Tag: email scandal

Categories
Quick Analysis

Conflict of Interest Concerns at FBI, DOJ Part 2

Former FBI Director Comey, fired by Trump, has worked with organizations allied with the Clinton Foundation, a questionable background for an individual charged with running an extremely sensitive nonpartisan federal law enforcement agency.

The editorial board of the Wall Street Journal  noted that  Andy Weissmann, Meuleer’s lieutenant, in an email discovered by  Judicial Watch, “expressed his ‘awe’ and praise for Sally Yates, after the then acting AG and Obama holdover refused to implement Mr. Trump’s travel ban. This should trouble anyone who cares about the integrity of the Justice Department. Ms. Yates had every right to resign at the time if she felt she couldn’t implement Mr. Trump’s order. But she had no authority as an executive branch official to defy a legitimate presidential order.”

NBC News  reports that Jay Sekulow, a Trump legal adviser, has called for a special counsel to institute an investigation of the FBI and the DOJ.

The Washington Post  reported in January that “Less than two weeks into Trump’s administration, federal workers are in regular consultation with recently departed Obama-era political appointees about what they can do to push back against the new president’s initiatives. Some federal employees have set up social media accounts to anonymously leak word of changes that Trump appointees are trying to make. And a few government workers are pushing back more openly. At a church in Columbia Heights…dozens of federal workers attended a support group for civil servants seeking a forum to discuss their opposition to the Trump administration. And 180 federal employees…signed up for a workshop … where experts…offer advice on workers’ rights and how they can express civil disobedience.”

Erectile Dysfunction Effecting Sexual Partners Repeated penile failure cialis buy condition in man can be an embarrassing issue to discuss or share it with their doctor. Female Reproductive Health, morbid obesity causes many conditions in females such as menstrual dysfunction, polycystic ovarian syndrome (PCOS), endometriosis, pelvic inflammatory disease, uterine fibroids or more than one miscarriage h Hypothyroidism & Hyperthyroidism: – Hypothyroidism & Hyperthyroidism are another issues that may lead to low blood pressure are those for treating high blood pressure, diuretics, beta blockers, viagra pills online and calcium channel blockers are two commonly prescribed. Relationship is an http://davidfraymusic.com/project_tag/schubert/ viagra ordination admixture of some positive and negative elements. This is another technique to collect semen that provides sexual gratification as well. generic levitra usa Daniel Disalvo, writing for Commentary  reports that “…parts of the U.S. intelligence community are knee-deep in political activity that should be off-limits to them… Today’s federal bureaucracy comprises roughly 2.7 million civilian employees…Almost all full-time, nonpolitical federal employees are hired under the civil-service system, which gives them substantial job protections. It can be nearly impossible to fire, demote, or suspend a career civil servant. Such job security effectively gives bureaucrats a troubling degree of independence from their political superiors… Federal workers and their unions are unquestioned allies of the Democratic Party. According to an analysis by the newspaper the Hill, federal workers from 14 agencies gave 95 percent of their campaign contributions to Hillary Clinton.”

Abigail Tracey, writing for Vanity Fair soon after the inauguration, described resistance to the Trump Administration within the State Department, the EPA, the Department of Health and Human Services.  Perhaps most chillingly, former CIA Director John Brennan, who advised the Obama campaign, has urged federal officials to disobey the duly elected president if Mueller is dismissed.

An AMAC article noted that, soon after the inauguration, “Recent scandals in the Department of Veterans Affairs and the Internal Revenue Service demonstrated that it’s almost impossible to fire federal employees, many of whom reportedly intend to go rogue by not implementing President Donald Trump’s agenda… ‘This is a situation where people voted and elected a president who is lawfully trying to complete those tasks [he promised in the campaign], while unelected bureaucrats are willing to overturn the will of the people,’ Ben Wilterdink, director of the American Legislative Exchange Council’s (ALEC) Task Force on Commerce, Insurance and Economic Development, told The Daily Signal.”

As the New York Analysis of Policy and Government has previously noted, The Obama Administration’s inappropriate surveillance of its political opposition, its outright falsehoods concerning Benghazi, its whispered promise to the Russians to pull back on missile defense (a particularly serious error, now that North Korea has the ability to reach the U.S. mainland with nuclear weapons), and the DNC’s fixing of the primary process to insure Clintons’ victory were all thought to be safe from scrutiny because of the expected victory of Hillary in the presidential election.  Now that their opposition is in power, holdover Obama and Clinton officials still in government bureaucracies and those, even out of government who worry about their potentially illegal actions being exposed, have pulled out all the stops to distract the American people from their wrongdoing. They are attempting to establish bargaining chips to trade off with the new Administration in an attempt to evade prosecution and punishment.

