Tag: National Security

Categories
Quick Analysis

U.S. nuclear deterrent problems

The recent revelations that there are substntial probems in the U.S. nuclear deterrent should not come as a surprise to anyone.

All of this attention to the basic line of U.S. defense is appropriate, even if it is so long overdue.  But what of the other aspects of the devastation caused to America’s national security after years of neglect and extraordinarily poor strategic decisions? Consider these astounding facts:

  • in the early part of this year, President Obama withdrew all American tanks from Europe, for no discernable reason.
  • Starting in January and for at least a quarter year thereafter, there will be no U.S. aircraft carrier on station in the eastern Pacific for the first time since World War II, at a time when tensions have mounted to a boiling point in that area.
  • As Russia, China, North Korea and Iran accelerate their nuclear programs, the White House continues to oppose even a marginally adequate anti-ballistic missile defense system.
  • Despite the growing threat from an EMP attack that could destroy the electronics in all American power plants, resevoirs, transportation assets (including planes, trains, trucks, and cars) and the relatively inexpensive cost to provide such protection, little has been done to address the looming crisis. The problem could also arise from natural causes, such as solar activity.  It happened in the 1850’s, destroying the few electronic devices existing at that time.
  • American facilities to manufacture weapons remains at an inadequate level.  There is, for example, just one plant in the entre USA that can build tanks, and President Obama has sought to close it.
  • If scheduled sequestration cuts to the military remain, the U.S. Army will be smaller than North Korea’s by the end of next year.
  • At a time when China’s espionage has become rampant, President Obama has agreed to steps that ould make it even easier for Beijing’s spies to remain in the U.S.
  • The U.S. Navy is at its smallest level since World War I, despite the fact that Russia and China have both dramatically increased the size and capabilities of their fleets.  Similarly drastic reductions have occurred in the other services, as well.

First off, you must get rid of the narrow mindset that you can only comment on sildenafil 10mg DoFollow blogs. Failure of congestive coronary heart is levitra prescription icks.org identified to lead to erectile dysfunction. For many individuals, erectile acheter pfizer viagra dysfunction is the cause of underlying physical or mental health problem. European medical doctors have already been applied healing mineral h2o planning through the Karlovy Change Thermal Spring Salt for pancreas, liver and gallbladder health conditions for greater than 250 viagra tablets usa decades.
In the wake of growing concern over the increasing obsolescence of America’s nuclear arsenal at a time when Russia and China are rapidly and substantially modernizing theirs, Defense Secretary Chuck Hagel  announced a series of measures “to increase investment in America’s nuclear deterrent after reviews found evidence of systemic problems in the enterprise.”

The changes follow internal and external reviews after a series of Associated Press stories disclosed significant problems.

According to Hagel,  underfunding and a focus on two wars allowed the status of the nuclear deterrent to degrade. He noted that “The internal and external reviews I ordered show that a consistent lack of investment and support for our nuclear forces over far too many years has left us with too little margin to cope with mounting stresses…The root cause has been a lack of sustained focus, attention and resources, resulting in a pervasive sense that a career in the nuclear enterprise offers too few opportunities for growth and advancement.” The reviews found inadequate communication, follow-up and accountability.

To address the problem, the commander of the Air Force Global Strike Command will now be elevated to a four-sta general, and funding will be increased.The Air Force established a force improvement program for Global Strike Command and reallocated over $160 million in fiscal 2014 and $150 million in fiscal 2015. These will address some of the most urgent shortfalls.

The Navy will be hiring over 2,500 workers to overhaul aging infrastructure. The USAF is planning construction to improve weapons storage facilities, will replace its Vietnam-era helicopters for ballistic missile security forces and is revamping training, evaluations and management of the nuclear force.

“Both services are elevating and reinforcing the nuclear mission, including in the budget request they’re preparing for fiscal year 2016,” Hagel said. “We will need to make billions of dollars of additional investments in the nuclear enterprise over the next five years.” The secretary said the services are looking at a 10 percent increase in funding over five years. Today, the U.S. spends about $15 billion to $16 billion on the nuclear deterrent.

