Tag: progressives

Categories
Quick Analysis

U.S. Left Follows Familiar Pattern

Judge Kavanaugh, in his rebuttal to Democrat attacks on his nomination, broke convention and cited Democrat goals to essentially overturn the results of the 2016 election. In the unlikely forum of a hearing to rule on a nomination for U.S. Supreme Court, an important threat to Constitutional order was given its greatest exposure.

The U.S. is not alone in this deterioration of democracy.  In Europe, the European Union has  engaged in tactics that replace rule by the people with rule by bureaucrats.

There is an extraordinary move by U.S. leftist elites to functionally ignore and overturn the results of the 2016 presidential election. The hard left, which has attained near-controlling influence over the lion’s share of the media, academia, and the leadership of the Democrat Party has engaged in nearly every conceivable tactic, including violence in the streets, a false sense of hysteria created by the media, attempts by the Ninth Circuit Court to impose unconstitutional restrains on the lawful ability of the President to restrict potentially harmful travel from terrorist-infested lands, and illegal negotiations by out of office pols to conduct foreign affairs as though Obama was still in office.

This is greater than the normal roughhousing by Democrats against Republicans in the U.S. It is a rejection of the concept that the majority, not the elites, have the final say, and in the sanctity of the concept of recognizing the results of the ballot box.

The immediate aftermath of the 2016 presidential voting was violence in the streets, reportedly well-funded by leftist billionaires. That tactic continued into the inauguration itself.  It was followed by attempts by Ninth Circuit judges to unlawfully hamper specific presidential directives on travel, and various moves by Democrat state attorneys general to engage the White House in groundless legal squabbles. Some Democrat-governed city and state governments sought to limit federal jurisdiction in immigration by declaring themselves “sanctuary” areas. The  recommendation of firmer CIA director John Brennan, (who has admitted to voting for a Communist Party candidate for president) to federal employees to disregard the directives of President Trump is perhaps the most troubling and unsettling example of this entire strategy.

A disturbing pattern of Democrat candidates for state attorney general openly campaigned on a platform of attacking the White House, an issue certainly outside of their job description. Sean Maloney, an unsuccessful Democrat primary candidate for New York State Attorney General campaigned, in numerous TV commercials, predominately on a platform of “fighting Trump.”  It’s a reflection of the well-funded effort to offset the 201 election results by any means necessary.
Therefore, it is considered as one of the best herbal anti-aging supplements for males. cialis on line click description Do seek out orden viagra viagra regencygrandenursing.com pharmacies that offer special deals and discounts on the medication. Adequate sleep, healthy eating, giving up smoking will have an immediate impact in enhancing your buy cipla cialis orgasm and eradicating your concerns when it comes to tool size. Oral medications have also been of great help to many. order viagra
This cannot be seen solely as a Democrat vs. Republican issue.  It must be understood as a move by the now hard-left dominated Democrat Party leadership to ignore the principles of the Constitution and the traditions of the American Republican in its bid to gain and keep power.

Obama made no secret of his contempt for the Constitution and the normal functioning of democracy.  His belief that he didn’t “have to wait for Congress,” and his acting on that by  enacting legislation-like executive orders, his signing off on what were, by any standard definition, major foreign treaties without the advice and consent of the Senate, his use of federal agencies to attack political rivals all attest to this. His presidency is over, but his leftist belief that the Constitution was an impediment that could be swept aside when convenient endures.

It follows a pattern that has become all too familiar over the past century in socialist nations.  It is no coincidence that as socialism becomes more mainstream within the Democrat Party, elitist and historically familiar socialist tactics become more common.  Soviet Bolsheviks, German National Socialists (Nazis) Chinese Communists, Cuban revolutionaries, and Venezuelan Chavistas all engaged in a similar timeline.  Allege to represent the poor or downtrodden, turn various segments of society against each other, and ignore democratic practices as a self-serving elite takes the reins of power under the pretense that they know better than the general public how to govern.

American leftists like to portray themselves as being “of the people.” That is clearly nonsense. Their love of high taxes, excessive bureaucracy, their determination to condone massive illegal immigration to dilute voting power, particularly in poor communities, their moves to crush free speech, all point to an elitist mob that will use any excuse, exploit any issue, and exacerbate any situation to gain power.

