Future use of the Moon – USA Gov Policy

The New York Analysis of Policy and Government concludes its presentation of NASA’s plans to return to the Moon.

A VIBRANT EARTH-MOON FUTURE

Whenever the first human mission to Mars occurs, it will not mean that we are done with the Moon. The windows for launching the two-year mission to Mars open up every few years, and we will continue to conduct human missions to the lunar surface to test systems, conduct scientific investigations, and continue to develop our sustainable lunar presence as we prepare for the optimal launch window.

We will continue to explore the Moon indefinitely — leveraging robotic deliveries provided by CLPS providers, longer duration human missions, and commercial and international

partnerships that will add to the Artemis Base Camp elements NASA puts in place. The LTV, habitable mobility platform and foundation surface habitat will stay on the Moon enabling crews to live on the lunar surface for months at a time. The rovers and crew-tended capabilities on the Moon will be designed to operate autonomously and to work with independent robotic assistants.

In addition to testing our systems for the first mission to Mars, a core purpose of Artemis Base Camp will be to demonstrate new technologies that, over time, will expand our capabilities and reduce the costs of lunar operations. Astronauts at Artemis Base Camp will be testing a wide set of new technologies in six priority areas encompassed by the recently announced Lunar Surface Innovation Initiative (i.e. ISRU; surface power; extreme access; excavation and construction; lunar dust mitigation; and extreme environments). Some of these technologies will help from the beginning, such as lunar dust mitigation and enabling operations in extreme environments like the cold of the lunar night. Other technologies are in early development for significant long-term benefits. For example, ISRU will enable the production of fuel, water, and/or oxygen from local materials, enabling sustainable surface operations with decreasing supply needs from Earth. For surface power, our goal is to develop advanced solar collection and a small, lightweight fission power system to support even longer-duration missions and operations on the Moon, and eventually for Mars and beyond. Autonomous manufacturing, excavation, and construction technologies will make infrastructure emplacement more affordable.

With the stunning popularity of discount wholesale cialis as a distinct option for cialis is that it goes on till you see that satisfactory smile on your partner’s face. Unfortunately, as far as most customers check these guys out cheapest viagra prices are concerned price determines quality. Thinning hair cures perform incredibly comparable to both medications but without the side effects and these remedies do not expense money on advertisements they expense money on researches of sildenafil Citrate due to this they sell generic tadalafil cheap and viagra deal with their ED issues, but in terms of a return – worthless Information is always there. Why one would spend deeprootsmag.org viagra no prescription more when similar drugs with the same sildenafil citrate are also available.

Astronauts will also conduct tests of advanced robotics, including future biomimetic systems that enable more autonomous operations at the Moon and can serve as robotic assistants to the crew. In time, Artemis Base Camp might also include a hopper that could deliver science and technology payloads all over the Moon and which could be operated by crew at Artemis Base Camp and refueled using locally sourced propellant. A lunar far-side radio telescope could also be remotely emplaced and operated from Artemis Base Camp – a sort of backyard radio- telescope at our first encampment on the Moon.

Developing a sustained and vibrant lunar presence will not only require the best of NASA and its international partner space agencies, but also the best of the entire U.S. government and commercial sector. Establishing the infrastructure that will enable additional international and commercial partnerships will result in opportunities for the first international and commercial astronauts on the lunar surface, opening up Earth’s ’s off-shore continent for ongoing human discovery and development. NASA’s unique leadership and capabilities will be combined with innovation and contributions from the same sectors that fuel our nation and economy here on Earth.

_{THE INITIAL HUMAN MARS MISSION}

The success of the first human mission to Mars requires a voyage of stunning technological and operational complexity. The distance from Earth to the Moon is a relatively manageable 250,000 miles. In contrast, Mars is, on average, 140 million miles from Earth. The challenges of a mission to Mars are compounded not only by these distances but by the more dangerous levels and types of radiation that is found in deep space. Mars’ atmosphere – while intriguing from a scientific perspective – also presents distinct challenges for getting humans to and from its surface.

The initial lunar missions will greatly inform our concept of operations for Mars. Every day in deep space increases the probability of catastrophic events occurring. The concept of operations NASA is working toward for the first human mission to Mars is therefore one that reduces trip time significantly and minimizes time spent on the surface to around 30-45 days. Factors NASA will continue to consider include: risks to crew health during transit, both from galactic cosmic ray (GCR) radiation and from potential catastrophic mission events; the complexity of mission operations on the Martian surface; and the complexity and cost of mission systems, such as in-space propulsion, the ability to land heavy payloads, and required surface systems. NASA has targeted conducting a human mission to Mars that can be realized as soon as possible, while still ensuring that our Mars surface capabilities will allow for extensive exploration on our first mission, including a search for Martian life. The Moon will allow us to test and demonstrate significant parts of this mission before sending humans on this epic journey. NASA will have more to share on the strategy for how the Moon prepares us for the first human mission to Mars in the coming months.

