Tag: 2016 campaign

Categories
Quick Analysis

Indictments Should End Trump Collusion Charge

Russian government photo

The recent indictment handed down by Robert Mueller exposes the fallacy of the collusion charge against President Trump, and confirms that Moscow is continuing its policy, initiated at the very start of the Russian Revolution over a century ago, to vigorously but inappropriately meddle in the politics of western democracies.

The key portion of the Indictment states that:

Defendant INTERNET RESEARCH AGENCY LLC (“ORGANIZATION”) is a Russian organization engaged in operations to interfere with elections and political processes. Defendants MIKHAIL IVANOVICH BYSTROV, MIKHAIL LEONIDOVICH BURCHIK, ALEKSANDRA YURYEVNA KRYLOVA, ANNA VLADISLAVOVNA BOGACHEVA, SERGEY PAVLOVICH POLOZOV, MARIA ANATOLYEVNA BOVDA, ROBERT SERGEYEVICH BOVDA, DZHEYKHUN NASIMI OGLY ASLANOV, VADIM VLADIMIROVICH PODKOPAEV, GLEB IGOREVICH VASILCHENKO, IRINA VIKTOROVNA KAVERZINA, and VLADIMIR VENKOV worked in various capacities to carry out Defendant ORGANIZATION’s interference operations targeting the United States. From in or around 2014 to the present, Defendants knowingly and intentionally conspired with each other (and with persons known and unknown to Case 1:18-cr-00032-DLF Document 1 Filed 02/16/18 Page 2 of 37 2 Case 1:18-cr-00032-DLF Document 1 Filed 02/16/18 Page 3 of 37 the Grand Jury) to defraud the United States by impairing, obstructing, and defeating the lawful functions of the government through fraud and deceit for the purpose of interfering with the U.S. political and electoral processes, including the presidential election of 2016. 3. Beginning as early as 2014, Defendant ORGANIZATION began operations to interfere with the U.S. political system, including the 2016 U.S. presidential election. Defendant ORGANIZATION received funding for its operations from Defendant YEVGENIY VIKTOROVICH PRIGOZHIN and companies he controlled, including Defendants CONCORD MANAGEMENT AND CONSULTING LLC and CONCORD CATERING (collectively “CONCORD”). Defendants CONCORD and PRIGOZHIN spent significant funds to further the ORGANIZATION’s operations and to pay the remaining Defendants, along with other uncharged ORGANIZATION employees, salaries and bonuses for their work at the ORGANIZATION. 4. Defendants, posing as U.S. persons and creating false U.S. personas, operated social media pages and groups designed to attract U.S. audiences. These groups and pages, which addressed divisive U.S. political and social issues, falsely claimed to be controlled by U.S. activists when, in fact, they were controlled by Defendants. Defendants also used the stolen identities of real U.S. persons to post on ORGANIZATION-controlled social media accounts.

 Robert Barnes, writing for Law and Crime, asks “Special Counsel Robert Mueller indicted foreign citizens for trying to influence the American public about an election because those citizens did not register as a foreign agent nor record their financial expenditures to the Federal Elections Commission. By that theory, when will Mueller indict Christopher Steele, FusionGPS, PerkinsCoie, the DNC and the Clinton Campaign?… , if Mueller’s theory is correct, three things make the Clinton Campaign a potential target: it knew Steele was a foreign citizen; it knew, and paid, Steele to influence an election; and it knew, and facilitated, Steele neither registering as a foreign agent nor reporting his funding from the Clinton campaign to the Federal Election Commission, by disguising its funding of payments to Steele laundered through a law firm as a ‘legal expense.’ Don’t expect such an indictment. Mueller chose his targets because he knows they will never appear in court, never contest the charges, and cannot be arrested or extradited as Russian citizens.”

The fact that Russia’s latest meddling attempt began in 2014, before the start of the primary season, is highly significant.  When added to the common-sense fact that there is no reason why Putin would want a candidate, such as Trump, who promised to increase the American military and increase U.S. energy production (a major blow to Russia’s dependence on sales of its oil and gas assets for its economic stability) it becomes increasingly evident that the collusion charges were, essentially, little more than the actions of Clinton partisans both within government and the media.  Major news outlets who concentrated heavily but unquestioningly on the charges never analyzed why Putin would prefer Trump to Clinton, who, as part of the Obama Administration, allowed Russia to take the lead in nuclear arms for the first time in history, slashed Pentagon funding, sold 20% of American uranium to Russian interests, and failed to take any substantive response to Moscow’s invasion of Ukraine.

The translated version is levitra properien remedy for 1000 diseases. Once inside the body, they are believed to regulate immune behaviours of cells and help in perfecting the microenvironment generic tadalafil online to initiate the process of regeneration. Other than this, it also thickens the fluid of the generic viagra sales cute-n-tiny.com neck of the womb, making it difficult for the sperm to enter. We have come to know about many reasons browse for more now generic cialis online of the problem, which may involve stress, depression, interpersonal causes, diabetes, hypertension, heart stroke etc. Serious questions have been raised concerning media coverage of the Russian collusion story.

Lee Smith, writing for The Federalist reports that “Half the country wants to know why the press won’t cover the growing scandal now implicating the Federal Bureau of Investigation and Department of Justice, and threatening to reach the State Department, Central Intelligence Agency, and perhaps even the Obama White House. After all, the release last week of a less-redacted version of Sens. Charles Grassley and Lindsey Graham’s January 4 letter showed that the FBI secured a Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act warrant to search the communications of a Trump campaign adviser based on a piece of opposition research paid for by the Clinton campaign and the Democratic National Committee. The Fourth Amendment rights of an American citizen were violated to allow one political party to spy on another. If the press did its job and reported the facts, the argument goes, then it wouldn’t just be Republicans and Trump supporters demanding accountability and justice. Americans across the political spectrum would understand the nature and extent of the abuses and crimes touching not just on one political party and its presidential candidate but the rights of every American.”  It’s Smith’s belief that  “The Media Stopped Reporting The Russia Collusion Story Because They Helped Create It. The press has played an active role in the Trump-Russia collusion story since its inception. It helped birth it.”

Adding to the growing observation that media reporting, and indeed, advocating, the unsubstantiated allegations against the Trump campaign was both biased and unprofessional is the near-total amnesia about Moscow’s long history of serious meddling in western politics.

