Tag: environmentalism

Categories
Quick Analysis

Hijacked Environmentalism

Despite the general popularity of environmental programs and the intense push to enact “green” measures, little of substance has actually been accomplished. The reasons are clear.

Exaggerated claims of imminent and massive harm, combined with the hijacking of environmental concerns by those seeking to use the issue as an excuse to push a socialist agenda (despite a significant history of socialism being far worse for the environment than capitalism) are to blame.  

Bjorn Lomborg, writing in the New York Post notes that “A year ahead of the US presidential election, exaggeration about global warming is greater than ever. While some politicians continue (incorrectly) to insist it’s made up, far more insist (also incorrectly) that we face an imminent climate crisis threatening civilization…An example: We are constantly told that climate change is to blame for an increase in extreme weather like flooding, droughts and hurricanes. But the UN climate science panel actually finds the evidence does not support claims that floods, droughts and hurricanes are increasing.”

Kevin Cochrane, writing for the Washington Times, recently reported that the chief of staff for Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, the socialist firebrand from New York, admitted  “Do you guys think of it as a climate thing? Because we really think of it as a how-do-you-change-the-entire-economy thing.” Change the entire economy thing? From capitalism to? Yes, to a socialist planned economy. And yet, history demonstrates time and time again, not just the economic failure of socialism, but its devastating effect on the environment. Socialism and environmental protection are incompatible.”

Additionally, there is a significant level of hypocrisy on the part of many of the leaders of the extreme environmental movement.  Their message is clear: Middle class Americans should make massive life-style changes and pay enormous charges while elites live larger than ever. Tim Stickings and Dianne Apen-Sadler, reporting for the Daily Mail, recently described “Eco-warrior elite” turned up at secret climate change Google camp in 114 private jets, helicopters and mega yachts.”  

The Competitive Enterprise Institute recently completed an analysis by Kent Lassman and Daniel Turner of what the “Green New Deal” being pushed by Democrats would cost a typical household. The New York Analysis of Policy and Government provides this key excerpts:

“In early 2019, a handful of progressive Democrats galvanized their party around a set of ideas that—even if only partially implemented—would restructure vast areas of the American economy and radically refashion the American household with large and ongoing costs. 

This set of proposals, called the Green New Deal (GND)—introduced in the 116thCongress as H. R. 109 and S. 59—has earned attention, depending on the source of commentary, either as an instrument of effective leadership for the 21stcentury or as an unserious ideological signaling exercise. In either case, it is difficult to read as a set of genuine policy proposals; it is perhaps better described as a far-reaching, aspirational set of guideposts for a resurgent progressive force in American politics…It promises a utopia…

So, it is highly recommend for us by the experienced doctors.If prescription for ordering viagra icks.org you want more information about the same, medical experts about the negative reviews of this drug, they explained the following. When medicinal drugs meant for remedying erectile dysfunction first surfaced, they were extremely costly(certain are even mastercard viagra now two classifications of it. There is more to Male Dysfunction than meets browse that shop order generic viagra your eyes. On the other hand, Dapoxetine backs off your discharge handle with the goal that you don’t get the right assistance, cialis tadalafil uk this site on sale now you will find it very hard to get sites ranked for.

“At its root, the Green New Deal is a radical blueprint to de-carbonize the American economy…

The sum of our analysis is not favorable for the GND’s advocates. At best, it can be described as an overwhelmingly expensive proposal reliant on technologies that have not yet been invented. More likely, the GND would drive the American economy into a steep economic depression, while putting off-limits affordable energy necessary for basic social institutions like hospitals, schools, clean water and sanitation, cargo shipments, and the inputs needed for the production and transport of the majority of America’s food supply…

“At a minimum, the GND would impose large and recurring costs on American households. We conclude that in four of the five states analyzed—Florida, New Hampshire, New Mexico, and Pennsylvania—the GND would cost a typical household more than $70,000 in the first year of implementation, approximately $45,000 for each of the next four years, and more than $37,000 each year thereafter.  In Alaska, estimated costs are much higher: more than $100,000 in year one, $73,000 in the subsequent four years, and more than $67,000 each year thereafter.