Photo: U.S. Supreme Court (Supreme Court photo)

Categories
Quick Analysis

Substituting Censorship and Lies for Debate

Eight years of Progressive control of both the White House and the national agenda resulted in economic stagnation, a sharply reduced defense environment, a doubling of debt, and deteriorated race relations.  Despite those poor results, hard-core leftists have managed to increase their influence.

Campaigning on the issues is not a winning tactic for an increasingly Progressive-dominated party. Instead, they and their supporters have, with disturbing frequency, adopted a strategy that combines suppression of alternative ideas, along with personal and inaccurate attacks on both rival politicians and anyone else who opposes their perspectives. Character assassination targets extend far beyond President Trump.

Florida GOP gubernatorial candidate Ron DeSantis and Red Sox baseball star J.D. Martinez provide telling examples.  DeSantis, emphasizing the importance of the issues in his state, urged voters not to “monkey it up.”  According to the Merriam-Webster Dictionary, the similar phrase “monkey around” is defined as “to do things that are not useful or serious: to waste time.”

But DeSantis’s opponents decided that the well-known and oft-use phrase was a racial slur. (His opponent is black.) It was a great way to avoid a discussion of the reality that the radical views expressed by hard-left candidate Andrew Gillum can be readily compared to those which have recently wrecked Venezuela and previously destroyed other nations both politically and economically, and have repeatedly been demonstrated to be a disaster wherever implemented.

An even more startling falsehood was seen in the thoroughly false characterization of the remarks about gun control uttered by Red Sox player J.D. Martinez, an advocate of Second Amendment rights.

Martinez noted, correctly, that the nightmare regime of Adolf Hitler moved to disarm the German population to eliminate the potential of resistance to his unprecedented assault on human rights. The Second Amendment is a target of the Left, but rather than engage in an honest dialogue, they chose to falsely portray Martinez as quoting Hitler in an admiring manner.

Beyond character assassination, suppression of alternative views has become a key tactic.

The moves by Facebook and Google to censor out non-leftist perspectives has increasingly enraged critics, including President Trump.  Google has recently demonstrated its intense progressive leanings by refusing to work with the U.S. Government on defense-related issues, while at the same time cooperating with the Beijing regime in its suppression of dissident views.
In addition to kamagra medicines there are other medications which are responsible viagra generic of ED in a number of guys such as Antiarrhythmics, Histamine H2-receptor antagonists, Muscle relaxants, Chemotherapy drugs etc. At last, of course these remedies are very brand viagra pfizer effective but it must be taken correctly to avoid any unnecessary stress. Researches have shown that ginsenosides in it feature anti-tumor effects which can damage the ovarian cancer cells, cialis 10 mg purchased here prostate cancer cells, lung adenocarcinoma cells, and neurobastoma cells. Intrauterine insemination (IUI) is a process in which both individual and shared goals are identified Promote intimacy by creating a safe space for communication Aid in re-establishing trust after crisis Reconnect clients with positive foundational relationship beliefs Provide support in the deconstruction of old, dysfunctional beliefs and the subsequent embracing of new shared truths Identify and deepen understanding of emotional triggers, ultimately helping generic 10mg cialis to.
Even some Facebook staff have rebelled against this. According to a Daily Mail report Facebook engineer Brian Amerige has described the company’s “political intolerance” and the threats against employees who don’t go along with leftist ideology.

Robert Epstein, writing in U.S. News, states that “Google, Inc., isn’t just the world’s biggest purveyor of information; it is also the world’s biggest censor.  The company maintains at least nine different blacklists that impact our lives, generally without input or authority from any outside advisory group, industry association or government agency. Google is not the only company suppressing content on the internet. Reddit has frequently been accused of banning postings on specific topics, and a recent report suggests that Facebook has been deleting conservative news stories from its newsfeed, a practice that might have a significant effect on public opinion – even on voting. Google, though, is currently the biggest bully on the block.”

A study by PJ media’s Paula Bolyard found that, when searching the term “Trump” on Google, “Not a single right-leaning site appeared on the first page of search results. But it got much, much worse when I analyzed the first 100 items that Google returned in a search for news on ‘Trump.’ CNN, by a wide margin, appeared most frequently, with nearly twice as many results returned as the second-place finisher, The Washington Post. Other left-leaning outlets also fared well, including NBC, CNBC, The Atlantic, and Politico.”