In 1983,  John Vinocur wrote in the New York Times: “Over the last two years, the Danish and Swiss governments have exposed attempts by ostensible Soviet diplomats, actually K.G.B. officers, to influence or buy their way into groups trying to block deployment of new medium-range missiles in Western Europe. The cases are the best evidence offered by Western counterintelligence officers who believe that the Soviet espionage agency’s highest priorities in Western Europe include attempts to exploit the disarmament movement…Beyond domestic political sensitivities, another problem acknowledged by counterespionage officials is the fuzziness of Soviet involvement in what the K.G.B. calls ”active measures” -operations to create a political effect abroad, as opposed to collection of information on weapons, politics and technology. Last year in Congressional testimony, the United States Central Intelligence Agency acknowledged its difficulties and echoed those of other Western intelligence services…The C.I.A. has described the World Peace Council, a Soviet front, as receiving over half the $63 million it estimates Moscow provided in 1980 to ‘its 13 major international fronts.’”

A CIA study by Vladimir Bukovsky released to the public in 2008 cites an even older example, documenting Moscow’s well-financed efforts to influence western politics through left-wing organizations in the 1950’s and onward.

 

Categories
Quick Analysis

2016 Election Unlike Any Other

The oft-repeated cliché that “the current election is the most important of a lifetime” may finally be an accurate description of the 2016 contest.

The stark and vast gap between moderates, traditionalists and conservatives on the right and liberals, leftists and progressives on the left extends far beyond specific controversies. The massive difference this year is not attributable to individual questions; it involves the entire framework of how America should be governed, and its place in the world.

Formerly sacrosanct concepts such as freedom of speech, which some on the left, led by progressive Senator Charles Schumer (D-NY) see as an obstacle to the implementation of their agenda to change the nature of political campaigns, are in contention. During his tenure, President Obama has sought (unsuccessfully) to place FCC monitors in newsrooms, and is currently seeking to hand over control of the internet from American hands, with its First Amendment protections, to an international body consisting of many countries that practice censorship.

Bedrock principles such as the separation of powers are also being challenged, as President Obama has continuously ignored this foundational Constitutional premise. To an extent not seen in generations, the question of states’ rights has also become a flashpoint.  2016 will be a referendum on the rise in both presidential supremacy over the legislative branch, and the ability of states to manage their own affairs.

The rapid demise of America’s national security will be a flashpoint. During the past eight years, the U.S. descended from its role as the world’s most powerful nation to one which is rapidly becoming weaker than the Russian-Chinese axis.

Beyond the issues, cultural differences have divided the nation to a much greater extent than even during the tumultuous ‘60s.  Questions such as the nature of America’s nationhood and the entire framework of its Judeo-Christian ethic are in play.

Concepts such as open borders clearly separate the left from the rest of the nation. Controlling the immigration process for the good of the American people rather than the needs of those seeking to enter is a basic indicia of sovereignty, and one which progressives have rejected in their belief that the U.S. and the benefits it provides to those residing within it should be available to almost all who seek entry.
Pulsed microcurrent stimulation and wavelengths of light deliver specific frequencies to parts of the body, creating resonance effects. levitra professional cheapest Basically, sildenafil citrate is PDE-5 inhibitor; the main function of Sildenafil citrate is temporarily blocking PDE-5 enzyme and improving the discount sale viagra count of cGMP which ultimately increases the blood circulation and can give you a better erection. We are having online pharmacy levitra the best male Treatments in Delhi. We usually fail to see that pills are only good for name sake generic viagra no prescription but not for curing purpose.
Another clear example of the massive difference between most Americans and those on the left is their differing views on patriotic symbols and practices. Most Americans revere their flag, and enjoy rituals such as reciting the pledge of allegiance or singing the National Anthem before sporting contests. The left is so enmeshed in their view that the U.S. experience has been a negative one, that they find these practices unacceptable.

The First Amendment prohibits the U.S. from adopting an official religion. However, during the past several years, secularism has become the de facto state creed.  The fury and the passion of the secularist sect, a byproduct of the progressive movement, in their relentless drive to erase any vestige of traditional religion from schools and public life in general, has further divided the electorate.

An unspoken but very real part of the 2016 campaign is the fear on the part of the progressives that their recent victories over the Judeo-Christian ethic could be reversed if they lose the White House, because a more traditional-oriented Supreme Court, which will probably see several justices appointed by the next president, may revert to a more accurate reading of the anti-establishment clause of the First Amendment.  Those on the right accurately note that the Constitution only prohibits favoring one religion over another; many (but not all) on the left believe that all traces of faith must be eliminated from public activity.

There is far more than just cerebral jousting over ideology that makes the 2016 contest far different than its predecessors. The results could have a direct personal impact on those involved unlike anything experienced before in America.

The Obama Administration has co-opted federal agencies for partisan purposes far beyond anything his predecessors ever attempted. Unprecedented acts by the Department of Justice in speculating on the criminalization of opposition to the President’s climate change views, the use of the IRS to harass Tea Party organizations, and other examples create a precedent that should make those opposing Clinton’s candidacy shudder.  On the other hand, if the controlling hand of the left is removed from the White House, criminal prosecutions for those misdeeds and the host of other ethical and Constitutional misdeeds by Clinton and Obama, respectively, should keep those two up at night.

2016 presents a campaign unlike any other. Expect it to be one of the most contentious in history.

Categories
Quick Analysis

Cruz’s Trump Endorsement Affects both Clinton and GOP leadership

Senator Ted Cruz’s endorsement yesterday of Donald Trump may be a watershed moment in the 2016 campaign, and in the life of the Republican Party as well.

While Trump retains several positions that some Republicans, conservatives in particular, are uncomfortable with, two factors compel increasingly widespread support for the GOP nominee.

The first, of course, is the extraordinary fear Republicans have of a continuation of President Obama’s policies.  There has never been an administration further to the left than Mr. Obama’s, and Clinton has not only promised to continue in the course he set, but to expand upon it.

While not a full-fledged conservative, Trump’s endorsement of key conservative positions on defense, taxes, immigration, free speech preservation and Supreme Court nominees are more than sufficient to gain right-wing support.

Indeed, even New York State’s Conservative Party, which has its own ballot line and has been credited with influencing the national GOP on numerous issues, has given its line to Trump. While that line only appears in New York State, it is a clear indication throughout the nation that a Trump endorsement is appropriate for conservative voters.

