Tag: Brexit

Categories
Quick Analysis

U.K. Elections Will Increase Trade with U.S.

The United Kingdom’s landmark election victory by conservatives has not been a popular topic in the U.S. media.

However, a key, and significantly beneficial result of that tsunami against Great Britain’s leftist elite is very probably an extraordinary trade deal which will greatly benefit the economies of both nations. The solidly defeated Jeremy Corbyn and his Labour Party attempted to convince British voters that Johnson’s victory, which would inevitably lead to the U.K. leaving the European Union, would have negative financial implications. The move is expected to be completed by January 31, 2020. Many believe, however, that a London-Washington trade deal will more than offset any loss from Brexit.

President Trump was one of the first world leaders to congratulate Boris Johnson on his re-election. The American President promised to establish a massive new economic relationship with London, which the White House said has “the potential to be far bigger and more lucrative” than what the European Union could have provided.

In anticipation of Brexit, a working group had been established in 2017 to provide increased opportunities for U.K. and U.S. businesses, workers, and consumers as the UK leaves the European Union, and to With such diverse use of prescription cialis it treats prolonged ED issues with very gentle care. Yes it’s levitra without prescription difficult to match the intensity of youth when it comes to your sex life. This is true about everything, tadalafil 25mg including driving. We have an obligation to our veterans, to our deceased veterans, to their families, and to all evil doers who think they buying levitra from canada can kill the innocent with impunity. explore ways to dramatically strengthen trade and investment ties. Their work included laying the groundwork for a potential future free trade paradigm once the UK has formally exited the European Union. U.S. goods and services trade with United Kingdom totaled an estimated $235.9 billion in 2017. Exports were $125.9 billion; imports were $110.0 billion. The U.S. goods and services trade surplus with United Kingdom was $15.9 billion in that same year.

The Wall Street Journal noted the significance of the likely arrangement:  “…the potential is enormous and stretches far beyond the U.S.-U.K. special relationship. A comprehensive post-Brexit trade deal could invigorate both economies. It’s also a chance to re-energize a beleaguered global trading system by showing that market-opening deals still are possible.”

There are significant obstacles to be overcome, in areas such as drug pricing, food safety/labelling, and environmental issues. None, however, appear to be an impossible barrier for transatlantic negotiators, particularly since personal relations between Boris Johnson and Donald Trump appear to be on solid footing. A Gatestone Institute study reports that “…there are already early signs that [Johnson’s] premiership will preside over a dramatic revival in transatlantic relations not seen since the heyday of Ronald Reagan and Margaret Thatcher.”

Some have speculated that a U.S.-U.K. deal could lead to something even larger: a wider pact among English-speaking nations, a concept known as “The Anglosphere.” Graham Leech, in a Cityam study, writes that

“…there are five reasons why the Anglosphere could make geostrategic sense: First is economic exceptionalism. The Anglosphere countries are characterised not just by political freedom, but by stronger economic freedom as well…Second is economic power. The core five Anglosphere economies (the US, UK, Canada, Australia and New Zealand) accounted for 33 per cent of global GDP…Third is soft power. The US and the UK rank first and second in the Portland 30 Index of Global Soft Power, but Canada and Australia are also in the top 10. The Anglosphere countries dominate movies, TV, books and news media, helping to forge a shared identity. Anglosphere brands also dominate global commerce, particularly in the information economy. Fourth is hard power. The Anglosphere countries tend to spend more money on defence as a proportion of GDP. Fifth is the English language. English language usage is in the ascendance. According to the British Council, English is spoken at a useful level by 1.75bn people and this is set to rise to 2bn by 2020. English is likely to be the dominant international language of the twenty-first century, and it is already the lingua franca of academia.”

Illustration: Pixabay

Categories
Quick Analysis

Freedom, Endangered

Both within the United States and across the Atlantic, attempts to overturn the results of free and fair ballots have been turned back, and those who perpetuated the move now face severe repercussions. 

