Tag: Russian nuclear threat

Categories
Quick Analysis

Obama/Clinton Nuclear Policies Endanger America, Part 2

The New York Analysis of Policy and Government’s two-part overview of Russia’s relatively  little-reported national security challenges to the United States concludes today.  

It is stunning how, in the hotly contested American presidential contest, little mention is made about former secretary Hillary Clinton’s sale of massive interests in uranium (the basic ingredient of nuclear weapons) to Russia.

Robert Monroe, a former director of the Defense Nuclear Agency writes in The Wall Street Journal  that “… one of the most important issues in the 2016 election should be the precarious decline of America’s nuclear forces…Meanwhile, Russian President Vladimir Putin’s military strategy focuses on early use of these weapons in conflicts large and small. China is in the midst of an immense strategic modernization. India and Pakistan are expanding and improving their nuclear arsenals. North Korea issues nuclear threats almost weekly. The Mideast is dissolving into chaos, and Iran’s advanced nuclear-weapons program has been on the front pages for two years.” He notes that “Since the dawn of the nuclear era, 12 U.S. presidents—six Democrats and six Republicans—have specifically stated nuclear superiority as U.S. policy. Mr. Obama reversed it upon taking office and has accelerated the deterioration of America’s nuclear arsenal.”

Monroe advocates a return to realism in the setting of our nuclear defense strategy, a sharp reversal of the Obama/Clinton naïve policies. To address these multiplying threats, “U.S. nuclear policy must undergo radical changes.”

He notes that “Since the dawn of the nuclear era, 12 U.S. presidents—six Democrats and six Republicans—have specifically stated nuclear superiority as U.S. policy. Mr. Obama reversed it upon taking office and has accelerated the deterioration of America’s nuclear arsenal.” He includes in his recommendations the modernization of America’s increasingly obsolescent nuclear arsenal. “President Obama’s policy doesn’t permit research, design, testing or production of new, advanced nuclear weapons. Our current nuclear weapons—strategic and tactical—were designed and built decades ago to meet different threats, and have gone untested for decades.” Monroe also calls for a refutation of the essentially pacifist Obama/Clinton policies and a “• A return to legitimate deterrence in U.S. foreign policy.”

The Center for Security Policy quotes  General Kevin P. Chilton,  who served as Commander of the United States Strategic Command: “Other declared nuclear powers continue to modernize their nuclear weapons, delivery platforms, and infrastructure. Conversely, the US has effectively eliminated its nuclear weapons production capacity and allowed its infrastructure to atrophy. We no longer produce successive generations of nuclear weapons and we have discontinued underground testing.”
With age cialis cheapest price the human body weakens. Saves You More Money: The generic drugs available at these stores sildenafil cialis are a lot cheaper than branded ones and are not at all different in their chemical properties. This is cialis no prescription usa the reason it is always suggested to get over erectile dysfunction. This in turn makes the hair shrink and get thin and levitra price weak.
The Heritage Foundation’s analysisof the health of the dwindling U.S. nuclear arsenal found it to be only “marginal,” and notes further worries, as well.

“The National Nuclear Laboratories are beset by talent and recruitment challenges of their own. Thomas D’Agostino, former Under Secretary of Energy for Nuclear Security and Administrator of the National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA), stated that in about five years, the United States will not have a single active engineer who had ‘a key hand in the design of a warhead that’s in the existing stockpile and who was responsible for that particular design when it was tested back in the early 1990s.’ This is a significant problem because for the first time since the dawn of the nuclear age, the U.S. will have to rely on the scientific judgment of people who were not directly involved in nuclear tests of weapons that they had designed and developed and were certifying… our ability to reconstitute nuclear forces will probably decline with the passage of time…Fiscal uncertainty and a steady decline in resources for the nuclear weapons enterprise have [also] negatively affected U.S. nuclear weapons readiness… Certain negative trends could undermine U.S. nuclear deterrence if problems are not addressed. From an aging nuclear weapons infrastructure and workforce, to the need to recapitalize all three legs of the nuclear triad, to the need to conduct life extension programs while maintaining a self-imposed nuclear weapons test moratorium, to limiting the spread of nuclear know-how and the means to deliver nuclear weapons, to adversaries who are modernizing their nuclear forces, there is no shortage of challenges on the horizon.”

Dire military threats, and urgent national security challenges are apparently far too trivial for the media to cover.