Opportunities for debate on substantive issues have been intentionally sabotaged by Progressives. A National Review article noted that “global-warming public intellectuals have warned the media that if they allow skeptics to have a voice in stories, they will boycott giving comment…no one is obliged to provide them with a platform, much less to appear alongside them to give the misleading impression that there is something substantive to debate.”  This, of course, is comparatively mild compared to the move by Loretta Lynch, while serving as U.S. Attorney General, to refer to the FBI for criminal prosecution consideration those who disagreed with Barack Obama’s views on climate change.

The direction is turning into even more worrisome areas. Despite the overwhelmingly favorable image of leftist candidates portrayed by the media, the mere threat of objective reporting is considered unacceptable by Progressives. New York City’s Alexandra Ocasio-Cortez, the “Democrat-Socialist” candidate for Congress, moved to ban reporters from her townhall meetings.

The Miami Herald reports that a Democrat candidate for State Senate, Daphne Campbell, “ a politician beset by scandals over the years,” called 911 when a reporter sought to question her. According to the Herald, “It wasn’t the first time Campbell called the cops on a reporter. In May, she also called police on the publisher of RISE NEWS outside a Miami Shores Village Council meeting.”

Illustration: Pixabay

Categories
Quick Analysis

Progressives Disdain Differing Ideas and Free Speech

In 1858, Abraham Lincoln famously stated that “A house divided against itself cannot stand.”  In 2016, one side of the political spectrum, the progressive left (which dominates the Democrat Party) has declared a decidedly uncivil war on the majority of the nation’s citizenry.

The most recent incident is Hillary Clinton’s stunning comment that half of rival Donald Trump’s supporters belonged in a “basket of deplorables.” She went on to claim that those who favor the GOP nominee were “racist, sexist, homophobic, xenophobic, Islamaphobic, you name it.”

This was certainly not the first time a leftist candidate has made unfounded, untrue and inappropriate comments about well over half the nation’s voters. In 2011, President Obama, speaking in California, described those who with differed with him as people who “cling to guns or religion or antipathy to people who aren’t like them or anti-immigrant sentiment or anti-trade sentiment as a way to explain their frustrations.”

In the 2016 presidential primaries, several progressive groups sought to physically block access to Trump rallies.

The actions of those in positions of legal authority are frightening. Attorney General Loretta Lynch openly speculated about the possibility of prosecuting those who differed with the President Obama’s perspectives on climate change. A number of state attorneys generals engaged in unethical acts of harassment against think tanks that merely produced data and discussion that contradicted the Progressive mantra on climate change.

New York’s Senator Charles Schumer astoundingly introduced legislation to limit the application of the First Amendment in regards to paid political speech.

Natural aphrodisiacs are being included within this kind of treatment in which fine needles are inserted in specific areas of the http://www.devensec.com/forms/DEC_Charitable_Games_Policy_approved_2014.pdf on line levitra body. Treatment for impotence can either be permanent or short cialis prescription canada term. Things to Keep in Mind Before Taking cialis generic cipla . Buleylu oil reduces dullness of the skin on viagra without rx your male organ. It’s not just those in politics and government who make such statements. Throughout academia, universities have engaged in numerous efforts to exclude moderate and conservative ideas. Students on one campus who sought to merely handout copies of the U.S. Constitution were told they could only do so in scrupulously restricted spaces. Those who respectfully disagree with professors are threatened with poor grades or worse. The repression is not limited to college. Some high school pupils who engaged in the simplest acts of patriotism, such as wearing T-shirts with American flag or other patriotic or non-leftist partisan symbols have been penalized.

A study in the Washington University Political Review   notes:

“…a controversy erupted at Wesleyan University surrounding the college newspaper, The Argus. Students were in an uproar, demanding that the paper’s funding be retracted. The editors issued an apology on the front page of the next edition, agreeing to many of the protestor’s demands, but that still was not enough for the protesters. Calls for The Argus to lose its funding continued. The newspaper’s crime? Having the temerity to publish an editorial critical of the Black Lives Matter movement. The great conservative intellectual William F. Buckley once said, “Liberals claim to want to give a hearing to other views, but then are shocked and offended to discover that there are other views.” Any politically active college student should be familiar with this sentiment. Liberals preach inclusivity and diversity of all kinds, but not the diversity of thought.”

The strident demonization of those who do not kowtow to Progressive orthodoxy goes far beyond mere hysterical rhetoric. Not unlike the extreme socialist regimes whose economic systems they prefer, many progressives seek to actively and forcefully silence and criminalize those with different ideas and beliefs. The examples are profound and significant.

