Categories
Quick Analysis

Substance Replaced by Evasion

Recently, Democrat presidential candidate Pete Buttigieg talked a bit about his campaign. As reported by WSBT, the South Bend, Indiana mayor said that even though he would eventually run a “substantive” ideas campaign,  “We’re … not going to inundate people with minutia of policy before they understand exactly what the big ideas are, the values that motivate our policies and the impacts they are going to have on the ground.”

Buttigieg’ comments may well be the anthem of the Democrats in the 2020 campaign, for good reason.  Another early Democrat “star” in the election cycle is “Beto” O’Rourke.  Luke Savage, writing in Jacobin reports: “ Despite taking the odd progressive position here and there, O’Rourke is assiduously vague and slippery on policy specifics. As the Washington Post’s Jenna Johnson observed a few months ago: “When it comes to many of the biggest policy issues facing the country today, O’Rourke’s default stance is to call for a debate” — even when it comes to areas he himself is fond of emphasizing, such as border policy and immigration.”

Specifics will not work for the Party that has moved far to the left of the American mainstream, and touts policies that have already failed. The shining dream of an election cycle that would be dominated by Russian collusion has turned into a nightmare, following the Mueller Report. Indeed, it now appears that the only high-level indictments that may arise will be those against key Democrat leaders and allies who conspired to defraud the FISA Court and the American public in a failed attempt to rig the 2016 general election for Hillary Clinton, just as they rigged the primary campaign to insure Bernie Sanders’ defeat.

The collection of 2020 Democrat contenders have largely relied on irrational, disproven, and unaffordable policies combined with identity politics and baseless attacks on their opponents. They are heavily dependent on the steadfast support and biased reporting of the mainstream media, cleverly censored social web sites and late night television comedians.

Consider the unpopular concepts they support.

Some of the candidates openly favor Socialism.  No wonder they reject specifics! The briefest look at Venezuela will turn off voters to that idea, The only real shining moments were Al Rollins’ and Max Bentley’s Hart cialis professional canada memorial trophies. So for all intents and purposes low cost viagra is an identical copy of the original medication. This drug is economic and very much effective so people want to buy this for their problem. levitra generika Maintain Good Life with Cheap Kamagra Well, kamagra is a popular substitute for cheapest levitra http://downtownsault.org/shirts-things/ which treats erectile dysfunction. not to mention the last 100 years of failed socialist regimes. They have turned a blind eye to the vast expense, crime, disease, and human trafficking resulting from their insistence on open borders, and instead call the U.S. border patrol “Nazis.” They ignore the plight of so many American workers whose jobs were lost due to China’s illicit practices, but criticize the Trump Administration’s moves to stop Beijing’s attacks on the American economy.

Astoundingly, some of the 2020 candidates and Democrat party leaders refer to the current White House as “fascist.” Yet it is they who seek to warp American government to gain unfair advantage and silence opposition.  Ideas include limiting free speech, as Senate Minority Leader Charles Schumer (D-NY) did in his bid to weaken the First Amendment. They have refused to condemn attacks on moderate and conservative students, professors and guest speakers on college campuses.  Some have proposed “stacking” the U.S. Supreme Court with additional left-wing justices to insure court victories.  They oppose sensible voter ID laws to allow illegal aliens to vote to overcome the preferences of the citizenry. And more recently, they have engaged in moves to allow convicted felons still in jail to cast votes. Upon losing elections, it is Democrat supporters who riot in the streets, and assault individuals for merely wearing hats supporting Trump.

The success of the game plan to warp the truth for partisan advantage, by party leaders, candidates and the left-wing is clearly seen in the extraordinary dishonesty about the effect of tax cuts. Despite clear evidence to the contrary, reports CNBC, “just 17% believe their own taxes will go down, the NBC News/Wall Street Journal Poll found. By contrast, 28% believe they’ll pay more, 27% expect to pay about the same and 28% don’t know enough to say… In reality, 8 in 10 Americans stood to receive tax cuts in 2018 under the law, according to an analysis by the nonpartisan Tax Policy Center.”

The nation needs a substantive, in-depth, vigorous and open debate on the issues.  Instead, many Democrat candidates have provided only evasion, meaningless platitudes, and personal attacks.

Photo: Presidential candidate Pete Buttigieg addresses crowd. (Campaign website)

Categories
Quick Analysis

Why are Democrats Destroying Their Own Front Runner?

This article was written by the distinguished retired judge, John H. Wilson

He’s been known as “Creepy Uncle Joe” for years.  Going back to at least 2015, former Vice President Joe Biden has a demonstrable history of stroking and smelling the hair of young girls, and in general, making them feel uncomfortable.  In fact, this behavior is so well known and prevalent, there is a YouTube video called “Creepy Uncle Joe” which shows a series of these incidents caught on camera during a variety of public events. .

Also in 2015, Jon Stewart of “The Daily Show,” made light of Biden having held onto the shoulders of the wife of former Defense Secretary Ash Carter while standing behind her.  Calling it the “Audacity of Grope,” Stewart and Samantha Bee lampooned Biden’s behavior for fun and laughs..

No one is laughing about this anymore.  With polls indicating that the former Vice President would be the front runner among the Democratic nominees, Joe Biden’s “creepy” behavior has suddenly become a major issue.

