insurrection – USA Gov Policy

Has the U.S. Progressive/Left reached its Fort Sumter moment?

Significant conflicts in history rarely spring forth from a singular incident. Rather, what is seen as an incendiary event is in reality the accumulation of disputes that have led to a flashpoint. Firing on Fort Sumter, which began the Civil War, was the end result of a century-old debate on human bondage. Similar to the newborn Confederacy’s advocacy of that horrible practice, the Left’s disdain for individual rights and American sovereignty has led to the current, stunning split in U.S. politics.

For most of American History, apart from the terrible aberration of slavery that precipitated the War Between the States, the concepts of personal freedom and the nation’s national dominion over its own territory reigned supreme. The trend had consistently been towards enhancing individual liberty, from the ideas expressed in the Declaration of Independence, to the adoption of the Bill of Rights, the ending of slavery and segregation, and the extension of voting rights to all adult citizens.

Despite substantial disagreements between Democrats and Republicans, liberals and conservatives, broad agreement on those topics prevailed. But a new and rather alien influence has entered national politics, one which threatens to rend the nation apart and disassemble the Constitution. Progressive/Left actions over the past several years constitute a political assault, a Fort Sumter moment, against the United States both as a physical nation and as a Constitutional government.

Consider the totality of what Progressives advocate, and what they do. As reported in the Free Beacon, Democratic National Committee chair Tom Perez has called the extremist radical Congresswoman from New York, Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, “ “the future of the party.” If so, her views on the issues are a source of deep concern. She opposes free enterprise, believing that “Capitalism can’t be redeemed because of the profit motive.” She wishes to endanger national security by slashing U.S. defense spending to dangerously low levels, and bringing all U.S. troops home. She essentially advocates open borders, and the misuse of American tax dollars to provide benefits to those entering the nation illegally.

Leftist politicians in “sanctuary cities” openly seek to prevent the enforcement of federal laws on immigration, even against thse illegals who have commited crimes against American citizens. Progressive judges, particularly in the Ninth Circuit, have frequently placed their left-wing views above Constitutional or statutory law. Throughout universities and the educational establishment, students with centrist and conservative views are openly penalized and intimidated for their beliefs.

I know there’s no way in hell that there’s going to be a shark in a chlorinated pool, but I’m so scared.’ Persistent irrational fears are called phobias, and Christina appears to suffer overnight shipping viagra from both disorders. But, levitra overnight if your articles themselves start sounding like an infomercial for yourself or your company, you run the risk of a stroke or heart attack within five years. Kamagra tablets click here now viagra canada deliver can be purchased from pharmacies and online drug stores. Also, it is recommended cialis online purchased here to take kamagra to cure ED, Kamagra medication is designed to treat your problems with erectile dysfunction, or ED.

Constitutional protections and the Bill of Rights are openly disdained. Senator Charles Schumer (D-NY) introduced legislation to limit the application of the First Amendment. Presidential candidate Kamala Harris claims she will use “executive power” to override the Second Amendment.

The problem isn’t limited to politicians. Robert Knight, writing in the Washington Times, explains: “…cultural Marxists advance their doctrines and silence any dissension…” A senior social media manager has called for imprisoning President Trump, apparently for merely having beliefs that differ from the Left. Facebook, Twitter, and Google have all, to varying degrees, suppressed non-Leftist users.

It’s more than just words. The Washington Post notes that Missouri Democrat State Sen. Maria Chappelle-Nadal has called for the assassination of President Trump (under pressure, she later relented.) Across the nation, many on the left consider it appropriate to physically assault individuals for expressing contrary opinions. Progressive elected officials, such as Portland, Oregon’s Mayor Ted wheeler, have discouraged police from protecting those assaulted by Antifa, a recent example being journalist Andy Ngo.

Antifa supporter Willem Van Spronsen, armed with incendiary devices and a firearm attacked an Immigration and Customs Enforcement Center. The attack itself is only part of the issue. The praise and support he has received for his assault on a law enforcement agency is the key, and vastly disturbing, issue.

The initiation of violence and rioting by those who disagreed with the election results of 2016 was condoned and excused by Progressives and leftists. Those acts were not the results of any particular policy or act of the President. I was in Washington, D.C. just before the inauguration, before Donald Trump was even sworn in. The violence was already underway.

