The New York Analysis of Policy & Government examines the question of what is responsible for the growing verbal and physical violence in U.S. politics.
In the wake of Wednesday’s attack on Republican Congressmen, elected officials of both parties have, appropriately, called for a toning down of the harsh rhetoric. It is, of course, true that extremists exist on both side of the political aisle.
There is a difference, however, in both the intensity and source of the violent rhetoric coming from the left.
The U.S. media generally describes violent language, or the advocacy of violence, by left-wing and progressive organizations as either being spontaneous, or inspired by a specific incident or cause, or coming from the fringes of the movement. That is utterly false.
It is time to have a bluntly honest discussion about the violent and aggressive tone of those in the mainstream of the Democrat Party, their staunch allies in the media, and their supporters in the entertainment industry. Include also those in academia who either tolerate or perpetuate violence on campuses whenever a non-leftist speaker is invited. Add to that the tolerance of violent terrorists such as Bill Ayers within Democrat inner circles. Indeed, the very leadership of the Democrat Party, especially Deputy Chair Keith Ellison, who has strong links to extremists, demonstrates that tolerance, even support, for violence. Tom Perez, the Party chair, has stated: “ Republicans “don’t give a s… about people… Donald Trump, you don’t stand for our values.’ Donald Trump, you didn’t win this election”
The very way many on the left describe themselves—“the Resistance”—gives rise to a self-perception of an aggressive movement that employs violence.
Quotes from James T. Hodgkinson, a staunch Bernie Sanders supporter and the perpetrator of the attempted assassination of Republican Majority Whip Steve Scalise and his Republican Congressional colleagues sound very much like mainstream Democrat comments. (“Trump is a traitor. Trump has destroyed our democracy. It’s time to destroy Trump & Co.”) His influencers are mainstream, as well; they apparently include MSNBC anchor Rachel Maddow. His perspectives are highly partisan. He has written that “We need to vote all Republicans out of Congress.”
Quality of service agreementEven though no health practitioner can guarantee recovery, excellence of service is a different matter. vardenafil online australia Not many people know that it can be cured with the right medicine? Yes, you are right as it can be cured with tadalafil prices cheap herbal remedies. The nerves in lower back are the ordering cialis online most common. This is one disease that men cannot ignore or avoid its treatment as sexual needs and satisfaction is as important viagra generic sildenafil as any other need such as emotional, psychological or mental.
How much longer can the images and rhetoric of violence from the left be ignored? Whether it’s Cathy Griffin holding up a replica bloody, severed head of the President, a New York play that portrays (and seemingly advocates) Trump’s assassination, the Clinton campaign’s overheated rhetoric about her Republican rival, the screaming descriptions of Trump as being someone who will destroy the environment, the very clear message is that the nation—and the world—would be better off if the President were dead.
Before Trump even took the oath of office, calls for his impeachment, accompanied by lurid and nonsensical charges that the President-elect was against women, minorities and the poor raised tempers throughout Washington. That tone continues as investigations are commenced on the flimsiest pretexts and conducted by left-wing partisans.
Kristen Tate, writing for The Hill noted:
“Turn on TV or browse your newsfeeds on social media, and you will be bombarded with polemics about the sky falling and credible threats of violence against conservative figures. The FBI investigated a threat to kill Milo Yiannoupolis for the audacity to want to speak on a college campus. Threats against former Labor Secretary nominee Andy Puzder’s wife caused him to withdraw himself from consideration. Multiple intimidatory remarks haunted members of the Trump-voting Electoral College. President Trump has been the target of declarations of violence on a near daily basis. And yet, when it comes to this constant flow of threats, there seems to be little outrage from the nation’s leading journalists and pundits. Social media shines almost every day with a new dimwitted threat against Trump and his presidency. ‘Comedienne’ Sarah Silverman called for a military coup. Madonna told protesters she ‘thought’ about blowing up the White House.”
There is also violence of the quasi-legal sort, as well. Rulings by Ninth Circuit judges that ignore both the Constitution and federal law in order to hamper the White House, nonsense lawsuits by several state Democrat attorneys general that amount to nothing more than legal harassment are clear examples.
The Report concludes tomorrow