border – USA Gov Policy

Everyone dreads coming across professionals who over-complicate matters for their own selfish purposes. The physician who prescribes needless tests to get extra fees, the car mechanic who replaces a perfectly good part simply to make a few extra dollars. Public life is no different. Far too often, elected officials and their appointees either create or misuse problems for their own political gains (remember the Obama Administration’s Rahm Emmanuel who famously stated “Never waste a good crisis?”)

America today faces extensive challenges that require resolution. Rather than do what is necessary, however, those problems remain unresolved and abused as an excuse by politicians to further their own often unstated goals.

Examples abound in matters both foreign and domestic. To name just two:

The United States is a sovereign nation with every right, and every obligation, to defend its borders. This is not as complicated a task as opponents of stricter controls would have you believe.. Building a fence supplemented with the appropriate patrols and technological surveillance is well within the capabilities of the federal government. The failure to do so exposes citizens to contagious diseases, increased crime, and terrorist infiltration. But, as Emmanuel noted, it is too good a crisis too waste.
The canadian viagra professional blood that fills the penis area so that you can get the usual vigor and zeal for sex once again. Based on personal tolerance and effectiveness, this dose may be increased to a maximum recommended dose of 100 mg per amerikabulteni.com brand levitra in usa day. cialis 80mg This physician specializes in the diagnosis, treatment, and repair of injuries plus the disorders and diseases that involve the musculoskeletal system. viagra samples from doctor Trouble, it can happen to anyone. if you want.
Those vast numbers of illegal immigrants will have needs for public assistance, and will eagerly vote for politicians who give that help to them. They will do this regardless of the fact that voting by noncitizens is an illegal act. The same politicians willing to ignore illegal entry into the United States also oppose measures designed to prevent illegal voting. That is why they needlessly complicate this problem.

Americans continue to suffer from high unemployment and rampant underemployment. Time and again, lowering taxes on individuals to provide them with more expendable income, and lowering taxes and regulations on corporations to allow them to hire more people within the U.S. has worked well. Democrat and Republican presidents have successfully used this tactic. But taxes remain high, and indeed, U.S. corporate taxes remain the highest in the world. The obvious solution pf lowering those rates and easing those regulations is ignored because too many politicians, on both sides of the aisle, greedily prefer to retain the current, complicated tax code in order to gain from the support of special interests who receive particular benefits.

America faces complicated problems. But the reason they remain unresolved is the gain those in power gain from over-complicating them for their own benefit.

In an exclusive interview with the Vernuccio/Allison Report, Clara E. Del Villar, the CEO & Editor-in-Chief of the Hispanic Post, revealed her concerns about the current crisis of illegal aliens flooding America’s southern border.

Ms. Villar notes that Mexico’s exceptionally powerful drug cartels are using the exodus as a screen to infiltrate their power to the United States. She has recommended the following common sense approach:

Secure the border. Our border security system is irresponsibly broken. Building up and maintaining strong, effective resources to address security, monitoring, and manpower requirements should not be a work in progress. Why the delay in addressing this obvious and primary need? The children now clamoring at our borders should sound serious alarm bells about the consequences and dangers of inaction…
2. Modernize the visa system. There are systems management technologies available to bring efficiency, scalability, and sensory tracking ability to major industries …
It is important for you to know whatever problem you face you must be first well aware about it and secondly you also have to take discounts on viagra. http://mouthsofthesouth.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/07/MOTS-08.03.19-Taylor.pdf cialis best prices It is a quality drug that works for the whole body. viagra canada pharmacies The person who will teach may not know all the traffic rules and regulations. Ed distance cialis sales australia mouthsofthesouth.com education institutes in Delhi offer admission into courses based on the marks attained in the graduation. 3. Help U.S. companies. They need E Verify, a potentially complex online system, to verify their workers’ legality.

4. Strengthen diplomatic efforts. Maintain real relationships with Central American and Mexican officials on these immigration issues and more. U.S.-Latin American relations have long been a secondary foreign policy consideration to our detriment.

5. Enact new laws. Serious immigration resolution requires provisional legal status, or guest-worker registration, with probation after all the background checks, fines, and taxes. Yes, there are doubts that undocumented immigrants will come forward to register. But it is safe to say that more will come forward to register than appear out of the shadows for mass deportation. Any process that includes identification beats the unknowable status quo we remain mired in at this time.

