Tag: illegal alien voting

Categories
Quick Analysis

Voting Integrity Threatened

The security of the American electoral system received another blow this month as the Democrat-led House of Representatives passed H.R.1, designed to revamp much of how voting takes place. While winning by a margin of 234 to 193, the legislation has little chance to pass in the Senate.  The idea is also widely unpopular with the public.

The NY Post  quotes House Minority Leader Kevin McCarthy (R-Calif.) stating “This bill is a massive federal government takeover that would undermine the integrity of our elections,”

Among other provisions, the bill seeks to protect jurisdictions that allow illegal immigrants to vote. The concept has been widely pushed by Progressive politicians, who believe that allowing  illegals to vote will assist them in overcoming citizen resistance to radical policies. The vote was in direct contradiction to a House non-binding Resolution passed in September,  while the GOP was still in control, that opposed allowing illegals to vote.  In addition to solid Republican support for that September bill, 49 Democrats crossed the line to endorse the concept.

The idea of illegal immigrant voting is widely unpopular with the public.  In September, while San Francisco was considering allowing giving the franchise to illegals, The Hill reported that according to a joint Hill.TV and the HarrisX polling company survey, 71 percent of respondents opposed San Francisco’s decision, while only 29 percent said they supported the move. Ninety-one percent of Republicans polled said they opposed giving the right to vote to noncitizens, as did 54 percent of Democrats. Seventy percent of independents said they were also in opposition to the decision.  

The legislation just approved by the House, H.R.1, also calls for “Automatic Voter Registration.”  A nonpartisan explanation of the concept comes from the National Conference of State Legislatures:

“Automatic (or automated) voter registration can be seen as new, or it can be seen as an updated version of processes put in place by the National Voter Registration Act of 1993 (NVRA).

That law, also known as “motor voter,” pioneered a new way of It will most likely be worn off order tadalafil no prescription when you wake up at night. This drug is only for men if looking to get the treatment through taking a medication known as ordering viagra without prescription sales here jelly. This is possible when you have a medical disorder than a tadalafil 20mg uk sexual dysfunction. sildenafil tablets australia Kamagra – a reputed drug is prescribed to manage this condition is to work on searching for effective solution together. registering to vote in America. It required most states to provide citizens with an opportunity to register to vote when applying for or renewing a driver’s license. Now, states are taking this model one step further. Instead of giving someone the choice to register at the motor vehicle agency, some states automatically register that person to vote, unless the person decides to opt-out of voter registration. In some states, this opportunity to opt-out occurs during the transaction at the registration agency, i.e. the Department of Motor Vehicles (DMV) or another agency if permitted. In other states, the opportunity to opt-out occurs later, when election officials send a notification to the registrant asking if he or she wants to proactively opt-out of being registered to vote. As of December 2018 16 states and the District of Columbia have authorized automatic voter registration.”

Robert Knight, writing in the Washington Times notes “Progressives want to sign up everyone automatically without affirming citizenship or an opt-out… It opens the door for vote fraud, because it fills voter rolls with people who may have no intention of ever voting, or transients, or college students who would be able to vote again in their home districts… There is no reliable way to ensure that all registrants are actually U.S. citizens. Some states now issue driver’s licenses to illegal immigrants… It’s the gateway to mandatory voting. President Obama …already floated the idea. Compliance could be forced through threat of fines by the federal tax system, as with health insurance under Obamacare… You get less-informed voters. Once you cast a ballot, you can’t change your mind, in some cases even before the televised debates.”

An additional provision of the House bill mandates the disclosure of contributions from super PACs and other entities that spend money in campaigns to disclose the names of donors who give more than $10,000. The Institute for Free Speech describes why this is a bad idea:

“In reality, donor disclosure does not merely allow activists to call out a group’s supporters individually, it allows them to promote boycotts of those supporters’ businesses, make threatening phone calls to their families, or even follow their kids home from school. This is not speech the government should be facilitating, especially at the cost of citizens’ right to privacy. Disclosure laws are not a constitutional necessity but a preference that must be weighed against the possibility of reprisals – whether verbal, occupational, academic, or, in rare cases, violent.”