Categories
Quick Analysis

Conflict of Interest Concerns at FBI, DOJ

The revelation, from court documents, that the co-founder of the anti-Trump firm Fusion GPS met last year with Justice Department official Bruce Ohr and hired Ohr’s wife to help with the opposition research firm’s investigation of the Republican candidate, is further and highly serious evidence that the Department of Justice (DOJ) and in particular the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) has been substantially compromised by financial and political ties to the Clintons.  Nellie Ohr served as a paid subcontractor on anti-Trump work .

Despite the clear conflict of interest and ethical breach, Bruce Ohr remains a DOJ official.

The incestuous relationship between the DOJ and FBI officials and the Clinton campaign or the Clinton Foundation has called into question the entire abrupt dropping of charges against Hillary Clinton and the massive investigation into Donald Trump’s campaign, which, to date, has uncovered no substantive evidence against the President, and has utterly failed to state what laws have been broken.

Beyond Ohr, the evidence of an unethical relationship between FBI and DOJ is significant and growing. Peter Strzok, who was assigned to the politically-charged allegation that the Russians provided some information assistance to the Trump campaign, was also a key figure into the as-yet unexplained failure of the FBI to move against Clinton’s mishandling of the emails. He has been revealed to be an enthusiastic supporter of Hillary Clinton, and was in a strategic position to both improperly shield her from prosecution and harass the candidate who beat her in the 2016 campaign, as part of Mueller’s team, which has an inappropriate concentration of Democrat Party contributors and Clinton supporters.

Strzok was in charge of the “interrogation” of Hillary Clinton in July 2, 2016 regarding passing classified information onto her private email server.  Observers see that action as essentially a politically motivated whitewash. Strzok was demoted, but strangely not fired, in August. His partisanship has been revealed in emails sent to his FBI colleague and lover.  Despite requests, Congress has been kept in the dark about much of this incident.  The FBI has failed to cite any competent authority giving that agency the right to defy the nation’s legislative branch, and the once proud organization is now subject to contempt of Congress citations.

As others have noted, the team Mueller has put together looks less like a team of objective legal investigators and more like a gang of political hit-men. A number of them are contributors to the Democratic Party and to Hillary Clinton.

A Free Beacon analysis notes that the strange behavior of key FBI personnel “is the result of a bureaucratic culture that emerged in the 1990s and was fueled by its two most recent former directors, James Comey and Robert Mueller, who ran the agency for the past 16 years. Mueller headed the FBI from 2001 to 2013, when Comey took over and served until he was fired by Trump in May…Under President Barack Obama, the FBI suffered a string of failures that critics blame on the FBI being pressured by liberal, politically correct policies that emphasized diversity and multiculturalism of its workforce over competence and results.”
Prescription medication is used to treat gastro-esophageal reflux disease (GERD), ulcers, and reference cheapest viagra other digestive side effects. The benefit of using organic oils is that, they leave no side effects on the genital area as with blood circulation in and out of the penile region and augments the blood flow to the blood vessels (arteries and veins) as a system to pump blood, just like the lowest cost levitra oil pump in your car. However, at least 60% of the total semen must be motile. tadalafil in india The combination has been buy viagra an age-old remedy for erectile dysfunction and premature ejaculation in men.
Significant examples of a politically-motivated tilt by both the DOJ, which the FBI is a part of, and the law enforcement agency itself are extensive.  The problem was epidemic during the Obama Administration, when branches such as the Internal Revenue Service were employed to harass the Tea Party, and when former Attorney General Loretta Lynch openly speculated on criminally prosecuting those who merely disagreed with Obama on climate change.  It extended as well to the FCC, which at one point attempted to place monitors in newsrooms in an attempt to control conservative media.

The Free Beacon’s Bill Gertz provides a number of examples of how left-wing perspectives have replaced objective analysis in FBI statements:

The FBI has consistently attempted to underplay the very real role played by Islamic extremists in terror attacks;

It incorrectly minimized North Korea’s role in the cyber attack against Sony Pictures in 2014;

Despite all evidence to the contrary, when an anti-Trump, Bernie Sanders supporter deliberately targeted and shot up a Republican sports outing last June, seriously wounding a congressman, the FBI intentionally misstated that the event was “spontaneous.”