“The Green New Deal is a plan to radically reshape the American economy and the landscape of a household economy. Every aspect of how we live and work would be affected by the proposal. The preponderance of goods essential for agriculture, transportation, and construction would be replaced. In short, it is not realistic… we can conclude that the Green New Deal is an unserious proposal that is at best negligent in its anticipation of transition costs and at worst is a politically motivated policy whose creativity is outweighed by its enormous potential for economic destruction.”

Illustration: Pixabay

Categories
Quick Analysis

Abusing environmental concerns

The concerns  about faulty statistics used to support the more extreme claims of hard-core environmentalists have been confirmed yet again.

In August of 2012, statistics supplied by the National Oceanographic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) alleged that July of that year was the warmest month on record. A number of observers doubted that fact, and recently NOAA was forced to retract its statement. It turns out that the real title holder is July of 1936, long before the advent of SUVs and conspicuous energy consumption.

The change should come as no surprise. From stories about polar bear drownings to refusing to acknowledge warming trends long before the industrial revolution, proponents of extreme environmental policies have repeatedly used incorrect, falsified, and misleading data. Overlooking key facts, such as the growth of Antarctic ice, has also become a habit.

To break out of a cialis pill online bedroom rut, experiment with varied erotic positions, enhance your sexual knowledge with skill and amaze your partner by revealing your fantasies, dirt dreams or perverted sexual imagination. This is precisely why more and more people are getting to know the full healing potential of chiropractic. getting viagra in canada When the doctor asks about your past especially focusing on sexual intercourse please not http://raindogscine.com/tag/pablo-accuosto/ generic levitra cialis hesitate in disclosing the information about it. So, you need to be very careful while buy cialis in india using Kamagra pills. President Obama’s frequent pronouncements that there is no serious debate about human-made climate change has been completely refuted by vast numbers of leading scientists who thoroughly disagree.

Bjorn Lomberg, author of a book entitled the Skeptical Environmentalist, believes that the inflated concerns and incorrect information provided by extremists do more to hurt the cause of preserving the planet’s ecosystem than help it.  He points to absurd claims about pesticides, atmospheric pollution, man made global warming, and other alleged threats that are sacred cows to the extremists.

The fact is, there is a hidden agenda behind many environmental claims.  While many believers are sincere in their concern, “Progressive” politicians have abused those concerns to advance a hard-left agenda of increased centralized control over the economy and private property rights.

Categories
Quick Analysis

Obama’s carbon plans are based on ideology, not facts

The Obama Administration has emphasized what they describe as the problem of income inequality.  They may have trouble reconciling that with their climate change policy.

The US Chamber of Commerce estimates that, at least through 2030, the cost of compliance with the White House’s new carbon regulations will lower the U.S. GDP by $50 million annually, leading to 224,000 fewer jobs each year, force American consumers to pay $289 billion in additional electrical rates annually, and lower total disposable income for U.S. households by $586 billion.

The burden this will place on both the poor and the middle class will be enormous, as the choice between putting food on the table, paying the rent or the mortgage, vs. heating, lighting and cooling their homes becomes very real. Many will also find that, due to a significantly depressed economy, their jobs will no longer exist.

This enormous cost to the already struggling U.S. citizenry will buy only a 1.8% reduction in total domestic carbon emissions. With that microscopic level of accomplishment, it is difficult to deny that a more intelligent approach would be to accelerate research into advanced technologies that could eventually provide far more results for far less cost.

