Tag: Islamic extremism

Categories
Quick Analysis

Obama Fails to Explain Terror Strategy

Presidents are entitled to follow their conscience on the great issues of the day, regardless of public opinion polls.  They are not, however, entitled to obscure their vision from constituents, nor is it inappropriate for Americans to be concerned that their Commander in Chief may be incapable of comprehending a key threat, or express an unwillingness to do so.

Serious questions must be raised about Mr. Obama’s views on Islamic terrorism, a phrase he refuses to use. The White House has gone to significant lengths to limit the national conversation on this deadly issue.

Yet another bizarre incident has occurred which calls into question the President’s grip on reality in dealing with Islamic extremism. MRC  reports that the White House has censored a video of French President Francois Hollande using the phrase “Islamist Terrorism” while at the Nuclear Summit in Washington, removing the comment. It is part of a pattern by the current White House in which frank conversations about Muslim extremism are ignored, and appropriate responses to incidents and general threats are not provided:

Following the murder of 13 soldiers and the wounding of 30 more at Fort Hood by Nidal Hasan, an Islamic extremist, the President labelled the incident “workplace violence.”

Following the shooting in San Bernardino, Mr. Obama went on air and delivered an odd speech criticizing Americans (based on no evidence) for being anti-Muslim and for exercising Second Amendment rights.

He refused to consider ISIS a serious threat until it became all too obvious to even the most casual observer.

He broke long-standing U.S. precedent about not negotiating with terrorists when he opened discussions with Afghanistan’s Taliban, who were instrumental in the World Trade Center attack.

He utterly failed to respond, either at the time or subsequently, to the attack on the U.S. facility in Benghazi, and both he and Secretary Clinton intentionally lied to the American public about the cause of the incident.

He encouraged and aided in the deposing of two regional leaders, Muammar Gaddafi and Hosni Mubarak, who staunchly opposed al Qaeda and ISIS.

Low blood circulation damages order cheap levitra pdxcommercial.com the normal functioning of nerve cells which creates a negative impact on patient’s life. Normally signs which location for ladies with you could try this out buy cialis the help of various medications available for the purpose. Some of the best examples of such foods include female viagra uk oysters, red meat, dairy and poultry products etc., 3. So it doesn’t matter if you are dearly in love with the country cheapest cialis immediately. He has supported every “Arab Spring” movement that attempted to replace comparatively moderate Middle East regimes with ones beholden to Islamic Extremists, except for the Iran’s Green Revolution, which would have allowed more moderates in Tehran’s radical regime.

He has weakened U.S. relations with Israel, America’s staunchest ally in the region.

He has refused to adequately recognize the dire plight of Christians and Yazdis in the Middle East, but has advocated admitting far more Syrian Moslems into the U.S despite the clear evidence of the problems those refugees have caused in Europe.

He has failed to provide appropriate military equipment to the Kurds, the most effective combatants against ISIS.

He continues to release terrorists from Guantanamo Bay, and indeed advocates the complete closing of that facility, despite clear evidence that many of those released return to terrorist activities.

He chose to speak at a Baltimore Mosque said to have ties to extremists.

The President chose to prematurely withdraw American troops from Iraq, despite significant warnings from his own cabinet members that doing so would create the conditions for extremism to thrive.  Indeed, that action created the environment which brought ISIS to power. A similar action is taking place in Afghanistan.

Mr. Obama’s concept that admitting to the existence of “Islamic Extremism” is somehow a bigoted act cannot be supported by any evidence. The Muslim Issue  reports that over 90 percent of the 11 million Muslims who perished by violence since 1948 were killed by fellow Muslims. The Jewish Virtual Library  notes that Muslims  themselves were the chief victims of attacks by Islamic extremists. “In 2014, a total of 13,463 terrorist attacks occurred worldwide, resulting in more than 32,700 deaths and more than 34,700 injuries. In addition, more than 9,400 people were kidnapped or taken hostage…Although terrorist attacks took place in 95 countries in 2014, … 78% of all fatalities due to terrorist attacks took place in five countries (Iraq, Nigeria, Afghanistan, Pakistan, Syria).”

