Biden scandal – USA Gov Policy

The belief by many Democrat leaders that they are immune from the law has reached breathtaking proportions. The support of the media for that feeling of entitlement is deeply disturbing.

The public has become familiar with unpunished scandals and blatant misdeeds such as the Obama Administration’s use of the IRS to assault the Tea Party, Hilary Clinton’s email abuse, and her approval of the sale of the basic ingredient of nuclear weapons to Russia in return for a massive donation to her organization. It is becoming increasingly evident that during the 2016 election and its aftermath, the leadership of the Obama-era FBI, joined by former CIA Director John Brennan, abused their positions for partisan political purposes and initiated a massive probe based on nothing more than false charges procured by the Clinton campaign of first candidate then President Trump. The issue has caused massive disruption that caused extensive and unnecessary division within the nation.

But a dramatic new wrinkle has been added.

There is significant reason to believe that, while serving as Vice President, Joe Biden substantially abused his position to enrich his family, in particular, his son, Hunter Biden. Hunter flew along with his father on Air Force two to China on an official mission, and returned with an over one billion dollar business deal in his pocket. Further, according to former NYC Mayor and presidential attorney Rudy Giuliani, Hunter Biden was making millions on the board of one of the most corrupt companies in Ukraine. Biden’s boss, Guliani disclosed, had stolen $5b from Ukraine and was a fugitive.

ABC News reports that “Democratic presidential candidate Joe Biden declined to answer questions on the campaign trail…about his son’s overseas business dealings in countries where the then-vice president was conducting diplomatic work.”

But the scandal gets far deeper. President Trump urged Suffering from erectile dysfunction? Here comes the solution for erectile dysfunction from pharmacies customers needed to have a good sexual life it becomes quite important for them to face a good supply of blood towards the penis results an issue of male impotence. viagra super active There are many women who suffer generic india levitra from problems in their sex lives. wholesale generic cialis These factors include conditions affecting blood flow to the genitals, whether you are male or female. Psychological buy cheap cialis counseling helps tackle issues related to marital relationship. Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky to probe the matter, an appropriate action for the nation’s chief executive to undertake in the wake of a significant foreign policy issue affecting the highest levels of the U.S. government. An individual described as a “partisan whistleblower,” complained about President Trump’s action.

The response from key Democrats and their media allies was stunning. House Intelligence Committee Chairman Adam Schiff has called for investigating, not Vice President Biden for his alleged misdeeds in China and Ukraine, but President Trump, for attempting to get further information about Biden’s actions. Schiff states that President Trump threatened to withhold military aid to Ukraine unless that nation cooperated in the investigation.

According to an article in the Independent Journalism Review “Former Housing and Urban Development Secretary Julián Castro — a 2020 Democratic presidential hopeful … blasted Trump as a ‘criminal’ and said the president ‘must be impeached immediately.’… The whistleblower complaint has resulted in three House committees, who will look into whether the president tried to have Ukraine aid in his reelection campaign and attack Biden — a frontrunner in the Democratic presidential primary race — as well as it being a national security threat.”

A review of major media sites reveals that the comments of Schiff, who has been a key anti-Trump player in the false Russian-collusion charges, have received far more print and air time than the actual and deeply substantial corrupt actions of the former Vice President. The extreme partisanship of both the Democrat leadership and their allies in the media, the willingness to tear the nation apart in return for partisan gain, should disturb every American regardless of ideology or party.

We have seen this before, and the comparison is frightening. Democrats, in their bid to protect the practice and spread of slavery, willingly split America asunder and initiated the Civil War.

