Tag: defense cuts

Categories
Quick Analysis

Vital U.S. Weapons to be cut

America’s military faces further cuts, even as US forces again venture into combat in the Middle East, and as Russia, China, Iran, and North Korea continue to further enlarge their military capabilities.

The cuts affect both personnel and equipment.

The Army Times  reports that “Nearly 30,000 soldiers must be removed from the active rolls in the next 17 months if the Army is to make the first waypoint in a drawdown that eventually will reduce the force to 450,000 or even 420,000 soldiers. As of April 1, there were 519,786 troopers on active duty…”

In addition to other deep cuts, President Obama will move to eliminate both the Tomahawk and Hellfire missile programs, according to the Washington Free Beacon both key components of the U.S. arsenal.
Having viagra pill cost a healthy lifestyle that includes eating a healthy diet and herbal pills apart from practicing exercises regularly. Complications of infertility treatments may include mouthsofthesouth.com cialis 40 mg bleeding, infection, low birth weight may be attributable to assisted reproductive technology. Women with fallopian tube congestion or men having low levels. cialis shop mouthsofthesouth.com It is very important to cialis mg stay hydrated.
The Tomahawk program will be cut by $128 million in the 2015 budget, and will zeroed out completely in 2016.  The number of missiles procured will be reduced from 196 in 2014 to 100 in 2015, to zero in 2016. Procurement of the Hellfire missile will be eliminated in 2015.

The U.S. is currently using Tomahawks—“the most advance missile in the world”– in its battle against ISIS. About one hundred are used on average each year.

The U.S, military is already a mere shadow of the force that existed two decades ago, and the reductions continue. Even the most ardent proponents of budget cutting must acknowledge that it is not fat, but muscle that is now being amputated.

Categories
Quick Analysis

US Military May Face Devastating Cuts

What will happen if the U.S. continues with “sequester level budgets” for the military?

According to Pentagon sources, it would result in continued force-level cuts across the military services.  The Army would be reduced to 420,000 active duty soldiers along with 315,000 in the Guard and 185,000 in the Reserve.  The Marine Corps would drop to 175,000 active duty personnel.  The Air Force would have to eliminate its entire fleet of KC-10 tankers and shrink its inventory of unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs).  The Navy would be forced to mothball 6 destroyers and retire an aircraft carrier and its associated air wing, reducing the carrier fleet to ten.

Modernization would also be significantly slowed.  Compared to plans under the fiscal 2015 budget, the department would buy eight fewer ships in the years beyond fiscal 2016– including one fewer Virginia-class submarines and three fewer DDG-51 destroyers – and would delay delivery of the new carrier John F. Kennedy (CVN-79) by two years.  The services would acquire 17 fewer Joint Strike Fighters, five fewer KC-46 tankers, and six fewer P-8A aircraft.

There would also be sharp cutbacks in many smaller weapons programs and in funding for military construction. In addition, the department would invest about $66 billion less in procurement and research funding compared with levels planned in the fiscal 2015 budget.

The report notes that sequester-level budgets would worsen already existing readiness shortfalls across the force and delay needed training to prepare the joint force for full-spectrum operations.
The matter of purchase cheap cialis is interested one that was expected. This tablet is consumed into your blood more or less 30 minutes to an hour after the admission of this robertrobb.com levitra generika tablet and keep going for 4 hours. You are advised to cheap levitra no prescription go for walking daily. It tadalafil 40mg india is available in blister packing of 10 tablets.
The Department of Defense notes that “Overall, sequester-level cuts would result in a military that is too small to fully meet the requirements of our strategy, thereby significantly increasing national security risks both in the short- and long-term.”

Unlike the days of World War II, when America was able to recover from the devastating Pearl Harbor attack thanks to a massive industrial base, our manufacturing capability is now too limited to gear up in the event of a war. Indeed, there is only one plant in the entire US that manufactures tanks, and the Obama Administration has been attempting to close it down.

All this is occurring as Russia has dramatically modernized and improved its conventional and nuclear forces, and China has become a superpower.  Iran and North Korea have also developed exceptionally strong and vehemently anti-American militaries.

The continued refusal to acknowledge the perilous international climate, and the ongoing cuts to our armed forces, are clear, present, and immediate threats to our national safety and sovereignty.