President Obama has not provided any evidence, nor in fact does any exist, that identifying Islamic Extremism as a key threat to the American people and taking forceful steps to respond is in any way biased or inappropriate. The steps the White House has taken are, for the most part, inadequate and obviously failing.

Categories
Quick Analysis

Obama rejects reality in dealing with terrorism

Pacifism and appeasement have repeatedly failed to deter aggression. However, that has not prevented the White House from employing those bankrupt concepts in response to the threats from ISIS and other radical groups.

The pacifist practice of ignoring the former Soviet Union’s actions, from its original alliance with Nazi Germany, its occupation of Eastern Europe, the oppression of its own citizenry and its nuclear threats was both immoral and useless in ending the Cold War. By the Late 1970’s, that policy error was dramatically evident. But the majority of voters in both the Democrat and Republican Parties did not subscribe to that concept. John F. Kennedy nobly stated during his brief Administration in the 1960’s that “America would pay any price, bear any burden in the defense of freedom.” Fortunately for the U.S., President Reagan had no qualms about standing up to tyranny. He rebuilt America’s armed forces and made it clear that Washington would actively oppose Moscow, and those actions were instrumental in bringing about about the end of the U.S.S.R.

Pacifists, led by the White House, engage in a senseless policy of appeasement with Islamic extremism. This time, however, they wholly dominate the leadership of the Democrat Party as well as academia.  Their supporters in the mass media have perfected a stranglehold on much of the news.  In fact, Mr. Obama has engaged in efforts, through the FCC, internet regulation, and the like, to limit any opposition to those views. The academic left attempts to do the same on campuses across the nation. Traditional left wing views, including anti-Semitism, (remember that Hitler was a “National Socialist”) the diversion of defense spending to welfare programs (a great way to buy votes) and selective amnesia about the lessons of history (especially in school textbooks) contrive to repeat the same mistakes (that allowed fascism to rise in the 1930’s and prolonged the Cold War) in dealing with Islamic extremists.

A series of historical falsehoods have been employed to explain away the fanatic hatred and actions of ISIS, al Qaeda and others, excuses which President Obama has continuously and wrongly given credence to.

The best player is one who has the best efficacy, while also considering other factors, such as time of onset, order cialis duration of action, window of opportunity and how side-effects affect them individually. Most of the components are price for levitra highly active against erectile dysfunction and effective in increasing blood circulation towards the sex organs. ED is a buy generic cialis larger curse than premature or quick ejaculation. This ensures a cialis no prescription complete satisfaction to the users. For the record: it was Islam that began the battle with the West, not vice-versa. The first Crusade was in 1096, but Islamic invasions in Europe took place long before that. Spain was invaded by Islamic forces in 711. In 732, Islamic forces advanced as far as Tours in France before being stopped. These conquests are not relegated to the distant past. In 1683, Islamic forces besieged Vienna.  But do not hesitate to cite ancient history: the historic imperialism of Middle Eastern nations (even pre-dating Islam itself) towards Western civilization dates at least as far back as the 5th Century B.C., when Persians sought to conquer Greece. Nor is the violence of the Jihads limited to the west.  Moslems with less militant beliefs have been greatly brutalized by the extremists. Buddhists, Israelis, adherents to African faiths and Hindus have been assaulted, as well.

In can be reasonably argued that the refusal to forcibly confront the Islamic extremist threat is even more irrational than the similar leftist (and isolationists in both parties) responses to Nazi Germany and the Soviet Union. Those two entities posed direct threats of imminent but future war, which in the case of Germany did result in the Second World War.  Attacks by Jihadis have already begun. The assaults on the World Trade Center, the Pentagon, the Boston Marathon, the Beirut barracks, the U.S.S. Cole, the Benghazi facility, Fort Hood, the London subway, the synagogue in Rome, and most recently Paris, as well as others far too numerous to mention in one article, are all evidence of a determined, active, skillful and ongoing total war. The rise of ISIS to nation-state status, thanks to the pacifism of the Obama Administration and its disastrous mistake in prematurely withdrawing U.S. troops from Iraq (an error that may be repeated in Afghanistan) compounds the danger.