Image: Ukraine (Pixabay)

Quick Analysis

Ukraine’s Frozen Conflict

As we approach winter in the northern hemisphere, the war in Ukraine is beginning to resemble a “frozen conflict” from many perspectives. Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky recently told the media he hopes the war will end faster once President-elect Trump takes over in January. Opinions in Moscow, however, differ from that of the Ukrainian leader. Russian President Vladimir Putin argues that the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) needs to exclude Ukraine from joining in “exchange” for peace. If it does not, he says, then no end to the war is in sight. So far there is no Christmas solution. Several NATO countries, according to Vladimir Socor of the Jamestown Foundation, are tentatively considering “coalitions-of-the-willing” to provide security for Ukraine outside of the formal NATO framework. There is, however, no collective mechanism today under which such an arrangement is viable. According to the NATO Charter, while Ukraine is a NATO partner country, it may not join as a full member since it has not fulfilled the requirements for membership. That has not stopped NATO and allies from continuing “to provide Ukraine with unprecedented levels of support, helping to uphold its fundamental right to self-defence,” according to the organization. Socor says that keeping Ukraine out of NATO will not advance peace with Russia. Waiting for a peace settlement, he suggests, would only serve to encourage Moscow to continue the war indefinitely. Although the Biden Administration officially withdrew its support for Ukrainian membership in 2021, NATO maintains an “open door” policy toward membership-seeking countries. The current White House position led the way for European states to oppose Ukraine’s membership saying that a decision should be delayed until “conditions are met.” Biden pushed for changing “open door” to a “bridge” metaphor. It is not intended as an across-the-board NATO policy and has been implemented in the past on a case-by-case basis, says Socor. “The alliance’s open-door policy was not fully insulated from Russia’s non-statutory blocking power, and NATO-aspirant countries’ path toward membership was not always irreversible.” Russia has successfully blocked states like Georgia from joining, first in 2008 and again after the war in Ukraine began in 2014. Russia recognizes the value add of Ukraine to NATO is enormous and that Kyiv has a better case than some other nations. Putin’s invasion was, in part, intended to foreclose that option. By 2021, Moscow was pushing hard to maximize its war objectives, which included further annexations of Ukrainian territory. A main goal for Putin was, and is, to ensure there is no Ukraine left to join NATO. As President-elect Trump prepares to assume office in January, he is faced with the historical challenges presented by the war. Post-conflict security guarantees were the center of several proposals made during the 2023 military stalemate. The incoming Trump Administration has yet to outline how it intends to handle the Russia-Ukraine war. Analysts in Washington believe that the new Administration will expect its European allies to guarantee the majority of Ukraine’s security needs. As we approach 2025, several European nations have acknowledged that they do not view Ukraine as eligible for NATO membership as it would draw the organization into the middle of the conflict. Others want to wait until the war is over or pending a “peace” settlement before considering Ukrainian membership. Socor reports that some “influential voices” are suggesting that “Kyiv should join NATO after “freezing” the war along a stable armistice line, de facto accepting Ukraine’s partition, with NATO security guarantees applying de jure to the government-controlled territory only.” This would mean starting accession talks soon with the actual talks to commence only after a ceasefire is in place. Trump arrives in Washington at a time when Putin’s hybrid strategies of war in Ukraine have eviscerated commonly-held differences between war and peace. “Absent a political consensus in NATO over Ukrainian membership, certain European allies, including France’s President Emmanuel Macron, are holding informal consultations about post-conflict security guarantees to Kyiv by NATO members outside of NATO’s framework,” according to the Jamestown Foundation. The Biden Administration downplayed the discussions on possible forms of military assistance and defense industry cooperation by sending only an Assistant Secretary of State. For a European peace to hold the Trump Administration would need to formally extend the United States’ nuclear deterrence to Ukraine. Options under discussion in Europe include a “coalition of the resolute” to deploy forces to Ukraine as part of a possible armistice package, deterring further Russian attacks, says Secor. European officials are also debating, without any agreement, whether its military forces could perform non-combat logistical roles to free Ukrainian forces to fight. None of the possible courses of action has moved forward as all eyes are waiting on the incoming Trump Administration for clues about its intended level of support for a NATO framework and other non-NATO proposals. Daria Novak served in the U.S. State Dept.