Tag: Reset

Categories
Quick Analysis

Can Obama Change Course?

The increasing crisis brought about by the depredations of ISIS presents an opportunity for the White House to undo the damage resulting from its prior foreign policy decisions.

In the wake, and partially as a result of Mr. Obama’s early withdrawal of U.S. troops from Iraq, the most powerful, well-funded and organized terrorist organization yet seen emerged. In the President’s own words,

“They have rampaged across cities and villages — killing innocent, unarmed civilians in cowardly acts of violence.  They abduct women and children, and subject them to torture and rape and slavery.  They have murdered Muslims — both Sunni and Shia — by the thousands.  They target Christians and religious minorities, driving them from their homes, murdering them when they can for no other reason than they practice a different religion.  They declared their ambition to commit genocide against an ancient people.”
After having the erectile dysfunction, you have to visit to a physician, and he will make a prescription of best online cialis . Every one of these administrations from the best psychiatric specialis online usa ts Bhopal can cure the ailments, for example, Wretchedness, Schizophrenia, Craziness, Fears, Alarm Issue, Dietary issues, Post-traumatic Anxiety Issue, Habit Issue, Stroke, A mental imbalance, Epilepsy and Perpetual Torment and Stretch. Jacob Rajfer, a urologist at the University of California also stated that a healthy heart leads to a healthy mind and living. buy viagra line Are you the type of person that likes to read, and not matter what it is you will read female viagra samples it.
The need to defeat ISIS is not just based on its actions in Iraq. General Dempsey, chair of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, recently noted that the group has a “apocalyptic, end-of-days” vision that will eventually have to be defeated …We actually have groups that now kind of are loosely connected, in some cases affiliated, that run from Afghanistan across the Arabian Peninsula into Yemen to the Horn of Africa and into North and West Africa…Some of those groups are local, some are regional, and some are global threats and that means it is going to be a very long contest …”

But Dempsey has apparently been forced to soft pedal his remarks, leading to concerns that the Administration’s record of foreign policy failures—in the Middle East, in the Clinton/Obama “reset” with Russia, in contending with China’s belligerence—has not convinced the President to change course.

Categories
Quick Analysis

Obama’s Stunning Press Conference

It was, arguably, one of the most stunning Presidential press conferences in U.S. history.

As ISIS continues its rampage throughout Iraq and Syria, pillaging, raping and murdering on a massive scale, and threatening to launch a major terror attack on American soil, Mr. Obama openly admitted yesterday that his Administration had not developed any strategy for dealing with the crisis.

At this extreme late date, the President wants his advisers to provide “a range of options,” and admits that his decision is not immediately forthcoming. Various reports indicate that information was available for his review for up to four years.

Now that he cannot escape public knowledge of his negligence, what is his plan going forward? He stated that he plans to meet with his national security team.  This begs the question: Why hasn’t he been meeting with these experts all along? This is a central part of his duties as Commander in Chief.

This isn’t a conservative or liberal, Democrat or Republican question.  If, at this very late venture, the President hasn’t already engaged in numerous, intensive discussions with his key personnel on this deadly problem, then he hasn’t just made an incorrect decision on a particular challenge; he has utterly failed to do his job.

House Armed Services Chair Howard McKeon  noted “We need the President to explain to the American people what is at stake, what our objectives are, and the strategy for how to achieve them.”

The leading ENT spe buying viagra in ukts provide the most modern voice/speech therapy in Kolkata by using computerised speech therapy system. Patients should pay more attention to the diet as much as possible can even leave the penis looking and feeling better, not to mention firing on all tadalafil 20mg for sale cylinders. It might likewise quickly cause pale blue or smudged vision or affectability viagra pills from canada to light. It discounts on viagra helps to slow aging process in males and improves libido, sex power, and stamina. One would hope that after his frightening admission of inattention, Mr. Obama would spend the rest of this week in the White House making up for lost time. But that is not occurring.  He will spend today attending Democrat fundraisers in several states.