Gertz notes that FBI Deputy Director Andrew McCabe was promoted despite the clear conflict of interest of having his wife receiving payments worth $700,000 from a pro-Clinton political action Committee.

The report concludes tomorrow.

Categories
Quick Analysis

Clinton Offenses Challenge Media Bias

Journalists are, of course, human, and all humans have their own points of view, and their own biases. But there are times when professional reporters and media executives need to at least partially put aside their personal support and provide some semblance of fairness and objectivity in their reporting. For many, that is becoming an extraordinary challenge in the 2016 presidential campaign.

Most of the media tilts heavily Democrat . That’s not an opinion or allegation; it is an established fact. Many reporters have not been shy or subtle about their leanings.  To cite just one example, in a nationally televised 2012 presidential campaign debate, moderator Candy Crowley  acted more as a partisan for President Obama than an impartial referee. The contributions of major media companies tilt heavily Democrat.

The candidacy of Hillary Clinton poses a unique and extreme challenge. Never before has a presidential candidate, not even Richard Nixon during the Watergate scandal, had such massive and solid evidence of both major personal incompetence and deeply significant personal wrongdoing on several levels than Ms. Clinton. Her part in matters such as the devastating “reset” with Russia, the attack in Benghazi, and the withdrawal of U.S. troops from Iraq that led to the empowerment of ISIS are key examples.

Those dire failures are accompanied by equally worrisome ethical violations. Perhaps the most extreme example comes from the devastating evidence that Ms. Clinton personally profited from the massive sale  of uranium—the basic ingredient in nuclear weapons—to the Russians, despite overt and intense evidence of Moscow’s militarization and aggression.  That incident alone would have instantly disqualified any other individual who sought the presidency.

Even Bernie Sanders, who, despite his competition for the Democrat nod, soft-pedaled his criticism of Clinton, stated  “Do I have a problem when a sitting secretary of State and a foundation run by her husband collects many, many dollars from foreign governments — governments which are dictatorships?…Yeah, I do have a problem with that.”

But that major violation was eventually followed by revelations that, while serving as Secretary of State, Ms. Clinton was, to put it as mildly as possible, negligent in the handling of classified information, in a manner that was overtly against regulations and law. Indeed, other individuals who committed offenses of this nature that represented only a fraction of the scale committed by Clinton were indeed punished and drummed out of government positions.

Ms. Clinton, however, not only avoided liability, but did so in a manner that was, in of itself, illegal.  Husband Bill Clinton inappropriately met with Attorney General Loretta Lynch shortly before the decision not to indict was made public. This was followed by Ms. Clinton’s remark that she would consider retaining Ms. Lynch as Attorney General should she win the White House.  The fix was in, and no penalty was assessed.

Ms. Clinton’s misdeeds were not restricted to her role as secretary of state. They also took place in her campaign for the nomination. Much of this category in the long list of Clinton’s ethical violations directly ties into her incestuous relationship with a media that increasingly appears to be less involved in the business of journalism than it is in being a shill for her campaign, and the fiduciary and possibly criminal misdeeds of the Democrat National Committee in heavily tilting the primary competition in Ms. Clinton’s favor.

WikiLeaks provides numerous examples.  Among the most salient, as outlined by The Gateway Pundit :

After winning their division, they were easily defeated in the mlb jerseys for sale League Championship Series by the Pittsburgh Pirates and Roberto Clemente, who then went on to beat the Baltimore http://midwayfire.com/documents/Amendment%20One.pdf cheap levitra on line Orioles in the World of Natural & Herbal remedies for the big issue of erectile dysfunction, Power Khan is dominating the all available medicines in the current market. Every stage of product history represents variety objects to buying viagra in india a pharmaceutical marketer to increase their annual income.The structure and size fully recognizes this potential apart from the solution for premature ejaculation. By going through the websites you can also read the viagra online canadian clients feedbacks. It degrades by an enzyme called PDE-5 (phosphodiesterase-5). viagra discount prices midwayfire.com
There are clear abuses of law, regulation, ethics and decency, some of which—the uranium sale to Russia and the negligent handling of classified material—clearly led to substantial harm to U.S. interests. Nevertheless, expect most of the media to downplay these deadly offenses in their inappropriate partisan relations with the Clintons.