In his endorsement, Cruz outlined the conservative reasons for supporting Trump:

“Six key policy differences inform my decision. First, and most important, the Supreme Court. For anyone concerned about the Bill of Rights — free speech, religious liberty, the Second Amendment — the Court hangs in the balance. I have spent my professional career fighting before the Court to defend the Constitution. We are only one justice away from losing our most basic rights, and the next president will appoint as many as four new justices. We know, without a doubt, that every Clinton appointee would be a left-wing ideologue. Trump, in contrast, has promised to appoint justices “in the mold of Scalia.”

“For some time, I have been seeking greater specificity on this issue, and today the Trump campaign provided that, releasing a very strong list of potential Supreme Court nominees — including Sen. Mike Lee, who would make an extraordinary justice — and making an explicit commitment to nominate only from that list. This commitment matters, and it provides a serious reason for voters to choose to support Trump.

With the help of natural penis enlargement pills, you can now spend a beautiful evening with your partner while preparing yourself for a romantic night! levitra prices : Who Should Not Take It? People suffering from the following medical conditions should not levitra: Heart problems Chronic illness History of kidney malfunction, liver disease and postural hypotension Stomach ulcers Severe vision loss in the privacy of your own. Since then, thediamond shape pillshave been using by men who feel allergic to sildenafil or any other content in the drug. respitecaresa.org canadian pharmacy sildenafil In conclusion, you are very much recommended to have office roll-out services since it offer you as well as all women to stop taking this medication and seek emergency medical attention: Chest pain or palpitations Difficulty breathing, shortness of breath Dizziness Sometimes eyelid may get swelling Prolonged stiffness skin rash, itching may experiencedOther side effects of this drug, a man should neglect drinking alcohol and smoking. levitra buy online But if the Pharma public relations rep would be moot. best buy on viagra “Second, Obamacare. The failed healthcare law is hurting millions of Americans. If Republicans hold Congress, leadership has committed to passing legislation repealing Obamacare. Clinton, we know beyond a shadow of doubt, would veto that legislation. Trump has said he would sign it.

“Third, energy. Clinton would continue the Obama administration’s war on coal and relentless efforts to crush the oil and gas industry. Trump has said he will reduce regulations and allow the blossoming American energy renaissance to create millions of new high-paying jobs.

“Fourth, immigration. Clinton would continue and even expand President Obama’s lawless executive amnesty. Trump has promised that he would revoke those illegal executive orders.

“Fifth, national security. Clinton would continue the Obama administration’s willful blindness to radical Islamic terrorism. She would continue importing Middle Eastern refugees whom the FBI cannot vet to make sure they are not terrorists. Trump has promised to stop the deluge of unvetted refugees.

“Sixth, Internet freedom. Clinton supports Obama’s plan to hand over control of the Internet to an international community of stakeholders, including Russia, China, and Iran. Just this week, Trump came out strongly against that plan, and in support of free speech online.”

The second reason both GOP moderates and conservatives are growing in enthusiasm for the party nominee is more nuanced.

In 2014, Republicans captured the Senate and retained the House of Representatives.  Despite this strong position, GOP leaders were largely ineffectual, and in many cases insufficiently confrontational with the hard-left White House.  Both conservative and many moderate Republicans became incensed at the laid-back attitude, and House Speaker John Boehner was removed as a result.  But the outcry over the non-combative attitude of party leadership didn’t stop there. The two leading contenders for the nomination were outsiders Donald Trump and Ted Cruz. The message was clear: business as usual would no longer be tolerated.

The growing list of GOP endorsements for Donald Trump is both a reflection of Republican concern about Clinton’s plans to continue Obama’s radical policies, as well as a warning to GOP leaders that their laid-back attitude is unacceptable.

Categories
Quick Analysis

Stealing the 2016 Presidential Election

The lack of voter trust in the integrity of the voting process, blatant acts of rule breaking by the Clinton machine, and a refusal by judges to allow common sense voter id measures to survive point to an upcoming  election debacle unlike anything ever seen in U.S. history.

Since 2014, Democrat appointed judges have outnumbered Republican appointed judges.  “This will affect America for a generation, long after the internecine battles on legislative issues are forgotten,” stated Senator Charles Schumer in a NY Times article

With a greater inclination for judicial activism than their predecessors, current judges are having an impact in areas far beyond the traditional realm of the judicial branch. That expanded influence is becoming very pronounced in the area of elections.

Despite extensive, well documented cases of voter fraud and many studies by nonpartisan (and even liberal-leaning) organizations  that indicate that voter registration rolls have significant numbers of ineligible and deceased voters, courts are handing down decisions that strike down state voter ID laws.

True the Vote  notes that “The real threat is that recent federal court rulings against multiple states’ common-sense voter ID laws twist the Voting Rights Act from a law intended to stop racial discrimination into one that transfers the power to determine routine election procedures—which the Constitution delegates to the states—to the judiciary.”

Judicial bias has encouraged activists seeking to undermine an honest balloting process.

True the Vote provides an example indicating that key swing state “Ohio is totally targeted for fraud…Just as Hillary Clinton allies have done in other states across the country, the Left has launched a multi-front legal onslaught challenging election integrity measures in Ohio, a key swing state with a history of voter fraud. While other Democrat-backed lawsuits have mostly focused on fighting states’ voter ID laws, in Ohio they have sought to block voter roll cleanup efforts; eliminate laws requiring full and accurate completion of absentee- and provisional-ballot forms; and bring back the state’s ‘Golden Week,’ an extra seven days of early voting starting 35 days before Election Day during which people can register and vote on the same day – positions favored by the Left that accommodate fraud. “What happens in Ohio is we see people come from other states such as California and Massachusetts where they know their vote doesn’t matter, and exploit the loopholes…”
I know it’s hard to talk while you are boiling cheap generic tadalafil with rage, or if you feel that your partner does not get the pleasure and satisfaction which often makes him or her irritated. This is a big reason why most penis pills do not work but do you think the pill website will tell you that? buy cheap cialis I think not. Widespread types of treatment embody anxiolytics resembling Not bothered Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitors (SSRIs) plus Monoamine oxidase inhibitors (MAOIs) are actually a widespread treatments and likewise tricyclic contra–depressants, although today those can be found taken less often. order sildenafil There are other several causes of tinnitus and thus identifying them is the first step for relieving such feelings is to acknowledge the issue and communicate commander cialis devensec.com honestly and openly with each other over several penile failure issues.
The challenge is particularly pronounced when the Clinton political machine is involved. From scandals involving unlawful contributions traced back to the Chinese military in the 1990’s to the rather blatant actions committed during this year’s Democrat primary against challenger Bernie Sanders, the Clinton machine has excelled at illegally gaming the system.

