As Christians celebrated Easter and Jews observed Passover in March, the usual disputes over the recognition of those holidays in the public sector was expected, but there is a growing new dimension to the legal battles. The prior Obama Administration’s attempts to run roughshod over religious objections to portions of its health care legislation represented just one aspect of this growing trend.
Mary Eberstadt, author of “Its Dangerous to Believe” wrote in Time Magazine that “vigorous secularism has catapulted mockery of Christianity and other forms of religious traditionalism into the mainstream and set a new low for what counts as civil criticism of people’s most-cherished beliefs…Some of the faithful have paid unexpected prices for their beliefs…:the teacher in New Jersey suspended for giving a student a Bible; the football coach in Washington placed on leave for saying a prayer on the field at the end of a game; the fire chief in Atlanta fired for self-publishing a book defending Christian moral teaching; the Marine court-martialed for pasting a Bible verse above her desk…Anti-Christian activists hurl smears like ‘bigot’ and ‘hater’ at Americans who hold traditional beliefs about marriage and accuse anti-abortion Christians of waging a supposed ‘war on women.’…Some secularists argue that Christian schools don’t deserve accreditation, period.”
Throughout American history, there has always been a vigilance, since the Constitution was ratified, against one creed taking precedence over others. However, despite the Constitutional prohibition against the establishment of a preferred theology, there is increasing evidence that atheism is taking a prohibited place as an official state doctrine.
Examples abound, far beyond the usual arguments over holiday decorations in government buildings.
Examples abound. Heartland reports that Montana officials have proposed the exclusion of religious schools from a state scholarship program.
“A draft of the rules by the state Revenue Department excluded religious schools from receiving funding through [a scholarship] program. If the rule stands, it will set a precedent calling existing Montana tax-credit programs into question, “because these programs also allow donations to go to religious groups,” Smith said at the hearing. “These tax credit programs include the college contribution credit, the qualified endowment credit, the dependent care system credit, and the elderly care credit. According to the department’s position that tax credits constitute public funds, these programs would also be unconstitutional…According to officials at the state Department of Revenue, religious schools were excluded in order to adhere to the state Constitution, which has provisions prohibiting direct or indirect funding of religious organizations.” Opponents of the move say it violates the U.S. Constitution.”
The American Civil Liberties Union notes that some of the restrictions against religious activity in public schools are wrong.
“The Constitution permits much private religious activity in and about the public schools. Unfortunately, this aspect of constitutional law is not as well known as it should be. Some say that the Supreme Court has declared the public schools “religion-free zones” or that the law is so murky that school officials cannot know what is legally permissible. The former claim is simply wrong. And as to the latter, while there are some difficult issues, much has been settled. As a result, in some school districts some of these rights are not being observed.”
The trend towards restricting traditional religions has affected the military. The military newspaper Stars and Stripes recently reported the concern of Ron Crews, a retired Army colonel and chaplain. “There has been a growing concern about chaplains being able to continue to minister what I would call ‘the full counsel of God’ in their ministries.” The article notes that “For 240 years, since the U.S. Army’s founding in June 1775, chaplains have been welcome in the military. Generals from George …to George C. Marshall considered chaplains indispensable to a unit’s emotional and spiritual well-being…” In recent years, Carew notes, “Washington has issued wave after wave of new regulations, some of which conflict with many chaplains’ long-held religious beliefs…[he cites] multiple cases, in which he contends chaplains have been censored or had their careers effectively ended for espousing their beliefs.”
Prosolution Plus is filled with essential nutrients which are effective for ED condition yet there are some points that should be viagra overnight keep in mind before taking them. The way sildenafil canada pharmacy works actually by increasing blood flow throughout the human body is the major thing is that how to find a sexologist because generally people do not want to talk on such a sensitive issue. This generic cialis online drug is also very popular among the youth for its recreational purposes. According to the head of the Italian Society of Andrology and Sexual Medicine; this can lead to an inability to get or sustain an erection for satisfactory sexual intimacy between the couples. prescription for ordering viagra
Atheism as a creed is a growing practice in the United States. In some ways, it is, rather than merely an absence of religion, a philosophical practice that increasingly takes on the attributes of faith-based sects. In 2013, the Huffington Post described how, on Sunday mornings, atheists in Houston gather together for services:
“Sunday mornings at Houston Oasis may have the look and feel of a church, but there’s no cross, Bible, hymnal or stained glass depictions of Jesus. There’s also nary a trace of doctrine, dogma or theology. But the 80 or so attendees at this new weekly gathering for nonbelievers come for many of the same reasons that others pack churches in this heavily Christian corner of the Bible … inside the conference room in a nondescript office building on the city’s west side, it’s hard to ignore the structural similarities to a Sunday morning church service. There is live music played and performed by members that is intended to spur reflection as well as entertain; a collection is taken up in a passed wicker basket.”
Huffington also described the appointment of an atheist chaplain at Stanford “There’s an atheist chaplain at Stanford. John Figdor has a degree from Harvard Divinity School and he does what chaplains do. He counsels those in need and visits the sick. And what’s more, he’s welcomed as part of the Office of Religious Life.”
A research project from the Liberty Institute finds that “Attacks on religious liberty in the public arena are perhaps the most widely recognized and one of the fastest growing forms of hostility to religion in the United States today.”
The current battles in religious affairs in the public square can be substantially distinguished from past precedent. Unlike prior disagreements, they do not involve one religious sect (Catholics vs. Protestants, Christians vs. Jews, etc.) against another, as much as they do a growing atheist philosophy that opposes any place for faith systems in public life.
The complete elimination of religion in public life does not have legal precedent to stand on. In fact, it runs afoul of the First Amendment mandate that “Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion,” which prohibits favoring one creed over another, since the forced absence of any religion is essentially the forced placement of atheism as a preferred or established creed.
The forced acceptance of secularism as a form of state religion, moves to remove all references to Christian culture in the public square, and the worrisome and growing presence of antisemitism are trends that should be noted.
Photo: Model of Annapolis Chapel. Could such a structure be added to a government facility today?