Tag: China in Latin America

Categories
Quick Analysis

China Prepares for War, Part 3

It would be a mistake to assume that any conflict with China would be restricted to Asia.

China’s Military Presence in Latin America

 A Foreign Policy study explains that: “The escalation of Chinese influence in Latin America is reflected in the number of nations that have swapped recognition from Taiwan to China, according to Ana Quintana, an analyst with the Heritage Foundation. This group now includes El Salvador, Costa Rica, Panama, and the Dominican Republic. The goal is not just “sticking it to the Americans,” but also “amplifying their power,” Quintana said, noting the region’s wealth of oil reserves. Both China and Russia “want to be in a position to be a power broker in Latin America.”

A study by the Center for a Secure Free Society  entitled “The Dragon and the Condor: Beyond China’s Economic Interest in Latin America”  reveals that: China is known for its strategic patience and is expected to begin carrying out intelligence operations in the Americas that build upon its current strengths. This is consistent with the activity of a major world player projecting power abroad, and is likely a long-term, multi-stage process meant to build China’s intelligence capabilities in Latin America alongside its economic influence.” The report points out that “China’s presence in Latin America will continue to grow not only in the economic sphere, but also in political, security, and cultural aspects. China’s intelligence operations in Latin America will be carried out gradually and in stages, especially until Beijing can develop trusted human intelligence networks to support its activity. Nevertheless, China’s mastery of cyberwarfare and corporate espionage already poses a threat to many of the region’s countries, which lack adequate cybersecurity and protection of critical infrastructure. The new 2018 US National Security Strategy presents China as a ‘strategic competitor’ that wants to realign global power in their interests, potentially threating the United States. Attention must be paid to the PRC’s various initiatives in the Western Hemisphere beyond what are described as economic ventures. The nature of the PRC’s state-controlled industries and policy banks, its use of economic clout and power to achieve geopolitical objectives, its increase in cyber activity in lieu of human intelligence, and other critical issues suggest that a purely economic interpretation of China’s activities in the Americas is inadequate.”

A Business Standard analysis notes that:

“In its most recent assessment of its operations, focused on Latin American countries below Mexico and most of the Caribbean, the U.S. Southern Command (SOUTHCOM) concedes that China’s activities in the Americas pose a threat to the United States. SOUTHCOM specifically noted Beijing’s decision to expand its ambitious multi-trillion-dollar “One Belt, One Road” (OBOR) initiative to Latin America as a menace to U.S. interests.

“The U.S. military has cautioned that the strategic challenge posed by China in this region requires a new approach to get effective results.The national security think-tank analysis also highlights China’s OBOR or the Belt and Road Initiative (BRI), as a threat to the United States.

Since, it is a solid pills one need to viagra in consume herbal pills for getting rid of weak erection. When faced with chronic stress and an over activated autonomic nervous system, he noted, a physical toll begins to appear. buy cialis pharmacy It should be noted that the uncontrolled taking cialis online order letrozole bodybuilders often leads to disruption of coordination and facilitates the dispersion of attention. So whether viagra online doctor you want to buy branded medicines that come at a high price. “The BRI raises serious inquiries about China’s long-term interests and objectives abroad. The U.S. Pacific Command (USPACOM), which covers American military activity in China, New Zealand, and all the countries in between, recently cautioned lawmakers the Chinese armed forces might soon challenge the United States’ military dominance in the Indo-Pacific region “across almost all domains.”

Conclusion

Beijing has a timeline to consider. It has spent vast sums on building an ultra- modern military capable of challenging the United States. However, its economy is slowing, and its historic practices of unfair trade and mass theft espionage of western military technology is meeting more resistance.   President Xi may consider that his nation’s armed forces are now at peak strength, particularly since western militaries, after years of reduced investment, are now beginning to rebuild.

It would not be in China’s own interest to directly attack the United States, although it now has the nuclear and naval capability of doing so.  It is far more likely that it will engage in an assault on Taiwan, leaving an American administration with an extreme dilemma: should the American homeland be placed at risk to protect one or more allies in the Pacific? The quandary is a familiar one to historians.

At the outset of the Second World War, Adolph Hitler demanded German control of the City of Danzig, a precursor to his full scale invasion of Poland. The French socialist Marcel Deat, arguing that it was better to appeaser Hitler than start a war with him, coined the phrase, “Why die for Danzig?”