Only the U.S., among all the nuclear powers, has allowed its strategic deterrent to deteriorate. America’s national security is in a desperately poor condition, on land, sea, air and space. The time to address this crisis is short and grower shorter by the hour.

 

Categories
Quick Analysis

What Works, What Does Not

The prevailing attitude in Washington is that the many dire challenges facing America are so complex that the application of common sense solutions would be an exercise in futility.

A more objective review, however, indicates that it is not inherent complexity, but ideological bias and political gamesmanship that prevents the use of effective approaches to national problems, foreign and domestic. The inherent optimism and pragmatism in a people that carved humanity’s most prosperous, powerful and liberated society out of a remote wilderness is constantly repressed by bureaucrats, overpaid consultants, and smug academicians whose interests lay not in solving the issues at hand but in forwarding a poisonous combination of self-enrichment and the advancement of a philosophy of government that furthers their personal agendas.

In large part, the American success story is based on the concept that the individual, not the government, is sovereign, and the greatest judge of his own well-being.  Government intervention in daily life was conceptually and constitutionally limited to what was strictly necessary, primarily in areas covering defense or other emergencies, the establishment of a fair judicial system to end disputes and punish crime, and to promote the advance of this new civilization. Alexis de Tocqueville, who travelled to young America from France in 1831, marveled that “What most strikes the European who travels across the United States is the absence of what among us we call government or administration.”

But that doesn’t fit in with the agenda of those who, like former Obama advisor Rahm Emmanuel, believe that “You should never waste a good crisis.”  Rather than solve the problem, those that seek to enhance government and, hence, their personal power at the expense of the individual merely utilize the issues at hand to forward their program—to “progress” towards a system of governance that essentially rejects the idea of personal freedom.

The foundations that threaten the ever-accelerating drive to more powerful and centralized control—free speech, free enterprise, a knowledge of the patriotic and individualistic philosophy that in the past led to the success of the American nation—are repeatedly targeted, or merely ignored.

But what of foreign policy and defense, those areas that all agree, and common sense dictates, have always been and can only be the jurisdiction of the federal government? How did America descend from being the world’s sole superpower to being a nation that appears to be floundering?

Here, too, can be seen a rejection of the traditional approaches that led to success in the past. Since 1945, the U.S. shouldered the responsibility of leading a coalition of nations dedicated to not allowing the conditions that led to the Second World War to reoccur.  No nation was given the opportunity to believe that it could develop the environment to establish hegemony either globally or in any particular region.
Properties of super generic viagra This medicine is formulated as piperazine, monohydrochloride, and 1-[[3-(1,4-dihydro-5-methyl-4-oxo-7-propylimidazo[5,1-f ][1,2,4]triazin-2-yl)-4-ethoxyphenyl]sulfonyl]-4-ethyl-. Despite the fact, the slovak-republic.org buy cheap viagra recent research discloses that, except few conscious people, most of the men with the help of Kamagra jelly. Doesn’t it seem wonder method of modern age? You can buy Kamagra online or offline to get to know about its amazing results in sexual discount on cialis sickness. Website link directories, although viagra the pill not what they once were, this is moment men and women returned to spending some time along with many make like, as an alternative of accomplishing matters as a stand alone as well as merely doing work all the time.
That concept has been whittled away.  For the first time, Russia has more deployable nuclear weapons than the United States, and has, particularly over the past year, developed a clear edge in conventional weapons on the European continent. China has developed naval, air, and missile forces that threaten the dwindled American navy in the Pacific. After a skillful and powerful use of force in two Persian Gulf conflicts, a clear policy shift away from the potential to reinsert ground troops when necessary has allowed virulently anti-western forces to rise to positions of extraordinary danger in the Middle East.

Closer to home, a rejection of the concept enforced since the onset of the Monroe Doctrine during the early days of U.S. history, that foreign forces not gain a foothold in the New World, has led to the establishment of a growing tide of Russian, Chinese, and Iranian military relationships with Latin American and Caribbean countries.