6. Fix the visa process. The H1B visa restrictions on foreign graduate students are unwieldy at best. Some rules are archaic, such as a 7 percent limit on permanent permits to any nationality. The notion of limiting H1B visas to 65,000 (a number selected during or just after 9/11) is incomprehensible in a free market society. Such a policy is arbitrary, inefficient, and creates no economic benefit.

Quick Analysis

Ukraine’s Frozen Conflict

As we approach winter in the northern hemisphere, the war in Ukraine is beginning to resemble a “frozen conflict” from many perspectives. Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky recently told the media he hopes the war will end faster once President-elect Trump takes over in January. Opinions in Moscow, however, differ from that of the Ukrainian leader. Russian President Vladimir Putin argues that the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) needs to exclude Ukraine from joining in “exchange” for peace. If it does not, he says, then no end to the war is in sight. So far there is no Christmas solution. Several NATO countries, according to Vladimir Socor of the Jamestown Foundation, are tentatively considering “coalitions-of-the-willing” to provide security for Ukraine outside of the formal NATO framework. There is, however, no collective mechanism today under which such an arrangement is viable. According to the NATO Charter, while Ukraine is a NATO partner country, it may not join as a full member since it has not fulfilled the requirements for membership. That has not stopped NATO and allies from continuing “to provide Ukraine with unprecedented levels of support, helping to uphold its fundamental right to self-defence,” according to the organization. Socor says that keeping Ukraine out of NATO will not advance peace with Russia. Waiting for a peace settlement, he suggests, would only serve to encourage Moscow to continue the war indefinitely. Although the Biden Administration officially withdrew its support for Ukrainian membership in 2021, NATO maintains an “open door” policy toward membership-seeking countries. The current White House position led the way for European states to oppose Ukraine’s membership saying that a decision should be delayed until “conditions are met.” Biden pushed for changing “open door” to a “bridge” metaphor. It is not intended as an across-the-board NATO policy and has been implemented in the past on a case-by-case basis, says Socor. “The alliance’s open-door policy was not fully insulated from Russia’s non-statutory blocking power, and NATO-aspirant countries’ path toward membership was not always irreversible.” Russia has successfully blocked states like Georgia from joining, first in 2008 and again after the war in Ukraine began in 2014. Russia recognizes the value add of Ukraine to NATO is enormous and that Kyiv has a better case than some other nations. Putin’s invasion was, in part, intended to foreclose that option. By 2021, Moscow was pushing hard to maximize its war objectives, which included further annexations of Ukrainian territory. A main goal for Putin was, and is, to ensure there is no Ukraine left to join NATO. As President-elect Trump prepares to assume office in January, he is faced with the historical challenges presented by the war. Post-conflict security guarantees were the center of several proposals made during the 2023 military stalemate. The incoming Trump Administration has yet to outline how it intends to handle the Russia-Ukraine war. Analysts in Washington believe that the new Administration will expect its European allies to guarantee the majority of Ukraine’s security needs. As we approach 2025, several European nations have acknowledged that they do not view Ukraine as eligible for NATO membership as it would draw the organization into the middle of the conflict. Others want to wait until the war is over or pending a “peace” settlement before considering Ukrainian membership. Socor reports that some “influential voices” are suggesting that “Kyiv should join NATO after “freezing” the war along a stable armistice line, de facto accepting Ukraine’s partition, with NATO security guarantees applying de jure to the government-controlled territory only.” This would mean starting accession talks soon with the actual talks to commence only after a ceasefire is in place. Trump arrives in Washington at a time when Putin’s hybrid strategies of war in Ukraine have eviscerated commonly-held differences between war and peace. “Absent a political consensus in NATO over Ukrainian membership, certain European allies, including France’s President Emmanuel Macron, are holding informal consultations about post-conflict security guarantees to Kyiv by NATO members outside of NATO’s framework,” according to the Jamestown Foundation. The Biden Administration downplayed the discussions on possible forms of military assistance and defense industry cooperation by sending only an Assistant Secretary of State. For a European peace to hold the Trump Administration would need to formally extend the United States’ nuclear deterrence to Ukraine. Options under discussion in Europe include a “coalition of the resolute” to deploy forces to Ukraine as part of a possible armistice package, deterring further Russian attacks, says Secor. European officials are also debating, without any agreement, whether its military forces could perform non-combat logistical roles to free Ukrainian forces to fight. None of the possible courses of action has moved forward as all eyes are waiting on the incoming Trump Administration for clues about its intended level of support for a NATO framework and other non-NATO proposals. Daria Novak served in the U.S. State Dept.