Appeasement only encouraged Hitler, and it is likely that a similar tact would do the same for China.

Photo: President Xi orders China’s armed forces to prepare for combat. (Chinese Ministry of Defence photo)

Categories
Quick Analysis

Growing Danger From Mexican Election

Those advocating the abolition of ICE and opposing reasonable border controls should reexamine their positions, particularly in the aftermath of the Mexican election. Leftist candidate Lopez Obrador, known also by the nickname AMLO, will be the next president of Mexico. He believes that “All have the right to immigrate to the United States.”  In essence, he has repealed America’s right to have sovereign borders. His approximately 53% victory was facilitated by the votes from the 12 million Mexicans living in the United States.

The extraordinary concept of abolishing the federal agency responsible for keeping America’s borders secure has come under attack in recent weeks.  A key figure, New York’s Senator Kirsten Gillibrand (D, NY) has joined the chorus of those seeking to eliminate it. As both a Senator from a large state and a potential contender for the Democrat nomination for president, she is neither an outsider nor an irrelevant figure.

Obrador’s leftist politics could turn Mexico into another Venezuela, Cuba or Nicaragua. If that occurs, the number of his citizens seeking to leave will skyrocket, flooding the U.S. with refugees.

But there is an even more immediate danger. Leftist regimes within the Western hemisphere have established military ties with Russia, China, and Iran.  Adding Mexico to that list, particularly considering its large presence on America’s southern border, presents a threat of the highest magnitude.

A growing danger from Latin America already exists. Moscow’s has placed landing facilities for nuclear bombers and a spy station in Nicaragua.  It has plans to place other heavy military equipment in the country. Russia’s Sputnik News notes that Nicaragua’s military training center was “constructed with Russia’s assistance and named after the legendary WW2 hero, Soviet Marshal Zhukov.” The U.S. Naval Institute  revealed in 2016 that “In late April Russia started shipping shipped T-72B tanks to Nicaragua.

The America’s Report has also linked Ortega to Iran “Iran has been making inroads into Latin America for some time, especially in countries with strong Chavista influence, including Venezuela, Bolivia, Ecuador and dangerously Nicaragua, which is very close in distance to the US… We have to consider that Iran has already used Hezbollah to attack what it considers enemies in Latin America, when they blew up the Israeli embassy and a Jewish center in Buenos Aires, Argentina, in the early -90’s killing and wounding hundreds…When Ortega became President of Nicaragua in 2007, [Iranian leader] Ahmadinejad considered his ascension so important that he was in Managua to attend the inauguration. Ortega even honored Ahmadinejad with two of the country’s most prestigious awards….Nicaragua is providing a safe place where Iran can send Revolutionary Guards and move them in and around the region.

In 2015, Pravda   reported “Russia and Cuba agreed to train Cuban specialists in Russia. This long-term strategy imposes obligations on Russia to supply its allies in Latin America with advanced weapons, including air defense systems, aircraft and warships.
Improving lifestyle with good nutrition, exercise and good habits will matter the most in the successful treatment of the physical causes. generico viagra on line robertrobb.com This restricts the flow of blood to the penis, causing erection. tadalafil tab Check all the other policies of the online drug online purchase of cialis store. Simple television shop presents to you the obvious anecdote about tremendously need levitra generika of those advisors managing those issues.
Iran’s semi-official FARS news agency has reported that there are plans to deploy warships in Latin American. Iran has been seeking to broaden ties and cooperation with Latin American states, including Mexico, iVenezuela, Bolivia, Brazil, Ecuador, Nicaragua, Cuba, and Colombia.

The Center for Security Policy calls Russia in Latin America “The problem we have chosen to ignore…Russian activities closer to home in the Western Hemisphere have been largely overlooked or perhaps just disregarded. There have been reports of  increasing Russian  military cooperation with countries in Latin America that are hostile to the United States, mainly Cuba, Venezuela, and  Nicaragua.  This includes agreements between Russia and the above named countries that would enable Russia to place their naval logistic facilities in Venezuelan, Cuban and Nicaraguan territory.

Beijing’s presence is increasingly being felt within the Western Hemisphere as well.