Throughout the Obama Administration, numerous attempts have been made to control free speech. His representatives on the Federal Communications Commission sought to embed “monitors” in newsrooms. Reporters who criticize the Administration have been penalized in various ways.

Now, defeated in his domestic attempts to control contrary opinions, the President has engineered the international control of the internet, an end run around the First Amendment. As this article was being prepared, the U.S. Senate was preparing to convene an urgent meeting to block the surrender of internet control. As reported in the Wall Street Journal  “President Obama wants this to be the last month of an open, uncensored internet guaranteed by the U.S. government. His plan to end American stewardship would hand new power to authoritarian governments offended by the internet as we know it… U.S. protection prevents Moscow, Beijing, Tehran and other authoritarian regimes from meddling. The Obama administration may not be comfortable with American exceptionalism, but the internet fosters free speech and innovation because it was built in the image of the U.S.”

Categories
Quick Analysis

Mayor de Blasio Wants Nationwide Influence, May First Have to Fight Ethics Charges

Why should anyone outside of the Big Apple even remotely care about a scandal involving horses (yes, horses) in New York City?

There is, indeed, a very good reason.  The city’s now beleaguered hard-left mayor, Bill de Blasio, who has sought to take a leadership position in the nationwide progressive movement, is thoroughly emblematic of the venality and hypocrisy of the extremist movement throughout the United States.

Mayor de Blasio has a personal history that is rather stunning, but apparently acceptable to his Progressive supporters.  At a time when the Soviet Union was, thanks to the Sandinista regime,  using Nicaragua as an anti-American forward base for its military, de Blasio was an ardent supporter of the Sandinistas. He violated federal law by spending his honeymoon in Cuba. How bad was the Sandinista regime so beloved by de Blasio?  Judicial Watch notes that “By 1983 there were about 20,000 political prisoners held in the Marxist regime’s jails, the highest number of political prisoners of any nation in the hemisphere with the exception of Fidel Castro’s communist Cuba.” A New York Times review quotes de Blasio as being an “advocate of democratic socialism.”

The central goal of the Progressive Movement is the centralization of power in a national government which they lead. Like extremist movements everywhere, they believe the ends justify the means. To amass power, they play the system, use Trojan horse issues, and ignore ethical rules.

During his 2013 campaign for Mayor, de Blasio weirdly decided to make an issue of the use of the famous horse-drawn carriages in and around Central Park, seeking to end the tradition so popular with tourist and locals alike.  He alleged that he was concerned with the welfare of the horses, but the argument was unconvincing, at best.  It was later discovered that a substantial donor wanted the land the horse stable was located on, but the owner wouldn’t sell. The Mayor then suggested using taxpayer dollars to build a new stable in Central Park. The animal rights group involved has now been subpoenaed.

The Mayor, according to reports, engaged in other similar schemes, masked by supposedly progressive causes, as a way gaining donations. Rather than go to further social causes, the funds were instead routed to like-minded progressive candidates.
Exercising regularly:- It is one of the buy viagra without consultation http://www.icks.org/html/04_publication.php?cate=FALL%2FWINTER+2004 best techniques for accomplishing otherworldly existence and illuminating the brain. But in the vast majority of http://icks.org/n/data/ijks/2019-2.pdf levitra 60 mg cases, it might be related to some medical causes such as hormonal problems, injury or side effects of some drugs. It is buy viagra sale also available in 100mg strength and enables men to attain and maintain powerful erections. This is done by pulling the ankle joint and maintain viagra cheap canada the amount of surface area to weight ratio.
Interestingly enough, it is Progressives who constantly advocate for tough campaign finance rules, but only when it applies to their opponents.  For decades, left-leaning organizations, many financed by public dollars, have funneled funds and assistance to candidates. However, should anyone on the opposing side do the same, excuses are found to restrict them. That is the reason Progressives have opposed the Citizens United decision so bitterly.

According to the New York Post the state Board of Elections has accused de Blasio of “willful and flagrant” violations of campaign finance laws,” the very same type of laws Progressives advocate to keep money out of politics (except, of course, dollars from left wing groups,  supportive unions, etc.)

Progressives are quick to criticize contributions from the Koch brothers, but turn a blind eye towards the enormous cash funneled from billionaires such as George Soros, (who has a highly questionable reputation) and Tom Speyer. De Blasio’s recent fundraiser for Hillary Clinton (He served as Clinton’s campaign manager for U.S. Senate) was composed, notes the NY Daily News of a “a who’s who of top lobbyists” who “served on the host committee of Bill de Blasio’s $1 million fund-raiser with Hillary Clinton.”