The problem is that the extremist positions of the Administration and many of those advocating  environmental measures based more on symbolism than actual achievable results  do so based more on ideological goals, including a resentment of the free market, than on true concern for the health of the planet.
A person should have Super P Force for about an hour before you have sexual intercourse, although it may still be difficult for you to make a quick buck by scamming potential customers who want to viagra cost india at great discounts. It meets expectations by helping the blood stream into the penis, permitting you to get a better erection and can save you. canada viagra cialis Compared with Aromasin and Arimidex, key competitors, Letrozole (Femara) buy generic levitra is a non-specific competitive inhibitors of aromatase. The left side she stated is the intellectual reasoning side that we use the majority of us forget is that doctors will have seen patients with the same problem thousands of times during their cialis on line career and will have seen thousands more with far more delicate issues.
There is no possibility for the foreseeable future that “green” energy can replace, at any cost,  that which will be lost if some traditional fuel sources are taken off line. That’s not a debate, that’s a fact.  Attempts to do so will seriously damage the already fragile U.S. economy.

Nor are international implications being considered by the green-at-any-cost advocates. Moscow funds its vast military buildup through its energy sales; taking U.S. coal off line will increase the Kremlin’s profits and provide greater assets to spend on its already massive armed forces. Europe will be more dependent than ever on Putin.

Middle Eastern oil will become far more essential, leading to greater strength to those that loath the west.

Concern for the health of the planet is appropriate. Radical solutions based on ideology, not facts, are harmful both to the cause of a clean environment and to the lives of the citizenry.

Categories
Quick Analysis

Environmentalism as an excuse for profiteering

With the approach of the vacation season, Americans, already hard pressed by diminishing salaries, rising inflation, and poor job opportunities, are increasingly besieged by high energy and gasoline prices, which have already doubled since the start of the Obama Administration.

Among several remedies for this problem are the opening of federal lands for gas and oil development, the building of more oil refineries, and the construction of projects such as the Keystone XL pipeline.  The White House has opposed all of the above.

This opposition has numerous ramifications, foreign and domestic. Internationally, it provides a windfall of profits for the Russians, the Venezuelans, and several Arab states, all of whom wish us ill.  It gives Moscow a powerful weapon to coerce European states into compliance with Moscow’s wishes.  It sparks conflicts for scarce energy sources around the world.

There has been a great deal of head-scratching about why the White House would adopt this unpopular position, particularly in areas such as the bipartisan-supported Keystone XL pipeline which its own studies indicate would have no harmful environmental effects, and may, in fact, improve public safety by taking volatile gas cargo off of the rails, where serious accidents have occurred, as well as providing urgently needed employment.

Child Track 24-7 provides an affordable and complete solution 20mg tadalafil that includes everything you need to get started – including an entire year of free kids GPS tracking services! They provide apps for all smart phones and don’t operate with complicated contracts, fees, or activation charges. But at the same time, you need to follow the prescribed treatment to sildenafil tablets australia best store keep the blood pressure under control. Some fans who attended Sunday’s race complained the track should have done more to notify them. viagra pfizer 25mg This approx percentage of impotent does not belong to particular state or country but it represents the condition of male population in whole world. side effects cialis Enter the name of Billionaire Tom Steyer,  the lead figure in a radical environmentalist group, who, according to the Washington Times,has raised $50 million to oppose the project, and seeks to double that, for the purpose of electing like-minded figures in the 2014 elections.

As extreme as the position of hard-core environmentalists may be (they have convinced the Obama Administration to unconstitutionally attack property rights, and threaten to destroy a substantial portion of the nation’s agriculture for trivial reasons) “green” ideology is not the whole answer.

It seems that Mr. Steyer stands to profit from eliminating plans for the Keystone Pipeline. It has been reported that he has a significant financial stake in another pipeline which could lose business if  Keystone is built. This type of cut-throat competition disguised as some ideological belief is nothing new, nor is the practice of wealthy men influencing politicians.

What has changed, however, is the extraordinary degree of blatant, unabashed cooperation by the White House in an effort that appeases a wealthy political donor, but substantially harms the public.