Staring into the Abyss – USA Gov Policy

America is staring into the face of the abyss, the same threatening realm faced by the people of Russia when the Bolsheviks took over, the Germans in the 1930’s, and, most recently, the citizens of Venezuela when Chavez first sought power. The rhetoric by the forces that took over those nations are deeply similar to the American Left.

The Obama-Biden Administration promised to fundamentally transform America, and did. During those eight years, America became more divided, government became more powerful, the economy stagnated. Freedom of speech and religion were relentlessly assaulted. The IRS was used to attack the Tea Party. The Department of Justice was employed to harass those who disagreed with the Obama- Biden Administration on climate change.

Internationally, America’s interests were subordinated to the financial goals of corrupt officials. Hillary Clinton became enriched by the sale of the basic ingredient of nuclear weapons to Russia. Biden’s family gained vast sums from dealing with Chinese organizations linked to Beijing’s military.

The world’s most dangerous terrorist organization, ISIS, rose to unprecedented power. China invaded the Philippine Exclusive economic Zone with impunity. Russia took over portions of the Ukraine. Obama was caught on an open microphone promising to do more to weaken America while speaking to a Russian leader. The U.S. defense budget was slashed. Our traditional ally Israel was pushed aside, inexplicably, in favor of Iran.

In what was one of the most controversial programs ever initiated by a federal agency, the Federal Communications Commission, led by Obama appointees, attempted to develop an effort entitled “critical information needs” (known as CIN) involving federal oversight of broadcasters and journalists throughout America. It would have placed government employees in the private internal conversations and meetings of journalists, media organizations, and even internet sites.

In 2014, Senator Charles Schumer (D-NY) introduced a measure in the Senate to amend the First Amendment in order to be able to restrict paid political speech. He garnered 41 votes. Across the nation, efforts dubiously labelled as “Campaign finance regulations” sought to place limits on free speech.

The plutocrats of social media, the lifelong politicians who have become wealthy selling out America to foreign powers, and the campus fascists who tolerate no difference of opinion have pulled out all the stops to win this election. They have changed the voting rules, physically assaulted opponents in the streets, attempted to cripple the Trump Administration with absurd charges and impeachment attempts and relentlessly lied in print, on the air, and online.

And, we want to recognize if these enhancement products are useful enough? Yes and purchase levitra no would be the response. Tadalista is one of the medications for treating erectile dysfunction and premature ejaculation. 1. cheap viagra on line There are alternatives on the market that are advertized as curing generico levitra on line the erectile dysfunction. Erections achieved by this cialis price downtownsault.org medicine are firm enough to have sexual intercourse.

Many believe America is an exceptional nation. If the totalitarian forces are beaten back this election, that will continue to be true. If not, then this great nation will have become just one more casualty of the age-old impulse of tyranny so vigorously and continuously embraced by the Left.

The threat to freedom is seen most clearly in the goal to “stack” the Supreme Court. Doing so would end the independence of the judiciary, and eliminate the whole concept of separation of powers that has preserved American rights.

During the 2020 presidential campaign, the reality of Joe Biden’s mental deterioration, his history of corruption, and his 47-year legacy in public office which produced nothing for the American people but a great deal of wealth for his family and himself was largely censored from public view. The unquestioned success of the Trump Administration in bringing peace to the Middle East, encouraging our Eastern European allies to maintain their independence, halting Moscow’s ongoing takeover of Ukraine, and getting NATO members to pay their fair share was completely ignored.

The use of Antifa and Black Lives Matter in a classic totalitarian move of physical intimidation has been scrupulously overlooked by a biased media.

Will American freedom survive? The answer should come on November 3.

Illustration: Pixabay

Quick Analysis

Why the Electoral College is Vital

Proposals for radical alterations in the way Americans vote are dangerous concepts that would have dramatic consequences for the nation and its Constitution. Some, such as ranked choice voting, are an unblushing bid to prop up fringe, leftist candidates. Others. if adopted, would essentially disunite the nation and overturn its Constitution. As they consistently have after each election loss, Democrat spokespeople have flooded the airwaves with complaints about the Electoral College. Why, they ask, can’t we have a “popular vote,” and let it be done with. Since the Electoral College process is part of the original design of the U.S. Constitution, it would be necessary to pass a Constitutional amendment to change this system. The National Archives notes that over the past 200 years more than 700 proposals have been introduced in Congress to reform or eliminate the Electoral College. There have been more proposals for Constitutional amendments on changing the Electoral College than on any other subject. The answer is as simple as the name of the country: The United States of America. The incredibly successful nation created almost two and a half centuries ago was a union of separate states. Fresh off of dealing with a monarch, it was intentionally set up that way to both prevent the possibility of having an all-powerful dictator, and to prevent larger states from bullying smaller ones. Abolishing the electoral college would essentially disenfranchise smaller states from having any say in the presidency. Indeed, even less populated areas of large states would lose influence. A collection of large cities, (New York, Los Angeles, Chicago, Houston, Phoenix, Philadelphia, San Antonio, San Diego, Dallas, Austin, Jacksonville, etc.) would decide the outcome in who gets the White House. Considering how badly many of those urban centers are run, that would not bode well for the future of the country! Beyond the practical policy implications, it would alienate the populations of those not living in California, Texas, New York, Florida, Pennsylvania, Illinois, who would, for the most part, be reduced to bystanders in the race for the only nationally-elected position. A Heritage study analyzed the concept of a “National Popular Vote” (NPV) this way: “The National Popular Vote (NPV) plan is the latest in a long line of schemes designed to replace the Electoral College. Imbued with the ideals of this nation’s Founders, the Electoral College has proved itself to be both effective in providing orderly elections for President and resilient in allowing a stable transfer of power of the leadership of the world’s greatest democracy. Therefore, while it would be a mistake to replace the Electoral College, replacing this system with the NPV would be a disaster. The NPV would devalue the minority interests that the Founders sought to protect, create electoral administrative problems, encourage voter fraud, and radicalize the U.S. political system. It also would likely violate the U.S. Constitution’s Compact Clause while directly contravening the Founders’ view of federalism and a representative republic. In an age of perceived political dysfunction, effective policies already in place—especially successful policies established by this nation’s Founders, such as the Electoral College—should be preserved.” Trent England, writing for the National Conference of State Legislatures outlined key reasons for the institution: “At the Constitutional Convention, the primary concern of delegates opposed to direct election was that big states would dominate presidential politics. By using a two-step election process, the Electoral College prevents one region, or a handful of major metropolitan areas, from controlling the White House. Support must be geographically distributed around the country in order to win enough states to capture an electoral vote majority. This was particularly important after the Civil War. The nation remained divided, and Democrats became dominant in the south. A combination of intense popularity with some voters and violent suppression of others allowed Democrats to receive the most popular votes in 1876 and 1888 even though they lost the Electoral College and thus those elections.” Eliminating the Electoral College would be a disaster for the United States/