Tag: anti-Trump protests

Categories
Quick Analysis

Left Uses Violence and Intimidation to Quell Free Speech

President Obama’s attempts to put government monitors in newsrooms were defeated, as was legislation introduced by Senator Schumer (D-NY) to limit the First Amendment.  Now out of office, Progressives continue to seek ways to restrict free speech.  Having lost the ability to do so through government action, they have turned to violence, intimidation, and other forms of pressure.

The violence is evident in the streets, as supporters of President Trump have, to their dismay, frequently found. There have been extensive news reports, including extensive video footage, of left-wing violence in response to Clinton’s loss in the 2016 election and the inauguration of a new president. What has been missing is condemnation of these acts by much of the mainstream media, academia, and progressive politicians.

Intimidation and pressure are evident in many areas, most notably within educational institutions. The Daily Mail  provides an example. Gavin, a 12-year-old 6th grade student in St. Louis, Missouri, was assaulted on a school bus for wearing a Trump “Make America Great Again” hat. The incident was recorded on video. The school response was extremely telling.  Although he was the victim, he was suspended along with his assailants.

A Goldwater Institute study  found that “freedom of speech is dying on our college campuses, and is increasingly imperiled in society at large…Freedom of speech, that cornerstone of our liberty and most fundamental constitutional right, is under siege on America’s college campuses. Speakers who challenge campus orthodoxies are rarely sought out, are disinvited when called, and are shouted down or otherwise disrupted while on campus. Speech codes that substantially limit First Amendment rights are widespread. New devices like ‘trigger warnings’ and ‘safe spaces’ shelter students from the give-and-take of discussion and debate. When protesters disrupt visiting speakers, or break in on meetings to take them over and list demands, administrators look the other way. Students have come to take it for granted they will face no discipline for such disruptions. Administrators themselves often disinvite controversial speakers and limit the exercise of liberty to narrow ‘free speech zones.’ Administrators also focus enforcement on silencing ‘offensive’ speech and give short shrift to due process protections for students accused of saying the wrong thing to the wrong group.

This will give the time to the Buy medication Online to bring on buy cheap levitra the original source the results. With more blood availability, your reproductive system becomes more functional to work wonderfully to get you able to rock the love game in the bed. if you do not want to use conventional medicines. tadalafil discount Most of the magazines and newspapers come up with buy viagra health relates articles. The chiropractic practitioner may levitra best price also give referrals to other health complications. Kate Hopkins, writing for the Daily Mail asks: “Schools are supposed to teach kids how to think for themselves, not what to think. So why are so many liberal teachers bullying and brain-washing children with their own intolerant views?”

Writing for the Daily Wire, Ben Shapiro points out the American left has made political violence its current method of limiting the free speech of those they disagree with the “ New Normal.” Stein writes: “In recent years, under the tender tutelage of the Obama Department of Justice, mass violent action by leftists has become commonplace across the country, from the Occupy Wall Street movement to Black Lives Matter-inspired mob violence in Ferguson and Baltimore, from campus chaos at California State University of Los Angeles to this sort of violence at Trump rallies. The tendency of the media has been, however, to blame the rise of Donald Trump for this violence.”

The Gatestone Institute believes that “Universities and colleges in the United States need to be safe places where students of all backgrounds and beliefs can live and study, free from intimidation by other students, faculty, and administrators. Protests are fine, and they are our right as Americans, but there needs to be zero tolerance for violence and intimidation. If a speaker or group is committing or inciting battery, assault or vandalism, the situation should be a police and judicial matter — as well as valid grounds for mandatory expulsion. There is no place for vigilantism by students, faculty or administers on campus to enforce political conformity. There is no place for any kind of intimidation and violence anywhere in the US. We should never let rioters have a hecklers veto over who gets to speak…The rioters have been doing us a favor by showing their real colors.”

David Harsanyi, writing for The Federalist,  asks, “Why Aren’t We Having a National Conversation About Leftist Violence?… Trump’s rhetoric doesn’t excuse the liberal attacks on speech we saw in California and Chicago, or the illiberal “protests” we’ve seen on college campuses for decades now.  A protest is a statement or action expressing disapproval of or objection to something. What campus lefties engage in are efforts to stop free expression. For that matter, it’s doesn’t excuse the Democratic Party’s constant assaults on the First Amendment. The Left has a free speech problem. When are we going to treat ourselves to a national conversation about the Left’s propensity to undermine free speech? Why aren’t we talking about leftist violence? We treat these events as isolated incidents that have nothing to do with the politics of the contemporary liberalism.”