The first to seriously call out Biden’s “handsy” activities was Lucy Flores, who while running for Lieutenant Governor of Nevada in 2014, was subjected to the Biden treatment – “I felt two hands on my shoulders… I felt him get closer to me from behind. He leaned further in and inhaled my hair. I was mortified…He proceeded to plant a big slow kiss on the back of my head. My brain couldn’t process what was happening. I was embarrassed.” .

Without waiting to be asked why she waited five years to reveal this experience, Ms Flores volunteered her own answer – “For years I feared my experience would be dismissed. ..But hearing Biden’s potential candidacy for president discussed without much talk about his troubling past as it relates to women became too much to keep bottled up any longer.”

Now, much like the accusers of Hollywood Producer Harvey Weinstein, one accuser has become a chorus of “Me Too.”  As of this writing, seven women have come forward to describe their experiences with Joe Biden as inappropriate and unwanted.  Amy Lappos, a former staffer to Congressman Jim Himes (D-Ct), describes a 2009 incident, in which Biden rubbed noses with her, while Catilyn Caruso describes Biden resting his hand on her thigh “just a little bit too long” while the two attended a fundraiser.  .

Naturally, the former Vice President denies that he ever knowingly did anything wrong:  “In many years on the campaign trail and in public life, I have offered countless handshakes, hugs, expressions of affection, support and comfort. And not once — never — did I believe I acted inappropriately. If it is suggested I did so, I will listen respectfully.”  .

But the question that arises is the same question asked after the tsunami of allegations brought against Weinstein – what motivation could his accusers have to bring these charges at this particular time?

A hint of the real reason for the timing of these charges came during the appearance of Political Analysis Joan Walsh on CNN.  When Biden had indicated that he wanted to “change the culture” of Washington, she stated that he could do just that by not running, and supporting a woman candidate:

While even the traditional medical group is beginning to dry up. buy levitra line is a recent case which was withdrawn because EU Member States could not agree on switching; this was believed to have been caused by the different views of the role of the pharmacist across Europe. Here, we take a look at 10 signs which help determine anxiety disorders: Body language that is tense and jittery: When a person clenches his or her fist often, trembles and keep tapping viagra australia price the feet or unable to sit still, then that is an ominous sign of anxiety disorder. However, the viagra from india online Colts winning tradition began to crumble by the late seventies. When this happens, the body starts increasing the secretion of NO and improve the erection power ability of a male body. super cialis canada

“Come out and support a woman. There’s six women in the race, four female senators. If you want to change it, that’s a way to change it…if you want to change it, don’t run.” .

In fact, it is obvious that the strategy of the Democratic Party since 2016 has been single-minded – put a woman in the White House.

The first accuser in the most recent accusations, Lucy Flores, has been linked to the camp of Bernie Sanders.  According to Fox News, “Flores endorsed Sanders in a 2016 Facebook post, served on the board of the Sanders-aligned Our Revolution group, and campaigned publicly on his behalf.”  . But the Sander’s camp has denied that Flores is acting at their behest, and Flores has also appeared at a campaign rally for Beto O’Rourke.

Still, the desire of the DNC to have a female candidate for President explains the machinations of then-Democratic Party Chairwoman Debbie Wasserman-Schultz to shut popular candidate Bernie Sanders out of primary after primary in 2016, while supporting unpopular candidate Hillary Clinton.  The fact that the Democratic Primaries were rigged against Sanders is a matter of record – in 2017, a federal judge dismissed a class action lawsuit brought against the DNC, finding that “the Court assumes (plaintiff’s) allegations are true…the DNC and Wasserman Schultz held a palpable bias in favor of Clinton and sought to propel her ahead of her Democratic opponent.”  The case was dismissed because the plaintiffs could not establish they had suffered any injury as a result of the DNC bias in favor of Clinton. .

Two years later, even though Wasserman-Schultz is no longer the Chairman, the DNC still wishes to have the first woman president be a member of their party.

After his many years in office, Joe Biden understands the desire of those in his own party who wish to see a woman in the Oval Office.  This would explain his overture to Stacey Abrams, the former candidate for Governor of Georgia, who lost that race after a narrow recount.  However, Ms Abrams appears to be equally astute. Rather than accept Biden’s offer, she is testing the waters for her own run at the Presidency.

Even if Biden survives this series of attacks, and does eventually announce his candidacy, expect to hear more about the former Vice President plagiarizing a speech he gave in 1988, . and his long-standing feud with Elizabeth Warren over regulation of banks. .

In the final analysis, however, this attempt by the Democrats to push forward a woman candidate at the expense of their potential front runner is ill considered, and ill fated.  While it is still early in the race for 2020, of the women candidates who have announced, only California’s Kamala Harris appears to have any traction, and even her polling is at only 9.8 percent.  Elizabeth Warren is behind her at 5.7 percent, and Minnesota’s Amy Klobuchar polls at 1.7 percent. It’s hardly worth mentioning New York’s Kristen Gilibrand at 0.7 percent. .

Compare this to Biden’s 28.8 percent (without even being officially announced as a candidate) and Sanders at 21.8 percent, and it is obvious that the majority of Democrats support some old white men as their standard-bearers against President Trump.  Much like 2016, however, it looks like the Democratic Party remains tone deaf to the desires of their membership.