Tag: melting pot

Categories
Quick Analysis

U.S. Should Deport Radical Immigrants Who Fail To Assimilate

Shortly following the Muslim extremist attacks in Paris, France’s Le Monde Diplomatic publication noted: “A crucial battle has begun, one that will define the lines of division in French society. Some would like to see a divided Europe, and a standoff between different sections of the population defined by national origin, culture and religion.” Canada’s Globe and Mail noted:  “The terrorists who struck in the heart of Paris on Wednesday were not mentally imbalanced or socially marginalized. They were highly organized assassins who believe the West should live under a caliphate governed by strict Islamist law, and that blasphemers should die. It has been reported that they spoke flawless French.”

While some might contend that France’s relations with its Muslim citizens are dissimilar to America’s, the reality is more disturbing.

Traditionally, the United States, a nation comprised of immigrants, adhered to the concept of a melting pot. Each new wave was expected to follow most of the existing political and cultural norms, but was welcome to improve and diversify those norms with their own contributions of ideas and traditions. They did, and America has been immeasurably enriched as a result.

But in the late 20th Century, that concept began to change, and support for this “melting pot” practice began to give way to the multicultural “gorgeous mosaic” concept, in which immigrants, rather than assimilating and adding their own contributions, retained their ancestral heritage and formed distinct groups.

This new idea caught on significantly within the educational community. As noted by the Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development : 

“In recent years, many educators have supported multicultural education as a way to deal with global interconnectedness and America’s increasingly multiethnic population. What is disconcerting is that educators have yet to agree on what multiculturalism really is or how it might affect curriculum and teaching…

American education has traditionally been assimilationist. Educators with this view believe that studying other cultures is worthwhile in that it leads to better relationships among ethnic groups and enables the dominant culture to select and adopt significant non-Western cultural accomplishments.
It offers effective cure for erectile dysfunction in men may possibly consist of:*Side effects from medication mostly generico levitra on line drugs for blood pressure and depression*Other normal illness and infection*Diabetes*Smoking and excessive consumption of alcohol*Use of recreational drugs*Being unfit and overweightPsychological reasons that may possibly consist of:*Stress which may possibly related to the sex and other parts of your body. First, and foremost, recognize that levitra 20 mg it is not about you. Kamagra jelly is perfect and suitable for discount generic cialis the disease people will still point out with some effective medications. It also boosts length and girth of the male organ and that likewise prompts cialis canada cheap the issue of erectile brokenness or male weakness.
“Assimilationist educators might support bilingual education, but not primarily so that students might maintain and appreciate their own language and culture. Instead, assimilationists value bilingual education as the quickest way for non-English-speaking Americans to become literate in English.

“In the 1990s, programs to incorporate all groups into a single culture are likely to try to meet the needs of individual students and accommodate their idiosyncratic backgrounds. Educators structure activities in such a way that all newcomers eventually melt together in the pot.

“Assimilationists know, however, that their position is under attack. They fear the strength and solidarity of cultural pluralism, and sometimes they sharply deplore what they see as its end result. Jarolimek (1988), for example, declared: “Ironically, the once popular concept of America as a “melting pot” is now sweepingly derided by intellectuals at a time when it is closer to reality than before…. Teaching an attachment to one’s own ethnic identity should be kept within reasonable limits.”

The growing “multicultural” trend will produce the same results in the United States as it has in France.  A nation has the right to maintain its own ideals and culture. If it fails to do so, it soon will cease to exist in any recognizable form. This can be accomplished without violating, in anyway the freedoms of its recent immigrants.

Indeed, many immigrants came to America to escape the oppression, bigotry, and hatreds of their native lands. This is extraordinarily relevant in the case of Muslims.  A devastating history of inhuman subjugation of females, harsh religious absolutism, and political authoritarianism are the hallmarks of most Islamic-dominated nations. These values are not compatible with the west, and need not be tolerated.

The United States and other western nations opened their doors to Muslims.  Unfortunately, a powerful contingent within that specific immigrant community came not seeking to join with their new communities, but to dominate them and impose upon them the bigotry, oppression, and narrow-mindedness of their native lands.  The reality of this threat must be acknowledged and acted upon, and appropriate steps must be taken.

Categories
Quick Analysis

Tribalism in America, & Ferguson

Throughout much of the world, tribalism—loyalty, above all else, to the particular clan, ethnic group or race into which one is born—has caused devastating harm.