Paul Coyer, writing for Forbes reports that “Beijing’s investments globally are rarely undertaken with solely business goals in … In the case of Huawei, as the largest telecommunications equipment supplier in the world [with] strong ties to China’s military and intelligence services, [has a]  considerable role in building many of Latin America’s telecommunications and information networks. [that is] is a boon to Chinese intelligence.

An Official Chinese document notes that “Since 2013, the Chinese leadership has set forth a series of major initiatives and measures on strengthening China’s relations and cooperation with Latin America and the Caribbean in a wide range of areas.”  It is of concern that trade is seen as a means to further other goals, and military cooperation plays a significant role. The document notes:

“China will actively carry out military exchanges and cooperation with Latin American and Caribbean countries, increase friendly exchanges between defense and military leaders from the two sides, strengthen policy dialogue and set up working meeting mechanisms, conduct exchanges of visits between delegations and vessels, deepen professional exchanges in such fields as military training, personnel training and UN peacekeeping, expand pragmatic cooperation in humanitarian relief, counter-terrorism and other non-traditional security fields, and enhance cooperation in military trade and military technology.”

Categories
Quick Analysis

China Makes its Move in Latin America

China’s rapidly growing influence is not confined to the far reaches of the Orient.  Beijing’s presence is increasingly being felt within the U.S.A.’s own hemisphere.

A decade of escalating interaction in Latin America and the Caribbean has risen to a crescendo into 2017. President Xi Jingping, during a visit to Ecuador, Peru and Chile, set up a series of trade deals. It’s part of China’s goal of becoming a major influence in the area. Beijing has issued plans setting out its methodical goal to begin a “new era” in China-Latin American relations, according to a report by the Wall Street Journal.

According to The Economist  “China’s aims in the region are expansive. In 2015 it signed a slew of agreements with Latin American countries promising to double bilateral trade to $500bn within ten years and to increase the total stock of investment between them from $85bn-100bn to $250bn. China also wants good relations in order to diversify its sources of energy, to find new markets for its infrastructure companies and to project power, both soft and military, in the western hemisphere.”

The long-term benefits of the deals to the region are in doubt. The Economist notes that “the impact on employment is slight. A study by Boston University found that trade with China generated 17% fewer jobs per dollar’s-worth of exports than did trade with other countries…Almost all imports from China are cheap manufactures. Some Latin American economists argue that Chinese subsidies to their producers undermine domestic industries. A new study published by the Atlantic Council…concludes that Chinese exports ‘have had an effect on the region’s de-industrialization”.

Thus , there devensec.com levitra without prescription is nothing wrong in saying that ” a healthy intercourse keeps a couple bind and close to each other. This failure during devensec.com brand viagra the intimate moments brings disappointment to both people. Other levitra fast shipping symptoms like breasts discharging milky liquid even when someone is suffering from this disease. Significant clinical generic cialis viagra benefit usually is experienced 6 to 8 weeks of use. Should Americans be worried? Paul Coyer, writing for Forbes noted that the Obama Administration didn’t consider Beijing’s growing influence as a problem. However, Coyer writes, “Beijing’s investments globally are rarely undertaken with solely business goals in mind – the Chinese, unlike Americans, are practiced strategic thinkers, with a rich history, thousands of years old, of strategic thinkers to inform their approach to geopolitics. In fact, whereas Americans tend to be woefully deficient in this area, geopolitics and the ability to think strategically and take the long view are deeply embedded parts of Chinese culture. Nowhere is this asymmetry in strategic thinking ability so evident as it is Latin America. Whether the US think this is the case or not, it is certainly Beijing’s goal to grow its influence at Washington’s expense… Chinese investment is driven much of the time by strategic considerations directed by the Chinese state rather than being driven purely by market forces. Chinese…state-owned enterprises…are by far the most important source of outward foreign direct investment…with one study showing that nearly two thirds of Chinese [investments] came from [state enterprises], illustrating the prominent role played by the Chinese state in Chinese foreign investment decisions. In the case of Huawei, which in 2012 surpassed longtime king of the hill Ericcson as the largest telecommunications equipment supplier in the world and has strong ties to China’s military and intelligence services, its considerable role in building many of Latin America’s telecommunications and information networks is a boon to Chinese intelligence. As one example, six out of the seven 4G mobile phone networks in Brazil were created by Huawei.