Categories
Quick Analysis

What are the Real Goals of the Anti-Trump Protests? Part 3

The New York Analysis of Policy and Government concludes its review of the anti-Trump protests.

The leftists protesters have not limited their targeting to the White House or to the overturning of the 2016 election.  Those who vocally disagree with their policies are also in their line of fire.

The Daily Caller reports that During an anti-Trump protest in Seattle this weekend, an activist associated with the Black Lives Matter (BLM) movement took to the megaphone to voice her support for, among other things, “killing people,” and “killing the White House.” While she said that, another protester can be heard saying, “Burn it!”

Trump supporters have been assaulted and beaten, one example being at an airport in Portland, as reported by the Daily Mail.

The CBS affiliate in San Franciscoreports that “Protesters armed with bricks and fireworks mounted an assault on the building hosting a speech by polarizing Breitbart News editor Milo Yiannopoulos Wednesday night, forcing the event’s cancellation. Several injuries have been reported and at least four banks have been vandalized after demonstrators marched away from the scene of a violent protest at the canceled speaking event by controversial far-right writer and speaker Yiannopoulos on the University of California at Berkeley campus.”

The New York Post reports that protestors sought to stop an appearance by conservative Vice Media co-founder Gavin McInnes, who was to address a seminar for college Republicans.
It can have a bad viagra sale without prescription psychological effect on your liver. ED is something no young male should have to worry about having another pill. sildenafil in canada As a result, penile pdxcommercial.com levitra prescription damage develops, forming a scar tissue. Men with blood-clotting disorders, too, are not recommended to use more than 1 viagra on line pharmacy pill in a day one tablet has been prescribed to take measured as sufficient to uphold for 36 hours.
Fox News reports that “many conservatives say they are increasingly under threat and being shut out of the political dialogue…Allison Coukos, director of public relations for the George Washington College Republicans and a junior majoring in political science…said [there is a] new level of enmity for conservative students and professors. Coukos said she has basically had to stop discussing politics altogether… ‘Students have told me of instances of harassment. We had a member spat on when they were wearing a ‘Make America Great Again’ hat,’ Coukos said.

Last week, video surfaced of a left-leaning college student physically and verbally assaulting a conservative leader at West Virginia University during a meeting to organize a joint debate. Jordan Martinez, a 24-year-old U.S Army combat veteran who is now a graduate student at the University of Southern California’s School of Cinematic Arts, said he has been shocked with the extreme shutdown of political discourse. Two days prior to the inauguration, according to Martinez, professors introduced a documentary filmmaker who said that he was part of an anti-Trump movement and invited students to join the protests in Downtown Los Angeles. He gave each student two forms which were “delegitimizing Trump’s election” and stated that he and Pence were ‘fascist.”

A careful review might disclose that an additional motivation for the protests could include a leadership struggle within the Democrat Party, the initial shots in a civil war brought about by the devastating loss of its power in the White House, the House of Representatives, the U.S. Senate, many state legislatures and governorships in recent years.  Democrats seeking the survival of their party will be forced to note that the combination of extreme left-wing policies, divisive identity politics, back-door influence by billionaires such as Tom Steyer and George Soros, and Clinton-style corruption have not served their party well.  Outrageous actions by New York Senator Charles Schumer, who introduced legislation to weaken First Amendment protections, have also harmed the party.

In addition to their losses at the ballot box, the embarrassing condition of many cities run by left-wing Democrat mayors across the nation (Chicago being a prime example) points to a clear need for significant change—an alteration which will detrimentally affect the leftist who currently control the party.

It is becoming increasingly evident that the goal of the extreme leftists sponsoring this movement is not to effectuate specific policy changes.  Part of it is a struggle to retain control of the Democrat Party despite a record of failure. And part of it is a rebellion—the word is used intentionally—against the constitutional election process which rendered a result the left did not want.  It is, in its essence, a rejection of the entire concept of the electoral process itself.

Categories
Quick Analysis

What are the Real Goals of the Anti-Trump Protests? Part 2

The New York Analysis continues its review of the anti-Trump protest movement.