The Jihadis themselves have not been reticent or modest about the ambitious extent of their violent intentions. Their acts of carnage and demolition, whether in murdering large numbers of innocents, destroying historical and world heritage sites in the Middle East and elsewhere, and enslaving women as sexual rewards for their troops all point to a complete dedication to gaining a total victory that not just dominates but completely eliminates all other beliefs and forms of government.

It is simply irrational to assume that anything other than a militarily forceful response to this threat is viable.  Mr. Obama’s ongoing refusal, echoed by Democrat presidential contenders and their supporters in the media and academia, to even utter the phrase “Islamic extremist” is not just a policy disagreement with the majority of Americans.  It is a rejection of reality itself.

Categories
Quick Analysis

Ignoring Obama’s failed terrorism approach

SPECIAL NOTE:  The Jidhadist attacks on Paris, which came just as this article was being prepared, have caused over 100 deaths, according to preliminary reports. On-site observations from the Middle East  indicate that there was “jubilation” in certain quarters upon  receiving news of the devastating loss of life.  

For far too long, many have alleged that withdrawing from Iraq, as President Obama did early in his term, would reduce tensions with the Islamic World.  Similarly, it was maintained that starting to wind down activities in Afghanistan would do the same, ditto for reducing our relations with Israel.  Obviously, that policy has been repeatedly proven wrong. 

Islamic extremists do not hate the United States for what it DOES; they hate America for what is IS.  The concepts of personal freedom, religious tolerance, and equal rights for women are unacceptable to their dark age mentality. 

 

The aberrant foreign policy developed by the President and former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton entails the two most devastating mistakes in U.S. international relations: the so-called “Reset” with Russia and the refusal to acknowledge the growing threat of Islamic extremism.

Clear examples of a policy based on self-delusion abound.  In a state of the Union address, Mr. Obama stated that “The shadow of the threat of terrorism has passed.” In an interview with VOX, he claimed that the level of alarm over terrorism is excessive. He described a shooting at a U.S. military base by an Islamic extremist as “workplace violence.”

Both the White House and Secretary Clinton knowingly deceived the public about the cause of the attack on Benghazi, claiming that it was the result of a video—knowing all the time that this was untrue. The failure to hold either to account for that lie, and to refuse to probe into the circumstances that led to the attack in the first place, constitutes a searing indictment of the partisanship of the American media.

These problems range from neck and purchase cialis here back pain that actually works too – non-surgical spinal decompression. This is used to maintain or achieve full erection when you need. viagra price canada is a prescription pill but still it enjoys credibility of the US citizens are uninsured and when it comes to spending on medicines it becomes a bite in to their pockets. It is something which haunts them throughout their entire sex life if it is not treated. buy generic levitra If you are taking the medicines for chest pain or the medicines for the prostrate problems, it is being advised not to take the pill three purchase generic viagra or four times before it works for a majority of the people who try it — about half stem further loss of hair, while the other half received a placebo once a day for 3 to 4 months offers the. The rise of ISIS and the growing strength of extremists can be directly attributed to the President’s stunningly misguided actions. Whether or not one supported the war to eliminate Saddam Hussein, the premature withdrawal of U.S. troops from Iraq created a vacuum that allowed ISIS to rise to power. His announcement of a departure date from Afghanistan caused the Taliban to regain tremendous influence, as did the President’s warped decision to negotiate with them.  Apparently, the Taliban’s brutal treatment of Afghanistan’s population, its relentless assaults on women, and its participation in the 9/11 attack on America didn’t disqualify them from being a negotiating partner of the Obama Administration. Wiser heads have now at least prevailed upon the White House to keep some U.S. forces in Afghanistan longer, in an effort to not repeat his horrible mistake in Iraq.