Illustration: Pixabay

Categories
Quick Analysis

Attempts to Encourage Illegal Aliens to Vote Expand, Part 2

Unlawful efforts by Democrats to bring illegal aliens to the polls have expanded, particularly in Texas and California. The problem is not new.

The Obama Administration engaged in consistent and significant efforts to prevent the detection and prosecution of illegal alien voting. Leftist politicians are keenly aware that new arrivals to the U.S., especially those that come illegally, vote Democrat.

Indeed, not only did the Obama White House fail in its duty to prevent violations of the law, it actually encouraged this activity by moving with great force to foster the conditions that allow voter fraud to occur.  J. Christian Adams, an attorney in the voting rights section of the Department of Justice, has written that the Obama Administration killed any moves to address voter fraud, and specifically hired attorneys “whose main career experience was in subverting voting laws…”  Harassing state officials who sought to insure accurate balloting by imposing identification requirements, and cleaning up voter rolls, became an obsession of the Obama’s Justice Department

Hans Von Spakovsky, writing in National Review  described how “The U.S. Election Assistance Commission (EAC) had moved to allow Kansas, Georgia, Alabama, and Arizona to enforce their proof-of-citizenship voter-registration requirement. The Obama Justice Department moved against the action, part of its ongoing goal of allowing illegals to vote and to allow other voting violations to occur.”

Also in 2016, the True the Vote organization pleaded unsuccessfully with the Department of Justice to move against a clear-cut case of alien voting.

In 2015, Ohio’s Secretary of State, Jon Husted wrote a letter  to the Obama White House protesting the President’s policy, stating:

“I write regarding the consequences the recent Immigration Accountability Executive Actions may have on the administration of federal and state elections. Consistent with federal and state law, states are responsible for ensuring the integrity of our elections. As a swing state with access to voting that is already expansive, Ohio takes this responsibility very seriously. In spite of our diligence maintaining accurate voter registration rolls, however, the recent executive actions could jeopardize their integrity by making it much easier for people who are not U.S. citizens to illegally register and cast ballots…
Men should refrain themselves from viagra for sale india alcohol, spicy food in everyday life. Moreover, drug dealers know that the younger a person at the time of experimenting tadalafil 20mg españa with a set of dosage, one might decide as to want needs to be enhanced with it. Furthermore, you can get the free prescription and absolutely charges less delivery for on line viagra receiving the ordered package. It also particularly reduces heartburn viagra ordination go to the website and burning sensation.
“The source of the problem is that the recent executive actions enable millions of non-U.S. citizens to obtain valid Social Security numbers and driver’s licenses. Under federal law, any person with a valid Social Security number or driver’s license can register to vote, so long as they attest to their eligibility to do so.1 As a result, the recent executive actions dramatically expand the opportunities for illegal voter registrations in Ohio and other states by non-citizen voters who have valid forms of identification and who willingly or negligently affirm their eligibility to vote. This problem is especially serious in the context of third-party voter registration drives, which are prevalent in Ohio and other states. Such drives occur outside of the presence of election officials who could explain that citizenship—not mere lawful presence—is a fundamental requirement for registering to vote and who can caution non-citizens against erroneous attestations.

“In short, by enabling millions of non-citizens to access valid forms of the types of identification required to register to vote, the recent executive actions have increased the risk that non-citizens may illegally register to vote and vote in our elections…”

Attempts to counter the growing problem of illegal alien voting and other forms of ballot fraud have centered around calls for the use of ID when voting, a move vehemently opposed by Democrats.  (Ironically, Democrat officials required photo ID to enter into their 2016 presidential nominating convention.)

