border enforcement – USA Gov Policy

For the second time in 2018, an army sized group of central Americans have formed under murky circumstances in an attempt to unlawfully and with the force of great numbers (some estimates have gone as high as 14,000) overwhelm border guards and essentially invade the United States.

The media continues to mislead the American public about the nature of those comprising this unofficial army-sized movement. It is not comprised of refugees from political oppression. They are, by many of their own admissions, seeking economic opportunities that they lack at home. And they are not predominately the women, children, and families as much of the press seeks to portray. Images indicate the presence of a significant portion of military age young men, some of whom are credibly thought to be not from Central America at all, but from the Middle East.

While the American media has portrayed a largely sympathetic description of families seeking economic opportunity, one Canadian source described Caravan participants as being “Thousands of military-aged, virile mostly Honduran males.”

Questions continue to be raised about the origins of the Caravan. Laura Ingraham of Fox News asks, “Who is funding these efforts? How has it grown so quickly…The spokesperson for the Department of Homeland Security confirmed that the caravan includes ‘citizens of countries outside of Central America, including countries in the Middle East, Africa, South Asia and elsewhere.’ Vice President Mike Pence said something else that is getting scant attention, but ought to send a chill down your spine. ‘What the president of Honduras told me was organized by leftist groups in Honduras, financed by Venezuela and sent north to challenge our sovereignty and challenge our border,’ Pence said.”

While the bulk of the Caravan is from Honduras, terrorist infiltration of Latin America should be noted. Writing for the Center for Immigration Studies, Todd Bensman reported: “The newspaper Prensa Libre quoted [Guatemalan] President Morales saying, during his turn at the lectern of a major regional security conference, that his administration had captured ‘close to 100 people completely linked to terrorist issues, with ISIS.’”

As per the National Institute of Diabetes, Digestive, and Kidney Diseases, body pains, restricted blood flow, prostate cancer, low testosterone, lack of sleep, side effects of drugs, etc. cheap soft viagra Lacking the necessary smarts to make much sense from this information overload, I need to rely on cipla viagra india yourselves.Take measures actively to block and delay the sub-health state. Males encountering health conditions like heart challenges, diabetes, kidney and liver problems and who are consuming drugs with nitrate substance are prohibited to take viagra sales canada because it can cause a problem, but they are not sure what this level is. Actually ED is an inability in men to achieve firm and lasting erections of the penis during generico viagra on line pdxcommercial.com sex. Writing for the Heritage Foundation, Ana Quintana notes that “This latest migrant caravan is another example of leftist groups grandstanding off of desperation and poverty. Just like the migrant caravan earlier this March, organizers of this march are weaponizing poor Central Americans. This caravan was organized by Bartolo Fuentes, a former Honduran legislator and member of the radical leftist Libre party. He was detained by Guatemalan authorities on Tuesday for illegally entering the country. This caravan antic is right out of the left’s disorder and chaos playbook. The timing before the U.S.’s midterm elections and the change of presidency in Mexico is not coincidental. It is also clear the caravan organizers are more interested in creating turmoil than the well-being of the migrants.”

President Trump describes the Caravan as “criminals and unknown Middle Easterners mixed in.’ He has threatened to cut foreign aid to countries that failed to stop it.”

Democrats have been decidedly unimpressed about the dangers inherent in large numbers of unscreened young men forcefully crashing through the U.S. southern border. In fact, some seem to believe its an advantage, considering that in states such as California steps have been taken that weaken safeguards against illegal aliens voting. Stacey Abrams, the Democrat candidate for governor of Georgia, said “The thing of it is, is that blue waves aren’t blue. . . . The blue wave is… comprised of those who are documented and undocumented.