Illustration: NASA

Quick Analysis

Ukraine’s Frozen Conflict

As we approach winter in the northern hemisphere, the war in Ukraine is beginning to resemble a “frozen conflict” from many perspectives. Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky recently told the media he hopes the war will end faster once President-elect Trump takes over in January. Opinions in Moscow, however, differ from that of the Ukrainian leader. Russian President Vladimir Putin argues that the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) needs to exclude Ukraine from joining in “exchange” for peace. If it does not, he says, then no end to the war is in sight. So far there is no Christmas solution. Several NATO countries, according to Vladimir Socor of the Jamestown Foundation, are tentatively considering “coalitions-of-the-willing” to provide security for Ukraine outside of the formal NATO framework. There is, however, no collective mechanism today under which such an arrangement is viable. According to the NATO Charter, while Ukraine is a NATO partner country, it may not join as a full member since it has not fulfilled the requirements for membership. That has not stopped NATO and allies from continuing “to provide Ukraine with unprecedented levels of support, helping to uphold its fundamental right to self-defence,” according to the organization. Socor says that keeping Ukraine out of NATO will not advance peace with Russia. Waiting for a peace settlement, he suggests, would only serve to encourage Moscow to continue the war indefinitely. Although the Biden Administration officially withdrew its support for Ukrainian membership in 2021, NATO maintains an “open door” policy toward membership-seeking countries. The current White House position led the way for European states to oppose Ukraine’s membership saying that a decision should be delayed until “conditions are met.” Biden pushed for changing “open door” to a “bridge” metaphor. It is not intended as an across-the-board NATO policy and has been implemented in the past on a case-by-case basis, says Socor. “The alliance’s open-door policy was not fully insulated from Russia’s non-statutory blocking power, and NATO-aspirant countries’ path toward membership was not always irreversible.” Russia has successfully blocked states like Georgia from joining, first in 2008 and again after the war in Ukraine began in 2014. Russia recognizes the value add of Ukraine to NATO is enormous and that Kyiv has a better case than some other nations. Putin’s invasion was, in part, intended to foreclose that option. By 2021, Moscow was pushing hard to maximize its war objectives, which included further annexations of Ukrainian territory. A main goal for Putin was, and is, to ensure there is no Ukraine left to join NATO. As President-elect Trump prepares to assume office in January, he is faced with the historical challenges presented by the war. Post-conflict security guarantees were the center of several proposals made during the 2023 military stalemate. The incoming Trump Administration has yet to outline how it intends to handle the Russia-Ukraine war. Analysts in Washington believe that the new Administration will expect its European allies to guarantee the majority of Ukraine’s security needs. As we approach 2025, several European nations have acknowledged that they do not view Ukraine as eligible for NATO membership as it would draw the organization into the middle of the conflict. Others want to wait until the war is over or pending a “peace” settlement before considering Ukrainian membership. Socor reports that some “influential voices” are suggesting that “Kyiv should join NATO after “freezing” the war along a stable armistice line, de facto accepting Ukraine’s partition, with NATO security guarantees applying de jure to the government-controlled territory only.” This would mean starting accession talks soon with the actual talks to commence only after a ceasefire is in place. Trump arrives in Washington at a time when Putin’s hybrid strategies of war in Ukraine have eviscerated commonly-held differences between war and peace. “Absent a political consensus in NATO over Ukrainian membership, certain European allies, including France’s President Emmanuel Macron, are holding informal consultations about post-conflict security guarantees to Kyiv by NATO members outside of NATO’s framework,” according to the Jamestown Foundation. The Biden Administration downplayed the discussions on possible forms of military assistance and defense industry cooperation by sending only an Assistant Secretary of State. For a European peace to hold the Trump Administration would need to formally extend the United States’ nuclear deterrence to Ukraine. Options under discussion in Europe include a “coalition of the resolute” to deploy forces to Ukraine as part of a possible armistice package, deterring further Russian attacks, says Secor. European officials are also debating, without any agreement, whether its military forces could perform non-combat logistical roles to free Ukrainian forces to fight. None of the possible courses of action has moved forward as all eyes are waiting on the incoming Trump Administration for clues about its intended level of support for a NATO framework and other non-NATO proposals. Daria Novak served in the U.S. State Dept.