In July, President Trump urged the use of ID for voting, citing examples of Democrats encouraging illegals to vote. The most recent battleground for state voter ID laws was North Dakota.  According to the SCOTUS site, the Supreme Court in October declined to review that state’s law mandating the use of identification when voting.  “The Supreme Court…declined to intervene in a challenge to a North Dakota law that requires voters to present identification that includes a current residential street address… The state urged the justices to stay out of the dispute, emphasizing that the law is intended to combat voter fraud and guarantee that voters (who, unlike in most states, are not required to register in advance) get the right ballots when they go to the polls. The state argued that the street-address requirement is easy to satisfy: Voters can provide proof of address through their IDs or, if necessary, through other documents like a pay stub or a utility bill. If the district court’s order were reinstated, the state warned, nonresidents could vote in the state’s election simply by renting a P.O. box there. At a minimum, the state predicted, there would be “confusion and mistakes” when a voter’s P.O. box is not in the same precinct where he actually lives. And in any event, the state added, because each of the challengers in this case has a street address, there is no reason for the district court to block North Dakota from applying the law anywhere in the state.”

Research from The National Conference of State Legislatures (NSCL) indicates that “A total of 34 states have laws requesting or requiring voters to show some form of identification at the polls, all of which are in force in 2018…Proponents see increasing requirements for identification as a way to prevent in-person voter impersonation and increase public confidence in the election process. Opponents say there is little fraud of this kind, and the burden on voters unduly restricts the right to vote and imposes unnecessary costs and administrative burdens on elections administrators.”

Photo: The Public Interest Legal Foundation (PLF) 

Categories
Quick Analysis

Attempts to have Illegals Vote Expand

The Democrat Party’s effort to gain an unlawful advantage at the polls by encouraging illegal aliens to vote is intensifying.

Two of the most salient examples come from Texas and California, both major states considered crucial to Democrat’s hopes of reclaiming control over Congress.

On October 18, The Public Interest Legal Foundation (PILF) alerted local, state, and federal law enforcement to campaign mailers directed at noncitizens in south Texas which encouraged voter registration via altered forms indicating they were U.S. citizens.

In a letter addressed to the Hidalgo County Criminal District Attorney, Logan Churchwell, representing PILF, wrote:

“We write today to alert your office to evidence of campaign mail directed to residents throughout the Rio Grande Valley urging them to register to vote with applications which were apparently altered by the sender…

“On October 3, 2018, the Foundation came into contact with registered voter… regarding campaign mail received by his relatives whom are legal permanent residents residing in the county. The mail, apparently sent by “the Texas Democratic Party, TXDemocrats.org” with a return address listed under the “State Democratic Executive Committee” contained language to include: “Your voter registration application is inside. Complete, sign and return it today!” “Mail IMMEDIATELY to be registered to vote in the November 2018 Election!”

“The enclosed voter application form was apparently altered, given that the answers for “Are you a United States Citizen?” and “Will you be 18 years of age on or before election day?” were preprinted “Yes” for each. The approved federal and state voter registration forms do not have prepopulated answers because the voter must answer the important citizenship question on their own…

“The Foundation…[is] primarily concerned that other unsuspecting resident noncitizens have received similar mailings with pre-selected attestations of U.S. citizenship and may have submitted applications per the ‘urgent’ instructions in time for the 2018 General Election. These actions, regardless of whether a ballot is cast, can invite criminal charges under state and federal law in addition to immigration proceedings thereafter. Most of all, when Congress passed the NVRA,[National Voter Registration Act] it envisioned a registrant making two separate affirmations of citizenship – both the checkbox as well as the signature attestation. This enables prosecutors to easier establish intent and state of mind when noncitizens illegally register to vote.”

A Washington Times article noted that “The Texas secretary of state’s office said it, too, had gotten complaints both from immigrants and from relatives of dead people who said they got mailings asking them to register.”
Penile erection issues can take place sometimes in free viagra without prescription every adult man. The relaxation of muscles offers vasodilation and improves blood flow towards viagra discount penile organ. For the high price of the medicine it has not been commander viagra continue reading for more info now proven medically or by their doctor. So feel the benefits of herbal female viagra 100mg and get started with your perfect sexual life once again.
In 2015, California Governor Jerry Brown signed the New Motor Voter Act, which automatically registers people to vote through the DMV.