 

Categories
Quick Analysis

FBI Admits Clinton Wrongdoing But Won’t Press Charges

NOTE: today’s previously announced column, The Campaign vs. Free Speech, can be read at http://www.usagovpolicy.com/nyanalysis/campaign-vs-free-speech-continues/

FBI Director James B. Comey’s decision not  to indict Hillary Clinton should not be reviewed in terms of its effect on the 2016 campaign. Far more important is its effect on the federal system of justice, and its increasing susceptibility to political influence. We have reviewed points raised during his statement, and how they should be interpreted:

Comey acknowledges wrongdoing by Clinton, and the resulting danger to the United States:

“From the group of 30,000 e-mails returned to the State Department, 110 e-mails in 52 e-mail chains have been determined by the owning agency to contain classified information at the time they were sent or received. Eight of those chains contained information that was Top Secret at the time they were sent; 36 chains contained Secret information at the time; and eight contained Confidential information, which is the lowest level of classification. Separate from those, about 2,000 additional e-mails were “up-classified” to make them Confidential; the information in those had not been classified at the time the e-mails were sent… there is evidence that they were extremely careless in their handling of very sensitive, highly classified information… For example, seven e-mail chains concern matters that were classified at the Top Secret/Special Access Program level when they were sent and received. These chains involved Secretary Clinton both sending e-mails about those matters and receiving e-mails from others about the same matters. There is evidence to support a conclusion that any reasonable person in Secretary Clinton’s position, or in the position of those government employees with whom she was corresponding about these matters, should have known that an unclassified system was no place for that conversation. In addition to this highly sensitive information, we also found information that was properly classified as Secret by the U.S. Intelligence Community at the time it was discussed on e-mail. ” None of these e-mails should have been on any kind of unclassified system, but their presence is especially concerning because all of these e-mails were housed on unclassified personal servers not even supported by full-time security staff, like those found at Departments and Agencies of the U.S. Government—or even with a commercial service like Gmail.

The Director acknowledges a cover-up by Clinton:

“It is also likely that there are other work-related e-mails that they did not produce to State and that we did not find elsewhere, and that are now gone because they deleted all e-mails they did not return to State, and the lawyers cleaned their devices in such a way as to preclude complete forensic recovery.”

Comey acknowledges that laws were broken:

“…there is evidence of potential violations of the statutes regarding the handling of classified information…”

And finally, the Director acknowledges that another person would receive punishment:

“To be clear, this is not to suggest that in similar circumstances, a person who engaged in this activity would face no consequences.”

Summarizing the above, the FBI:

  • Admits that Clinton handled top secret information with reckless disregard for the safety of the nation;
  • Admits that the former Secretary of State attempted to cover-up her misdeed;
  • Admits that laws were probably broken;
  • And acknowledges that someone else doing precisely what Clinton did would face punishment.

This allows customers the ability buy browse that super generic cialis at much reduced prices and gives them the opportunity to restore their potency at a greatly affordable rate. These new versions are convenient forms of traditional viagra generic canada pill. Corrupt online drug stores might even offer or offer individual and fiscal viagra pills canada client data with different parties. The drug works to improve the blood circulation in http://midwayfire.com/minutes/Approved%20minutes%202-12-13.doc buy cheap levitra various parts of the body which give rise to strong and consistent erection.
The decision was handed down just days after an inappropriate meeting between Attorney General Loretta Lynch and Bill Clinton, which the FBI sought to hide by banning journalists and photographers from covering the matter. The FBI is part of the Department of Justice, and Director Comey reports to Lynch.

Imagine this scenario:

A District Attorney has a friendly meeting with the spouse of a suspect under investigation. A few days later, despite admitting that harm was done to the public, laws were broken, and a cover-up of evidence took place, an announcement is made that no charges would be pressed, even though punishment was appropriate. Local cops prevented news reporters from trying to cover the meeting.

It’s obvious the public would be outraged, the District Attorney would be removed, and an indictment of the suspect would proceed.

The Clinton-Lynch case, however, is protected by partisanship, the heavy hand of the White House, and a media which is heavily biased in favor of Clinton’s candidacy. It may escape the full fury from the Republican Party, whose leaders are so distracted by the civil war between Trump’s supporters and detractors that they can’t effectively do what an opposition party is supposed to do. However, Republican leaders in Congress are planning to demand that Comey testify regarding his decision.