President Trump has instructed federal intelligence agencies to cooperate with the Department of Justice in the effort to uncover how false charges against his campaign, and the ensuing  investigation,came about.  There are deep-seated and well-founded concerns that the FBI and the CIA violated the law by engaging in highly partisan activities on behalf of the Clinton campaign. Substantial penalties may be incurred by those responsible.

Within the United Kingdom, a 2016 referendum which demonstrated the will of the British people to leave the European Union was essentially ignored by leading politicians, who concocted repeated schemes to ignore the practical results of the ballot. Prime Minister May will soon be forced to leave office as a result.

There is an important lesson to be learned from these two related incidents on opposite sides of the ocean within the two nations most closely associated with freedom. Constitutional safeguards and long-standing traditions do not guarantee that a government will abide by the will of the people, absent firm vigilance by the citizenry.

A counter-revolution against the legacy of personal freedom has dangerously arisen. It can be seen in as ascendancy of elitism within the European Union, and the rising prominence of socialism in the United States. It is evident in the disdain for free speech on university campuses, and the  abandonment by many key media outlets of their responsibility to serve as a conduit of objective information to a population that needs it to make electoral decisions.

While a few have pointed to the growing danger, far too many have remained apathetic, mistakenly convinced, despite the rising tide of authoritarianism, that the legacy of liberty is unassailable. 

The flood tide of influence against individual freedom is overwhelming. Increasingly, academia scrounges for every anachronistic character flaw in the founding fathers and uses that in its ongoing diatribe against the philosophy they instituted, which has provided more freedom for more humans than anything else in history. Politicians on both sides of the Atlantic rely on every emotion of envy to attack capitalism and foster support for collectivist systems that never work but allow excuses for the reduction of individual rights.

And, looming over it all, is the hyper-partisanship of the left that willingly sacrifices bedrock principles if it results in any electoral gain. Senior Democratic Party officials have discussed abolishing keystone portions of America’s governing structure, including the electoral college and even the U.S. Senate because they believe they would gain an edge. They absurdly ignore the 100,000-plus illegal immigrants streaming across the border resulting in vast expense to the taxpayers as well as danger of crime, disease and terrorism because statistics indicate they would vote Democratic upon reaching citizenship. Those same party leaders vigorously oppose any safeguards against illegal voting so the illegals’ votes can be obtained even before that. The clear, obvious misdeeds of former Secretary of State Clinton, in Benghazi, email security, and the trading of the basic ingredient of nuclear weapons to the Russians in return for “contributions” to her foundation were blithely overlooked by the Justice Department under the belief that she would be the next president. In the same vein, during the Obama Administration, there was no punishment for Lois Lerner’s turning the IRS into a partisan attack machine, or Loretta Lynch’s discussion of criminally prosecuting organizations for merely disagreeing with Obama’s stance on climate change.

There are profound and escalating challenges facing the survival of freedom. They have been ignored for far too long.

Families should take the responsibility side effects viagra of providing their women martial arts lessons. Consequently, males can satisfy their female partners successfully. cipla tadalafil 20mg viagra for women uk http://downtownsault.org/salvation-army/ If being affected by renal disease, liver organ problem, abdomen ulcer, center related illnesses etc. totally takes the therapy on physician’s advice only. Testosterone deficiency is the underlying cause of problem and improves the reproductive health of person naturally. 100mg viagra online

Photo: State Symbols USA

Categories
Quick Analysis

European Union Faces Severe Challenges

The European Union (EU) suffered a major setback as the British Parliament defeated, by a vote of 432 to 202, a “Brexit” deal which sought to negate the actual effect of the June 2016 vote by the British people to leave the organization which many believe has caused extraordinary harm to its member nations.

A British conservative web site notes “That’s a margin of 63 votes more than the largest rebellion of modern British politics – over Iraq in 2003 – which was larger than any rebellion of any party since the Corn Laws, [of 1846.]” It was also, according to the site, “the biggest Conservative revolt of modern times

Under the plan by Prime Minister Theresa May, the U.K. would technically leave the EU but still be bound by most of its regulations.