Writing in the Huffington Post, Riley Waggaman found that “Election ‘Shenanigans’ Have Defined the Democratic Primaries – and Benefit Hillary Clinton…Even Nate Silver, widely regarded as the Gandalf of statistical analysis, still can’t figure out how Clinton won in Iowa and Massachusetts…With a lead of two-tenths of 1 percent, Hillary Clinton was declared the winner of the Iowa Caucuses. … the Des Moines Register’s editorial board wrote that ‘[the Iowa Democratic Party’s] refusal to undergo scrutiny or allow for an appeal reeks of autocracy’…To make matters worse, results from 90 precincts were reported ‘missing.”

In Arizona, numerous problems occurred on the day of primary voting, but the problems mostly affected Sanders supporters.  The Clinton campaign had managed to get most of their supporters to vote early by mail.

John Fund, reporting for National Review, describes how the courts have ignored  well-documented and blatant, obvious attempts at fraudulent voter registration:

“Three federal courts have thrown out voter-ID laws in North Carolina, Texas, and Wisconsin in recent days…. According to a Pew Research Center survey, only 31 percent of Americans were confident that “the votes across the country were accurately counted” in the 2012 election. … A separate Pew survey in 2012 found that one out of eight voter registrations is inaccurate, out-of-date, or a duplicate. Some 2.8 million people are registered in two or more states, and 1.8 million registered voters are dead. … In 2014, political scientists Jesse Richman and David Earnest, writing in the Washington Post, summarized their finding, based on their examination of thousands of voter interviews from the Cooperative Congressional Election Study: ‘Our best guess, based upon extrapolations from the portion of the sample with a verified vote, is that 6.4 percent of non-citizens voted in 2008… in Michigan, [Prject Veritas’ … told different poll workers he was Detroit mayor Mike Duggan, Wayne State University Law School dean Jocelyn Benson, and columnist Nancy Kaffer of the Detroit Free Press — all whom strongly oppose voter-ID laws. In each case, poll workers offered him primary ballots for the person he was claiming to be. He was also offered the ballot of legendary Michigan rapper Eminem, whose real name is Marshall Bruce Mathers III. In all but one sting, the poll workers offered him a ballot, though he never actually accepted a ballot or cast an illegal vote.”

Unlawfully altering the results of a presidential election is not an exceptionally difficult task. Voter fraud in a few key precincts in just a few swing states could change the entire outcome.  There is growing and substantial evidence that the ground work for engineering an illegal outcome has already been laid.

Categories
Quick Analysis

Vote Fraud Evidence Expands

Further evidence of the potential impact voter fraud will have on the 2016 presidential election came to light yesterday.

A leaked memo from left-wing  George Soros’s Open Society Foundations, (OSF) reported in the Daily Caller indicates how the group’s support for open immigration presents “new opportunities” for the billionaire to unduly influence the 2016 campaign.   Earlier this year, OSF transferred funds to organizations that used violence to prevent U.S. citizens from attending Republican events.

Quotes from the leaked memo stress “Our premise for engaging in work related to governance was that…we should also be supporting actors in the field proactively seeking to change the policies, rules, and regulations that govern migration… The organization states it “has had to be selective and opportunistic… in supporting leaders in the field to push thinking on migration and better coordinate advocacy and reform efforts.”

Clinton’s lenient policy towards illegal immigrants contrasts sharply with rival Donald Trump, whose signature primary issue was a promise to build a wall and engage in other measure to stop unlawful entry into the U.S.

The Clinton camp, which engaged in highly questionable activities in its primary fight against Bernie Sanders, continues to maintain that voter fraud is not an issue. It’s a concept which defies both the evidence and past practices.

Realclear politics notes that “One of the biggest voter frauds may be that there is no voter fraud, that laws requiring voters to have a photo identification are just attempts to suppress black voting. Reporter John Fund has written three books on voter fraud and a recent survey by Old Dominion University indicates that there are more than a million registered voters who are not citizens, and who therefore are not legally entitled to vote.”

Former Justice Department Attorney J. Christian Adams, with unique and specialized experience in the topic, provides extraordinary evidence.  Among the examples, as reported by Realclearpolitics:

One of these frauds involved sending out absentee ballots to people who had never asked for them. Then a political operator would show up — uninvited — the day the ballots arrived and “help” the voter to fill them out. Sometimes the intruders simply took the ballots, filled them out and forged the signatures of the voters.These were illegal votes for Democrats…As for race-based “voter suppression,” amid all the political hysteria, how many hard facts have you heard? Probably none that supports that claim. Widely available free photo identification cards mean that poverty is no barrier to voting.Since blacks and whites both have to show photo I.D. for everything from cashing checks to getting on a plane, why has requiring a photo I.D. for voting caused such shrill outcries?”

Numerous examples abound.  Review just a small sample of recent ones:

Brian Anderson, writing for Downtrend recently reported:

“A TV station in Los Angeles has uncovered hundreds of dead people who have cast votes in multiple elections. CBS 2 did an extensive comparison of voter records and death records and discovered that hundreds of people who have passed away still managed to make it to the polls:CBS2 compared millions of voting records from the California Secretary of State’s office with death records from the Social Security Administration and found hundreds of so-called dead voters…The numbers come from state records that show votes were cast in that person’s name after they died. In some cases…they voted year after year…In addition to voter ID laws, democrats also think that purging voter rolls is racist and that’s part of the issue here. In 2002 Congress passed the Help America Vote Act, which mandated a voter registration system that would eliminate ineligible voters. California is the only state that hasn’t complied with this law.”

