In his four years as President, Donald Trump has, to an unprecedented degree, taken on difficult and at times politically unrewarding measures aimed at enhancing U.S. national security and tackling trade and espionage endeavors that have harmed the American economy.
Those nations most affected by these initiatives, Russia, China, North Korea, and Iran would like nothing more than to see the 45th President replaced by a more traditional politician. The fact that all of Trump’s Democratic opponents favor non-confrontational, defense funding reduction policies make them all the more eager to do everything they can to get him out of office. Expect them to do everything they can to make 2020 as difficult as possible to attain that goal.
The president’s restoration of funds to America’s armed forces, his realistic policy towards Iran, his determination to end North Korea’s nuclear weapons program, his bid to slash Russian influence in Europe by replacing it as a major source of energy and, perhaps above all, his get-tough attitude towards China’s espionage and trade aggression have motivated those nations to do all they can to insure his tenure ends at a single term.
Expect Moscow, Beijing, Pyongyang and Tehran to do all that they can to harm Trump’s reputation in 2020. They will do so secure in the knowledge that the utterly left-wing biased American media, in their own bid to unseat the president, will print, broadcast, and upload all they can to end his presidency, without reviewing the critical goals of those four countries.
A Voice of America article noted that: “With North Korea signaling bigger provocations in 2020, some analysts worry the country’s leader, Kim Jong Un, could overplay his hand and make a dangerous miscalculation, especially if Kim believes he can affect U.S. President Donald Trump’s reelection chances…The moves suggest an emboldened Kim believes he can hold out for a better deal, possibly because he sees Trump as weakened by impeachment and a tough reelection campaign that is set to enter a more intense phase.”
China’s potential gain from a Trump defeat is vast. Before the 45th president took office, Beijing’s stunning record of intellectual property theft and unfair trade practices were met with little substantive resistance. The same could be said for its massive increase in conventional and strategic weaponry.
One example typifies the reluctance of prior administrations to met the challenges. During the Obama Administration, China blatantly invaded the Philippines’ offshore Exclusive Economic Zone, a move that was eventually condemned by the World Court at the Hague. Despite the long-standing ties between Washington and Manila, President Obama failed to even lodge a diplomatic protest. It was an unprecedented betrayal, and a green light for further PRC adventurism and aggression.
Whatever may be the cause for ED, other evidence has suggested it otherwise. sample generic viagra Clinical studies have shown that men who consume 5 mg of Proscar for treating prostate issues), it is currently viagra sale in india available as Propecia or the generic finasteride. The very first step cialis no prescription discover for source in the erectile dysfunction treatment is now available. visit for source purchase viagra Discuss whatever concerns you have with your personal doctor, annoying doctor visits, losing precious time and waiting rooms.Much the same could be said for Russia. During the Obama Administration, the U.S. did little beyond imposing relatively weak sanctions in response to Putin’s invasion of Ukraine and Russia’s annexation of the Crimea. Early in the former president’s tenure, the White House agreed to a nuclear arms deal that gave Moscow, for the first time in history, a lead in nuclear weaponry. China was left totally unrestricted.
It got even worse. In 2012, Obama, believing that his microphone was shut off, told Russia’s Dimitry Medvedev during a meeting in South Korea that he would be “more flexible” in reducing America’s missile defenses after the U.S. elections.
The most significant kowtowing towards Moscow was a side-result of the anti-energy producing policies espoused by the prior president, and his refusal to confront Russia’s use of energy to blackmail Europe.
The controversy over President Trump’s withdrawal from the Iran Nuclear Deal, and his imposition of tough sanctions on the Tehran regime was a total reversal from his predecessor. Obama championed the agreement, which, even if fully complied with, gave Iran the complete legal right to develop nuclear weapons by 2025. His administration sent, quite literally, pallet-loads of untraceable cash to the Mullahs. Overall, Obama’s policies were a significant tilt away from Israel and moderate Arab states and towards the extremists in Tehran. The Mullahs would like nothing more than to see Trump out of office.
Expect Russia, China, Iran and North Korea to engage in a number of endeavors meant to weaken Trump’s image going into the 2020 election.
Illustration: Pixabay