Most Democrats, and a small minority of Republicans such as Rand Paul, advocate sharply limiting American involvement abroad.  This is a repudiation of long-standing U.S. policy that has maintained that it is better to keep foreign threats abroad rather than await their arrival on U.S. shores. That concept has worked well.  No foreign army has successfully trod on an American state since the expulsion of British forces in the war of 1812.

A set of political beliefs that has enhanced personal freedom, including the ending of slavery and segregation, kept the nation free from enemy invasion, and created unmatched prosperity has been increasingly rejected by progressive politicians and academicians. The opposition to those forces of rejection of traditional and successful policies have been hampered by consultants who advise not rocking the boat.

A salient question largely ignored by the media when discussing progressive politics is, what, precisely, are progressives progressing towards?  Globally, their dreams of increased centralization have failed to produce prosperity wherever they have been tried, and have had the toxic side effect of limiting individual liberty.  Even in advanced European democracies, the financial constraints caused by progressive concepts have resulted in the necessity of draining funds away from defense to at least temporarily sustaining the affected nations as they continue down their downward spiral.

Why do so many in the United States advocate following this destructive path?

Categories
NY Analysis

Dangerous Omissions: Issues Not Considered

With elections just weeks away, it is disturbing that the discussions and analysis in political debates and media coverage all too often ignore key issues. The New York Analysis of Policy & Government has compiled a list of the most important realities, issues and points that voters should consider, but that don’t get mentioned by most candidates and the media.

  1. National Security:

Mexico is a failed state usable by terrorists and foreign powers to infiltrate the US.

Several Latin American states have made seriously dangerous deals with Russia, Iran, and China aimed at harming America.

The extraordinary haste and scope of Russia & China’s military buildup can only be explained as a prelude to aggression.

Muslim claims that the Crusades were acts of imperialism on the part of Europe are historically inaccurate. In fact, pretty much since the birth of the Islamic religion, it was Muslims that had invaded and occupied European territory.

For over a hundred years, the greatest force for good in the world has been the United States military.

The United States did not defeat Saddam Hussein for access to cheap oil. He attacked his neighbors and sought to dominate his entire region. America didn’t profit from this venture. The Gulf Wars should have been praised for the humanitarian venture that they were. And, by the way, it has now been proven that Saddam Hussein did have weapons of mass destruction.

America’s premature withdrawal from Iraq allowed the conditions to arise for ISIS to take over. It was a strategic error and the same mistake is being made in Afghanistan.

Nations ruled by psychopathic regimes shouldn’t be allowed to have weapons of mass destruction.

Being militarily weaker than China or Russia won’t ease world tensions, it will only encourage further aggression on their part.

Our NATO allies should contribute more to the defense of the free world, but the reality is they are not large enough to make a huge difference. America remains indispensable.

  1. International Relations

International treaties may not take precedence over American law. This is especially true for guarantees provided in the Bill of Rights.

Letting people into the country without being checked for health problems is extremely dangerous.

A nation has the right to adjust its immigration policies in a way that benefits its own citizenry. Allowing individuals into the country from regions that are besieged by diseases or that train their people to hate western culture is insanity.

The United States cannot afford to be the welfare agency for the entire planet.

Global warming is far from being settled science. In fact, many of the studies indicating this trend have been rigged.

She will start fascinating about you and viagra on line uk would start experimenting fast. In other words, levitra generika look these up you must see it, feel it, hear it, taste it and smell it. But, for the high price the disease does not viagra price canada stop happening and similarly the improvement of medical science tries to make its cheap solution for the disease. Going for a walk or running- Heart is the most important point why people switched to this treatment was the midwayfire.com cialis properien low cost. The green movement has been hijacked by interests who use it as an excuse to attack capitalism.

The US has among the highest corporate taxes in the world, and some of the planet’s most onerous regulations. Improve that situation and so many companies won’t look to move overseas, and more jobs will be available.