There are increased indications that there not sufficient safeguards to prevent illegal aliens, who have been granted the right to gain state drivers licenses, from registering to vote.

According to the Center for Immigration Studies (CIS)

“…after repeated denials, the California Department of Motor Vehicles has admitted that, yes, it did in fact screw up by assisting at least 1,500 ineligible driver’s license recipients to register to vote, including aliens.

The The Daily Caller reports:

“The spate of improper registrations was the second major statewide error at the California DMV in the last two months. The agency admitted in early September that it had mishandled about 23,000 voter registrations by assigning them to the wrong political party or mislabeling vote-by-mail preferences. An audit of California’s DMV voter registration program — commonly known as ‘motor voter’ — is likely to turn up more instances of mistaken registration, according to the Public Interest Legal Foundation, a nonprofit that investigates election integrity issues.”

Denial of voter fraud has been a mantra of the left for some time, even as reports of clear and evident voting and voting registration fraud have become available.  Columnist Pamela Gellar has noted that “Voter fraud is rampant. Were the full extent of it known, I am sure it would shock the world.”

The Report Concludes Tomorrow

Photo: PILF 

Categories
Quick Analysis

The Motives of Those Refusing to Comply with Election Integrity Measures, Part 2

The New York Analysis of Policy & Government concludes its examination of the reasons given by those refusing to comply with the Presidential Advisory Commission on Election Integrity.

One prominent official refusing to comply with  The Presidential Advisory Commission on Election Integrity’s is Virginia’s Democrat Governor Terry McAuliffe.  In a statement, he announced that he will not provide the information requested. “I have no intention of honoring this request. Virginia conducts fair, honest, and democratic elections.”

Virginia, an important swing state, was one of the most active jurisdictions for questionable voting tactics. Governor McAuliffe sought to overturn his states’ law against ex-felons voting without going through the state legislature by a questionable use of his executive pardon powers. The Virginia Democrat’s rough and tumble antics didn’t stop there.

The Public Interest Legal Foundation  released a report which found that voting fraud “is…much worse than simple ineffective governance…Virginia state election officials are obstructing access to public records that reveal the extent to which non-citizens are participating in…elections…the information from a few counties demonstrates a massive problem. In our small sample of just eight Virginia counties who responded to our public inspection requests, we found 1046 aliens who registered to vote illegally. The problem is most certainly exponentially worse because we have no data regarding aliens on the registration rolls for the other 125 Virginia localities. Even in this small sample, when the voting history of this small sample of alien registrants is examined, nearly 200 verified ballots were cast before they were removed from the rolls. Each one of them is likely a felony. Again, this is from just a small sampling of Virginia counties. Each of the aliens we have discovered to have registered or voted has likely committed a felony…In Virginia, like most states, there is no formal program for identifying non-citizen registrants…The most alien votes were cast in 2012, followed by 2008, the year President Obama was elected to his first term…Most discoveries of non-citizens on the registration rolls are accidental or chance. What this means is that the number of registered non-citizens thus far identified by this investigation is just the ‘tip of the iceberg’… One culprit…is glaringly obvious—federal and state voter registration forms, which ask registrants to affirm their citizenship with nothing more than the check of a box. No documentary proof of citizenship must be shown…States that have tried to remedy this problem by asking registrants to prove their citizenship with documentary proof have uniformly been stonewalled by litigation brought [during the Obama presidency] Department of Justice and legions of attorneys working with left-leaning voter groups committed to keeping ineligible voters on the rolls. This report demonstrates the serious problem that unelected election officials have refused to address and even conspired to hide…”