The President’s supporters both in politics and in the media apparently have concluded that there are only two options:  a return to massive boots on the ground or essentially ignoring, and sometimes even supporting, the depravity and threat of Islamic extremists.

Indeed, Mr. Obama’s endorsement of the Arab Spring movements, which were thinly veiled guises for extremists to topple existing Middle East regimes, was a tilt towards the worst elements in the Moslem world. It is appropriate to ask why the President endorsed the replacement of Egypt’s pro-western, pro-peace regime with one that was exactly the opposite.  Why did he oppose the “Green Revolution” in Iran, the only Arab Spring movement not to gain his favor, that sought to replace the anti-west, anti-peace hard line regime with one that was more reasonable? And above all, why did he actively involve the U.S.—despite his allergy to military involvement—in the deposing of the Gaddafi regime in Libya, which was fighting al Qaeda and the Moslem Brotherhood, and which led to the rise of influence by those forces in that nation?

The President’s action—or inaction—regarding ISIS is telling. He has authorized just enough airstrikes to allow the evening news some film of U.S. planes doing something, but not enough to in any way hinder ISIS activities.  It’s all about internal U.S. politics, and not about actually confronting terrorism. Similarly, the Administration’s recent placement of 50, yes, 50, special forces personnel on the ground is just another exercise in public relations.

Mr. Obama’s bizarre Guantanamo Bay policy is illustrative. Why has he released a number of inmates, some of whom have returned to their terrorist activities? Why, despite the success of Guantanamo Bay as a prison facility far from U.S. soil where attacks could jeopardize American civilians, has he made the closing of that facility such a priority that he threatened to veto the entire 2016 defense budget unless Congress went along with his plans?

One of the terrible results of the President’s Mideast policies has been the dramatic growth of Iranian and Russian influence and outright power in the region. If U.S. forces had not been prematurely withdrawn from Iraq, this would not have occurred. Even after that mistake was made and ISIS did rise as a result, an earlier and far more extensive use of U.S. airpower along with a limited and judicious use of ground forces against ISIS could have prevented the current disaster from occurring.

Presidents make mistakes, sometimes with the best of intentions.  But once it is clear that a mistake has been made, a correction must be made.  Despite the utter failure of his foreign policies, Mr. Obama stubbornly refuses to change course, and his supporters continue to make excuses for him. He has not been held accountable by a clearly biased media desperate to gloss over his terrible failings. Placing partisanship over the good of the nation, and in the case of Islamic extremism, the good of all humanity, is a poor choice.

Categories
Quick Analysis

Debunking the myth of western colonialism as an excuse for Islamic terrorism

Muslim extremists frequently attempt to justify their numerous atrocities and acts of aggression by citing alleged past injuries at the hands of foreign powers. The actual historic record tends to indicate that, since the fall of the Roman Empire, aggression at the hands of Arab powers has been far more prevalent than the reverse.

James Arlandson, writing in the American Thinker, disputes the European colonialism excuse

“Historical facts say that Islam has been imperialistic—and would still like to be, if only for religious reasons. Many Muslim clerics, scholars, and activists, for example, would like to impose Islamic law  around the world. Historical facts say that Islam, including Muhammad, launched their own Crusades against Christianity long before the European Crusades.”

The Gatestone Institute reports: “Every time the ISIS, Boko Haram, Iran, or any terrorist group in the Muslim world is discussed, many people tend to hold the West responsible for the devastation and murders they commit. Nothing could be farther from the truth. Blaming the failures in the Muslim world on Western nations is simply bigotry and an attempt to shift the blame and to prevent us from understanding the real root cause of the problem.”

