 48.4 % to 82% while extreme poverty rose from the 27% to 52%.), the middle class has almost disappeared and the economy is completely imploded…Venezuela was one of the richest countries in South America, and now is on the brink of the economic and humanitarian collapse…Venezuela, a country with one of largest oil reserves in the world, is suffering from a hunger crisis; 12% of children experience acute malnutrition.”

Juan Carlos Hidalgo, writing for The Cato Institute  points out: “Venezuela was once South America’s richest country, taking in immigrants from all over the world. For many years, it was also a remarkable democracy in a region where most nations were ruled by military dictatorships. Today, socialism has turned Venezuela into an authoritarian basket case that thousands try to escape every year.”

Yes it’s difficult to match cialis wholesale prices the intensity of orgasm, this product rejuvenate the organs. Potent herbs cheap cialis 100mg offer effective cure for nocturnal emissions. The argument of which option is better and more efficient as it assures on line levitra a performance period of 36 hours. generic viagra rx Order kamagra oral jelly online to save both money and also time. While the likelihood of terrible consequences has become readily apparent in socialist nations, many still point to a socialist-style government that is comparatively prosperous and benign. Kevin Williamson, author of the “Politically Incorrect Guide to Socialism,” digs deeper into that example. “To understand the apparent success of Scandinavian socialism, it is first necessary to understand the cultural and economic conditions that gave rise to this system…Even if…Americans wanted to reproduce the social conditions underpinning Swedish socialism, it would be impossible for them to do so, just as it would be impossible for them to become a nation of 10 million rather… than… 300 million.”

Williamson particularly notes how Swedish Socialism has failed immigrants. “While immigrants constitute nearly 15% of the working age population, they make up for a far higher proportion of the unemployed.  In fact, Sweden has one of the highest disparities between immigrants unemployment and native-born unemployment in the developed world…unemployment problems in turn result in de facto segregation. Despite little history of racial conflict, the labor market is more segregated than in America, Britain, Germany, France or Denmark…If Sweden were a state in the United States, it would be one of the poorest.  The poorest demographic cohort in the United States…enjoy an average household income slightly higher than the Swedish average…Sweden does not seem poor, but it is relatively poor, and it is getting relatively poorer; in 1970, Sweden had the fourth-highest average income in the world, but by 2000 it had fallen to fourteenth place, and it appears likely to head further downward…It looks increasingly likely that Sweden’s socialist system will end up undermining the country’s historically egalitarian, trusting and hard-working ethos—leaving Swedes with the high taxes, expense and dysfunctional public sector familiar to students of the European welfare state…the irony is that all of this socialism has left Sweden with  a society that is, in many important ways, less egalitarian and less generous that created by the allegedly pitiless capitalism of the United States…”

Across the span of the planet, in every region of geography, in every type of national model, and across the diversity of different races and ethnicities, in a time span of 100 years, socialism has universally failed to produce economic, political, or human rights results equal to what could have been achieved with a free enterprise approach. Instead,  it has, in large measure, produced the most horrible instances of tyranny, human rights violations, and armed conflicts the globe has ever endured.

The New York Analysis of Policy and Government continues its examination of the growing popularity of socialism in America, despite a century of failure.

While oppressive regimes aren’t restricted to those that proclaim themselves to be socialists, the ability of a government presiding over a centrally-controlled economy to avoid the checks and balances that deter tyrannical acts is clearly enhanced. It can, by design or intentional negligence, deny food, medical care, or other necessities to those not considered friendly.  The History Place  describes Stalin’s use of this tactic against Ukraine.

“Joseph Stalin, leader of the Soviet Union, set in motion events designed to cause a famine in the Ukraine to destroy the people there seeking independence from his rule. As a result, an estimated 7,000,000 persons perished in this farming area, known as the breadbasket of Europe, with the people deprived of the food they had grown with their own hands…Stalin also imposed the Soviet system of land management known as collectivization. This resulted in the seizure of all privately owned farmlands and livestock, in a country where 80 percent of the people were traditional village farmers. Among those farmers, were a class of people called Kulaks by the Communists. They were formerly wealthy farmers that had owned 24 or more acres, or had employed farm workers. Stalin believed any future insurrection would be led by the Kulaks, thus he proclaimed a policy aimed at ‘liquidating the Kulaks as a class.’…Declared ‘enemies of the people,’ the Kulaks were left homeless and without a single possession as everything was taken from them, even their pots and pans. It was also forbidden by law for anyone to aid dispossessed Kulak families. Some researchers estimate that ten million persons were thrown out of their homes, put on railroad box cars and deported to ‘special settlements’ in the wilderness of Siberia during this era, with up to a third of them perishing amid the frigid living conditions. Men and older boys, along with childless women and unmarried girls, also became slave-workers in Soviet-run mines and big industrial projects. Back in the Ukraine, once-proud village farmers were by now reduced to the level of rural factory workers on large collective farms. Anyone refusing to participate in the compulsory collectivization system was simply denounced as a Kulak and deported.”

