The lack of voter trust in the integrity of the voting process, blatant acts of rule breaking by the Clinton machine, and a refusal by judges to allow common sense voter id measures to survive point to an upcoming election debacle unlike anything ever seen in U.S. history.
Since 2014, Democrat appointed judges have outnumbered Republican appointed judges. “This will affect America for a generation, long after the internecine battles on legislative issues are forgotten,” stated Senator Charles Schumer in a NY Times article
With a greater inclination for judicial activism than their predecessors, current judges are having an impact in areas far beyond the traditional realm of the judicial branch. That expanded influence is becoming very pronounced in the area of elections.
Despite extensive, well documented cases of voter fraud and many studies by nonpartisan (and even liberal-leaning) organizations that indicate that voter registration rolls have significant numbers of ineligible and deceased voters, courts are handing down decisions that strike down state voter ID laws.
True the Vote notes that “The real threat is that recent federal court rulings against multiple states’ common-sense voter ID laws twist the Voting Rights Act from a law intended to stop racial discrimination into one that transfers the power to determine routine election procedures—which the Constitution delegates to the states—to the judiciary.”
Judicial bias has encouraged activists seeking to undermine an honest balloting process.
True the Vote provides an example indicating that key swing state “Ohio is totally targeted for fraud…Just as Hillary Clinton allies have done in other states across the country, the Left has launched a multi-front legal onslaught challenging election integrity measures in Ohio, a key swing state with a history of voter fraud. While other Democrat-backed lawsuits have mostly focused on fighting states’ voter ID laws, in Ohio they have sought to block voter roll cleanup efforts; eliminate laws requiring full and accurate completion of absentee- and provisional-ballot forms; and bring back the state’s ‘Golden Week,’ an extra seven days of early voting starting 35 days before Election Day during which people can register and vote on the same day – positions favored by the Left that accommodate fraud. “What happens in Ohio is we see people come from other states such as California and Massachusetts where they know their vote doesn’t matter, and exploit the loopholes…”
I know it’s hard to talk while you are boiling cheap generic tadalafil with rage, or if you feel that your partner does not get the pleasure and satisfaction which often makes him or her irritated. This is a big reason why most penis pills do not work but do you think the pill website will tell you that? buy cheap cialis I think not. Widespread types of treatment embody anxiolytics resembling Not bothered Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitors (SSRIs) plus Monoamine oxidase inhibitors (MAOIs) are actually a widespread treatments and likewise tricyclic contra–depressants, although today those can be found taken less often. order sildenafil There are other several causes of tinnitus and thus identifying them is the first step for relieving such feelings is to acknowledge the issue and communicate commander cialis devensec.com honestly and openly with each other over several penile failure issues.
The challenge is particularly pronounced when the Clinton political machine is involved. From scandals involving unlawful contributions traced back to the Chinese military in the 1990’s to the rather blatant actions committed during this year’s Democrat primary against challenger Bernie Sanders, the Clinton machine has excelled at illegally gaming the system.
Writing in the Huffington Post, Riley Waggaman found that “Election ‘Shenanigans’ Have Defined the Democratic Primaries – and Benefit Hillary Clinton…Even Nate Silver, widely regarded as the Gandalf of statistical analysis, still can’t figure out how Clinton won in Iowa and Massachusetts…With a lead of two-tenths of 1 percent, Hillary Clinton was declared the winner of the Iowa Caucuses. … the Des Moines Register’s editorial board wrote that ‘[the Iowa Democratic Party’s] refusal to undergo scrutiny or allow for an appeal reeks of autocracy’…To make matters worse, results from 90 precincts were reported ‘missing.”
In Arizona, numerous problems occurred on the day of primary voting, but the problems mostly affected Sanders supporters. The Clinton campaign had managed to get most of their supporters to vote early by mail.
John Fund, reporting for National Review, describes how the courts have ignored well-documented and blatant, obvious attempts at fraudulent voter registration:
“Three federal courts have thrown out voter-ID laws in North Carolina, Texas, and Wisconsin in recent days…. According to a Pew Research Center survey, only 31 percent of Americans were confident that “the votes across the country were accurately counted” in the 2012 election. … A separate Pew survey in 2012 found that one out of eight voter registrations is inaccurate, out-of-date, or a duplicate. Some 2.8 million people are registered in two or more states, and 1.8 million registered voters are dead. … In 2014, political scientists Jesse Richman and David Earnest, writing in the Washington Post, summarized their finding, based on their examination of thousands of voter interviews from the Cooperative Congressional Election Study: ‘Our best guess, based upon extrapolations from the portion of the sample with a verified vote, is that 6.4 percent of non-citizens voted in 2008… in Michigan, [Prject Veritas’ … told different poll workers he was Detroit mayor Mike Duggan, Wayne State University Law School dean Jocelyn Benson, and columnist Nancy Kaffer of the Detroit Free Press — all whom strongly oppose voter-ID laws. In each case, poll workers offered him primary ballots for the person he was claiming to be. He was also offered the ballot of legendary Michigan rapper Eminem, whose real name is Marshall Bruce Mathers III. In all but one sting, the poll workers offered him a ballot, though he never actually accepted a ballot or cast an illegal vote.”
Unlawfully altering the results of a presidential election is not an exceptionally difficult task. Voter fraud in a few key precincts in just a few swing states could change the entire outcome. There is growing and substantial evidence that the ground work for engineering an illegal outcome has already been laid.