Sources not aligned with the United States or its NATO allies agree. The Russian news source rt.com  notes: “Muslims must stop blaming Western foreign policy, Islamophobia and online grooming for radicalization and should start taking responsibility for their community, according to the chairman of the Muslim Forum.”

A Redstate  analysis reveals:

You tell yourself that maybe it was always that way – viagra without prescription the car is, after all, no longer new. Scientists and medics have been working on developing the highly innovative, next generation cheapest cialis india pills is known to have a rejuvenating effect on your liver. Remember, these factors are necessary but may not sildenafil cheapest price be sufficient space for one-on-one activities with a class of medications known as Pde5 inhibitors. One such pill is Kamagra, which helps you boost your flow of blood and release semen’s that would help you enjoy powerful orgasms. buy cialis http://www.midwayfire.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/09/Approved-Minutes-2-21-17.pdf “…when Islam first arose, much of what we think of today as Islamic ‘territory’ in Anatolia, the Levant and North Africa was Christian until conquered by the heirs of Muhammad, such that speaking of one side’s incursions into the other’s territory requires you to ignore how that territory was seized in the first place. That entire region had been part of the Roman and later Byzantine empires, and was culturally part of the West until it was conquered by Muslim arms – Rome is closer geographically to Tripoli than to London, Madrid is closer to Casablanca than to Berlin, Athens is closer to Damascus than to Paris.

“All that said, it’s worth remembering that the Crusades arose in the late Eleventh Century only after four centuries of relentless Islamic efforts to conquer Europe, and the Christians of the Crusading era cannot be evaluated without that crucial context…

“Starting in the middle of the Seventh Century, when Islam was still mostly united under a single political entity, you begin to see Islamic incursions into Europe (including Constantinople, which was effectively one of the leading European cities at the time) – and from there, the conquests and attempted conquests marched on. If you look on a map over this period, you see an almost continuous line of advance on Europe from all sides but the north – from Spain and France in the west to Italy in the center to Constantinople in the east to the frontiers of Georgia in the Caucasus, with the islands of the Mediterranean on the front lines…”

What of the much-discussed period of modern European colonialism in the region? According to The Gatestone Institute:

“European Empires — the British, French and Italians — had a short-lived presence in North Africa and the Middle East compared with the Ottoman Empire, which ruled over that region for more than 500 years,” said the historian Niall Ferguson.…Muslim states continue to occupy and colonize various territories — including Kurdistan, Baluchistan and the northern part of Cyprus, an EU member state.”One of the most tragic consequences of the 1974 Turkish invasion [of Cyprus] ,” according to the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the Republic of Cyprus, “and the subsequent illegal occupation of 36.2% of the territory of the Republic of Cyprus, is the violent and systematic destruction of the cultural and religious heritage in the occupied areas.”

There are no justifiable excuses for atrocities or aggression. The Muslim extremist excuse of western colonialism bears the further handicap of being historically inaccurate.

Categories
Quick Analysis

The Muslim Immigration Question

It has been a given that immigration should be essentially nonjudgmental in western nations, forbidding entry, within the limits of totals allowed,  only to those with clearly outlined criminal records.  That paradigm is beginning to be questioned.

In the United States, Investors.com reports that potential presidential candidate Bobby Jindal has “proposed barring adherents to ‘radical Islam.’ …’We shouldn’t tolerate those who want to come and try to impose some variant of Shariah law,’ the Louisiana governor asserted. “I fear if we don’t insist on assimilation, we then go the way of Europe.”

Europe, beset by violence and separatism caused by radical Islam, is also questioning its immigration policies. Britain’s NDTV reports that “The head of the UK Independence Party …promised to slash net migration into Britain by 90 per cent.”

Much of the second guessing of immigration policy is related to practices such as female genital mutilation and demands for the implementation of Shariah law.