The anti-Trump protests, hyped by many in the media and supported by the financiers of progressive causes, are aimed not just at an individual, but at the Constitutional process of free elections.

The Daily Signal  reported that: “Disrupt J20 organizers, [posted] this definition of what it means to take ‘direct action:’ ‘Direct Action is when you take collective action to make social change without giving power over to an authority or middle person. We don’t ask permission or put our faith in electoral politics, [emphasis added] instead, we use our bodies to stop the smooth operation of the system we oppose. Examples of direct action include the ongoing resistance at Standing Rock against the Dakota Access Pipeline, the street and highway blockades of Black Lives Matter, or the occupations of public squares during Occupy Wall Street.’ Anarchist-affiliated media sites such as Crimethinc.com…suggest the potential for violence.”

CNN reported that six police officers were injured, 217 protestors were arrested, and a limousine was set afire in Washington on Inauguration Day. Centrist Democrat Senator Claire McCaskill (D-Mo.) condemned the violence, in an interview with The Hill.

If these activities occurred spontaneously, some leeway might be given to the lack of coherence or logic in the course of their actions and statements.  But the reality is this movement is well-funded and well-planned. Breitbart reports that “The Women’s March on Washington, a celebrity-endorsed event [was] backed by a who’s who of far-left organizations, including scores of groups financed by billionaire George Soros.”

The Washington Times reported “Republican strategist Michael McKenna said protesting the peaceful transition of power is ‘really an unhelpful thing’ for Democrats looking to establish the moral high ground and turn public opinion against Mr. Trump. ‘It’s pathological,’ said Mr. McKenna, who at one point advised the Trump transition. ‘Democrats need to realize that one-party rule doesn’t serve anyone’s purposes. Competition is what makes this whole thing work, and Democrats need to start being a competitive party again.’ ”

The extraordinary tenor and violence of left wing protests across the United States, both those aimed directly at President Trump and at others who vocally disagree with “progressive” viewpoints, have crossed a line.  It is no longer political dissent.  It is now an effort to overturn the results of a legal election and the protections of the First Amendment by means of harassment, false news reporting, and violence.

While there have been election results in the past that have resulted in dramatic changes in philosophy in the White House, (the switch from Jimmy Carter to Ronald Reagan, and from George W. Bush to Barack Obama are among the most recent; historically, the election of Andrew Jackson should be noted) only the election of Abraham Lincoln resulted in anything resembling the current climate.

Unlike prior periods of discord, these current events are not centered around a singular disputed issue or policy but rather concern the most inherent aspects of Constitutional government.

The once-sacrosanct and widely held beliefs in freedom of speech and the acceptance of election results are being challenged as never before in U.S. history.

Consider:

  • The tone for the current climate was set when numerous Democrat elected official boycotted the inauguration ceremony, and continued when Democrat members of the Senate Finance Committee boycotted votes on the nomination of President Trump’s candidate to lead the departments of the Treasury and Health and Human Services.
  • Mayors of several large cities have openly planned to defy lawful federal immigration laws.
  • Fox News reports that two Democrat lawmakers  have sought to limit Trump’s authority as commander-in-chief.
  • Acting Attorney General Sally Yates, an Obama appointee, directed her legal staff to not perform their duty to defend a lawful presidential order in court.
  • The Washington Examiner reports that a Secret Service agent refuses to protect the President because she disagrees with his policies—ending a long-standing tradition of impartiality.
  • Violating a long standing tradition of judicial impartiality,  IJR  reports, a judge wore a radical feminist symbol—the so-called “pussy hat”—while presiding at court.

This is the positive or yang polarity energies (electro) of the cosmos meeting the online viagra store http://davidfraymusic.com/events/liszt-academy-grand-hall-budapest/ negative or yin (magnetic) to create a circuit. So, if a man buying viagra on line is getting difficulty achieving erection, it may be due to this dysfunction. Systemic Inflammation acquisition de viagra http://davidfraymusic.com/fray-a-triumph-performing-bach-boulez-schoenberg-and-brahms-in-chicago/ In COPD Sets Up Depression And Anxiety Depression and anxiety are common in COPD, which occur in 20-50% of COPD patients. While taking this generic levitra from canada medicine, follow the instructions strictly to make it able penetrating during the act.
Some of the actions of the protesters have been extraordinary in their tenor:

  • Yahoo news reports that “Radio stations in South Carolina and several other states say their signals were hacked and interrupted by an anti-Donald Trump rap song that contained obscene language.
  • McClatchy reports the BuzzFeed news servicehas published unverified smears, (as have other news outlets) in an effort to discredit and de-legitimize  the legally elected Administration.
  • Twitter, reports Fox News, has committed $1.6 million to oppose the President’s travel ban.
  • As reported by Fox News, comedian Sarah Silverman has called for a military coup against President Donald Trump.

