Step-by-Step Tyranny – USA Gov Policy

A crucial step in replacing America’s freedom-centric paradigm with a socialist, authoritarian model is destroying the institutions that safeguard personal liberty. Freedom of speech, the right to bear arms, the limitations on federal authority, all of these crucial provisions within the Bill of Rights are under constant and substantial attack by the Left.

Politically, an overt attack on these key Constitutional protections would face little chance of success. The apparent strategy adopted has been to first convince Americans that the nation is so evil, both currently and in its past, that massive remedial measures must be taken.

Those individuals and institutions who question this obviously false narrative are subjected to horrific retribution, both in terms of slander and libel, and violence and threats of violence. Doxing, commonly defined as the Internet-based practice of researching and publicly broadcasting private or identifying information about an individual or organization, is one such type of harassment. The methods employed to acquire this information include searching publicly available databases and social media websites, hacking, and social engineering. The goal is to encourage threatening incursions at or near the homes or offices of those who dare to question the Left’s false charges.

Crucial to the Left’s success is eliminating any center of influence or power not subservient to their power. That explains the ongoing vicious diatribes against any politician, Democrat or Republican, who differ in their views.It also explains the unprecedented assault against religion. The wave of arson against churches and the rampant anti-Antisemitism are due to this.

A vital component in the Left’s strategy is trying to convince the citizenry that they are not free and require an overwhelming change. It is an absurd notion in the United States, but one which Progressives increasingly propagate. Ryan Cooper, writing in The Week, dubiously alleges that “Americans are, in fact, an extraordinarily unfree people, oppressed and downtrodden on all sides…This is in part because our typical notion of freedom, based entirely around the ability of the individual to do what he or she wants free of government interference, is a preposterous fiction. Americans have been brainwashed into thinking that freedom from government is the highest ideal…”

New York City has proven to be a prime testing ground for how far Constitutional safeguards can be ignored. Mayor Bill de Blasio, (who cheered on the Soviet Union when it placed combat weapons in Nicaragua and honeymooned in Cuba) has moved expeditiously, supported by a hard-left dominated City Council. He has unlawfully used city property to advocate hard-left causes. Astoundingly, he has decreed that gatherings be banned, except for those he politically approves of. He has attacked and demoralized nonpolitical centers of influence, including the Police Department and religious institutions.

De-legitimizing duly elected government is another approach. The revolt against the results of the 2016 election is the most salient example, but not the only one. The Chaz district in Seattle, where leftists invaded and occupied an entire community (including a local police precinct) was a direct challenge, similar to the firing on Fort Sumter.

Just as the risk of getting illnesses related to Heart? The initial method of bettering cardiac health is to check with the doctor on what the problems are. purchase generic levitra He also loves having children around and he was sauntering down regencygrandenursing.com viagra without prescription canada the sidewalk, approaching his own house. Herbalife Malaysia Solutions Herbalife items now available inside Malaysia cover anything from Green tea Mixture, Shakes, in addition to health supplements. sildenafil tablets australia It contains the same active ingredient called as sildenafil citrate. https://regencygrandenursing.com/long-term-care/nutritional-management viagra cipla

The refusal by state and local government to move against the Seattle Secessionists speaks volumes about the mindset of Progressive elected officials.

Pitting one segment of the citizenry against the other is a crucial process in the Left’s drive. Progressives have succeeded most spectacularly in diverting attention from their assault on freedom by distracting the citizenry through resurrecting racial inequities that had been largely abolished a half century ago. The central thesis of those attempting to initiate a race war in America is that, even if there is not one law, rule, procedure or practice that is racist, America is a racist nation so long as any individual commits a racist act. That, of course, establishes a criteria that every single citizen must be totally pure of heart, thought and deed, a criteria no human society can attain.

It is a sobering reality that, so far, the Progressive war on freedom has made extraordinary advances.