In addition to taking jobs away from carriage drivers and funding leftist candidates, de Blasio’s other passion apparently is criticizing cops. His verbal attacks on his own city’s police force, which most believe to be the most professional and unbiased in the nation, has been so severe that at one point officers mounted a work slow down of nonemergency activities in response. A National Review study notes that “public safety remains at risk from an activist mayor who sees his base as the anti-police Left.”

True to Progressive tactics, de Blasio has sought taxpayer funding for his partisan national political crusades using a variety of unconvincing excuses. Wherever you live in the USA, Mayor de Blasio, friend of the Castros and Sandinistas, wants to influence your local government.

Categories
Quick Analysis

America’s Great Divide

Two completely different philosophies of government are dividing the U.S. population. More serious than any mere difference over a single issue, the chasm represents wholly divergent views on the rights of individuals and the powers of federal, state and local authorities.

Since the dawn of the American Republic, there has been a fairly consistent understanding of what government is supposed to do. Washington handles foreign relations, protects the nation from enemies abroad, settles disputes between the states, protects the liberties enumerated in the Bill of Rights (and later amendments), administers federal courts, patrols the borders, delivers the mail, opens up new frontiers and provides major interstate transportation infrastructure. States and localities are tasked with protecting residents from crime, maintaining sanitary and safety conditions, providing local transportation, educating the young, and providing a legal system to peacefully settling local disputes.

There have been relatively moderate additions to those duties. Programs such as Social Security, Medicare, and Medicaid gave the government more direct interaction with individuals. States and cities provided financial and other assistance to those in need. But the guiding principles of the ninth and tenth Amendments within the Bill of Rights remained intact:

Ninth Amendment: The enumeration in the Constitution, of certain rights, shall not be construed to deny or disparage others retained by the people.

Tenth Amendment: The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people.

In the view of progressives, however, the 9th and 10th Amendment limitations on government’s rights and duties are anachronisms to be largely ignored, as are the separation of powers and the distinction between the federal government’s role and that of more local jurisdictions.

Progressives choose to de-emphasize traditional duties and limitations on government, and replace them with different responsibilities. They advocate reduced funding for defense on the national level and crime fighting on the local level and shifting those dollars to what have been called “nanny state” priorities.

Some of those new priorities have been the subject of ridicule. While mayor of NYC, Michael Bloomberg cut the size of the police department, and advocated cutting the size of the fire department. He focused on regulating what size soda could be purchased, and the salt intake of his constituents.

Others have created extraordinary controversy. The use of the Common Core curriculum to enhance federal oversight of education and politicize curriculum has been contentious. Federal interference into what was once a local responsibility extends even to what food items may be placed on school menus.

The most controversial, of course, was the enactment of Obamacare. While its progressive advocates likened it to programs such as social security, its opponents noted that its lengthy list of bureaucratic interactions with the patient-physician relationship render it an extraordinary and inappropriate increase in federal power.

Paul Joseph Warson, writing for Infowars in 2012   stated that “The nanny state is no longer just on steroids, it has turned into the Incredible Hulk as collectivism, pernicious bureaucracy, regulation, mass surveillance and outright tyranny runs wild across the country.”

He provided a number of examples. Among them:

– Parents across the country are being arrested for letting their children play outside.

–a man was found guilty and sentenced to spend 30 days in jail for collecting rainwater in three “illegal reservoirs” despite the fact that they are on his property.
The therapist must be informed of medical history, so that he/she can prescribe the best regiment to fight tadalafil canadian impotence. The capsule is requiring ingesting with facilitation of water in order to correct getting viagra in australia digestion in the bloodstream. Typically, 10 water balls contain 150 mg of respitecaresa.org viagra online citrulline, which is adequate enough to combat problems of blood flow and erection disorders in men. Habit of Alcohol, Smoking and other Drugs used to respitecaresa.org sildenafil cheapest treat ED.
– Last year, a Michigan resident faced jail time for the crime of growing a “vegetable garden in front yard space.”

– Americans are being harassed by utility workers who are trespassing on private property and forcibly trying to install “smart” energy meters which spy on homeowners.

– Cities are passing ordinances that makes recycling compulsory

– The TSA has expanded its grope-down checkpoints beyond the airports to highways, political events and even school prom nights.

– The TSA is kicking Americans off flights for having a “bad attitude” and refusing to obey bizarre orders quickly enough.