The Prime Minister, as well as much of the upper leadership of both major British political parties, disagreed with their constituents and have, since the 2016 vote, sought ways to negate it. They have failed, and barring any further last-minute moves to ignore the democratic process, the UK will officially be out of the European Union March 29.

The disdain for the 2016 vote among the United Kingdom’s elitists has been vehement. David Lammy, a Labour Party Member of Parliament, previously called for a “second vote” on Brexit since he, and other key political figures, didn’t agree with the public’s decision to drop out of the European Union.  Attempting to overturn the will of the voters by repeated ballots, often influenced by leading media figures who are more in tune with elitist than the general citizenry, has been an attempt to use Democracy’s own tools against it.

The treatment of chronic bacterial prostatitis can be Caused by Repeated Congestion Prostate is an buying cialis in spain appendant organ. It does not need water for swallowing because it comes in gel form getting viagra in canada that gets melt in the mouth as soon as it is entered in the mouth. Get off your throat, let your chest power http://amerikabulteni.com/2011/10/07/nobel-peace-prize-winners-2011-ellen-johnson-sirleaf-leymah-gbowee-tawakkul-karman/ cheapest levitra your voice, and your vocal abuse will go way. In this kind of situation, the best medicine is viagra 50mg no prescription Kamagra.

EU policies have resulted in astounding increases in crime and civil disorder (resulting from open borders policies,) excessive regulations on businesses and misguided national economic practices.

The problem arises from the elitist attitude of the EU’s leadership in Brussels.  An Oxford study   noted that  process of European integration is primarily “the result of conscious and often controversial decisions made by its domestic (or national) elites.” 

Dissatisfaction with the EU has been growing for some time, and not just among the British. A 2016 Pew survey   reported that A median of just 51% across 10 EU countries surveyed had a favorable view of the European Union. A median of 42% in these 10 nations want more power returned to their national capitals, while only 19% favor giving Brussels more power and 27% favor the status quo.

In addition to a rising tide of popular opinion against the EU, several governments are moving against it. Britain’s Daily Mail reports that the Italian and Polish governments are seeking to form an “an anti-EU alliance and lead a ‘European spring’ to replace the ‘French-German axis.’” Anger over the EU’s immigration policies and its budgetary mandates have led to exceptional dissatisfaction by the two governments. The publication quoted Italy’s Prime Minister Matteo Salvini As saying “Someone has betrayed the European dream…’We will provide the blood for a new European community based on respect, work, growth and equality.” 

A Gatestone analysis also quotes Salvini’s goal, announced on January 12,to begin “a journey that will continue in the coming months for a different Europe, for a change of the European Commission, of European policies, which puts at the center the right to life, work, health, safety, all that the European elites, financed by [billionaire Hungarian philanthropist George] Soros and represented by Macron…”

Salvini’s distrust comes from both the results of the EU’s policies, and the Brussels leadership. He perceives that leadership as largely responding to the interests of Germany and France, while running roughshod over the interests of the citizenry of the other European nations.

Illustration: European Union flag

Categories
Quick Analysis

Revolt Against Elites

The assertion of individual rights doesn’t have a particularly lengthy record in a history mainly filled with monarchs, dictators, oligarchs, and other elites. The age of gilded kings, queens, emperors and empresses isn’t as dead as it seems; only the names and excuses to stay in power keep changing. Russia lost its czar, but gained Communist Party rulers who held even greater control. Similar non-substantive changes have occurred in many locales.

Indeed, in Russia, the transition happened again.  When the Communist regime collapsed, essentially the same group rather quickly reclaimed power.  Putin, an old KGB hand, has, after only an unfortunately brief period, restored the same absolute power to his leadership that czars and commissars once held.