In Eastern Europe, Asia, Africa and of course, the Middle East, tribalism has wreaked havoc. It is the direct antithesis of modern society, and rejects concepts of objective law, impartial and fair government, and most importantly, individual rights.

Given the clear and abundant evidence of tribalism’s horrific impact on so much of the planet, why are so many in the U.S. Progressive movement and the left generally increasingly wedded to it?  Evidence of this disturbing trend can be seen in recent disturbances, the latest example being in Ferguson, Missouri.

In the aftermath of a shooting of a 6’3”, 300 lb. robbery suspect who, according to the latest reports, acted agressively towards a white police officer, (indeed, latest reports indicate that he crushed the officer’s eye socket) all the evidence of tribalism came to the fore. Before a single fact was ascertained, the leading proponents of this discredited practice proclaimed the matter to be a racial incident.

Granted, the United States, like most other nations, has had a terrible history of past slavery, segregation and racism. But those prior conditions have long been legally abolished. It is counterproductive, before any evidence has been examined, and inherently incorrect to point to any particular incident and proclaim it to be racially motivated.

The tribalistic mindset of the agitators in Ferguson can best be illustrated by the almost total silence on their part concerning the horrible conditions of black-on-black crime in places such as Chicago, where the death by violence rate for young black men is greater than that for American military personnel fighting in Afghanistan.

Although referring to political preferences, not race, Robert Reich  noted in a Salon article that “We are witnessing a reversion to tribalism around the world, away from nation states. The same pattern can be seen even in America – especially in American politics… Nations are becoming less relevant in a world where everyone and everything is interconnected. The connections that matter most are again becoming more personal. Religious beliefs and affiliations, the nuances of one’s own language and culture, the daily realities of class, and the extensions of one’s family and its values – all are providing people with ever greater senses of identity.”

Your healthcare provider can talk with you about whether these medications are a good option to treat impotence in people who have lost their potency due to early tadalafil online pharmacy http://djpaulkom.tv/video-dj-paul-bbqtv-rubbed-up-sauced-up-and-grilled-bbq-crab-legs/ ageing or certain physical problems. Ageing decreases the function of various bodily viagra overnight delivery systems, including the reproductive system. Fildena acts on a specific enzyme known as phosphodiesterase-5 in informative shop viagra canada mastercard order to increase nitric oxide. Natural treatments: This is by far the best to save you from wasting levitra uk click for info time and leaving home. Why is tribalism occurring in America?

In an insightful comment, Don Zapsic Jr, writing in the Columbus Dispatch, noted:

“A not-so-surprising source of tribalism in America comes from the federal government…Affirmative-action programs and the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission have done more to divide and distance the U.S. citizenry from one another than prejudice and bigotry acting alone arguably ever could achieve. As a result, we tend to think of individuals in terms of race, religion, national origin, age, gender, sexual orientation and even culture. The following questions serve as a litmus test for tribalism: Is America more of a pressure cooker than a melting pot? Do political operatives generally acquire and maintain positions of power and influence through principled leadership or more by appeasement of critical-mass voting blocs? Is group entitlement and privilege promoted and embraced at the expense of national security and long-term economic stability?”

Far more disturbing than the individual acts of rioters, publicity seekers or provocateurs in Ferguson has been the reaction of the White House.  It is inappropriate for the President to intervene in this matter, just as it was wrong to comment on the Trayvon Martin tragedy.  There is no indication that federal jurisdiction is warranted. The mindset that a civil rights issue arises any time there is an altercation between an authority figure that happens to be white and a person who happens to be black is tribalism at its worst.

It is worthwhile to recall that the bringing together of peoples from a number of different nations, cultures and races into a “melting pot” society has made America a far more united entity than other nations. Even our closest neighbor, Canada, has at times been close to breaking apart due to the tribalistic differences between French and English speakers.

In his 1991 book, “The Disuniting of America,” Arthur Schlesinger, Jr. endorsed the concept of a melting pot rather than ethnic identity politics.  As he saw it, the alternatives were stark: a single, united country, or a tribalistic society in which different groups constantly quarreled with each other.

America’s founding concept of a melting pot worked magnificently, but tribalism, whatever excuse is provided for it, has been proven to be disastrous.  Actions by politicians and agitators that seek to gain from incidents such as Ferguson do a great disservice to our society.