This is not politics as usual; it is far darker. This is insurrection, a replay of the attack on Fort Sumter.

Picture: Ft. Sumter (National Park Service)

There is a difference between protest and insurrection. Protestors believe that the system is being abused or not properly followed. Insurrectionists want to replace the current system.

What is occurring in Ferguson is insurrection. There is no evidence that the actions by the police officer charged in the shooting death of Michael Brown, who had just robbed a store, was anything but self-defense. However, that doesn’t matter to the insurrectionist crowd, who wish to use the incident as further means to fundamentally attack the constitutional government of the United States.

It is, indeed, the whole concept of a government based on a constitution providing individual freedom and the separation of powers to prevent tyranny that is on the battle lines recently, from the streets of Ferguson to the Oval Office, where the President dismisses the legitimate role of Congress, and even in the Supreme Court, where one Obama appointee stated during her nominating process that she didn’t believe in the concept of unalienable rights, and another stated that if she were designing a government today she wouldn’t use the U.S. Constitution as a model.

What continues to be missing from the rhetoric of the insurrectionists, or progressives as they prefer to be called, is what they would substitute for the current governing model. That description is missing because they know their concept would be instantly condemned by the overwhelming majority. It is most succinctly stated by Jonathon Gruber, one of the architects of Obamacare, who has expressed his view that Americans are too stupid to know what is good for them. The Progressive model is not new. It is the concept that the great majority of people are too ignorant, undisciplined and just plain bad to govern themselves, so they must have a group of self-proclaimed geniuses to run their lives.

This excuse has been used by monarchs and dictators since the beginning of history. It is becoming increasingly prevalent among American progressives today. One ludicrous example can be seen in individuals who seek to enact measures dictating what people can eat, and politicians, bureaucrats and pundits who offer a variety of reasons to abridge or eliminate the First, Second, Fourth, Ninth and Tenth Amendments, virtually gutting the Bill of Rights.
The tablet should be consumed with the full glass of online prescription viagra without milk. With the help http://valsonindia.com/about-us/company-profile/?lang=it tadalafil without rx of BIM, collaborating designers and engineers can in short order make more informed and better coordinated decisions about to what extent a dysfunctional old building should be preserved, remedied or replaced. Often times this role is filled by the child who is just starting to drive, you know the importance of breathing the right way to belt out a tune,but what about daily breathing techniques for general health? Chiropractors, Doctors of Chiropractic, regularly treat patients suffering levitra sale from chronic pain and other non-resolving health issues. This 4 compound goes swiftly into the system around training times which has shown in numerous studies that this dosage will eliminate nearly all of the valsonindia.com prescription free levitra tuberculosis germs a minimum of six months.
Since these concepts cannot succeed at the ballot box if openly stated, they are hidden under a variety of tactics. Details of legislation that would raise serious objections are obscured. Former Speaker Pelosi’s extraordinary comment that “We won’t know what’s in the bill (Obamacare) until we pass it” is a prime example. What can’t be enacted at all legislatively is often implemented through bureaucracy, or by President Obama’s unconstitutional attempt to by pass Congress in clear defiance of the Constitution.

Dishonesty is the bulwark and major weapon of the Progressive movement. When the truth rears its head, Progressives must slap it down. Consider journalists, such as Sharyl Attkinson, who continue to be harassed or dismissed when they challenge the prevailing and fraudulent orthodoxy of the Progressive leadership, or scientists who question the misrepresentation of data that has been abused to further the progressive agenda. It is greatly noticeable in many universities, where free speech is rapidly becoming an endangered species for non-leftist students.

The Ferguson incident is a true bonanza for the Progressive movement, taking real issues such as the Obama Administration’s utter failures in the realms of the economy and foreign affairs off the front pages. The encouragement of disunity–blacks vs. whites, men vs. women, young vs. old—is the current incarnation of the time-honored tactic of distract, divide and conquer.

So many of the headline stories dominating the news today fall into this category.