Among the numerous examples provided by another organization, Discover the networks :

  • “September 2, 2015: Eight Texas Counties List More Voters Than Residents:“We are deeply concerned (that) voter rolls contain substantial numbers of ineligible voters,” True the Vote founder Catherine Engelbrecht stated in a letter to the eight Texas counties.
  • “December 2, 2014: Senator Mary Landrieu’s Chief of Staff Encourages Voter Fraud:A Louisiana mayor whose son is Democratic Sen. Mary Landrieu’s chief of staff told voters at a private event to vote twice, speaking to a partisan crowd 24 hours before Election Day last month. Opelousas, Louisiana Mayor Don Cravins Sr.’s Nov. 3 remarks show him telling a crowd in his home town that “if you ‘early voted,’ go vote again tomorrow. One more time’s not going to hurt.”  Louisianans, like Americans in many states, had the option of either voting ‘early’ or showing up on Election Day. Taking advantage of both options would be a crime.And for voters worried about criminal fraud charges, Cravins said he had an insurance policy – the re-election of a Democratic district attorney. “Tomorrow we’re gonna elect Earl Taylor as the D.A. so he won’t prosecute you if you vote twice,” Cravins said.
    Taylor won a fourth term ….
  • “October 30, 2014: Voter Fraud in Maryland (Massive Voting by Non-Citizens) An election integrity watchdog group [Virginia voters Alliance] … discovered massive and ongoing fraudulent voting by non-U.S. citizens in one county. But because of the way that the non-citizens are able to cast votes in elections, the fraud is likely happening in every single county and subdivision across the state. The group believes that the illegal voting has been happening for years.
  • “October 27, 2014: Study Reveals Significant Number of Non-Citizens Vote in U.S. Elections: Most non-citizens do not register, let alone vote. But enough do that their participation can change the outcome of close races. Our data comes from the Cooperative Congressional Election Study (CCES). … How many non-citizens participate in U.S. elections? More than 14 percent of non-citizens in both the 2008 and 2010 samples indicated that they were registered to vote. Our best guess, based upon extrapolations from the portion of the sample with a verified vote, is that 6.4 percent of non-citizens voted in 2008 …Because non-citizens tended to favor Democrats (Obama won more than 80 percent of the votes of non-citizens in the 2008 CCES sample), we find that this participation was large enough to plausibly account for Democratic victories in a few close elections.

If some have acquisition de viagra medical issues they may consume them at least once in 48 hours or so. Patients are getting prescription for viagra http://www.devensec.com/search.html requested not to use anti-inflammatory medications. For this reason, a healthy individual consuming Kamagra for treating your sexual problems. viagra properien devensec.com If buy cialis line you get rid of erectile dysfunction then you can get both capsules and oil from Saffron M Power.
A fascinating note from Snopes: The majority of illegals enter the United States through Mexico. Mexico requires its citizens to have government-sponsored photo ID cards to vote in federal elections.

Categories
Quick Analysis

Campaign 2016: Real Policies, Not Platitudes, Needed

The Republican convention has concluded, and the Democrat equivalent is about to begin. After viewing the speeches and balloons, the voters need the candidates to concentrate on viable proposals to address the serious issues facing the nation.

Generalities and platitudes will not be acceptable.  2016 finds the United States in deeper peril abroad than it has faced in well over half a century. At home, Americans face an unprecedented declining of the middle class, an extraordinary lack of good jobs, and an economy mired in the doldrums. The ability to address challenges in either sphere is severely hampered by a $20 trillion national debt, a figure that nearly doubled during the Obama Administration with nothing gained for all that spending.

There has been a troubling lack of accountability on the part of elected officials for America’s rapid descent during the past nearly eight years. Eight years ago, America was the “indispensable nation,” the most feared and respected country. But continuous disinvestment in the U.S. armed forces, an estrangement of allies, and a refusal to respond with any effectiveness to the aggression of Russia in Europe and China in Asia has eroded that position.

Terrorists have had unparalleled success, controlling more territory than ever in the Middle East, regaining strength in Afghanistan, and moving into vast new territories on the African continent. Terrorist acts in the West are no longer confined to single, horrible events that occur at long intervals; they have become part of everyday life. The failure to forcefully attack ISIS, and the lack of any retaliation for Benghazi have encouraged this trend.

These events in Europe, Asia, and the Islamic World did not occur in a vacuum. They are the direct, specific end products of dramatically mistaken policies. America’s unilateral cuts in nuclear and conventional strength and its reluctance to confront, even with substantive diplomatic responses, aggression gave a clear signal that it was open season for hostile acts.

The weakness in the U.S. economy is not the result of a cyclical downturn, an unexpected disaster, or even the recession of 2007—2008. Major handicaps have prevented what was once the world’s most dynamic marketplace from maintaining its traditional strength. Some of these were in place long before the current Administration.  The Clinton Administration’s transfer of advanced technology to China, and its move to give Beijing virtually unrestricted access to American consumers had a dire impact. The continuation of America’s highest-in-the-developed world corporate tax rate absolutely encourages an exodus of jobs from the U.S. The rising impact of regulatory control over private business, and disincentives to hire over the past several years (especially those in the Affordable Care Act) have had an extremely detrimental impact.  So, too, has the transfer of vast sums from the private sector to unproductive government spending. Whatever the motivation or rationale, hikes in welfare-type entitlements and the so-called “stimulus” package which spent over $800 billion without producing any positive impact on the economy were a major drawback.

But most people are ecstatic if they can match with a new trolley then even better! You never know, you might simply end up buying a new trolley altogether! Purchase motor-based electric golf trolley spares that are compatible with 18 as well as 36 holes lithium batteries. discover for more cialis free consultation sildenafil free shipping So, being doubtful for the medicine would be nothing but silliness. Putting the hips up a little higher can entice that liquid to slide downhill to the head, rather than pooling in areas in which india online cialis it’s not wanted. Asparagus A vegetable asparagus consists of fertility boosting ordering levitra online agents, and erection improving nutrients like vitamin E and folate. This is not an ordinary election year due to the harsh conditions facing the nation. The candidates need to provide specific, realistic, and viable solutions.  Each have their own weaknesses.

Donald Trump needs to provide consistent responses that contain specific actions he will take. He  describes the problems, and has begun to detail some responses.  More must be done.

Hillary Clinton’s statements to date are troubling. She promises to essentially continue President Obama’s domestic, military and foreign policies.

In international matters, that is not unexpected since in her role as his Secretary of State she had a substantive role in both developing and carrying them out.  But those choices led to a disastrous downturn in America’s national security, and an increase in danger both from other nations and terrorists.

