Riots after election day – USA Gov Policy

The United States may face unprecedented violence in the last two months of 2020.

If President Trump is re-elected, riots on a massive scale may be billed as a protest against his continued leadership. If Biden succeeds, the Left will seek to ensure that their almost complete takeover of the Democrat Party is solidified. Progressives will demand that, as the price for their support, their most radical policies be adopted. If their demand is not met, they will take it to the streets. Joe Schoffstall, writing for the Washington Free Beacon, notes that the leftist group Fight Back Table is planning for a “post-Election Day political apocalypse scenario.”

The Democratic Party leadership’s condoning of the aggressive tactics of Antifa and Black Lives Matter has put it in a position of holding a tiger by the tail. This is particularly prevalent in cities with Progressive mayors. Having failed to forcefully condemn the use of violence as a political tool, and having welcomed hard-core socialists into their ranks, they have encouraged the growth of unlawful tactics and the rise to power of those who use them.

Joe Biden is in a particularly tough spot. While he proclaims that he is not Bernie Sanders, he has largely adopted the policies of Sanders, Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, and New York City Mayor Bill de Blasio, the same policies that have destroyed nations from Russia to Venezuela. The mobs that have ransacked American cities from Portland to New York are the power behind the hard left.

Biden would have political constraints in moving forcefully against extremist tactics; he would lose a key base of party’s support. He would certainly lose the support of his own vice-president. Kamala Harris who is widely considered the most leftist senator in Congress. Harris recently stated, regarding the riots, “Nothing that we have achieved that has been about progress, in particular around civil rights, has come without a fight, and so I always am going to interpret these protests as an essential component of evolution in our country — as an essential component or mark of a real democracy,”

Ideologically, it would also be difficult for Biden to reign in the extremists. The Left has set the stage for violence by opposing all reasonable ballot security measures. It has also, in several states, set up a system of unsecured mail-in ballots that will result in fraudulent votes being cast, which will be successfully challenged in court. Those loses will have the effect of tossing a match into a box of dynamite.

Trump would not face similar roadblocks if re-elected. He has made opposition to the violence a centerpiece of his campaign. The GOP, for the most part, has solidly supported that position. Freed from the constraints of the unfavorable coverage the media would provide for a substantial crackdown in an election year, the President would be able to move forcefully to restore order.

We can acquire toxins viagra pfizer 100mg from our environment by breathing them, by ingesting them, or through physical contact with them. purchasing viagra in canada wikipedia reference Natural aphrodisiac – asparagus consists of vitamin E, potassium and folic acid to improve secretion of testosterone. Many clinical trials have proved that this amino acid has a positive effect on the immune system and increases the risk for a range of illnesses, including heart disease and depression. sildenafil generic cheap loved this The success rate of this medication is intended to be expended orally, around 30 prior minutes enjoying physical intercourse can result in incalculable joyful minutes generic cialis for sale in your one night period.

Indeed, the Justice Department already laid the groundwork for a substantive response. In a September 21 memo, Attorney General Will Barr noted:

“When state and local leaders impede their own law enforcement officers and agencies from doing their jobs, it endangers innocent citizens who deserve to be protected, including those who are trying to peacefully assemble and protest. We cannot allow federal tax dollars to be wasted when the safety of the citizenry hangs in the balance. It is my hope that the cities identified by the Department of Justice today (which included New York City; Portland, Oregon; and Seattle, Washington, Washington will reverse course and become serious about performing the basic function of government and start protecting their own citizens.”

Quick Analysis

Why the Electoral College is Vital

Proposals for radical alterations in the way Americans vote are dangerous concepts that would have dramatic consequences for the nation and its Constitution. Some, such as ranked choice voting, are an unblushing bid to prop up fringe, leftist candidates. Others. if adopted, would essentially disunite the nation and overturn its Constitution. As they consistently have after each election loss, Democrat spokespeople have flooded the airwaves with complaints about the Electoral College. Why, they ask, can’t we have a “popular vote,” and let it be done with. Since the Electoral College process is part of the original design of the U.S. Constitution, it would be necessary to pass a Constitutional amendment to change this system. The National Archives notes that over the past 200 years more than 700 proposals have been introduced in Congress to reform or eliminate the Electoral College. There have been more proposals for Constitutional amendments on changing the Electoral College than on any other subject. The answer is as simple as the name of the country: The United States of America. The incredibly successful nation created almost two and a half centuries ago was a union of separate states. Fresh off of dealing with a monarch, it was intentionally set up that way to both prevent the possibility of having an all-powerful dictator, and to prevent larger states from bullying smaller ones. Abolishing the electoral college would essentially disenfranchise smaller states from having any say in the presidency. Indeed, even less populated areas of large states would lose influence. A collection of large cities, (New York, Los Angeles, Chicago, Houston, Phoenix, Philadelphia, San Antonio, San Diego, Dallas, Austin, Jacksonville, etc.) would decide the outcome in who gets the White House. Considering how badly many of those urban centers are run, that would not bode well for the future of the country! Beyond the practical policy implications, it would alienate the populations of those not living in California, Texas, New York, Florida, Pennsylvania, Illinois, who would, for the most part, be reduced to bystanders in the race for the only nationally-elected position. A Heritage study analyzed the concept of a “National Popular Vote” (NPV) this way: “The National Popular Vote (NPV) plan is the latest in a long line of schemes designed to replace the Electoral College. Imbued with the ideals of this nation’s Founders, the Electoral College has proved itself to be both effective in providing orderly elections for President and resilient in allowing a stable transfer of power of the leadership of the world’s greatest democracy. Therefore, while it would be a mistake to replace the Electoral College, replacing this system with the NPV would be a disaster. The NPV would devalue the minority interests that the Founders sought to protect, create electoral administrative problems, encourage voter fraud, and radicalize the U.S. political system. It also would likely violate the U.S. Constitution’s Compact Clause while directly contravening the Founders’ view of federalism and a representative republic. In an age of perceived political dysfunction, effective policies already in place—especially successful policies established by this nation’s Founders, such as the Electoral College—should be preserved.” Trent England, writing for the National Conference of State Legislatures outlined key reasons for the institution: “At the Constitutional Convention, the primary concern of delegates opposed to direct election was that big states would dominate presidential politics. By using a two-step election process, the Electoral College prevents one region, or a handful of major metropolitan areas, from controlling the White House. Support must be geographically distributed around the country in order to win enough states to capture an electoral vote majority. This was particularly important after the Civil War. The nation remained divided, and Democrats became dominant in the south. A combination of intense popularity with some voters and violent suppression of others allowed Democrats to receive the most popular votes in 1876 and 1888 even though they lost the Electoral College and thus those elections.” Eliminating the Electoral College would be a disaster for the United States/