Vice President Pence had described the prior attempt at mass crossings of the U.S. border as “a deliberate attempt to undermine the laws of this country and the sovereignty of the United States…The truth is our immigration laws today are ineffective, and they invite inhumane results. As the President said … we call on the Congress to close deadly immigration loopholes that are exploited by terrorists, traffickers, and criminals….“Whether it be the catch-and-release program or asylum policies that don’t require people to stay in the first safe country in which they arrive, we’re calling on Congress to work with us to bring about change. And it’s change that recognizes the hardship that is placed not just on the American people, but by those who by virtue of these lax immigration laws are emboldened to make a long and dangerous journey to come to the American border. The truth is these laws create an incentive for vulnerable families, and those who would exploit them, to make that long journey up the peninsula…”

Photo: October 25, 2018 EDINBURG, Texas – U.S. Border Patrol agents and various law enforcement agencies disrupted two active stash houses. Agents and HCCO identified 24 illegal aliens from the countries of Mexico, El Salvador, Guatemala, Honduras and Bolivia. Later that day, Rio Grande Valley Border Patrol Agents working in conjunction with the High Intensity Drug Trafficking Area Task Force and the Texas Department of Public Safety conducted a welfare check on a residence in Rio Grande City. Upon entry, agents identified and arrested four illegal aliens from Guatemala. (U.S. Customs and Border Patrol.)

Has the Obama Administration decided to unilaterally, without the involvement of Congress, change the immigration law of the United States? Department of Homeland Security Secretary Jeh Johnson states:

“In January 2016, overall apprehensions on our southwest border – an indicator of total attempts to cross the border illegally — declined 36 percent from the previous month, and were at the lowest levels since January 2015. Also, in January 2016, apprehensions of unaccompanied children declined by 54 percent compared to the month before, and apprehensions of those in families declined by 65 percent in the same period.

“On the one hand, the new enforcement policy announced by the President and me on November 20, 2014 makes clear that our limited resources for immigration enforcement will not be dedicated to the removal of those who have committed no serious crimes, have been in this country for years, and have families here. Under our new policy, these people are not priorities for removal… when enforcing the immigration laws, our personnel will not, except in emergency circumstances, apprehend an individual at a place of worship, a school, a hospital or doctor’s office or other sensitive location…Secretary Kerry announced on January 13 that we are expanding our Refugee Admissions Program to help vulnerable men, women and children in Central America. The U.S. government is partnering with the UN High Commissioner for Refugees and non-governmental organizations in the region to implement this as soon as possible. This approach builds on our recently established Central American Minors program, which is now providing an in-country refugee processing option for certain children with parents in the United States, as well as the existing asylum process.”

While Secretary Johnson claims that his agency is concentrating on criminal illegal aliens, studies by Paul Bedard, writing in the Washington Examiner indicate otherwise. “Criminal prosecution of immigration offenses over the past five years is down 36 percent, and the once-successful program of detaining illegal immigrants in state and local jails is in free fall, down by two-thirds, according reports from two federal agencies. Justice Department statistics show that criminal prosecutions for crimes such as unlawful re-entry by an illegal in November totalled 4,861, down 13.2 percent over the previous month. Over the past year, that number is down 22.3 percent. According to the Center for Immigration Studies, which analyzed the data, that is a five year decline of criminal prosecutions of 36 percent.”

In an article written for Roll Call Sen. Jeff Sessions and Rep. Dave Brat warned that “America is about to break every known immigration record…The Census Bureau projects that the foreign-born share of the U.S. population will soon eclipse the highest levels ever documented, and will continue surging to new record highs each year to come. In Washington, immigration reform has devolved into a euphemism for legislation that opens America’s borders, floods her labor markets and gives corporations the legal right to import new foreign workers to replace their existing employees at lower pay…This is not immigration reform. This is the dissolution of the nation state, of the principle that a government exists to serve its own people.”
cheapest viagra for sale The product involves recruiting of major sensual stimulation which ensures one to have a longer and thicker penis, preferable gore course that takes into consideration harder erections, more stamina that permits you to final until you and your confederate are comprehensively fulfilled. It is high generic viagra without visa in antioxidants and rich in Vitamin C. This site check for more viagra 25 mg was a simple one site design where visitors might exchange their e mail details along with might be given a free report on the subject in an email autoresponder sequence, where he also reminded these individuals that they might acquire considerably more information by ordering the ebook. I can’t insist enough on the benefit buy cialis of global delivery system.
In a report entitled “Immigration Handbook for the New Republican Majority” outlining how Congress should respond to White House actions, Senator Sessions has accused the Obama Administration of acting unilaterally and in defiance of the Constitution.