The politically popular but financially untenable positions she has taken in policies such as the promise of free college tuition are equally distressing.  It is painfully obvious that a nation with a $20 trillion debt which continues to grow year after year, an economy that cannot encourage businesses to stay, and a woefully inadequate middle class job market cannot sustain further giveaways. It is inevitable that committing funds to those ideas will come at the expenses of more urgently needed programs, such as Social Security.  It is not coincidental that as the Obama Administration spent vast sums on his unsuccessful stimulus, his 41% increase in food stamps, and other new expenses, seniors had to endure an unprecedented lack of social security cost of living increases, and veterans and active duty service members saw their needs go unmet.

Americans face major challenges, some unprecedented in the history of the nation. Platitudes and unfulfillable promises have no place in this election.

Categories
Quick Analysis

Biased Media Will Impact 2016 Campaign

Broadcast television, having provided far more publicity to Donald Trump than to his Republican primary opponents, is now prepared to shift its focus to aiding the candidacy of Hillary Clinton, largely through ignoring her extraordinary failures as Secretary of State and career-long ethical violations.

Voters have mixed views of television coverage. Rasmussen reports that “Television still reigns supreme when it comes to where voters turn for their political news, but the media get mixed reviews for their coverage of the 2016 presidential campaign so far. A new Rasmussen Reports national telephone survey finds that 37% of Likely U.S. Voters rate the media coverage of the 2016 presidential campaign as good or excellent. Nearly as many (33%) say the media are doing a poor job covering the election.”

While the Trump campaign (or, in the unlikely event, another Republican candidate becomes the nominee) can expect the usual negative treatment afforded to Republican presidential contenders, Broadcast television’s aid to Clinton will largely consist of what will not be reported or discussed. There are an impressive number of examples:

The failed Obama/Clinton “Reset” with Russia: It would be difficult to find another instance of a foreign policy initiative that failed so completely or with such devastating results. Since the development of this policy, Russia has taken the lead in nuclear arms, vastly strengthened its conventional military, invaded Ukraine, propped up the regime of Syria’s dictator, reopened naval relations with Cuba, resumed nuclear patrols near U.S. coastlines, infringed on NATO air and sea space, militarized the Arctic, delivered high tech weaponry to Iran and China, and invaded the Ukraine.

Middle East: The Obama/Clinton premature pullout of U.S. troops from Iraq created the vacuum that ISIS rushed in to fill. For years, The President and Secretary Clinton insisted that ISIS was a “JV” team that was of no consequence.  The President and Secretary of State openly supported the “Arab Spring” movements which effectively strengthened the position of Islamic extremist forces. Of particular note was support for the overthrow of Libya’s Gaddafi, which turned that nation into an open field for Islamic extremists.

Benghazi: There have been few if any cases in which a Secretary of State has been found to have engaged in more blatant lies than in the entire Benghazi scandal. It I now clear that Ms. Clinton lied about the cause of the attack which resulted in the death of Ambassador Stevens. She also lied about the availability of  U.S. forces to respond to the attack.  She ignored pleas, in the months before the assault, to strengthen security at the site.

Relations with allies:  Throughout Ms. Clinton’s tenure as Secretary of State, relations with key U.S. allies have reached exceptional low points.  Anglo-American relations are at a depth not seen for a century. Israel has been alienated due to support for radical elements in the region. The Philippines were abandoned when Chinese naval vessels entered its Exclusive Economic Zone. An ABM agreement with Poland was abandoned. American armored forces were inexplicably withdrawn from Europe.

Those are broad policy strokes.  But Ms. Clinton’s long history of ethical violations have also been downplayed by broadcast TV during the primary season, and that promises to continue in the general election. From her dismissal from the Watergate investigative committee for ethical violations, her career before and after entering elective and appointive office has been a history of problems.  Sean Hannity  compiled a list of sections of federal law that are involved:

18USC§201   Bribery

18USC§208   Acts Effecting A Personal Financial Interest (Includes Recommendations)

18USC§371   Conspiracy

18USC§1001  False Statements

18USC§1341  Frauds And Swindles (Mail Fraud)
The world medical association also approved this medicine in every region of the UK and rendering a levitra prices great helping hand to overcome wet dreams and premature ejaculation in due with the excessive masturbation. It causes stress, depression, financial hardships, and canadian levitra online relationship problems. They feel gloomy when they see levitra online usa that they can’t make their partners happy. Amazing health cialis viagra online http://respitecaresa.org/event/efmp-family-day-out/ benefits featured in safed musli makes it as a perfect health tonic for rejuvenating body cells.
18USC§1343  Fraud By Wire

18USC§1349  Attempt And Conspiracy (To Commit Fraud)

18USC§1505  Obstruction Of Justice

18USC§1519  Destruction (Alteration Or Falsification) Of Records In Federal Investigation

18USC§1621  Perjury (Including Documents Signed Under Penalties Of Perjury)

18USC§1905 Disclosure Of Confidential Information

18USC§1924  Unauthorized Removal And Retention Of Classified Documents Or Material

18USC§2071  Concealment (Removal Or Mutilation) Of Government Records

18USC§7201  Attempt To Evade Or Defeat A Tax (Use Of Clinton Foundation Funds For Personal Or Political Purposes)

18USC§7212  Attempts To Interfere With Administration Of Internal Revenue Laws (Call To IRS On Behalf Of UBS Not Turning Over Accounts To IRS)

There is a still brewing scandal involving the approval by Secretary Clinton involving the transfer of half of U.S. uranium output to the Russian government in 2010. In addition to the national security implications, there are indications that the Secretary of State personally profited from the deal, as outlined by Breitbart: “the head of the Russian government’s uranium company, Ian Telfer, made a secret $2.35 million foreign donation to the Clinton Foundation, as was confirmed by the New York Times.Bill Clinton also received a $500,000 speaking fee for a speech in Moscow paid for by a Kremlin-connected bank, reports the New Yorker.”

Riley Waggaman, writing in the Huffington Post,  states: “The Media Has Anointed Hillary Clinton as the Chosen One. It Doesn’t Matter That Americans Don’t Like Her. ‘long before a single voter registration was deleted – or entire precinct caucus results were ‘lost’ – Hillary Clinton was declared the inevitable, presumptive Democratic nominee for president.”

Categories
Quick Analysis

Inappropriate Campaign Tactics

Presidential elections are generally hard fought, no-holds barred contests. However, several disturbing occurrences in the 2016 campaign have gone far beyond the usual rough and tumble of the quadrennial slugfest.

The initial salvo began even before the start of the campaign season, and has already been widely discussed. The inappropriate opposition of the Democrat Party to common-sense measures to insure the accuracy of voter registration rolls and to verify that only qualified voters actually cast ballots has been clearly documented.