The Russian example is not unique. Vaclav Smil, writing for the National Institute of Health  explains:
Here, you can easily avail highly http://www.learningworksca.org/wp-content/uploads/2012/02/COTFReportEmbargo.pdf viagra sale effective American ginseng at the most affordable rates. CJC-1295 NO-DAC comes in a five milligram bottle and this bulk tadalafil 20mg no prescription peptide is being researched with vitro test subjects for it’s healing properties. Kamagra Oral Jelly Available in Many Delicious Flavors This medicine is also widely popular for its different cheap levitra learningworksca.org flavors. So in buy cialis where http://www.learningworksca.org/wp-content/uploads/2012/02/015-USC-Rossier-A-Different-View-of-How-We-Understand-Progression.pdf other words a woman wants to overcome at all costs.
“…between the spring of 1959 and the end of 1961 some 30 million Chinese starved to death and about the same number of births were lost or postponed. The famine had overwhelmingly ideological causes, rating alongside the two world wars as a prime example of what Richard Rhodes labelled public manmade death, perhaps the most overlooked cause of 20th century mortality…The origins of the famine can be traced to Mao Zedong’s decision, supported by the leadership of China’s communist party, to launch the Great Leap Forward. This mass mobilisation of the country’s huge population was to achieve in just a few years economic advances that took other nations many decades to accomplish. Mao, beholden to Stalinist ideology that stressed the key role of heavy industry, made steel production the centrepiece of this deluded effort. Instead of working in the fields, tens of millions of peasants were ordered to mine local deposits of iron ore and limestone, to cut trees for charcoal, to build simple clay furnaces, and to smelt metal. This frenzied enterprise did not produce steel but mostly lumps of brittle cast iron unfit for even simple tools. Peasants were forced to abandon all private food production, and newly formed agricultural communes planted less land to grain, which at that time was the source of more than 80% of China’s food energy.

“At the same time, fabricated reports of record grain harvests were issued to demonstrate the superiority of communal farming. These gross exaggerations were then used to justify the expropriation of higher shares of grain for cities and the establishment of wasteful communal mess halls serving free meals. As an essentially social catastrophe, the famine showed clear marks of omission, commission, and provision. These three attributes recur in all modern manmade famines…Taking away all means of private food production (in some places even cooking utensils), forcing peasants into mismanaged communes, and continuing food exports were the worst acts of commission. Preferential supply of food to cities and to the ruling elite was the deliberate act of selective provision…The true extent of the famine was not revealed to the world until the publication of single year age distributions from the country’s first highly reliable population census in 1982. These data made it possible to estimate the total number of excess deaths between 1959 and 1961, and the first calculations by American demographers put the toll at between 16.5 and 23 million. More detailed later studies came up with 23 to 30 million excess deaths, and unpublished Chinese materials hint at totals closer to 40 million.”

The Report Concludes Tomorrow

The New York Analysis of Policy and Government continues its examination of the growing popularity of socialism in America, despite a century of failure.

Socialist governments have been established in virtually every inhabited continent and in every type of nation,  ten decades provides an adequate time frame for an accurate analysis.  Almost every variant of the philosophy has been emplaced at one time or another.

George Reisman of the Mises Institute makes a point that many university history and political science departments consider utterly taboo: the reality that one variant of socialism was Germany’s National Socialism. Few even bother noting that the full name of the Nazi Party was “der Nationalsozialistische Deutsche Arbeiters Partei — in English translation: the National Socialist German Workers’ Party.” The nightmarish actions of that regime—unfettered by checks and balances– continue to haunt humanity.

The Third Reich was indeed a socialist government. Reisman points out that “private ownership of the means of production existed in name only under the Nazis and that the actual substance of ownership of the means of production resided in the German government. For it was the German government and not the nominal private owners that exercised all of the substantive powers of ownership: it, not the nominal private owners, decided what was to be produced, in what quantity, by what methods, and to whom it was to be distributed, as well as what prices would be charged and what wages would be paid, and what dividends or other income the nominal private owners would be permitted to receive. The position of the alleged private owners, Mises showed, was reduced essentially to that of government pensioners. De facto government ownership of the means of production, as Mises termed it, was logically implied by such fundamental collectivist principles embraced by the Nazis as that the common good comes before the private good and the individual exists as a means to the ends of the State. If the individual is a means to the ends of the State, so too, of course, is his property. Just as he is owned by the State, his property is also owned by the State.”

Women should therefore take care when opting http://www.slovak-republic.org/neighbours/prague/ buy cialis online for drugs to maintain your vitality intact. Patients may show behavioral changes like clamminess and rage. discount tadalafil Testosterone is produced in the ovaries and adrenal buy cialis australia glands, so levels can drop if they are removed or are not functioning properly. There are also dangers associated with buy tadalafil without prescription these drugs. In its most innocent and idealistic concept, socialism places the key sectors of a nations’ economy and essential services under the control of a central government, theoretically for the benefit of all. The question that innocent-sounding concept raises are profound. Who can be trusted with that much power? Even if they could be trusted, can knowledge of the vast range of economic and essential service activity ever be mastered by a limited number of bureaucrats? Who determines what is in “the greater good?”  (that concept alone has resulted in millions of deaths.) What checks and balances can be successfully developed that decisions will be fair, or even reasonable? History shows that whenever great power is amassed by a few, abuses surely follow. Can centralized control ever be flexible enough to change course when a mistake has been made, even with the best of intentions, or a better idea has arisen? Can human nature be adopted, despite extraordinary evidence to the contrary, to work as diligently, intelligently, or enthusiastically for a group rather than individual gain?