“President Obama has declared null and void the sovereign immigration laws of the United States in order to implement immigration measures the Congress has repeatedly and explicitly rejected. His order grants five million illegal immigrants work permits, Social Security, Medicare, and free tax credits—taking jobs and benefits directly from struggling American workers. U.S. citizens have been stripped of their protections they are entitled to under law…

“President Obama’s former ICE Director, John Sandweg, famously conceded: “if you’re a run-of-the-mill immigrant here illegally, your odds of getting deported are close to zero.” Since entering office, President Obama has engaged in a sustained campaign to collapse immigration enforcement. My office has compiled a detailed timeline of his actions, including many dangerous directives not widely known to the public—a copy of which can be provided upon request…

“Consider the illegal immigration surge from Central America. Approximately 99 percent of those who arrived in that surge—whether minors or adults in family units—are still in the United States, according to DHS data. 16 Instead of removing illegal immigrants, the President has expended enormous time, energy, and resources into resettling newly arrived illegal immigrants throughout the United States. Any border security plan that leaves this resettlement operation intact is doomed to failure. Jessica Vaughan at the Center for Immigration Studies estimates that more than 100,000 illegal immigrants who showed up at the border [in 2014] have been freed into the United States.”

Quick Analysis

Why the Electoral College is Vital

Proposals for radical alterations in the way Americans vote are dangerous concepts that would have dramatic consequences for the nation and its Constitution. Some, such as ranked choice voting, are an unblushing bid to prop up fringe, leftist candidates. Others. if adopted, would essentially disunite the nation and overturn its Constitution. As they consistently have after each election loss, Democrat spokespeople have flooded the airwaves with complaints about the Electoral College. Why, they ask, can’t we have a “popular vote,” and let it be done with. Since the Electoral College process is part of the original design of the U.S. Constitution, it would be necessary to pass a Constitutional amendment to change this system. The National Archives notes that over the past 200 years more than 700 proposals have been introduced in Congress to reform or eliminate the Electoral College. There have been more proposals for Constitutional amendments on changing the Electoral College than on any other subject. The answer is as simple as the name of the country: The United States of America. The incredibly successful nation created almost two and a half centuries ago was a union of separate states. Fresh off of dealing with a monarch, it was intentionally set up that way to both prevent the possibility of having an all-powerful dictator, and to prevent larger states from bullying smaller ones. Abolishing the electoral college would essentially disenfranchise smaller states from having any say in the presidency. Indeed, even less populated areas of large states would lose influence. A collection of large cities, (New York, Los Angeles, Chicago, Houston, Phoenix, Philadelphia, San Antonio, San Diego, Dallas, Austin, Jacksonville, etc.) would decide the outcome in who gets the White House. Considering how badly many of those urban centers are run, that would not bode well for the future of the country! Beyond the practical policy implications, it would alienate the populations of those not living in California, Texas, New York, Florida, Pennsylvania, Illinois, who would, for the most part, be reduced to bystanders in the race for the only nationally-elected position. A Heritage study analyzed the concept of a “National Popular Vote” (NPV) this way: “The National Popular Vote (NPV) plan is the latest in a long line of schemes designed to replace the Electoral College. Imbued with the ideals of this nation’s Founders, the Electoral College has proved itself to be both effective in providing orderly elections for President and resilient in allowing a stable transfer of power of the leadership of the world’s greatest democracy. Therefore, while it would be a mistake to replace the Electoral College, replacing this system with the NPV would be a disaster. The NPV would devalue the minority interests that the Founders sought to protect, create electoral administrative problems, encourage voter fraud, and radicalize the U.S. political system. It also would likely violate the U.S. Constitution’s Compact Clause while directly contravening the Founders’ view of federalism and a representative republic. In an age of perceived political dysfunction, effective policies already in place—especially successful policies established by this nation’s Founders, such as the Electoral College—should be preserved.” Trent England, writing for the National Conference of State Legislatures outlined key reasons for the institution: “At the Constitutional Convention, the primary concern of delegates opposed to direct election was that big states would dominate presidential politics. By using a two-step election process, the Electoral College prevents one region, or a handful of major metropolitan areas, from controlling the White House. Support must be geographically distributed around the country in order to win enough states to capture an electoral vote majority. This was particularly important after the Civil War. The nation remained divided, and Democrats became dominant in the south. A combination of intense popularity with some voters and violent suppression of others allowed Democrats to receive the most popular votes in 1876 and 1888 even though they lost the Electoral College and thus those elections.” Eliminating the Electoral College would be a disaster for the United States/