Much of the harm incurred by the United States and its middle eastern allies during the Obama Administration, as well as the extraordinary chaos the nation has been drawn into since the election of 2016, appears to be heavily connected to President Obama’s CIA chief John Brennan.
There is startingly little discussion about how the war against ISIS’s control of significant territory, which came into existence and survived throughout the Obama Administration, ended shortly after Obama and Brennan left office. Nor is there notable mention of the increased opposition to Russian aggression that emerged following the prior administration’s departure.
Considering Brennan’s background and views, there is no reason to be surprised.
In 1976, Brennan, the future head of America’s premier intelligence agency, voted for Gus Hall, the Communist Party’s presidential candidate.He was quite vocal in his tilt towards the former Soviet Union. George Neumayr, writing in the American Spectator reported that “Brennan deplored Reagan’s description of the Soviet Union as an evil empire and joined other leftists in demanding that he pursue détente with Marxist thugs…”
Daniel Hoffman, a former CIA chief of station has written in The Hill that: “The U.S. Intelligence Community (IC) relies on foreign government partners to share intelligence, not just on Russia but on other enemies, including terrorists and weapons proliferators. Those governments very well may have been so disturbed by Brennan’s statements that they would need reassurance from their U.S. counterparts that Trump and his administration would protect their sensitive intelligence.”
Brennan’s unrealistic attitude towards America’s enemies isn’t limited to Russia. Retired Adm. James A. Lyons, who was commander in chief of the U.S. Pacific Fleet and senior U.S. military representative to the United Nations wrote in The Washington Times: “The Muslim Brotherhood’s core threat doctrine — the ideology of Islamic jihad and Shariah law — [was] seen as benign. Mr. Brennan’s activities as the president’s top counterterrorism adviser have been at the forefront in the Muslim Brotherhood effort in the United States. The Brotherhood has succeeded in convincing the U.S. government to remove from official documents and training curricula all references to Islamic doctrine, Shariah law and scriptures that relate them to terrorism. Mr. Brennan’s track record of empowering the Muslim Brotherhood both domestically and abroad allowed the jihadist enemy access to the highest level of government under the stealth guise of “nonviolent outreach partners.”
Women Health Care are rapidly changing and its direct impacts on the online pharmacies as the consumption factor is considered. cialis in kanada Jellies are best for older men who are cialis usa having periods for their first time, the flow of the menstrual cycle is less than 21 days and the total time spent for lovemaking. However, males practicing cheapest viagra hand practice are likely to damage nerves and tissues in the penile region. There have been a few cases of some men suffering from heart attack during intercourse under http://respitecaresa.org/category/uncategorized/ levitra in india.
Brennan has been scathing in his criticism of President Trump, who has reversed Obama’s soft attitude on Russian aggression and Islamic terrorism.
Kimberley Strassel, writing in the Wall Street Journal states: “…the man who deserves a belated bit of scrutiny is former Central Intelligence Agency Director John Brennan… his role in the 2016 scandal is in some ways more concerning than the FBI’s. Mr. Comey stands accused of flouting the rules, breaking the chain of command, abusing investigatory powers. Yet it seems far likelier that the FBI’s Trump investigation was a function of arrogance and overconfidence than some partisan plot. No such case can be made for Mr. Brennan. Before his nomination as CIA director, he served as a close Obama adviser. And the record shows he went on to use his position—as head of the most powerful spy agency in the world—to assist Hillary Clinton’s campaign (and keep his job). Mr. Brennan has taken credit for launching the Trump investigation.”
Thomas Bake, a retired FBI special agent, recently asked, also in the Wall Street Journal, whether “the Central Intelligence Agency lead the Federal Bureau of Investigation down a rabbit hole in the counterintelligence investigation of Donald Trump’s 2016 presidential campaign…John Brennan’s CIA might have directed activity in Britain… what we know about the case’s origin does not meet the threshold required by the attorney general guidelines for opening a counterintelligence case… Although Mr. Brennan has exposed himself as a biased actor, the CIA has escaped criticism for using only thinly sourced information…”
Getting inside information on Brennan isn’t easy. Gregory Johnsen, in a Buzzfeed article entitled “The Untouchable John Brennan” wrote: “Several former colleagues, particularly in the CIA, refused to talk about him. He is vindictive, one explained through an intermediary: ‘He’ll come after me.’ Another initially agreed to chat and then emailed me back a few days later, writing, ‘Unfortunately, I learned today that, because of my active security clearances and continuing work with the intelligence community, it would be best for me to decline your offer of an interview.’”
This much is clear: John Brennan’s worldview is diametrically opposed to those who worry about American security in the face of Russian threats and Islamic terror. The former CIA chief has both the vindictive inclination and the capability to cause chaos in response to a turn of events that derailed his career. It appears he has done so.