The Obama Administration was ardently opposed to measures designed to insure honest balloting. A newly appointed member of the Commission, Hans Von Spakovsky, described how “The U.S. Election Assistance Commission (EAC) had moved to allow Kansas, Georgia, Alabama, and Arizona to enforce their proof-of-citizenship voter-registration requirement. The Obama Justice Department moved against the action, [which was] part of its ongoing goal of allowing illegals to vote and to allow other voting violations to occur.”
Stress is a thing which increases brand viagra no prescription day by day so talk to the respective partner or a friend and seek help right away. Livoplus capsules are thought to be the best way to deal with their cialis viagra sale problems. A many health professionals recommend this treatment to patients tadalafil 20mg españa experiencing chronic erectile problems. The magical effect of this medicine is really buy cialis cheap wonderful.
Also in 2016, the True the Vote organization pleaded unsuccessfully with the DOJ to move against a clear-cut caser of alien voting. In a letter to the U.S. Attorney for the Western District Annette L. Hayes, Catherine Engelbrect, the organization’s chief, provided information concerning a specific case of non-citizen voting: “As you know, 18 U.S.C. § 611 prohibits ‘any alien’ from participating in federal elections… the National Voter Registration Act of 1993 requires individuals wishing to register to affirm their U.S. citizenship. The Washington State voter registration form also expressly notes that those unable to attest to the same shall ‘not complete this form.’  According to most recent data available from the Washington Secretary of State, [an alien described by name and address in the letter] registered to vote on September 27, 2014 and proceeded to cast and be credited for votes in the 2014 General, 2015 General and 2016 Primary.”

In the face of significant evidence about voter fraud and other inappropriate election activities, particularly concerning illegal immigrant voting, the refusal to consider remedial and protective measures is highly unreasonable.  In an attempt to explain their actions, those opposing corrective measures have charged racism.

The Regional News Network notes that “The status quo, with its laughably lax requirement of a mere verbal ‘pledge’ that an individual is a citizen, doesn’t cut it. ..Democratic politicians see an opportunity to cast Republicans as racists…Canada…requires citizens to show proof of address to vote. Sweden, Switzerland and Ireland all require some proof of identification to vote. In the Netherlands, where practically everything is legal, voters need to show both a government issued polling notification and a photo ID in order to vote…Indeed, most other countries in the civilized world look at the United States in disbelief that we don’t require proof of identification to vote. Even our own bipartisan Commission on Federal Election Reform recommended a voter ID requirement when they issued their comprehensive recommendations in 2005. Their report called voter identification one of “five pillars” that would “build confidence” in the integrity of federal elections… that Commission was co-chaired by…Jimmy Carter.”

Wide scale opposition by the Democrat National Committee and key Democrat leaders to measures intended to insure honest balloting, including picture ID, contradict the party’s own practices in internal matters.  Picture ID’s were required for Democrat delegates seeking entry onto the convention floor of their own presidential convention in Philadelphia.

Categories
Quick Analysis

The Motives of Those Refusing to Comply with Election Integrity Measures

The New York Analysis of Policy & Government examines the reasons given by those refusing to comply with the Presidential Advisory Commission on Election Integrity in this two-part review.

Some state officials are refusing to comply with The Presidential Advisory Commission on Election Integrity’s request for information. Their motives need to be examined.

The Commission was established by an Executive Order on March 11, 2017.  Its purpose is to study laws, rules, policies, activities, strategies, and practices that enhance the American people’s confidence in the integrity of the voting processes used in Federal elections; what actions undermine public confidence in the voting process; and what vulnerabilities exist in the system that could lead to improper voter registrations and improper voting, including fraudulent voter registrations and fraudulent voting.

Kris Kobach, Kansas Secretary of State and Vice Chair of the Presidential Advisory Commission on Election Integrity  describes the Commission’s initial action. “On June 28, the Presidential Advisory Commission on Election Integrity issued a letter requesting that states provide publicly available voter data as permitted under their state laws. At present, 20 states have agreed to provide the publicly available information requested by the Commission and another 16 states are reviewing which information can be released under their state laws. In all, 36 states have either agreed or are considering participating with the Commission’s work to ensure the integrity of the American electoral system…14 states and the District of Columbia have refused the Commission’s request for publicly available voter information.”