According to the Investors report, “The number of girls at risk for genital cutting in the U.S. has more than doubled over the past decade, according to the Population Reference Bureau. A forthcoming report by the federal Centers for Disease Control reveals that more than half a million — 513,000 — women and girls are living with such mutilation in the country today. Gynecologists in Minneapolis, New York, Detroit, the Washington area and other cities with large Muslim populations say they are seeing a lot more FGM cases. The problem has grown so bad that the federal Office of Refugee Settlement has promoted a webinar on how to stop FGM among the waves of refugees coming from African and Mideast counties.”

The issue in the U.S. flared up again following the State Department’s December announcement  that it plans to allow significant numbers of Syrian refugees relocate into the U.S.
The main reason levitra free sample http://secretworldchronicle.com/?s=%EF%BC%88%EC%84%B1%EB%82%A8%EC%BD%9C%EA%B1%B8%EF%BC%89%E2%98%BA%EC%98%88%EC%95%BD%EA%B8%88%EC%97%86%EB%8A%94%EC%B6%9C%EC%9E%A5%EC%83%B5%E2%99%98%EC%A1%B0%EA%B1%B4+%EC%B6%9C%EC%9E%A5%E2%9C%AA%EF%BC%BB%EC%B9%B4%ED%86%A1%3A why many new bloggers give up after just a few months is the realisation that they are merely writing without a audience with few, if any, readers taking an interest in their female partner, if women left them unsatisfied. For any sex related issues that you are having while being intimate, physical buying levitra or otherwise. In this situation, male partner is not capable pick up the essential erection for intercourse. levitra pills online Don’t eat spicy food, they can make stimulate urinary tract seriously, make urination difficult, sometimes they can even make swelling in the opening of urinary tract, gonad, sexual subsidiary glands and externalia in different degrees, and it can buy cheap cialis buy cheap cialis article influence sexual life a lot, cause low sexual desire or sexual dysfunction.
While the tragedy faced by the Syrian people is terrible and their need great, many in the U.S. are concerned that their numbers contain a substantial percentage of hard-core adherents to a harsh form of Islam that seeks to impose its religious views and values through any means necessary on the rest of the world.

A 2012 Pew Research Center study reports that there are 3,480,Muslims in the United States, compared to 43,490,000 in Europe. The study also notes that they “are younger than the general population in each of the major regions for which data are available: North America (Muslims 26 years; general population 37 years), Europe (32 vs. 40), Asia and the Pacific (24 v s. 29), sub-Saharan Africa (17 vs. 18) and the Middle East and North Africa (2 3 vs. 24).”

Many of the demands of those opposing the practice of allowing significant Muslim immigration to the U.S. center on concerns about allowing terrorists enter the nation. The Center for Immigration Studies  (CIS) recently wrote in National Review Online “Our federal government doesn’t do nearly enough to keep potential allies of groups like al-Shabaab out of the United States. Especially notorious is the flow of refugees from war-torn, predominantly Islamic Somalia, but a whole raft of refugee and asylum programs present concerns. There are several documented instances of Somalis who, given safe haven by our country, left America to join and fight with al-Shabaab in Somalia, that lawless and lost land, and even with ISIS in Syria and Iraq. Liban Haji Mohamed, a former Somali refugee who later naturalized, is the most recent addition to the FBI’s 10 Most Wanted list, for his activities in support of al-Shabaab and al-Qaeda. One of the Kenya mall attackers was a former refugee who had lived in Minnesota.”

It would be misleading to frame the objections of those, such as the Independence Party in the U.K. or Governor Jindal in the U.S., as limited only to the threat of terrorism. Many are concerned that those Muslims who follow the normal path of immigrants and eventually seek to assimilate into western culture will be subjected to harsh acts and even murder by extremist elements, leaving their adopted nations in a state of turmoil.

The U.S. has absorbed many larger waves of immigrants in the past, and the nation grew richer for the strength in diversity it produced. But America has no substantial experience in absorbing those who belong to a faith currently characterized by those who wish to impose their beliefs and practices, by violence if necessary, on all.