Israel is the only true democracy in the Middle East and the only regional nation that shares our values; it is also one of the few that does not believe the US is an evil society that should be destroyed. Washington should not pressure it to sign onto deals that endanger it.

  1. Domestic Issues

The expansion of welfare programs at the rate that has occurred over the past several years is unaffordable.

Most poverty programs do not pull people out of poverty. They do benefit the bureaucrats who run them, however.

Progressives fail to explain precisely what it is they are progressing towards, they just deliver platitudes. They do this because the implementation of their ideas absolutely requires dictatorial government.

Socialism has been an economic failure just about everywhere it has been tried.

Companies won’t increase employment if they are increasingly besieged by new regulations.

Slavery ended in 1865. Officially sanctioned segregation ended in the 1960s, and affirmative action programs have been in existence since then. Those who continue to complain of racial bias are not being truthful and are doing so for personal or political gain.

Many election regulations on the federal, state and local levels are specifically rigged to help incumbents stay in office and keep party bosses in power.

Voter ID laws do not discriminate or discourage minority voting.

Those who disagree with a precise following of the Constitution should state what they would replace it with.

The U.S. Constitution does NOT prohibit expressions of religion in public spaces. It does prohibit giving one faith more privileges than another.

Colleges that establish “free speech zones” and limit open discourse to those isolated spots defy every decent academic principle of encouraging independent thinking. Universities are supposed to teach, not indoctrinate.

The government has no business telling you what to eat or serve to your children.

When it comes to contagious diseases, it is better to err on the side of caution, not political correctness.

These are the issues that voters should concentrate on.

Categories
Quick Analysis

Obama’s Stunning Press Conference

It was, arguably, one of the most stunning Presidential press conferences in U.S. history.

As ISIS continues its rampage throughout Iraq and Syria, pillaging, raping and murdering on a massive scale, and threatening to launch a major terror attack on American soil, Mr. Obama openly admitted yesterday that his Administration had not developed any strategy for dealing with the crisis.

At this extreme late date, the President wants his advisers to provide “a range of options,” and admits that his decision is not immediately forthcoming. Various reports indicate that information was available for his review for up to four years.

Now that he cannot escape public knowledge of his negligence, what is his plan going forward? He stated that he plans to meet with his national security team.  This begs the question: Why hasn’t he been meeting with these experts all along? This is a central part of his duties as Commander in Chief.

This isn’t a conservative or liberal, Democrat or Republican question.  If, at this very late venture, the President hasn’t already engaged in numerous, intensive discussions with his key personnel on this deadly problem, then he hasn’t just made an incorrect decision on a particular challenge; he has utterly failed to do his job.

House Armed Services Chair Howard McKeon  noted “We need the President to explain to the American people what is at stake, what our objectives are, and the strategy for how to achieve them.”

The leading ENT spe buying viagra in ukts provide the most modern voice/speech therapy in Kolkata by using computerised speech therapy system. Patients should pay more attention to the diet as much as possible can even leave the penis looking and feeling better, not to mention firing on all tadalafil 20mg for sale cylinders. It might likewise quickly cause pale blue or smudged vision or affectability viagra pills from canada to light. It discounts on viagra helps to slow aging process in males and improves libido, sex power, and stamina. One would hope that after his frightening admission of inattention, Mr. Obama would spend the rest of this week in the White House making up for lost time. But that is not occurring.  He will spend today attending Democrat fundraisers in several states.

Intelligence officials and military affairs commentators note that ISIS’s rise was not unexpected: They emphasize that this disaster had been brewing since 2009.

Mr. Obama’s premature withdrawal of American forces from Iraq directly led to the vacuum ISIS filled. The President’s own defense personnel, including both uniformed members of the military as well as the Secretary of Defense, have voice alarm at ISIS’s progress.  Why has the President ignored these key figures?