The Report concludes tomorrow.

 

Categories
Quick Analysis

What are the Real Goals of the Anti-Trump Movement?

The New York Analysis of Policy Government begins a three–part review of the actions and motives of the anti-Trump protests. 

The real goals of the anti-Trump movement leaders are more complex than portrayed by the friendly media.

Even before Donald Trump took the oath of office, protests were being planned and executed across the United States. The tone and vehemence of those events are without any precedent, with the sole exception of the reaction to the election of Abraham Lincoln.

There is a certain irrationality to the comments and demonstrations.  Some of the conditions those involved are angry about exist after eight years of an Obama presidency, a leader they clearly prefer. Despite the angry shouts, signs, and statements of the participants, there is scant evidence that, absent a strenuous misinterpretation, (which a biased media has been quite willing to provide) Mr. Trump has engaged in any action that could reasonably be construed as racist, misogynist, xenophobic, or anti-lgbt.

Strangely lost amidst all the press coverage concerning the vehement and occasionally violent protests about the inauguration and subsequent policy moves of President Donald Trump are the most basic questions reputable journalists should be asking.  What, precisely, are the objections that have led to the near-hysteria that began even before the Administration took office?

Neither Trump’s campaign statements nor his prior history portray him as a doctrinaire conservative that would raise the ire of progressives.  His positions on infrastructure are, to take just one example, directly in line with liberal Democrats.  Marketwatch  noted last year that “One presidential candidate wants to end loopholes for the ‘very rich.’ He’s against trade deals that allow foreign “sweatshops” to steal American jobs. He backs “prevailing wages” for U.S. positions filled by foreigners with special visas.”  That wasn’t a description of Bernie Sanders—it was a description of Donald Trump.

The Fiscal Times  notes that in trade, infrastructure, paid family leave, carried interest, and the deficit, Trump’s positions are very similar to the many of the people engaging in strenuous objections to his Administration.

Conservative hawks also are clearly distraught over Trump’s soft rhetoric about Russia. Oddly enough, despite decades of seeking to soften tough talk from the Right about Moscow, the left now condemns Trump for doing what they have been advocating.

Once secured, most of the air in the penis is disrupted it leads to problem in achieving erections. online viagra india Science and modern levitra online canada technologies have many treatments for the solution of this very dangerous problem. viagra brand online Many thanks.” Fabia Brackenbury – Founder of the Vulval Health Awareness Campaign and of the National Lichen Sclerosis Support Group “I am often asked which lubricant I like to use. In some cases it was observed that women were failing to attain the hard on without this medication intake.Drugs containing nitrates, discount cialis canada in particular nitroglycerine should be avoided along with the Silagra 100mg For Men Erectile Dysfunction. Human Rights and gender issues are among the more frequently heard issues at anti-Trump protests. Here, too, there is a curious lack of substance.

Throughout the entire eight years of the Obama Administration, there was a stunning lack of concern for the two most oppressed and attacked groups of middle eastern residents, Christians and Yazkidis.

As noted by Chatham House, extensive witness testimonies and the discovery of mass graves around Sinjar have evidenced ISIS’s responsibility for the expulsion, flight, forced apostasy, murder and sexual enslavement of thousands of Yazidi women and men.

According to a Georgetown University study, “a Christian was martyred about once every six minutes in 2016, making them the most persecuted religious group in the world.”

The Obama Administration clearly refused to reach out and assist either of these groups by allowing them to enter the U.S. as refugees.  An honest examination of refugee policies during Obama’s presidency would lead to the undisputable conclusion that he went out of his way to exclude them.