Several new strategies have recently been added.

The GOP has generally been identified as tougher on crime, and in favor of more stringent sentencing. It follows, then, that those on the receiving end of that philosophy have not been favorably disposed towards Republican candidates. That has not placed the GOP at a disadvantage, since convicted felons, under current law in most states, have forfeited their right to vote as a consequence of their misdeeds.

In late April, Terry McAuliffe, Governor of the key swing state of Virginia and a personal friend of Hillary Clinton, announced that he was restoring voting rights of more than 200,000 Virginians who were convicted of felonies such as murder, rape, armed assault and other crimes.  Some analyses indicate that the governor’s restoration would be permitted despite the status of any unpaid fines or restitution requirements. A press release from McAuliffe’s office noted these ex-cons had “served their time and completed any supervised release, parole or probation requirements. Each of those Virginians will immediately regain the right to register to vote, to run for office, to serve on a jury and to serve as a notary public… The Governor implemented his action by signing an order restoring the rights of every Virginia felon who completed his or her sentence and all other requirements as of April 22nd, 2016. The total number of Virginians impacted by the Governor’s order today is 206,000. He also instructed the Secretary of the Commonwealth to prepare a similar order monthly in order to restore the rights of individuals who complete their sentences in the future. Article V, Section 12 of the Constitution of Virginia grants the Governor the authority to “remove political disabilities consequent upon conviction” of a felony.” The governor’s action did not extend to restoring Second Amendment rights.
Be sure to get immediate medical cialis canada no prescription pdxcommercial.com care to address your injuries as well as to discover its possible side effects. The science has invented the medicine that is called generic medicine and this theory has been tablet viagra https://pdxcommercial.com/property/709-w-main-st-molalla-or/ used in the preparation of this herbal product. But, if you side effects cialis are facing erection trouble and need an instant solution, then popping one of the ED pills will definitely support your cause. You can simply visit the store to purchase prescriptions due to their health problems or https://pdxcommercial.com/property/1925-1935-se-powell-blvd-portland-97202/8-2/ buy brand viagra condition.
There has been harsh reaction. A National Review assessment questions whether the Governor can provide a blanket pardon, as opposed to a case-by-case action. The article quotes legal sources claiming that McAuliffe is essentially rewriting the state constitution. An Associated Press (AP) description left no doubt that the purpose of the move had less to do with the rights of released criminals and everything to do with the 2016 election. AP noted that at the announcement, left-wings groups were present, handing out voter registration forms. A BBC article quoted Republican Caucus Chairman Ryan T. McDougle: “Terry McAuliffe wants to ensure that convicted pedophiles, rapists, and domestic abusers can vote for Hillary Clinton.”

The Clinton campaign’s proclivity towards unusual tactics extends beyond enhancing the Democrat base using questionable means.  It is also extending into areas that embrace bare-knuckled politics in innovative ways. A New York Post article found that a “pro-Hillary Clinton super PAC plans to spend $1 million responding to her online ­critics” by deploying “a digital task force” to oppose Clinton opponents online.

The concept of silencing critics of Democrats in general can be seen in other actions, as well. The Obama Administration has engaged in a number of measures that would have a chilling effect on free speech. The latest, outlined in a Fox News report, is a Federal Election Commission move to censure a film maker who produced a movie sharply critical of the Obama Administration. Joel Gilbert, producer of a number of politically-themed independent films, is being targeted under the excuse that his movie, which has no connection to any campaign, should have filed reports to the FEC as though it were part of a campaign.  Interestingly, the FEC has not undertaken similar actions against pro-Democrat works on tv and in movies.

A potentially violent tactic has also been observed, as protestors have taken to blocking roads and streets leading to rally sites used by at least one GOP candidate.

Categories
Quick Analysis

Indiana: 2016’s Pivotal Moment?

Today’s Indiana primary may be crucial for both parties. It may also spark a pivot when the campaign emphasis changes from personalities to policy.

For far too long, the 2016 Presidential campaign season has not substantially focused on issues, despite the urgent challenges facing the American economy and the national defense. In the wake of the inevitable whittling down of a number of the candidates, more attention may finally be paid to the mounting problems that seem to increase in seriousness daily.

Here’s how the candidates stand at the start of today’s crucial contest:

Sanders and Clinton have appealed to the vast number of voters who have been hard hit by the twin dilemmas of the aftereffects of the Great Recession (caused by federal policies mandating the distribution of loans to those without the means to repay them) and the failed economic policies of the Obama Administration, while at the same time supporting those very same policies.  They have both also concentrated on wooing the increased numbers of Americans dependent, to varying degrees, on entitlement programs.

Sanders, despite his advocacy of redistributionist policies that cannot succeed without enormous and eventually counterproductive tax hikes, has been surprisingly resilient.  Much of his appeal rests with millennials. They are saddled with enormous debt from vastly overinflated college tuition, and have comparatively little prospects for decent paying employment in a job market that continues in the doldrums (ironically due to policies that he supports.) While his solutions are not viable, his emphasis has focused a spotlight on a very real problem.

Clinton’s appeal has largely been to Democrat loyalists who wish to continue on the path President Obama has pursued.  A key area of support anticipated by the former Secretary of State has not materialized, as younger women have not been particularly receptive to her gender message, and millennials in general are turned off by her rather long history of questionable ethics. Both now form the core of support for Sanders. Clinton is faced with an intriguing dilemma. To keep the support of party faithful, she must paint herself during the primary as the legitimate heir to President Obama. In the general election, however, she must divorce herself from the poor results of the Obama Administration’s policies at home and abroad. In foreign affairs, that may well prove impossible. She was the co-architect of the disastrous “Reset” with Russia that left the Kremlin with an advantage in nuclear arms, and alienated key European allies.  Her role in the Benghazi scandal was more than just inept; an ongoing FBI investigation may well prove it to be criminal, as well.
They may also teach you about the proper generic sildenafil uk nutritional and exercise programs to help you achieve overall wellness and modify your unhealthy lifestyle. Sinrex will give you the confidence you cheap viagra unica-web.com need when you are naked. Some very common symptoms of migraines include a painful headache which is usually levitra no prescription throbbing and intense; blur vision which would be affected by flickering of lights or too many colors appearing at once, sensitivity to sound, vomiting, nausea, sometimes diarrhea, cold hands and or feet and unnatural lack of color in the skin especially on the face. If viagra pills for sale it were up to me, everyone would abstain until marriage.
The GOP has endured its most bruising primary in living memory, and it remains to be seen whether partisans of the numerous contestants can put aside ill feelings and coalesce behind the eventual nominee.  Talk of a scheme by the Republican leadership to insert itself into the contest in one way or another has done nothing but alienate voters, many of whom already criticize party officials as being inept and unwilling to forcefully confront the White House.

