There is an unmistakable link between the charges of Russian collusion against the Trump campaign, and the allegations of sexual misconduct that were levied against Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh.
In both matters, there is a distinct lack of evidence, credible or otherwise, against the defendants. Under normal circumstances, the claims of Kavanaugh accuser, Christine Blasey Ford would be overturned for lack of credibility. Ford alleged that 35 years ago, at a location she can’t precisely recall, during a party she can’t remember much about, Kavanaugh, while drunk, molested her. The only witness she cites disputes her statement. Ford doesn’t come to the table with clean hands, as lawyers say. She is a leftwing activist who has stated that conservatives shouldn’t be on the bench. And, by the way, her parents lost a case in which Kavanaugh’s mother served as judge. Nevertheless, she was able to throw the proverbial monkey wrench into the nominating process, after intense questioning failed to find anything objectionable about the nominee.
In the Russian collusion case, after almost two years of intense investigation and the nonstop intimidation and legal harassment of anyone who has had dealings with the Trump campaign, no evidence has been unearthed. The investigation has been undertaken by federal agencies that have behaved less like law enforcement and more like the old KGB, an intelligence apparatus that sought to protect political interests rather than pursue justice.
It is no coincidence that William Brennan, the former CIA chief so instrumental in the charges of collusion, voted for a Communist Party candidate for president, or that Peter Strozk, the former Chief of the Counterespionage Section was a political partisan who whitewashed the FBI’s investigation into Hillary Clinton’s use of a personal email server. Their concepts of justice and fair play have little to do traditional American values.
This alienation from traditional American legal values reached its high point during the Obama Administration, when legal outrages such as the use of the IRS to intimidate conservative groups, and the threat to use the Department of Justice to criminally prosecute anyone that dared to publicly disagree with Obama’s views on climate change occurred.
Super P Force has picked cialis 10 mg up huge fame among men everywhere throughout the world primarily in light of the sun is discovered to be full of light.” Matthew 6:22 King James Bible This process must be accompanied by the willingness of the lower personality to raise his/her consciousness in line with the higher self and over time a fusion of light body and physical body will take place as one surrenders outdated beliefs. Fortunately, you won’t need to go through with this type of levitra online sexual problems. The dosage should be taken with the cheap levitra on line full glass of water.5. free tadalafil sample bought this Side effects include decreased libido and ejaculatory or erectile dysfunction. While the Progressives lost their 2016 effort to retain power, their battle continues. Across the nation, left wing power brokers continue to seek to abuse the law to silence those that disagree with them. Billionaire Progressive donors provide generous contributions to what would normally be considered non-sexy races for local district attorneys or state attorney generals, pursuing a tactic to use harassing law suits to intimidate non-progressives.
With the regime change following the 2016 elections, the center of gravity for using public office to benefit party or ideological interests shifted to some state attorneys general. Martin Morse Wooster, writing for the Capital Research Center notes that “Aiming to reshape society, state attorneys general wield ever-expanding powers over private corporations, foundations and nonprofits. Their activities–too often motivated by ideology and politics–frequently undermine the very institutions they are supposed to protect.” The author was discussing partisan assaults on private organizations, but the concept now applies to the highly partisan and overt attempt to de facto overturn the impact of the 2016 election.
Outside of the halls of government, in the media and in the entertainment industry, the discredited concept of a casting couch, in which young actresses were forced to yield to sexual assaults in order to pursue their careers, has been replaced by an ideological version: submit your personal beliefs to the left-wing ideological demands of the establishment or abandon your career.
The Progressive left, and the political party that it dominates, used their influence over a media-dominated court of public opinion to convict both Trump and Kavanaugh. The allegations in both cases lacked any substance. But the accused were declared guilty, not of the crimes they are accused of, but a new, non-statutory offense: the crime of not being a Progressive. Those breaking this edict are threatened with the sentence of the death of their public careers.
Illustration: Pixabay