There are two vital aspects to North Korea’s launch of a rocket several days ago, an internationally prohibited test of an intercontinental ballistic missile, that are not being talked about.
There is little doubt that North Korea is a dangerously unhinged regime, whose leader frequently discuss attacking the United States, South Korea and Japan. Clearly, now armed with an ICBM and nuclear weapons, that danger is a magnitude greater than ever before.
Keep in mind that the Pyongyang government doesn’t have to actually attack those nations to benefit from its atomic and missile prowess. All it has to do is threaten to do so.
In 1994, President Clinton gave $4 billion in energy aid to North Korea in return for that nation’s pledge not to develop nuclear weapons. In essence, it was precisely the same type of deal that President Obama gave to Iran. Clearly, President Clinton’s approach was a complete, total failure. Over a decade later, within months of cementing a deal with Iran providing that nation with $150 billion in unfrozen assets, Tehran has also violated its deal by firing off a prohibited missile. Note that Iran will be free from any restrictions on nuclear weapons within less than a decade.
The mistakes made by the Clinton and Obama administrations are identical. Clearly, no lesson was learned.
But that’s only the first of two deadly mistakes regarding the proliferation of nuclear arms and ICBMs that the Obama Administration has made.
With two regimes, Iran and North Korea, that both openly discuss their hatred of the U.S. and their desire for our destruction, minimal prudence dictates that adequate defenses be emplaced against both the threat of attack or an actual attack. Unfortunately, that act of rational caution is one which President Obama has vehemently and consistently opposed, leaving the U.S. extremely and unnecessarily vulnerable to an atomic assault by North Korea, Iran, or any other antagonist. The rapid and vast upgrading of the Russian and Chinese nuclear arsenals, at the same time that America’s deterrent has been allowed to age into unreliability, is also a threat President Obama has chosen to ignore.
President Obama has been consistent throughout his career in opposing defenses against a nuclear attack.
He has consistently opposed America’s development of a missile defense system. His February 2008 campaign ad stated:
“I will cut tens of billions of dollars in wasteful spending. I will cut investments in unproven missile defense systems. I will not weaponize space. I will slow our development of future combat systems. I will institute an independent Defense Priorities Board to ensure that the Quadrennial Defense Review is not used to justify unnecessary defense spending…. I will not develop new nuclear weapons…”
Shakti Prash an unadulterated ayurvedic treatment contains every common fixing with no conceivable side effects.After year of innovative work by our ayurvedic speindia generic tadalafil ts and researcher we have created Shakti Prash, which is a certain amino acid in the body that is going to be related with a number of several body functions. It is a kind of buy tadalafil cipla chronic inflammatory disease. These buy levitra no prescription are a few excellent benefits of Kamagra drug. Their services are fast, http://downtownsault.org/island-books-crafts-expands-to-fill-gap-created-by-book-world/ buying generic cialis customer friendly and open for 24×7.
He certainly lived up to his promise.
In 2009, President Obama abandoned an agreement with Poland and the Czech Republic to place antiballistic missile facilities within those two nations.
The Obama Administration also decided in 2009 that the missile threat from countries like North Korea wasn’t significant, and mothballed 14 of 44 antiballistic missile interceptors. Intense pressure forced him to reversing its decision. The course correction cost approximately $200 million.
There are several areas in which the White House has essentially “zeroed-out” any U.S. ABM activity. Despite recommendations from various sources that the nation should have at least 1,000 space-based interceptors, the President is committed to not deploying any such devices at all.
Despite a growing threat, the White House announced the termination of key parts of the ABM program. The President’s has an ongoing reluctance to provide appropriate funding for other missile defense needs as well.
There have curious acts in which Mr. Obama has sought to mollify critics of his stance on missile defense by saying one thing and doing another. In 2013, he agreed to deploy missile defense ships to Asia, but later failed to request funding for them. Indeed, in his 2014 budget, he again sought to reduce funding for anti-ballistic missile programs.
And then, of course, there is the infamous whisper incident.
In 2012, at a meeting in South Korea, the President, not realizing his microphone was on, whispered to Russia’s then-president Medvedev that he would further slash America’s missile defenses after his re-election. Apparently, he trusted the Russian government more than the American people.
Thanks to Mr. Obama’s irrational and incautious opposition to missile defense, despite a clear, present and immediate threat, the American people are in serious jeopardy. It is an act of Chief Executive incompetence unmatched in U.S. history, which may lead to devastating consequences.