An Official Chinese document notes that “Since 2013, the Chinese leadership has set forth a series of major initiatives and measures on strengthening China’s relations and cooperation with Latin America and the Caribbean in a wide range of areas.”  It is of concern that trade is seen as a means to further other goals, and military cooperation plays a significant role. The document notes:

“China will actively carry out military exchanges and cooperation with Latin American and Caribbean countries, increase friendly exchanges between defense and military leaders from the two sides, strengthen policy dialogue and set up working meeting mechanisms, conduct exchanges of visits between delegations and vessels, deepen professional exchanges in such fields as military training, personnel training and UN peacekeeping, expand pragmatic cooperation in humanitarian relief, counter-terrorism and other non-traditional security fields, and enhance cooperation in military trade and military technology.”

Russia (and the former USSR’s) attempts to influence the region were more obvious and heavy handed, heavily centered on overt military ties.  China’s approach is more multi-faceted, and therefore presents a greater long-term danger.

Categories
Quick Analysis

Military Challenges Close to U.S. Homeland

The lack of appropriate coverage on key national security issues facing the U.S. remains a significant problem. This failure is a reflection of the partisanship of most of the major outlets. That negligence extends to military activity within the Americas.

The vast and growing threats from Russia, which now is the world’s most significant nuclear power (it has greater numbers and more modern equipment) China (which already has more submarines than the U.S. and by 2020 will have a larger navy) and Iran, with its arsenal of missiles and budding nuclear program, are magnified by the increasingly intimate relationship between those nations, which form an axis that is now the world’s most powerful military grouping. The danger is being brought close to the American homeland.

This is a roundup of recent dramatic developments that have not received adequate attention:

The Free Beacon disclosed that Moscow is constructing an electronic intelligence gathering facility in Nicaragua. Putin has also sold 50 T-72 tanks to the Central American nation.  This is another indication of the dramatic failure of the Obama Administration’s establishing diplomatic relations with the Castro regime, which, bizarrely enough, came just a month after Moscow resumed its naval presence on the island nation so close to the U.S. shore.

The general press has barely mentioned the dangerous and inflammatory move, just as they have failed to discuss at any length Russia’s nuclear patrols off U.S. coastlines, its military to military relations with Venezuela or its large-scale militarization of the Arctic. The socialist governments of Nicaragua and Venezuela have close ties to Cuba.

There are legitimate questions why Nicaragua would want tanks.  There are no threats facing the nation, and the military capabilityof its neighbors are close to nonexistent.

The U.S. Department of Defense notes that the presence of terrorist groups, barely ever mentioned in major media outlets, are also a key threat in Latin America. U.S. Southern Command commander Navy Adm. Kurt W. Tidd notes “there is longstanding concern in the region about organizations like Hezbollah — a Shiite Islamist militant group.”
After these the two, it’s now the time to move up the impotence fighting drug ranking. viagra fast The words said above are not for frightening, but to make a PDE-5 inhibitor work, sexual rx sildenafil djpaulkom.tv stimulation is needed. Only cialis generic pharmacy your doctor can give the advice that compliments your lifestyle. This medicine is not suggested in case if you allergic to some cialis 25mg ingredient in Kamagra.
Paul Coyer, writing in Forbes, China’s growing military presence in the region … is serving to undermine, aided by Washington’s neglect, the United States’ strategic position in its own Hemisphere… Illustrating the anti-American tenor of Chinese engagement in the defense arena is the fact that sales of Chinese military hardware have entered the region mostly through states that share an anti-American foreign policy orientation, particularly the “ALBA” states (Alianza Bolivariana para los Pueblos de Nuestra América, or “Bolivarian Alliance for the Peoples of our America”, founded by Fidel Castro and Hugo Chavez with the aim of countering American influence in Latin America). Chinese resources to these states have allowed such virulently anti-American regimes as Venezuela’s to invite Iranian Quds forces to Latin America, and have indirectly enabled them to give basing rights to Russia, whose goal in gaining such rights is to challenge the United States in the Western Hemisphere…”

The Heritage Foundation’s Justin Johnson, in an exclusive interview on the Vernuccio/Novak Report, expressed deep concern over the 25% cut in the defense budget during the Obama Administration. (Defense spending accounts for about 16% of the overall federal budget.) He has noted that “The U.S. military seems to be breaking. Senior military leaders have made dire statements before Congress, and story after story is revealing the potentially deadly challenges facing our men and women in uniform.” He provided six examples of desperate needs:

  1. The Marine Corps is pulling parts off of museum planes to keep their F-18s flying. Even with that drastic action, only about 30 percent of their F-18s are ready to fly. Not only that, but instead of getting 25 or 30 hours a month in the cockpit, Marine Corps pilots are getting as little as four hours per month of flying time.
  2. Only one-third of Army brigadesare ready for combat. The Army has now fallen to the smallest level since before World War II, while the top Army general says that the Army would face “high military risk” if it were to fight a serious war.
  3. The Air Force is cannibalizing parts from some F-16’sto keep other F-16’s flying and is pulling parts off museum planes to keep their B-1 bombers flying. And half of Air Force squadrons are not prepared for serious combat.
  4. The Navy keeps extending deploymentsof its ships, but still doesn’t have enough to meet demand. While the Navy needs about 350 ships, today it only has 273
  5. Serious crashes of Marine Corps planes and helicopters are nearly double the 10-year average.
  6.  The Air Force’s B-52 bombers are an average of 53 years old.

Categories
Quick Analysis

China’s Growing Threat in Latin America

For the first time since the Cuban missile crisis, America faces a significant military challenge within its own hemisphere.

While Moscow plays a growing role in the militarization of the region as its navy returns to Cuba and its nuclear bombers land in Nicaragua, it is China that has become the most prolific foreign influence in the region. The Wilson Center  reports that despite the end of the “Golden Decade” of the commodities boom, China will continue to be a game changer for the region.

A Strategic Studies Institute study  found that “the People’s Republic of China (PRC) has expanded its military ties with Latin America in multiple important ways. High-level trips by Latin American defense and security personnel to the PRC and visits by their Chinese counterparts have become commonplace. The volume and sophistication of Chinese arms sold to the region has increased. Officer exchange programs, institutional visits, and other lower-level ties have also expanded. Chinese military personnel have begun participating in operations in the region in a modest, yet symbolically important manner. Military engagement among Western countries traditionally has focused on securing greater capability for confronting an adversary, including alliances and base access agreements,  that confer strategic geographical position. By contrast, Chinese military engagement primarily supports broader objectives of national development and regime survival.

An example is the recent agreement between China and Argentina.  The U.S.-China Economic and Security Review Commission (USCC) notes: “China’s recent agreements with Argentina will prospectively feature the purchase or coproduction of fighter aircraft, APCs, and naval vessels; enhanced military-to-military exchanges; and the implementation of a space tracking facility tied to satellite imagery sharing. Together, these agreements would represent a new phase in China-Latin America military engagement if accomplished…These developments would mark an expansion of China’s broader defense engagement with Latin America that would carry several implications for the United States…the United States may face a new regional security hazard, albeit harmless in the absence of an external conflict. Third, regional actors might use Chinese arms in ways unfavorable to U.S. interests or perceive their security options to have expanded.”

The period usually strikes at forty when tadalafil buy india age normally causes internal troubles to almost everyone. All the ingredients are clinically approved tropical remedies that can improve the hair growth by preventing hair loss problems. vardenafil india As the circulation increases, more blood is in a position to enter the erectile tissue thereby resulting to a tough and female viagra canada solid erection. With continued usage, new blood cells canadian levitra are eliminated. Paul Cover, writing for Forbes, warns:  “The public position of the United States Government is that Washington does not see a geopolitical threat arising from China’s quickly growing influence in Latin America…”

China’s growing commercial investment in the region (Cover notes “In 2000, the Chinese share of Latin American trade was merely 2%, while that of the United States was 53%. As of 2010, the Chinese share had grown to 11% of the total, while that of the United States had dropped to 39%…) has direct military applications. Commercial Chinese firms have bases on both sides of the Panama Canal, vital to the U.S. military, and Huawei, a telecommunications firm with strong ties to the Chinese military, has invested in the region, providing  a boon to Chinese intelligence.

All this comes at a time when the U.S. has reduced its economic presence in the region.  CNN Money reports that  in 2014, “Chinese banks sent nearly $30 billion in loans to Latin American governments last year, more than double the amount from 2014. It’s also more money than the World Bank and Inter-American Development Bank gave to the region last year combined, according to the Inter-American Dialogue, a non-profit in Washington…The investments come as U.S. government aid and private investment in Latin America have declined for three straight years, according to State Department data and EPFR, a research firm that tracks fund flows…”What [the Chinese are] going for is influence — strategic power in the region to create dependence,” says Ilan Berman, vice president at American Foreign Policy Council. American “’influence has steadily retracted.”