It also refused to take any significant steps to thwart the enslavement, rape, and murder of females throughout the region.  Which clearly leads to the question why women’s groups, who were so silent about Obama’s refusal to react to this gender-cide against women, are now so vocal in their opposition to Trump.

There does not appear to be any attempt to engage the new president in a reasonable discussion to dissuade him from the views that the demonstrators object to. Indeed, on Inauguration Day, rather than seeking to merely make their voices heard as the process unfolded, the actions were actually aimed at disrupting the process itself.

The Report continues Monday. 

Categories
Quick Analysis

Electoral Vote Doesn’t Stop Protests

The Electoral College vote has been cast with the expected result, but the bitterness that highlighted the 2016 presidential contest, pitting the left vs. both the center and conservatives will go on. The unprecedented attempts to delegitimize the ballot, even including death threats to members of the electoral college, (see, for example The Hill’s description of the threats to a young Michigan elector)  indicate an unfortunate turn in U.S.  politics.

The results as this article went to press indicated that Trump received 304 electoral votes, with only 270 needed to win. Clinton had 224. NBC news reported that “Anti-Trump protesters descended on state capitols throughout the U.S. in a last-ditch effort to persuade so-called ‘faithless electors’ in states Trump won to change their vote. Many of the Republicans casting ballots said they were inundated with calls and emails urging them to dump Trump… Only one Republican elector, Christopher Suprun of Texas, publicly pledged not to vote for Trump despite his state heavily favoring the president-elect last month. One other Texas elector also abandoned Trump in the final vote.”

While political and policy disagreements never vanish following elections, the broad post-campaign efforts, many organized and funded by leftist leaders, are unique.

The sides not only argue about specific topics; they disagree about the rules of their competition. As marriage counsellors note, learning how to fight is essential to preserving a relationship—in this case, living under the same government.

Not accepting the results of a fair election, using paid agitators to produce demonstrations some of which turned into violent riots, initiating groundless calls for recounts, and casting aspersions on the president-elect violate long-standing traditions that helped preserve the peaceful transition of power in America.

The debate is no longer centered over approaches to specific issues, such as how to spend federal dollars, or which foreign treaty to sign.  The new conflict is far more fundamental.  Centrists and Conservatives seek to preserve a free-market oriented economy and Constitutional practices; over the past eight years of the Obama Administration,  leftists expanded their perception that Constitutional rules and restrictions could be severely bent, and that a more regulated economy was preferable.
What women can do? cialis 40 mg A woman can help by her man get over erectile problems by her love and patience. So you should need to go for viagra sildenafil buy uk. It causes cialis 10mg reduced lubrication and arousal problems. Some people choose products, which increase their heart rate cheap super viagra and this, will pose a huge risk to their health.
While centrists and conservatives tend to concentrate on specific issues, such as middle-class unemployment, over-taxation, crime, national security, etc., their progressive counterparts advance a broader agenda, which President Obama called the “fundamental transformation” of America.

As the New York Analysis of Policy and Government previously noted, actual political campaigns constitute just one battleground for progressives.  Academia and entertainment, which those in the center and right tend not to emphasize as forums for political debate, are a major avenue for the advancement of leftist agendas. This increasingly outrages parents who do not wish to see their tax or tuition dollars being used to advance causes they disagree with, and tire of having to monitor television, movie and music programming for messages that trouble them.

The tenor of the political battle has changed radically.  In the mid part of the 20th Century, a common refrain heard was “I totally disagree with everything you say, but I would fight for your right to say it.” During the past several years, the American left has increasingly sought to deprive their opponents of a forum.  When conservatives complained of news bias on the part of the major television networks and newspapers, they invested heavily in talk radio, specialized opinion journals, Fox News, and internet sites.  Angry over the success of those alternatives, progressives have repeatedly sought to enact various forms of censorship.

Despite the seeming finality of the campaign following the electoral college vote, more unprecedented disorder is on the horizon. The Hollywood Reporter quotes activists/entertainer Michael Moore on plans to disrupt the inauguration:

“If by some awful happenstance Trump shows up to be sworn in on January 20th, I will be there helping lead the national protest and non-violently disrupting the Inauguration of a man no one other than the electoral college elected — and I’ll also be doing my own thing as a private citizen (activities I won’t disclose now)… This impending disaster requires everyone to get involved now — all hands on deck! This is not a drill!”