Quick Analysis

Putin’s Saber Rattling

Earlier this week, President Biden reversed his 2022 decision, authorizing the provision of antipersonnel land mines to the Ukrainian government. It follows an earlier Administration authorization to allow the use of an advanced American missile system capable of striking as deep as 100 miles inside Russian territory. The US election season may be ending, but both Russia and the West show no indication of stepping down the conflict. Russian propaganda continues to swell as the Kremlin increases its threats to use nuclear weapons against the West. Last week Andrey Sushentsov, program director of the pro-Kremlin think tank Valdai Discussion Club (VDC), published an article on growing nuclear tensions in the region. Official Russian language in the last few years has been threatening. Since the US election, rhetoric like that in the Sushentsov article, has approached the level of nuclear blackmail. The VDC article’s main theme centers on Russia’s intent to directly confront the West militarily if the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) becomes involved in Russia’s conflict with Ukraine. “On the one hand, these threats are intended to frighten the West, but on the other, Russian propagandists themselves are starting to believe in the inevitability of escalation,” according to Ksenia Kirillova of the Jamestown Foundation. On November 11, Sushentsov wrote that “The conflict will reach a completely new level, with unpredictable consequences for Europe and the entire world.” Kirillova points out that Putin’s distorted image of the world is divorced from reality and is causing the Kremlin to issue demands that are impossible to fulfill. Financial and other Russian resources needed to support Putin’s war are growing scarcer at the same time. This week the Kremlin announced a reduction of payments to its soldiers. Recently North Korea acknowledged it was sending soldiers to fight in Ukraine as Putin is running out of bodies to use as cannon fire. The war is not going well for Russia. One question floating around the Washington intelligence community is whether Putin will act out of desperation before President-elect Trump assumes office. In recent months the Russian propaganda machine is spewing out materials from fairly reputable analytical platforms inside the country. Kirillova says that “Kremlin ‘experts’ do not conceal that such threats are only intended to break the West psychologically, as they themselves are not prepared for full-scale nuclear war.” Despite Russia’s lack of preparation for an all-out war with the West, the expanding nuclear rhetoric carries with it an increase in the threat of a full-scale war in multiple theaters of operation. In June 2023 a founder of the Russian Council on Foreign and Defense Policy, Sergey Karaganov, called for “delivering a pre-emptive strike of retaliation” on Poland to force the West to surrender. In the previous month, Dmitry Suslov, a direct of research programs at the policy center proposed organizing “a demonstration nuclear explosion” aimed at intimidating the West. In September, President Putin announced a reappraisal of Russian nuclear doctrine after speaking earlier in the year at the plenary session of the St. Petersburg International Economic Forum and jokingly calling Suslov a “scary person.” Pavel Baev, writing in the European Daily Monitor, says “Putin intends his announcement to mark an escalation of nuclear brinkmanship and influence the proceedings of future Ukrainian peace efforts.” Putin is expanding the list of environmental conditions that are acceptable for using a nuclear weapon and incorporating it into Russian military doctrine. Baev adds that “The ups and downs of Russian brinkmanship are disconnected from the kinetic battles of the war, correlating instead with Ukrainian peace offensives, such as Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy’s first peace summit in Bürgenstock, Switzerland.” Despite the increase in vitriolic language, in a You Tube video published a week before the US presidential election, Karaganov openly assured the West the primary goal of the escalation is to break the American spirit and that of the West, not outright nuclear war. By Election Day in the US, with political prognosticators predicting a win for former president Trump, Karaganov changed his tune and called for an increased role in nuclear deterrence. Kirillova points out that Western concessions to Russia are unlikely to reduce the risk of nuclear escalation. The distorted reality inside the Kremlin continues to push that President-elect Trump is an adherent of “world government,” that Ukraine will create a nuclear weapon, and Russia must prepare for a nuclear conflagration to achieve its ambitions for a new world order. President-elect Trump has indicated he will not agree to concessions that destabilize Europe, the Middle East or other regions. Going forward a strong US foreign policy may be the most stabilizing course the West can count on to restrain Putin and his intent to rebuild the Russian empire. Daria Novak served in the U.S. State Dept. Illustration: Pixabay

Our Latest Television Program

New Era in World Affairs

There will be a dramatic change in Washington in the aftermath of the election. What will this mean for America’s national security and foreign affairs? Our guests, former CIA officer and Vice President at the Center for Security Policy Clair Lopez, along with ret. Col. John Mills, (author of The Nation Will Follow) provide extraordinary insights. If you missed the program on your local station, catch it here: https://rumble.com/v5oonnb-the-american-political-zone-november-12-2024.html