 The importance of this must be understood in light of Beijing’s’ swiftly growing ability to project power, particularly naval power. The United States Navy, for the first time since the middle of the Second World War, is no longer an unchallengeable force at sea.  China already has more submarines than the U.S., and its fleet will be larger than America’s within four years.

Categories
Quick Analysis

China’s new canal challenges U.S. security in Latin America

The dramatic transformation of Latin America from a relatively nonthreatening geographical region to one that presents a clear danger, harboring the U.S.’s most significant rivals, continues at a worrisome pace. China’s involvement in the Panama Canal, and its construction of its own canal across Nicaragua, is a prime example.

Strategically, the ability to travel through the Western Hemisphere, bypassing the need for the lengthy and dangerous passage at the extreme southern end of South America provides an enormous advantage to whichever nation controls the canal allowing this to occur. The Panama Canal has been a vital asset to the United States, allowing mobility for its fleet.  Its importance is understood by other nations as well, particularly China.

The Menges Project  reports that “Currently the Panama Ports Company, a subsidiary of Hutchison Whampoa Ltd., has exclusive and extensive rights to control both ends of the Panama Canal. Hutchison Whampoa is a Chinese company owned by Hong Kong billionaire, Li Ka-Shing, who has strong ties with Beijing. Considering Li’s close ties with the Chinese government, it is highly plausible that Hutchison Whampoa has the potential to act as Beijing’s political agent and that their possession of the ports at either end of the Panama Canal constitutes a serious U.S. national security issue.”

Richard A. Delgaudio, who authored a book on the issue, notes that “..the takeover of the Panama Canal by Red China is a serious security threat to the United States.”

Beijing has even larger goals. Initial work on a larger canal, dug through Nicaragua, was begun in December. The $70 billion dollar project will take 14 years to reach completion in 2029. It will serve China’s navy well. Beijing’s rapidly growing fleet will outnumber America’s navy by 2020.
Do not let erectile dysfunction curb your physical and mental health. cialis canadian generic Symptoms levitra without prescription http://robertrobb.com/a-simpler-way-to-legalize-pot/ of myofascial dysfunction include: Deep ache, tightness or tenderness in the jaw (especially common area). While giving the error description to IBM (informally known as ‘Big Blue’ then), the Lattice, Inc. developers named the error as ‘Blue Screen of Death’ associating its color with IBM’s and a dead screen appearance viagra uk without prescription that just didn’t move away without rebooting. So what need to you feed your pet bird to continue to keep it healthful and pleased? To cialis online prices play it safe, supply a superior superior seed and pellet diet program and supplement with authorized fruits and greens if wanted.
According to a report in The World, “Two years ago Nicaragua put its sovereignty in hock by giving a concession of up to 100 years for a canal that could cost $40 billion-50 billion to Wang Jing, a Chinese telecoms magnate. …The next step will be a port a few miles inland big enough to process 500-metre-long ships with five times the container-carrying capacity of those that currently traverse the Panama Canal.”

Reviewing the project, the Diplomat notes: “As for the geopolitical implications, there has been much speculation about China’s intentions with the canal. China has active in Central America for years (even decades). It has been selling arms to Western Hemisphere states, while pursuing other initiatives to build military and economic relations… Clearly, this is a challenge to traditional U.S. pre-eminence in the Western Hemisphere…

“The canal may attract Chinese military vessels looking to protect Chinese commercial interests. China has recently published plans to grow its navy by 351 warships, surpassing the U.S. Navy in sheer numbers at least by 2020. Whether it plans to deploy its ships to waters around China or use them to expand its presence elsewhere, like Central America, is unclear. Still, combined with its infrastructure investment, traditional assumptions of U.S. primacy are facing their greatest challenge in decades – even in a region traditionally considered its backyard.”

Environmental objections to the Nicaraguan Canal project have also been raised. According to Matthew Shaer’s study reported in the Smithsonian  “A New canal through Central America could have devastating consequences. The ramifications of the proposed route have environmentalists worried, and for good reason…The new canal and its infrastructure, from roads to pipelines to power plants, will destroy or alter nearly one million acres of rainforest and wetlands. And that doesn’t include Lake Nicaragua, a beloved 3,191-square-mile inland reservoir that provides most Nicaraguans with drinking water.”

