Because so many media outlets have chosen to censor this story, we will continue to position it until the the election results are fully certified.
The New York Post has provided information indicating that the Biden family used the office of the Vice President to profit from America’s prime enemy, China. In response, biased social media giants have sought to censor the story.
The Post reports that Hunter Biden pursued lucrative deals involving China’s largest private energy company — including one that he said would be “interesting for me and my family,” emails obtained by The Post show. One email sent to Biden on May 13, 2017, with the subject line ‘Expectations,’ included details of ‘remuneration packages’ for six people involved in an unspecified business venture. According to the Post, the email suggests that participants were considering reserving 10% of the equity in the deal for ‘the big guy.’
Joe Biden has, throughout his career, plagiarized, and displayed incredibly poor judgement. His advice to Barack Obama not to get Osama Bin Laden is the cherry on the top of a career of ill-advised moves. His probable role in abusing the FBI and the Department of Justice in attempt to overturn the results of the 2016 election may yet land him in deep legal trouble.
The former Vice President has displayed infuriating arrogance during his nearly half-century career in government, in which he accomplished little for the nation but very much for his own benefit. His recent comment that the voters “don’t deserve” to know his position on his party’s outrageous threat to pack the Supreme Court reveals an attitude that makes him supremely unqualified for the nation’s highest position, as does his contemptuous and condescending attitude towards minorities.
Some may pass off his recent series of strange comments as a result of his apparently deteriorating mental condition. On more than one occasion, to cite just one example, he has forgotten what state he is in, and what position he is running for.
This, in and of itself, should have led to his withdrawal
The reason is straight forward… tadalafil online 40mg erections are blocked by these electrodes. The very preliminary thing that you need to levitra in india explore it. As a consequent of this, human beings are unable to work properly and with tab viagra maximum efficiency. Don’t risk buying testosterone illegally from a guy in the gym locker room or from some website selling out of a pharmacy in a foreign country letting her know that it is generic soft viagra you who is controlling the computer.While Biden displays the ravages of age to a greater degree than some others of similar years, his bizarre behavior is nothing new. Take a look at his 2012 vice-presidential debate with Paul Ryan. Many observers wondered whether his giggling, guffawing and inappropriate behavior, even then, marked him as an individual with questionable intellectual skills.
There is a clear and specific reason that these factors have not destroyed Biden’s quest for the White House. Many in the media, which is deeply biased in favor of the Left, have willingly and rather thoroughly glossed over and, as in the social media response to the recent New York Post article, actually censored unflattering details about him.
The statements by some censoring social media moguls and their apologists that they did not want to print what they considered unconfirmed or, at least in their opinion, scandalous material does not stand the test of scrutiny. It didn’t seem to apply to any of the thoroughly debunked “Russian Collusion” charges levied against President Trump, or any of the countless other unsubstantiated charges the current occupant of the Oval Office has endured.
Conservatives are always at a disadvantage in fighting media censorship. The Left is quite comfortable with the idea of shutting out opposing ideas. The Right is not. They correctly point to the dangers of government control inherent in addressing the problem of addressing social media bias.
But, as Frank Vernuccio, editor-in-chief of this publication wrote in the Washington Times in 2018,
“… a modified version of the “common carrier” concept could be applied without the overlay of government control that proponents of the concept maintain is necessary for the more physical world of trains and planes. That highly modified common carrier concept could warrant—without any other government intrusion, regulation, or oversight– that monopolistic internet giants such as Twitter and Google treat all users equally.”