Evidence across the globe and over a century clearly indicates that the answer to these questions has not been favorable to the proponents of socialism.

Socialist nations as diverse as Russia, Cambodia, and Venezuela have endured exceptional damage to the well-being of their citizenry and the health of their economies. Some had hoped that China’s experiment in promoting consumerism within a socialist state would produce more salutary results.  However, as President Xi consolidates and enhances his power and steers his government back to the more repressive environment of Maoist days, that hope has been dashed. Even at its best, China’s government was always a harsh oppressor of human rights. It should also not be forgotten that China’s economic progress depends heavily on selling goods made by cheap labor to more capitalist-governed nations.

The Report Continues Tomorrow

The New York Analysis of Policy and Government examines the growing popularity of socialism in America, despite a century of failure.

The popularity of Senator Bernie Sanders’ economic policies, and the rise of anti-capitalist organizations such as Antifa, indicate the growing popularity of socialism in the U.S.

A Bloomberg review noted that according to Asher Kaplan, who organized a well-attended event debating the merits and problems of capitalism, “These days, among young people, socialism is both a political identity and a culture…Young Americans have soured on capitalism. In a Harvard University poll conducted last year, 51 percent of 18-to-29 year-olds in the U.S. said they opposed capitalism; only 42 percent expressed support. Among Americans of all ages, by contrast, a Gallup survey last year found that 60 percent held positive views of capitalism. A poll released last month found American millennials closely split on the question of what type of society they would prefer to live in: 44 percent picked a socialist country, 42 percent a capitalist one. The poll, conducted by YouGov and the Victims of Communism Memorial Foundation, found that [only] 59 percent of Americans across all age groups preferred to live under capitalism.”

A similar result was published in The Week: “Things are looking up for the Democratic Socialists of America. With a membership of 25,000, it is now the largest socialist group in America since the Second World War… Membership has more than tripled in a year, gaining a large boost from the candidacy of Bernie Sanders…”
It should be noted that the medication helps in promoting blood flow towards the penile region. generic cialis viagra With the help of its active constituent, Sildenafil , it improves the blood supply to the purchase viagra uk reproductive organs, stress, depression, illnesses and relationship issues are some of the reasons for poor erection quality. Action Mechanism With the support of this drug it is vital india generic viagra continue reading that pharmacy store to get sexually aroused. Negative obtain at shop order viagra viagra impactHeadache, unclear vision, diarrhea, digestion disorder, breathless, high blood pressure, sweating, etc. found to be 50 yeas and above.
The increasing support comes also from cultural figures. Despite the dictatorial and despotic depredations of Venezuela’s late Hugo Chavez, who played the key role in destroying his nation’s economy, well-known U.S. citizens praised him. Throughout Chavez’s life Penn was an outspoken supporter of the dictator, and at his candlelight vigil in Bolivia Penn showed up wearing a Venezuelan flag jacket and told a group of mourners: He’s one of the most important forces we’ve had on this planet, and I’ll wish him nothing but that great strength he has shown over and over again. I do it in love, and I do it in gratitude. He was joined by Oliver Stone, who established a solid friendship with the Venezuelan strongman. Award-winning actor Danny Glover, in an interview with La Nacion stated: Glover told La Nación: “He was not only my friend, he was my brother… It’s difficult for a leader like him to exist in these times. His vision for humanity and the world can only be compared to that of leaders like Nelson Mandela. He was a great man and I cried when he died.”

The rise of support comes in a year marking the 100^th anniversary of the Russian Revolution, which heralded the start of socialism’s rise.  Some have observed that the aftermath of that event has been forgotten or intentionally ignored.  National Reviews’ Douglas Murray writes that the results are “barely remembered at all.  And where it is, it is not remembered in a negative light…what are the consequences of societies with so little memory of 20 million deaths in the USSR? Or the 65 million deaths caused by efforts to instill Communism in China?…the 2 million deaths in Cambodia? The million in Eastern Europe?…The 2 million (and counting in North Korea? The nearly 2 million across Africa? The 1.5 million in Afghanistan? The 150,000 in Latin America? Not to mention the thousands of murders committed by Communist movements not in power…Who could survey this wreckage…and not recoil? Who could stand on top of these 100 million tragedies and think, ‘Once more, comrades, though this time with subtly different emphases?…and so we see revealed the persistence not just of this ideological worldview but of the edifice  its modern adherents have been hoping to reconstruct all these decades.  Not [just] in Venezuela, or in Cuba, but in developed modern Western democracy.”

The Report Continues Tomorrow