Categories
Quick Analysis

Venezuela’s Threat

Life in Venezuela continues to be an exercise in fear and intimidation. The virulently anti-American regime continues to work jointly with Russian and Iranian military interests, suppresses free speech, and brutally oppresses political opposition. Those calling for freedom are incarcerated without trial.  The government authorizes paramilitary organizations to perform acts of violence on those with the courage to speak out against its atrocities. In one rare case where a non-establishment candidate, Antonio Ledezma, did succeed in winning an election as mayor of Caracas, the government robbed him of authority by creating an alternative city hall.

Venezuela’s problems deeply affect the United States. Some of those arriving illegally on our southern border are escaping the terrible conditions in their homeland. But Venezuela has far more dangerous exports, as well. The national government utilizes its oil wealth to finance military threats against both the U.S. and its Latin American neighbors, purchasing arms and expertise from China, Iran, and Russia.

Liver bile serves to eliminate a variety of the non-knife modalities to rescue the gallbladders of their patients for the services offered by medical experts at very affordable price. lowest cost cialis If the victim is harmed between viagra generika cute-n-tiny.com the fifth and seventh cervical vertebrae, Cerebral palsy is likely to occur. viagra france For example- kidney failure and HIV positive and taking its treatment. Regardless of size of renal cell carcinoma, about 20% of patients may have no symptoms others may experience: Feelings of tiredness or fatigue Increased appetite Constant viagra tablets usa thirst Urinating very often Weight loss without trying Blurred vision Loss of feeling or tingling in the feet Deep, rapid breathing Dry skin and mouth Increased pulse rate Nausea or vomiting Stomach pain Complications Over time, if left untreated it can cause major problems. It is, as noted by The Menges Hemispheric Security Report which has reported on this problem, “heavily involved in the drug trade…Venezuela is the only country in Latin America that willingly makes its ports and airports available to drug cartels and harbors their leadership and operatives.”

Luis Fleischman, writing for Menges, notes that although the House of Representatives has passed legislation enabling sanctions on Venezuela, the Senate has failed to go along.

Categories
Quick Analysis

The Growing Threat in Latin America

U.S. citizens are barely aware of the propaganda war being waged against them south of the border. It isn’t all words, either.  With the assistance of China, Russia, and Iran, a number of Latin American and Caribbean nations are developing a new, hostile military structure.

The Strategy Center’s study on the Advance of Radical Populist Doctrine in Latin America  describes how Venezuela has utilized its vast income from oil sales to develop an anti-U.S. movement in the western hemisphere. Entitled ALBA (also known as the Bolivarian Alliance for the Peoples of Our America) it was initially formed by the late Venezuelan president Hugo Chavez in 2004 and includes Venezuela, Cuba, Bolivia, Nicaragua, Dominica, Ecuador, Antigua & Barbuda, and Saint Vincent & the Grenadines.

The organization espouses an overtly anti-capitalist agenda.

According to a Bolivian diplomatic document reviewed by the New York Analysis of Policy & Government, the organization seeks to develop a number of cooperative economic initiatives, and most importantly, a “new military doctrine.”  This alliance is clearly anti-U.S.

Vinpocetine is being called ‘ viagra on line pharmacy for brain’. It acts inside 30 to 45 minutes while overwhelmed by the appropriate thought of swallowing procedure, as it ought not pulverized or broken for making simple swallowing mode. continue reading for more buying cialis in uk Most of the physicians have suggested for getting viagra http://raindogscine.com/por-que-raindogs-cine/ the treatment. Chronic penile weakness is a classical symptom of erectile cialis pills free raindogscine.com dysfunction in males. The Strategy Center study quotes a Bolivian source that stresses that “Every U.S. military base in Our America is not only a terrible threat, but an attack on the dignity of the people and an intolerable humiliation.” The organization welcomes the presence of Iran, Russia and China in the hemisphere.

Gen. John Kelly, in charge of the U.S. Southern Command which has responsibility for Latin American security matters, is deeply worried that the slashed American defense budget has been deeply detrimental to our interests in Latin America and is “significantly degrading our ability to defend the southern approaches to the United States.”