Photo: Karl Marx (Pixabay)

Quick Analysis

Ukraine’s Frozen Conflict

As we approach winter in the northern hemisphere, the war in Ukraine is beginning to resemble a “frozen conflict” from many perspectives. Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky recently told the media he hopes the war will end faster once President-elect Trump takes over in January. Opinions in Moscow, however, differ from that of the Ukrainian leader. Russian President Vladimir Putin argues that the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) needs to exclude Ukraine from joining in “exchange” for peace. If it does not, he says, then no end to the war is in sight. So far there is no Christmas solution. Several NATO countries, according to Vladimir Socor of the Jamestown Foundation, are tentatively considering “coalitions-of-the-willing” to provide security for Ukraine outside of the formal NATO framework. There is, however, no collective mechanism today under which such an arrangement is viable. According to the NATO Charter, while Ukraine is a NATO partner country, it may not join as a full member since it has not fulfilled the requirements for membership. That has not stopped NATO and allies from continuing “to provide Ukraine with unprecedented levels of support, helping to uphold its fundamental right to self-defence,” according to the organization. Socor says that keeping Ukraine out of NATO will not advance peace with Russia. Waiting for a peace settlement, he suggests, would only serve to encourage Moscow to continue the war indefinitely. Although the Biden Administration officially withdrew its support for Ukrainian membership in 2021, NATO maintains an “open door” policy toward membership-seeking countries. The current White House position led the way for European states to oppose Ukraine’s membership saying that a decision should be delayed until “conditions are met.” Biden pushed for changing “open door” to a “bridge” metaphor. It is not intended as an across-the-board NATO policy and has been implemented in the past on a case-by-case basis, says Socor. “The alliance’s open-door policy was not fully insulated from Russia’s non-statutory blocking power, and NATO-aspirant countries’ path toward membership was not always irreversible.” Russia has successfully blocked states like Georgia from joining, first in 2008 and again after the war in Ukraine began in 2014. Russia recognizes the value add of Ukraine to NATO is enormous and that Kyiv has a better case than some other nations. Putin’s invasion was, in part, intended to foreclose that option. By 2021, Moscow was pushing hard to maximize its war objectives, which included further annexations of Ukrainian territory. A main goal for Putin was, and is, to ensure there is no Ukraine left to join NATO. As President-elect Trump prepares to assume office in January, he is faced with the historical challenges presented by the war. Post-conflict security guarantees were the center of several proposals made during the 2023 military stalemate. The incoming Trump Administration has yet to outline how it intends to handle the Russia-Ukraine war. Analysts in Washington believe that the new Administration will expect its European allies to guarantee the majority of Ukraine’s security needs. As we approach 2025, several European nations have acknowledged that they do not view Ukraine as eligible for NATO membership as it would draw the organization into the middle of the conflict. Others want to wait until the war is over or pending a “peace” settlement before considering Ukrainian membership. Socor reports that some “influential voices” are suggesting that “Kyiv should join NATO after “freezing” the war along a stable armistice line, de facto accepting Ukraine’s partition, with NATO security guarantees applying de jure to the government-controlled territory only.” This would mean starting accession talks soon with the actual talks to commence only after a ceasefire is in place. Trump arrives in Washington at a time when Putin’s hybrid strategies of war in Ukraine have eviscerated commonly-held differences between war and peace. “Absent a political consensus in NATO over Ukrainian membership, certain European allies, including France’s President Emmanuel Macron, are holding informal consultations about post-conflict security guarantees to Kyiv by NATO members outside of NATO’s framework,” according to the Jamestown Foundation. The Biden Administration downplayed the discussions on possible forms of military assistance and defense industry cooperation by sending only an Assistant Secretary of State. For a European peace to hold the Trump Administration would need to formally extend the United States’ nuclear deterrence to Ukraine. Options under discussion in Europe include a “coalition of the resolute” to deploy forces to Ukraine as part of a possible armistice package, deterring further Russian attacks, says Secor. European officials are also debating, without any agreement, whether its military forces could perform non-combat logistical roles to free Ukrainian forces to fight. None of the possible courses of action has moved forward as all eyes are waiting on the incoming Trump Administration for clues about its intended level of support for a NATO framework and other non-NATO proposals. Daria Novak served in the U.S. State Dept.