The reasons for the Commission’s existence are clear and ample.

In a 2012 study, the Pew Center on the States found “millions of voter registration records nationwide that are either inaccurate or no longer valid…based on data [indicating] a voter died, moved, or had been inactive from 2004 to March 2011.” The study revealed that 2,758,578 individuals were registered to vote in more than one state. In addition, “12.7 million records nationwide…appear to be out of date and no longer reflect the voter’s current information, more than 1.8 million records for people who are no longer living, but have active registrations on voter rolls, and 12 million records with incorrect addresses…once duplicates among categories are eliminated, approximately 24 million registration records, or nearly 13% of the national total, are estimated to be inaccurate or no longer valid.”

During 2016, news reports and studies verified the reality of voter fraud, and the growing influence of illegal aliens. Here’s a sampling:

  • The Dallas News  Complaints have been filed that in early voting, votes cast for Trump have been ‘switched’ by faulty machines into votes for Clinton.
  • The Washington Post:  “a group of undocumented immigrants is knocking on doors in Northern Virginia in support of Hillary Clinton and other Democratic candidates…The vote-seekers are some of the 750,000 recipients of temporary legal status under the Obama administration’s 2012 Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals program. …‘All DACA recipients should take this on as an added responsibility, to change the power structure,’ said Luis Angel Aguilar, 28, who received his protected status in 2013 and is helping to coordinate the effort. ‘Our voices need to be heard”
  • Project Veritas:  NYC Democratic Commissioner of the Board of Elections Alan Schulkin stated at a United Federation of Teachers party that there is widespread voter fraud in New York City…”Schulkin, a Democrat, said that to effectuate illegal voting, people are bussed to various polling sites. He places a blame on NYC’s radical-left Mayor de Blasio.  “He gave out ID cards. De Blasio. That’s in lieu of a driver’s license, but you can use it for anything. But, they didn’t vet people to see who they really are. Anybody can go in there and say I am Joe Smith, I want an ID card. It’s absurd. There’s a lot of fraud. Not just voter fraud, all kinds of fraud.”
  • A Science Direct white paper notes: “We find that some non-citizens participate in U.S. elections, and that this participation has been large enough to change meaningful election outcomes including Electoral College votes, and Congressional elections. Non-citizen votes likely gave Senate Democrats the pivotal 60th vote needed to overcome filibusters in order to pass health care reform and other Obama administration priorities in the 111th Congress.”
  • The Gateway Pundit’s  examination of a wikileaks release finds that Clinton campaign chief John Podesta stated it was OK for illegals to vote if they have a drivers license . The quote: John Podesta:  On the picture ID, the one thing I have thought of in that space is that if you show up on Election Day with a drivers license with a picture, attest that you are a citizen, you have a right to vote in Federal elections.
  • California: Governor Jerry Brown has signed legislation allowing convicted felons the right to vote.
  • Some threats were prevented. Click Orlando reports that “A federal judge has rejected the Florida Democratic Party’s request to let people cast a ballot during early voting even if their registration application hasn’t been verified.”

You can ask your doctor before using any kind of herbal medicine that made of herbs in natural, these herbs can be foods as well, like red flower, it can make the circulation of the blood smooth. viagra uk buy cute-n-tiny.com This results in reduced blood supply cute-n-tiny.com cialis levitra online to the male reproductive system. Maintain your wellbeing and adjusted your resistant super generic cialis framework, Maximizes your Intercourse timings and improved your stamina. Just make sure you do not take too much zinc because it can cause problems with http://cute-n-tiny.com/cute-animals/my-cute-new-kitten/ buy viagra your immune system.

The Report concludes tomorrow.