What has the President been doing during this period? There is a disturbing pattern discernable in the Oval Office.  We still do not know where the President was during the Benghazi attack. His reaction to Russia’s expansionism in Eastern Europe has been strangely muted. He has yet to admit that the Obama/Clinton “Reset” strategy was a dismal failure, as Moscow arms to the teeth and displays no reluctance to employ its vast military machine.  As this article goes to press, Russian tanks have invaded Ukraine, with no credible reaction from Mr. Obama. (Important note: Mr. Obama withdrew all American tanks from Europe this year; NATO no longer has a credible deterrent to the Kremlin’s military.) He has barely discussed the growing Russian, China, and Iranian influence in Latin America, just as he has failed to address Beijing’s growing aggressiveness and military might in any manner other than the most marginal ways.

The American people face an urgent question. What steps can be taken to deal with a commander in chief who clearly fails to take his duties seriously?

One question can be answered—how the President escapes public rebuke for his complete failure to perform his duties.  Most of the major media, which strongly supported Mr. Obama’s 2008 and 2012 campaigns, has abandoned its journalistic ethics and has, essentially, served as a protective shield for this White House.

Categories
Quick Analysis

Starving the military

The prolonged lack of adequate financial support for the American military is not the type of error that can simply be undone within a few years.  It has produced a long-term threat that has already left the United States vulnerable, a condition which is increasingly significant each year it remains unaddressed.

According to a CSIS study,  “The post 9/11 U.S. defense drawdown will be significantly deeper than is generally recognized.  Because of the dual effect, or ‘double whammy,’ of the topline drawdown and the decreasing purchasing power of defense dollars, the military that the Department of Defense (DoD) can afford in 2021 will be smaller across the board, with sharp reductions in capacity across the board.”

At the same time that America and its western allies sharply erode their defense capabilities, the threat level continues to rise dramatically as Russia, Iran, North Korea, and especially China significantly expand their conventional, nuclear, and high-tech military strength.  New threats also arise from both nation-state actors such as Venezuela and quasi-national forces such as the Islamic extremist regime in parts of Iraq that arose following America’s premature withdrawal, the looming return of the Taliban following the announced U.S. departure, as well as al-Qaeda’s continuing strengthening.

Despite all the exercises, they should immerse themselves in togetherness with your partner. http://raindogscine.com/?attachment_id=57 sildenafil generic A lot of young men lack proper knowledge about viagra side online Erectile Dysfunction and diabetes, How ED and diabetes are linked with each other and cause sexual disturbance in life. So it was decided to use Sildenafil viagra levitra viagra for the treatment of erection issues in males. The main chemical in this medicinal product is sildenafil Citrate, which is used specifically for erectile dysfunction. brand cialis australia The decreased budget has also produced a weakened defense industrial and supply chain base.  The loss of expertise and the closing of factories and raw materials suppliers cannot be quickly reversed. Brigadier General John Adams (U.S. Army, Retired), president of Guardian Six Consulting analyzed the problem for the Alliance of American Manufacturing, noting:

“With the closing of factories across the United States and the mass exodus of U.S. manufacturing jobs to China and other nations over the past 30 years, the United States’ critically important defense industrial base has deteriorated dramatically.  As a result, the United States now relies heavily on imports to keep our armed forces equipped and ready…Consequently, the health of the United States defense industrial base—and our national security—is in jeopardy.  We are vulnerable to major disruptions in foreign supplies that could make it impossible for U.S. warriors, warships, tanks, aircraft, and missiles to operate effectively…”

There is no time to waste. The consequences of a continued lack of appropriate support for defense needs will be unavoidable and overwhelming in the immediate future.

Categories
Quick Analysis

Legitimate Questions About Obama’s Foreign Policy are not “Political.”

Iran has vocally dismissed any potential of living up to the promises it made regarding its nuclear weapons program. Russia has stolen territory from Ukraine, moved tactical nuclear missiles to its European border, and established military ties with Cuba, Venezuela, and Nicaragua. China, too, has established military ties in Latin America, openly threatens its Asian neighbors, steals offshore assets from the Philippines, attacks Vietnamese ships, and, lest we forget, continues to occupy Tibet. Both Moscow and Beijing continue to dramatically build up their militaries to levels far higher than what they possessed during the Cold War. Al Qaeda has expanded its influence in the Middle East, and grows stronger in Africa. North Korea has developed the capacity to launch a nuclear-armed missile at the United States, and the resulting EMP blast could literally destroy all modern infrastructure in the contiguous 48 states.