– A teenager was recently visited by FBI special agents who grilled him over the content of a political You Tube video.

– The EPA is using spy drones to monitor farms as police use Predator drones to hunt down Americans for the crime of allowing cows to wander onto their land.

– Students in schools across the country are being indoctrinated to accept their treatment as prisoners on parole by being forced to wear RFID tracking chips.

– Veterans across the country are being declared “mentally defective” on a whim by the state and having their firearms seized.

– The federal government is officially backing Al-Qaeda fighters in Syria while declaring conservative Americans to be extremists and terrorists if they are “reverent of individual liberty.”

The dramatic increase in the size of existing programs is also indicative of the shift in governmental emphasis from basic services to a social-welfare nanny state. The Fiscal Times has noted that “everyone is aware of SNAP (food stamps), the mother of all food handouts, where over 47.8 million people participate at an annual cost of $81 billion. But awareness of the sprawling array of other government food programs is another eye opener. WIC, for example, the Women, Infants and Children Food and Nutrition Service, started small in 1968 to help poor and undernourished mothers-to-be. It now covers 53 percent of all infants in America at an annual cost of $8.8 billion, and involves 90 state agencies, 1,836 bureaus and 9,000 clinics. This now staggering project is a gateway to many other government-funded entitlement programs, including SNAP. There are, of course, lots of rules and the catalogue of approved foods is mind-boggling. Under WIC, mothers to be can’t buy white potatoes (insufficiently nutritious), imported cheeses or cheese spreads and only 9 types of domestic cheeses are approved. Canned beans are fine, but not if they include pork or frankfurters. Moms may buy a gallon of milk, but only in gallon containers, not two half-gallons.

“The spread of free school lunches—and now free breakfasts– is another story. In 1969, some 2.9 million youngsters received free lunches daily. By 2012, there were 18.7 million free lunches, 68.2 percent of all school lunches. What about free food during summer? No problem thanks to the Seamless Summer Option. Now ALL children can eat free in communities where 50 percent of all children are eligible for free or reduced-cost meals—that’s about two-thirds of all schools with lunch programs. In large part, the 50 percent of lunches that go to apparently ineligible youngsters are given to avoid stigmatizing the eligible.”

The list of individual examples could go on and on. But the key point is the significant growth in the powers of government in untraditional and unconstitutional areas, and the neglect of more appropriate responsibilities.  All this has occurred without any attempt to truly involve the American people in any meaningful discussion or debate.

Categories
Quick Analysis

Totalitarianism on Campus

Universities were designed to be centers for the exploration of knowledge.  Far too many, however, have become little more than indoctrination centers for the so-called “progressive movement,” a shoddy synonym for socialist politics.

The descent of American colleges was first significantly noted in 1987, when author Allan Bloom published his landmark book, “The closing of the American Mind.” He reported that the curriculum rejected rationality and reality.  The situation has since grown worse.

Throughout the nation, professors, students, and guest speakers alike who challenge the leftist orthodoxy are harassed and marginalized.  Insane policies that defy the very foundation of the First Amendment have been enacted to prevent the free exchange of ideas. Political correctness—which in practice can include the rejection of anything that challenges left wing biases—has replaced open discourse.

Clear examples of an increasingly totalitarian bent can be seen in the treatment of teachers and guest lecturers who refuse to kowtow to the Leftist academic establishment.
As per studies, men cannot viagra on line satisfy their partner during their intimate moments. Introduce your baby to recommended new foods with a gap of at least 2 days to super cheap viagra develop their taste and accomplish nutrition requirements. It requires only a few minutes for discount bulk viagra becoming effective in the blood and show wonders for several hours. Of course there are no other restrictions regarding ingestion of cialis levitra online and it is not compulsory to consume the drug after meals.
Former Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice is an extraordinary and fascinating person.  An African American woman who rose to the position of Secretary of State, she is eloquent, brilliant and modest. She also happens to not pander to left wing stereotypes, and therefore the progressive establishment utterly despises her.

Following her invitation to serve as commencement speaker at New Jersey’s Rutgers College, the usual collection of extremists protested vigorously. In a move that symbolizes her integrity, Ms. Rice wrote that  “Commencement should be a time of joyous celebration for the graduates and their families,” and decided not to attend the ceremony.

We need to take a hard look at our universities, which charge continuously skyrocketing tuition fees for the privilege of a four year experience that used to be provided free in Soviet reeducation camps in Siberia.