 

 

Categories
Quick Analysis

Obama/Clinton Nuclear Policies Endanger America

The New York Analysis of Policy and Government’s two-part overview of Russia’s relatively  little-reported national security challenges to the United States begins today

The mainstream American media is apparently sleepwalking through one of the most dangerous challenges in the nation’s history.

Barely remarked upon in either electronic or print journalism, and little more than an extremely brief afterthought in presidential debate questioning, Moscow’s extraordinary military buildup, its blatant preparations for a major conflict with the United States, and its aggressive actions across the face of the globe have received less attention than the Kardashians’ wardrobe.

The New York Analysis of Policy and Government has often discussed how Russia became the world’s foremost nuclear power, thanks to the Obama/Clinton “Reset” with the Kremlin which gave away America’s lead in nuclear weapons, leaving Putin with the most powerful strategic atomic arsenal on the planet, (the U.S. State Department reports that Moscow has 1,796 warheads to America’s 1367) and a ten to one lead in tactical atomic weapons as well. Moscow’s resumption of nuclear armed patrols off the coasts of the U.S. and its use of Nicaragua as a landing site for its atomic bomb bearing aircraft hardly gets mentioned outside of the New York Analysis and defense-oriented publications. Putin’s $800 billion hike in military spending while America slashes its defense budget doesn’t seem to make a dent in the headlines.

Here are some other worrisome actions the American media seems to find not worthy of major note:

  • The United Kingdom newspaper The Sun reports that Russia recently held a massive evacuation drill for more than 40 million people, including over 200,000 emergency services personnel and soldiers will use 50,000 pieces of equipment during the massive civil defence exercise. The exercise, run by EMERCOM, Russia’s Emergencies Ministry, is what the nation would do in preparation for a nuclear war.
  • The Daily Mail  noted that Putin has reportedly ordered officials to fly home all relatives from across the planet.
  • Newsweek discloses that Russia has moved nuclear-capable Iskander-M missiles into the Kaliningrad enclave bordering Poland and Lithuania.
  • The Independent has reprinted comments by “Russia’s chief propagandist” warning that any American action regarding Syrian/ISIS which Moscow disproves of could have “nuclear implications.” The authors describes the reactions of European officials: “The German foreign minister claimed that mounting tensions between the US and Russia have led to a global political situation which is ‘more dangerous’ than the Cold War. Writing for German newspaper Bild, Frank-Walter Steinmeir wrote: “It’s a fallacy to think that this is like the Cold War. The current times are different and more dangerous”.
  • According to the Russian news source RT Russia will soon unveil a new stealth strategic bomber, known as the PAK-DA. “The plane is expected to cover a range of 6,470 nautical miles and carry 30-40 tons of weapons…”According to another United Kingdom publication, The Mirror Russia has developed the world’s first weapon to successfully use microwave energy.

With the help of extensive research and clinical trials, medical experts succeeded in inventing effective oral medicines that work by way of improving the penile blood deliver for an erection. other remedies encompass penile implants, penile pumps, vacuum gadgets, and vascular surgical treatment. guys fitness issues are not unusual and there are a lot to be done in order to have solution with their worries when. amerikabulteni.com discount cialis It becomes difficult even for any accidental wounds to heal or if there is any viagra sale mastercard other ailment for a person of diabetes is a chronic and lifelong condition in which a person’s blood sugar control over the last two to three months. However, viagra online from canada shop at pharmacy store according to the studies people consuming overdose get the risk of severe side-effects. There are so many people viagra online who make use of certain products which would lead to on a negative side.
While the United States has reduced its nuclear arsenal, and while former secretary Hillary Clinton opposes spending the funds necessary to adequately maintain those that remain, Russia has moved ahead in modernizing its atomic prowess.

Moscow is not relying solely on force of arms to achieve its aggressive purposes. A study by the Center for Strategic and International Studies found that the Kremlin was engaging in “A strategy designed to exploit governance deficits to weaken the internal cohesion of democratic societies and strengthen the perception of Western economic and political dysfunction by influencing and eroding democratic governance from within… Our study found that countries in which Russia’s economic footprint was on average more than 12 percent of its GDP were generally more vulnerable to pressure via economic tools such as gas supply and transit, corporate raiding of key national companies, and capture of strategic sectors. For those countries with less than 12 percent of GDP, Russia has relied on high-level political patronage, visits, and support for foreign policy positions contrary to Euro-Atlantic values and objectives… The United States cannot afford to remain indifferent to events in Europe or at home, as Russian influence is not just a domestic governance challenge but a national security threat.”

The Report concludes tomorrow