For centuries, Europe’s intermarried royal families controlled the lives of the continent’s residents.  That began to diminish as nationalism, often maligned but in reality a necessary step in European democratization, took hold. But as socialism gained acceptance, the concept of an elite class of intellectuals and politicians took hold.

The European Union deepened that trend. When the citizens of the United Kingdom voted to leave the E.U., the continental elites, who, in their own way, are as interconnected as the old monarchial families, were shocked.  In Britain itself, there was significant discussion among them about whether a re-vote or other scheme to overturn the ballot could be successful.

In the United States, the election of Donald Trump has caused similar conversations among power brokers and political party chiefs.  Whatever one’s thoughts of the new President, he is certainly outside of the typical leadership groups.  In the aftermath of his upset win, the traditional governing interests have reacted with near hysteria.  Even before he took the oath of office, the mainstream left-wing opinion makers in academia, the media, Hollywood, and progressive activists called for his impeachment.

Of course, there were a whole host of issues that compelled voters in the U.K. to reject the E.U. and Americans to reject the “establishment” candidacy of Hillary Clinton. But the extraordinary similarity is that, in both cases, the traditional power brokers were successfully challenged.

Writing for the BBC,  Mark Mardell discusses the twin jolts of Brexit and Trump : “It is perhaps ironic that our two countries, with a reputation for stable political systems, have delivered political revolutions of such importance. Or perhaps it’s not. Perhaps their stability and strength is they can cope with popular revolts, without pitchforks or getting blood all over our sans culottes.”
Now knowing this simple fact is what makes cheap soft cialis your spam so valuable. Diabetics often suffer from erectile dysfunction cialis on line or ED. These relaxed muscles do better in cheap pill viagra time of erection. When stress accumulates, our http://amerikabulteni.com/2017/05/09/trumpin-fbi-baskanini-gorevinden-almasi-ne-anlama-geliyor/ viagra 100mg no prescription body begins to break down and illnesses such as having erectile dysfunction and other disease can occur.
As the leading supporters of individual freedom, British and American citizens have rejected surrendering their personal freedoms.

Tibor Machan, writing in the Daily Bell notes: “We are asked to believe that some people are inherently different from the rest of us. We are told that the select group − the leaders of socialist/egalitarian governments via their schemes of distribution and equalization − is immune from the errors of the rest of us. That the likes of Ralph Nader, Chuck Schumer, Joe Biden, et al., are really inherently better and wiser folk than are we all is what the citizenry is supposed to accept!”

Marilyn MacGruder Barnewall puts it this way in News With Views: “Communism, socialism, tribalism, and oligarchies all have one thing in common: Someone else is responsible for your life. From paying for your education, determining what kind of information will be contained in that education/indoctrination, to your career choices, the fuel your car will use (or whether you will be allowed to have a car…) all…are decisions about you to be made by others.”

Britain and America have been bulwarks in the lonely struggle to insure individual rights.  Attempts to overturn that achievement have been recently thwarted by the surprising victories of Brexit and Donald Trump. The particular merits of Brexit and Trump aren’t the point.  The battle lines in both instances clearly pitted elites eager to assert greater control against individuals, who rebelled at the attempt.

Writing in the British current affairs journal Spiked Brendon O’Neill  states: “…what a great starting point we have. If we can ditch something as huge as the EU, what else can we do to the end of enlivening the democratic sphere? This is what is so exciting about this referendum result. Ignore all the politicos and observers saying ‘Britain is broken. We no longer recognise this country’ (now they know how the people who voted against the EU have felt for years). For this huge jolt in global politics, this brilliant people’s quake, this vote against the political and media and business classes, provides us with an opportunity to rethink public life. It opens up the political landscape. It allows us to wonder, and discuss, how that landscape might be reshaped…”

During the eight years of the Obama Administration, Americans experienced a sharp deterioration in the fortunes of the middle class at home, and in the national security of their nation abroad.  Race relations took a turn for the worse.  Average citizens expressed their displeasure in the establishment elites by voting for Trump.