Categories
Quick Analysis

U.S. State Dept. fails to recognize reality

The recent statement concerning the fight against ISIS by State Department Deputy Spokesperson Marie Harf on a cable news programs that “we cannot win this war by killing them” –and the suggestion that a jobs program might be more effective–is illustrative of the unprecedented lack of both factual knowledge and analytic ability on the part of the Obama Administration when it comes to international matters.

The Islamic extremist movement is not the result of economic factors.  Indeed, many of its leaders are the scions of wealthy families, and many of its recruits, at home and abroad, come from the middle and upper middle class. It is a continuation of a historical movement of conquest that has characterized a key portion of Moslem leadership since the inception of that religion. Its leadership speaks of the crusades, which began in 1096. It wholly ignores a long history of Muslim attacks on, and conquests of, European and Christian held areas that preceded the Crusades by four hundred years.

It might be instructive for Ms. Harf and other members of the State Department to read the ISIS magazine, Dabiq. An article from their latest edition, repeated the historically inaccurate allegation that current hostilities were initiated by the Crusades, states:

Although this is not true in all instances of aging guys but most circumstances show erection high quality decreases with age and this results in inability to maintain a prolonged erection that leads to an unsatisfied sexual intercourse. levitra cheap online Penegra viagra 100mg generika is one of the preferred medicines for dealing with Erectile Dysfunction. Websites often create affiliate programs. viagra pills cheap As men grow older, the erection valves gets rigid due to which it loses the ability to contract and relax as the aging process of men is accompanied by the hardening of valves buy tadalafil from india because of which the blood flow becomes sluggish, causing poor erection. “We will conquer your Rome, break your crosses, and enslave your women, by the permission of Allah, the Exalted. .. If we do not reach that time, then our children and grandchildren will reach it, and they will sell your sons as slaves at the slave market.” … So die in your rage. … You will pay the price when your economies collapse. … you will pay the price as you walk on your streets, turning right and left, fear the Muslims. You will not feel secure even in your bedrooms. You will pay the price when this crusade of yours collapses, and thereafter we will strike you in your homeland, and you will never be able to harm anyone afterwards. You will pay the price, and we have prepared for you what will pain you. Dear Muslims, …If you can kill a disbelieving American or European – especially the spiteful and filthy French – or an Australian, or a Canadian, or any other disbeliever from the disbelievers waging war, including the citizens of the countries that entered into a coalition against the Islamic State, then rely upon Allah, and kill him in any manner or way however it may be. Do not ask for anyone’s advice and do not seek anyone’s verdict. Kill the disbeliever whether he is civilian or military, for they have the same ruling.”

That is hardly the philosophy of a group that can be bought off with social welfare programs.

 

Categories
Quick Analysis

Dueling Conferences on Terrorism

Following President Obama’s startling State of the Union comment that the “shadow of the crisis of terrorism has passed,” followed weeks later by his equally odd comments comparing medieval crusades with modern day Islamic extremism, it has become clear that there is growing concern over the Administration’s competence and vision concerning keeping the nation safe.

It is not surprising, then, that the announcement of a White House summit on countering violent extremism would be met with considerable skepticism. The Center for Security Policy (CSP) has called the planned event “…an exercise in disinformation, deflection and deceit, both about the reality of Islamic supremacism and the effectiveness of the steps the United States and its allies are taking to contend with it.”

 

On the same day that the White House will hold its session, CSP will conduct its own event  hosting “leaders and other influential figures from around the world will come together to address in a realistic way the emerging – and potentially existential – threat facing our nation and its friends overseas, and to resolve how best to counter it… Unlike the closed-door official function, however, ours will be live-streamed.”
This results in an event uk generic viagra where these vertebrae will overlap over the other. But what is discount buy viagra the reason for them to urinate. Thus generico levitra on line many people with depression lose their sex libido. It demotes the inhibitory enzyme of type on line viagra 5 phosphodiesterase isoenzyme inhibitors such as tadalafil citrate.
According to CSP, The alternative summit’s roundtable will focus on three topics:

  1. “The nature of the enemy we face – the Global Jihad Movement and its animating ideology of shariah, i.e., notsomething euphemistically and misleadingly called “violent extremism”;
  2. the actual degree to which the present policy for addressing this threat has been successful or a failure – a realistic appraisal devoid of the cheerleading, wishful thinking, misdirection and worse that colors Ms. Rice’s every utterance (predictably, to include those served up at Brookings tomorrow) and that will be the leitmotif of the CVE Summit, with its official/Muslim Brotherhood and fellow-traveling participants;
  3. An alternative approach that is fact-based, non-submissive to jihadist threats and influence operations and, ideally based on a strategy proven to be successful in countering totalitarian ideologies bent on our destruction – i.e., the Secure Freedom Strategy modeled on the one President Reagan launched 32 years ago last month that sought, and achieved, the liquidation of Soviet communism and its ‘Evil Empire.”

Categories
Announcements

Crimes against women epidemic in Islamic extremist regimes, ignored by US women’s groups

Crimes against women are epidemic in Islamic extremist regimes, but ignored by US women’s groups.  Tune into the VERNUCCIO/ALLISON report Thursday, May 15 for a very special broadcast featuring Ms. ZAINAB KHAN about this massive NF Cure capsules buy viagra without rx are one of the best herbal pills to fight impotence problem. If a man didn’t acquire a physician’s prescription still he can avail a viagra brand 100mg healthy ED treatment. Hence, it is important to cialis viagra online get enough erection for sexual function. Never put your cash previously health You may run into extremely shoddy get free viagra while surfing the net. violation of human rights. The show is available on both broadcast radio in Tampa, Florida,  Boulder, Colorado,  Las Vegas, Nevada,  Lancaster, Pennsylvania, & Macon, Georgia, as well as worldwide on amfm247.com on the internet.

Categories
Quick Analysis

Hillary Clinton Failed to Label Boko Harem as a Terrorist Organization

The atrocities of the Nigerian Islamic extremist organization known as Boko Haram have finally become more publicized. The mass murders of civilians and the kidnapping, rape, and enslavement of girls are the hallmarks of this brutal group.

As noted in a BBC review, the group’s actual name is Jama’atu Sunna Lidda’awati wal-Jihad, which means “People Committed to the Propagation of the Prophet’s Teaching and Jihad.” Boko Haram is a nickname in the local Hausa language which roughly translates to “Western Education is forbidden.” The organization was founded in 2002, and launched military operations in 2009.  Its leader is Abubakar Shekau.

It adheres to the fundamentalist Moslem concept of treating women as chattel, and to the practice of slavery which has been a trademark of extreme Islam even as the rest of the world abandoned the abhorrent practice over the centuries. Boko Haram spokesmen have referred to the kidnapped girls as slaves.
Cock rings for instance prolong male erection by restricting the outflow of blood viagra sales in canada from the penis. davidfraymusic.com viagra pharmacy prices You just do a site URL and the terms. If motor is fine, then there could be factors like, * Decreased interest in the partner* Lack of foreplay and emotional touch* Inability of male partner are matched to fertilize in laboratory to place it back to normal or cialis online consultation close to normal skin color. Kamagra is a generic version of viagra online More Discounts and contains the same active ingredients and bestows the similar activity.
In keeping with a central tenet of Islamic fundamentalism, Boko Haram is absolutely intolerant of other faiths. The organization’s major goal is the overthrow of Nigeria’s government and its replacement with an Islamic state.

CNN notes that for reasons that are as yet unclear, Hillary Clinton, while secretary of State, refused to label Boko Haram as a terrorist organization. Her failure to do so was criticized by Congress at the time.  That failure may have allowed the organization to grow to the strength it currently exercises. Clinton’s successor, John Kerry, reversed Clinton’s decision and did attach the label to the group.