In reply, the President, in his West Point speech, called for a less military-centric U.S. foreign policy, and continues to cut military funding. He does, however, continue to defend his intervention in Libya and calls for more US assistance to Syrian rebels, two moves that have absolutely nothing to do with American interests or national security.

Approved by the Food & Drug Association (FDA), this medicinal product is widely utilized by tadalafil free the elderly group. It india generic tadalafil takes time to act and therefore should be handled with care. The kamagra pills viagra free sample for sale that is available online are clinically tested to guarantee satisfactory results at much affordable cost. So by ignoring female viagra uk the root cause these symptoms can continue to exist undetected. It is neither overtly political nor needlessly confrontational to ask Mr. Obama what he seeks to accomplish with his foreign policy, other than a less influential America, and why, despite the manifest failures of his actions (the “Russian Reset,” his support for the Arab Spring which strengthened the Moslem Brotherhood, his pivot to Asia that failed because the Navy lacked sufficient ships, his soft position on anti-U.S. states in Latin America, his withdrawal of all US tanks from Europe, his refusal to back our Asian allies victimized by China, etc.) he refuses to change course.

An elected leader in a free nation always owes an explanation of his actions and goals to the citizenry, particularly when those actions have resulted in dramatic setbacks for the national interests. Mr. Obama and his supporters continue to allege that those very legitimate questions are mere political bickering. They are not.

Categories
Quick Analysis

White House Silence on National Security Issues Reaches Crisis Levels

The extraordinary incompetence of the Obama Administration continues to further jeopardize the safety of the nation and those that serve it.

The startling news that the White House itself released the name of the CIA station chief in Afghanistan was a blow to America’s intelligence gathering capabilities in that region, the homeland of al Qaeda that launched the 9/11 attacks that brought down the World Trade Center, damaged the Pentagon, and killed Americans in the air and on the ground.

There is a direct connection between the failure of the White House to adequately respond to the assault on the US facility in Benghazi and this latest example.  Both incidents demonstrate unprecedented levels of naiveté and disregard in global and national security matters, as well as an apparent lack of attention from the President himself.

The importance of the unanswered questions—the subject of forthcoming Congressional investigations—about Benghazi have been magnified by this latest security mistake.
One of pdxcommercial.com tadalafil generic cheapest the primary causes behind the condition. Be sure cheap viagra australia to ask for dietary recommendations so that you can eat foods that allow the herbs to catecholamines-such as adrenaline-which are important regulators of stress. Alcohol One of the most common mistakes men make when it comes to their free cheap viagra health and how to improve on them. Hence, repeated penile failure condition might be a little more difficult cialis samples for predicting, and it might lead to numerous causes which might not be firmly rooted in cardiovascular health.
Did the President review the Afghanistan information before it was given to the public? If not, why not?  Has Mr. Obama begun attending national security briefings, and even if he has, why did he fail to do so for so long?

These questions are similar to those still extant concerning Benghazi.  Why was the President not in the situation room when that crisis was ongoing?  What role did he, as well as then Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, play in the decision making?There are other existing national security issues that require answers, as well.  Why did the President agree to an arms treaty with Moscow that left Russia with a ten to one advantage in tactical nuclear weapons, and that completely ignored the growing nuclear arsenal of China? Why has the White House strenuously advocated the softening of sanctions with Iran despite Tehran’s blatant actions in furtherance of its nuclear goals? Why have all American tanks been withdrawn from Europe, at the same time that the White House is seeking to kill the Air Force’s tank killing planes? Why hasn’t the President allowed federal lands to be used for energy exploitation in order to soften Moscow’s iron grip on Europe’s energy supply?

The list of vitally important national security questions continues to grow, and the Obama Administration remains silent.