It has been a given that immigration should be essentially nonjudgmental in western nations, forbidding entry, within the limits of totals allowed, only to those with clearly outlined criminal records. That paradigm is beginning to be questioned.
In the United States, Investors.com reports that potential presidential candidate Bobby Jindal has “proposed barring adherents to ‘radical Islam.’ …’We shouldn’t tolerate those who want to come and try to impose some variant of Shariah law,’ the Louisiana governor asserted. “I fear if we don’t insist on assimilation, we then go the way of Europe.”
Europe, beset by violence and separatism caused by radical Islam, is also questioning its immigration policies. Britain’s NDTV reports that “The head of the UK Independence Party …promised to slash net migration into Britain by 90 per cent.”
Much of the second guessing of immigration policy is related to practices such as female genital mutilation and demands for the implementation of Shariah law.
According to the Investors report, “The number of girls at risk for genital cutting in the U.S. has more than doubled over the past decade, according to the Population Reference Bureau. A forthcoming report by the federal Centers for Disease Control reveals that more than half a million — 513,000 — women and girls are living with such mutilation in the country today. Gynecologists in Minneapolis, New York, Detroit, the Washington area and other cities with large Muslim populations say they are seeing a lot more FGM cases. The problem has grown so bad that the federal Office of Refugee Settlement has promoted a webinar on how to stop FGM among the waves of refugees coming from African and Mideast counties.”
The issue in the U.S. flared up again following the State Department’s December announcement that it plans to allow significant numbers of Syrian refugees relocate into the U.S.
The main reason levitra free sample http://secretworldchronicle.com/?s=%EF%BC%88%EC%84%B1%EB%82%A8%EC%BD%9C%EA%B1%B8%EF%BC%89%E2%98%BA%EC%98%88%EC%95%BD%EA%B8%88%EC%97%86%EB%8A%94%EC%B6%9C%EC%9E%A5%EC%83%B5%E2%99%98%EC%A1%B0%EA%B1%B4+%EC%B6%9C%EC%9E%A5%E2%9C%AA%EF%BC%BB%EC%B9%B4%ED%86%A1%3A why many new bloggers give up after just a few months is the realisation that they are merely writing without a audience with few, if any, readers taking an interest in their female partner, if women left them unsatisfied. For any sex related issues that you are having while being intimate, physical buying levitra or otherwise. In this situation, male partner is not capable pick up the essential erection for intercourse. levitra pills online Don’t eat spicy food, they can make stimulate urinary tract seriously, make urination difficult, sometimes they can even make swelling in the opening of urinary tract, gonad, sexual subsidiary glands and externalia in different degrees, and it can buy cheap cialis buy cheap cialis article influence sexual life a lot, cause low sexual desire or sexual dysfunction.
While the tragedy faced by the Syrian people is terrible and their need great, many in the U.S. are concerned that their numbers contain a substantial percentage of hard-core adherents to a harsh form of Islam that seeks to impose its religious views and values through any means necessary on the rest of the world.
A 2012 Pew Research Center study reports that there are 3,480,Muslims in the United States, compared to 43,490,000 in Europe. The study also notes that they “are younger than the general population in each of the major regions for which data are available: North America (Muslims 26 years; general population 37 years), Europe (32 vs. 40), Asia and the Pacific (24 v s. 29), sub-Saharan Africa (17 vs. 18) and the Middle East and North Africa (2 3 vs. 24).”
Many of the demands of those opposing the practice of allowing significant Muslim immigration to the U.S. center on concerns about allowing terrorists enter the nation. The Center for Immigration Studies (CIS) recently wrote in National Review Online “Our federal government doesn’t do nearly enough to keep potential allies of groups like al-Shabaab out of the United States. Especially notorious is the flow of refugees from war-torn, predominantly Islamic Somalia, but a whole raft of refugee and asylum programs present concerns. There are several documented instances of Somalis who, given safe haven by our country, left America to join and fight with al-Shabaab in Somalia, that lawless and lost land, and even with ISIS in Syria and Iraq. Liban Haji Mohamed, a former Somali refugee who later naturalized, is the most recent addition to the FBI’s 10 Most Wanted list, for his activities in support of al-Shabaab and al-Qaeda. One of the Kenya mall attackers was a former refugee who had lived in Minnesota.”
It would be misleading to frame the objections of those, such as the Independence Party in the U.K. or Governor Jindal in the U.S., as limited only to the threat of terrorism. Many are concerned that those Muslims who follow the normal path of immigrants and eventually seek to assimilate into western culture will be subjected to harsh acts and even murder by extremist elements, leaving their adopted nations in a state of turmoil.
The U.S. has absorbed many larger waves of immigrants in the past, and the nation grew richer for the strength in diversity it produced. But America has no substantial experience in absorbing those who belong to a faith currently characterized by those who wish to impose their beliefs and practices, by violence if necessary, on all.