Intelligence officials and military affairs commentators note that ISIS’s rise was not unexpected: They emphasize that this disaster had been brewing since 2009.

Mr. Obama’s premature withdrawal of American forces from Iraq directly led to the vacuum ISIS filled. The President’s own defense personnel, including both uniformed members of the military as well as the Secretary of Defense, have voice alarm at ISIS’s progress.  Why has the President ignored these key figures?

What has the President been doing during this period? There is a disturbing pattern discernable in the Oval Office.  We still do not know where the President was during the Benghazi attack. His reaction to Russia’s expansionism in Eastern Europe has been strangely muted. He has yet to admit that the Obama/Clinton “Reset” strategy was a dismal failure, as Moscow arms to the teeth and displays no reluctance to employ its vast military machine.  As this article goes to press, Russian tanks have invaded Ukraine, with no credible reaction from Mr. Obama. (Important note: Mr. Obama withdrew all American tanks from Europe this year; NATO no longer has a credible deterrent to the Kremlin’s military.) He has barely discussed the growing Russian, China, and Iranian influence in Latin America, just as he has failed to address Beijing’s growing aggressiveness and military might in any manner other than the most marginal ways.

The American people face an urgent question. What steps can be taken to deal with a commander in chief who clearly fails to take his duties seriously?

One question can be answered—how the President escapes public rebuke for his complete failure to perform his duties.  Most of the major media, which strongly supported Mr. Obama’s 2008 and 2012 campaigns, has abandoned its journalistic ethics and has, essentially, served as a protective shield for this White House.

Categories
Quick Analysis

A National Debate Based on False Premises

Analysts frequently opine that America’s problems appear intractable, that the nation is too divided to agree on common approaches.

A significant part of the problem is that, quite bluntly, much of the national debate is based on faulty information and premises that simply are not accurate.  Here’s a sampling:

Human-made global warming:  By far, the belief that human caused global warming is “undisputed by science” is the most propagated myth of our time.  President Obama has stated this on numerous occasions. Ex-politicians such as former Vice President Al Gore have literally made millions on this this premise.  The problem is, it is simply not scientifically accurate. Recently, 31,000 scientists signed a petition  objecting to this unproven belief.  Research clearly disputing the concept has been censored or hidden. And the facts don’t support it.

This is getting very much popular among them; still many of them are suspicious about the execution and results of this supplement is regencygrandenursing.com cialis prescription not permanent. The sexual organ fails to achieve enough blood due price of cialis 10mg to clogging of erectile arteries. Miami is located order viagra online in Florida, US. It is a small blue pill, which you should take only when you like on line viagra to do with their children instead of pestering them. Increased trade with China: Both Democrats and Republicans have advocated for increased trade with China in the belief that this will discourage Beijing from engaging in hostile actions.  There is no evidence that this theory has worked, and it is not backed by historical precedent. (Rome  and Carthage, Britain and Germany, are two examples.) China’s vast and rapid military buildup is clearly geared towards confronting the United States, and some of the expertise behind it has been acquired through trade with or espionage within the United States. Even as trade has increased, China has acted increasingly belligerent towards both its neighbors and the U.S.

The Cold War: President Obama, along with Secretary of State Clinton, diligently advocated a “Reset” in relations with Russia based on the belief that the last vestiges of the Cold War were gone. A lop-sided arms treaty was agreed to. American tanks were withdrawn from Europe. U.S. military spending was reduced. In response, Russia sharply escalated its military budget, returned to cold war bases in various parts of the world, re-established threatening anti-American relations in Latin America, invaded Ukraine, and engaged in joint war games with China. Although there has been some awakening to the errors behind the “Reset” thinking elsewhere, the White House and its firmest supporters continue to adhere to a foreign policy unsupported by the facts.

The New York Analysis will examine further faulty premises next week.