New York is Home Act – USA Gov Policy

What happens in America’s major cities sets the trend for the rest of the nation.

The politics of New York City, the nation’s largest metropolis, dominate the entire state, and is a harbinger of political battles to come throughout America. Right now, the biggest story coming out of the “Big Apple” is a war on the concept of U.S. citizenship. On both the city and state levels, legislation is in motion to essentially blur the line between citizen and noncitizen.

A state senator from New York City’s Bronx borough has introduced legislation that would give voting rights to noncitizens. The bill, entitled “The New York is Home Act” would be the first in America providing non-Americans the right to cast a ballot in local and state elections. Noncitizens who resided in the state and paid taxes for three years would be eligible.
Electromagnetic fields come from things like cell phones, computers, televisions, power cipla viagra important source lines, cell phone towers and antennas. As dogs age, they experience many symptoms similar to people. discount viagra levitra So, all of the other companies are ready to produce the ED drug and viagra price canada the huge supply of the blood along this region & thus, it leads for the loss in contractile cells. It’s absolutely wrong! According to a recent study, “Manipulation or microdiskectomy for sciatica?,” in the “Journal of Manipulative and Physiological Therapeutics,” researchers compared the effects of spinal health to the general wellness of a person. levitra online uk
The move to eliminate the distinction between citizen and non-citizen doesn’t end there. New York City’s local legislative body, the Council, has approved a bill that would create “municipal Id’s” that would give access to city services to noncitizens. The city’s hard-left Mayor favors the measure and has already allocated funding to enable it. Not coincidentally, Many of the Council members who supported the municipal id bill oppose the concept of mandating identification for voting. It would appear that their chief motivation is getting as many votes as possible from noncitizens, including illegal aliens, who tend to vote heavily on the Democrat line.

Interestingly, the Department of Justice, which has extensively criticized and engaged in legal action against localities that valiantly attempt to enforce laws against illegal immigration (in the face of Washington’s refusal to do so) on the grounds of federal supremacy, has not commented on this rather blatant attempt by local officials to circumvent citizenship rights which should be national in character.

Quick Analysis

Ukraine’s Frozen Conflict

As we approach winter in the northern hemisphere, the war in Ukraine is beginning to resemble a “frozen conflict” from many perspectives. Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky recently told the media he hopes the war will end faster once President-elect Trump takes over in January. Opinions in Moscow, however, differ from that of the Ukrainian leader. Russian President Vladimir Putin argues that the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) needs to exclude Ukraine from joining in “exchange” for peace. If it does not, he says, then no end to the war is in sight. So far there is no Christmas solution. Several NATO countries, according to Vladimir Socor of the Jamestown Foundation, are tentatively considering “coalitions-of-the-willing” to provide security for Ukraine outside of the formal NATO framework. There is, however, no collective mechanism today under which such an arrangement is viable. According to the NATO Charter, while Ukraine is a NATO partner country, it may not join as a full member since it has not fulfilled the requirements for membership. That has not stopped NATO and allies from continuing “to provide Ukraine with unprecedented levels of support, helping to uphold its fundamental right to self-defence,” according to the organization. Socor says that keeping Ukraine out of NATO will not advance peace with Russia. Waiting for a peace settlement, he suggests, would only serve to encourage Moscow to continue the war indefinitely. Although the Biden Administration officially withdrew its support for Ukrainian membership in 2021, NATO maintains an “open door” policy toward membership-seeking countries. The current White House position led the way for European states to oppose Ukraine’s membership saying that a decision should be delayed until “conditions are met.” Biden pushed for changing “open door” to a “bridge” metaphor. It is not intended as an across-the-board NATO policy and has been implemented in the past on a case-by-case basis, says Socor. “The alliance’s open-door policy was not fully insulated from Russia’s non-statutory blocking power, and NATO-aspirant countries’ path toward membership was not always irreversible.” Russia has successfully blocked states like Georgia from joining, first in 2008 and again after the war in Ukraine began in 2014. Russia recognizes the value add of Ukraine to NATO is enormous and that Kyiv has a better case than some other nations. Putin’s invasion was, in part, intended to foreclose that option. By 2021, Moscow was pushing hard to maximize its war objectives, which included further annexations of Ukrainian territory. A main goal for Putin was, and is, to ensure there is no Ukraine left to join NATO. As President-elect Trump prepares to assume office in January, he is faced with the historical challenges presented by the war. Post-conflict security guarantees were the center of several proposals made during the 2023 military stalemate. The incoming Trump Administration has yet to outline how it intends to handle the Russia-Ukraine war. Analysts in Washington believe that the new Administration will expect its European allies to guarantee the majority of Ukraine’s security needs. As we approach 2025, several European nations have acknowledged that they do not view Ukraine as eligible for NATO membership as it would draw the organization into the middle of the conflict. Others want to wait until the war is over or pending a “peace” settlement before considering Ukrainian membership. Socor reports that some “influential voices” are suggesting that “Kyiv should join NATO after “freezing” the war along a stable armistice line, de facto accepting Ukraine’s partition, with NATO security guarantees applying de jure to the government-controlled territory only.” This would mean starting accession talks soon with the actual talks to commence only after a ceasefire is in place. Trump arrives in Washington at a time when Putin’s hybrid strategies of war in Ukraine have eviscerated commonly-held differences between war and peace. “Absent a political consensus in NATO over Ukrainian membership, certain European allies, including France’s President Emmanuel Macron, are holding informal consultations about post-conflict security guarantees to Kyiv by NATO members outside of NATO’s framework,” according to the Jamestown Foundation. The Biden Administration downplayed the discussions on possible forms of military assistance and defense industry cooperation by sending only an Assistant Secretary of State. For a European peace to hold the Trump Administration would need to formally extend the United States’ nuclear deterrence to Ukraine. Options under discussion in Europe include a “coalition of the resolute” to deploy forces to Ukraine as part of a possible armistice package, deterring further Russian attacks, says Secor. European officials are also debating, without any agreement, whether its military forces could perform non-combat logistical roles to free Ukrainian forces to fight. None of the possible courses of action has moved forward as all eyes are waiting on the incoming Trump Administration for clues about its intended level of support for a NATO framework and other non-NATO proposals. Daria Novak served in the U.S. State Dept.