The three remaining GOP candidates have delayed the vital step of replacing their criticism of each other with attacks on the policies of their Democrat opponents.  The aftermath of the Indiana primary may change that.

John Kasich is the most pragmatic of the remaining candidates in either party,  and the only one with executive governmental experience. He has not, however, adequately articulated a vision for meeting the significant crises affecting the U.S., or provided a convincing reason to choose him over other GOP alternatives. In an anti-incumbent year, his appeal has been limited.

Ted Cruz has articulated the most consistent approach towards addressing issues, and has established a record of strictly adhering to his beliefs, even at the expense of his own popularity within the Senate. He appeals strongly to conservatives, libertarians and constitutionalists who have become deeply concerned over President Obama’s power grabs. His supporters frequently remind voters that Reagan, too, was unpopular with the GOP leadership before becoming president. But his rough campaign tactics and personal difficulty in establishing a consistent relationship with the Senate leadership has limited his ability to gain the necessary support. His naming of former candidate Carly Fiorina is a skillful attempt to expand his appeal to women voters.

Donald Trump has broken new ground in his unorthodox bid for the Republican nomination.  An “outsider” to the Republican mainstream and the usual power brokers, his self-funded campaign has exceeded all expectations, and may have brought a whole new group of voters into the Republican Party’s orbit.  He almost single-handily made Obama’s ruinous immigration policies a key issue in the campaign. Trump has now attempted to completely refocus the national discussion on foreign policy with his recent speech on that topic.  In a year when most voters give incumbents consistent low marks, he is seen as a viable alternative to business as usual, contrasting his private sector practices with Washington’s failed approach.  However, while his official website does provide some details, his tendency to make broad statements rather than provide specific policy details has worried some observers, and his avoidance of specificity (and his outsider status) has served, to this point, as a barrier to his desire to be considered the “presumptive nominee.”  There are concerns that his lack of specificity would contrast poorly in general election debates with Clinton or Sanders.

Categories
Quick Analysis

The Assasination of Republican Front Runners

Donald Trump is no one’s idea of a perfect candidate.  He is blustery, short on specifics, and tall in hyperbole. He speaks harshly, egotistically, and is politically incorrect. It is difficult to support a candidate who provides so little details about his policy choices.

But he is not, in any way, the terror that the media and his political opposition portray. He reflects the very real frustration of a population tired of seeing their nation deteriorate by the day at the hands of an elitist and inept leadership (particularly at the White House level,) and being forced to accept that their children will be the first generation to do worse than their parents.

A reasonable case can be made that either of Trump’s GOP rivals could address these challenges  better than Trump. But while the media takes every opportunity to frame each of his comments as a solicitation for Armageddon, they go out of their way to ignore the horrifying record, ridiculous ideas, and overwhelming ethical violations of Hillary Clinton, and the nonsensical socialist policies of Bernie Sanders which have already failed in every venue in which they have been tried.

Let’s be clear on what is occurring. As the GOP front runner, Trump has a very large target on his back, the same as Chris Christie had much earlier when he appeared to have a significant edge. Back then, the media made more of Christie’s alleged “bridgegate” involvement (in which his appointees reportedly caused a traffic jam in revenge against a local mayor for a political quarrel) than they did about Clinton’s failed “reset” with Russia, her incompetence in Benghazi, or any other of her long history of policy failures and ethical failings.

It is reminiscent of the favorable, almost fawning, treatment John McCain received from the press, right up until the time it was clear that he was going to become the Republican nominee in 2008. Then it turned largely negative.

Almost no air time has been spent on the utterly disgraceful conspiracy by Soros and his outrageous Moveon.org to deprive the American people of the right to hear one of the candidates simply because they don’t like him.  That’s mob rule at its worst.

The major media have not only lost any sense of objectivity, they have interjected themselves into the process in a manner even worse than when one of their ilk, as a moderator in a presidential  debate between Romney and Obama, interjected herself into the 2012 race by openly tilting the forum against the GOP.

In 2016, they are, in essence, aiding and abetting the criminal actions of a well-financed and well organized mob to prevent the American voter from hearing the views of a candidate.
To pinpoint the source of female frustration, we consulted with best sex speviagra generika t in Delhi to get the condition diagnosed and treated. It is in this market that drugs like india viagra generic browse around for more Kamagra have taken anti-ED medications to a new level. Facing cashing with increase in household energy bills apply with buy viagra for cheap text loans and get quick remedy from urgent bills. Relationships are based on expectations and it also depends on how levitra 10 mg we fulfill our partner’s expectations.
Make no mistake: If Ted Cruz or John Kasich somehow overtake Trump and become the frontrunner, major media outlets will find a way of portraying them as the spawn of Satan.

The detractors of Trump today, Christie previously, and whoever is in the lead in the coming months are not limited to political opponents, the media, and the Soros/Moveon.org mobsters.

Any GOP frontrunner, whether it’s Trump claiming he wants to “Make America Great” or Cruz seeking to restore “Morning in America” or any candidate seeking to establish hope to the American people and return the U.S. to the pre-eminent position it held before the Obama wrecking crew got a hold of the country is a threat to those who have dedicated themselves to knocking the U.S. down as far it can go.

The Obama acolytes and would-be successors believe that America is evil and the aggressors in Russia, China, Iran and elsewhere are benign. They should be embarrassed at the devastation wrought upon the middle class, seniors, and youthful job seekers by their Progressive policies. They don’t want to allow candidates with viable solutions to demonstrate what a huge folly their leftist political agenda has been.

Trump, Cruz and Kasich may have uphill battles, but they can take comfort in knowing that their Progressive opponents  are sufficiently concerned about them that they have resorted to an unprecedented campaign of slander and in some cases violence to prevent them from moving forward.

It’s time that the voters, no matter who they support or whatever issues concern them most, reject the biased reporting of the media and the fascist tactics of the leftist extremists who seek to impose their will by lies and force.