The impact of the global trend towards censorship by social media giants, news organizations and other outlets has caught many by surprise in the United States, where the concept of free speech had long been held sacrosanct.
That cherished concept began to break down around the time that the “progressive” wing of the Democrat Party rose to ascendency, reflecting the impact that “cancel culture” universities had in producing young voters educated in leftist institutions that openly oppressed contrary opinions.
Several years ago, Senator Charles Schumer called for the weakening of free speech rights, alleging that paid political speech is not covered by the First Amendment. He stated that “The First Amendment is sacred, but it is not absolute.” Frighteningly, he received the support of the Democrat delegation. Happily, that was not enough to secure passage of the measure.
Throughout the Obama Administration, various tools were employed to attack political opponents. The IRS sought to deny conservative groups the ability to form not-for-profit organizations. It’s Department of Justice engaged in harassing actions against conservative think tanks. There were thwarted attempts to place federal monitors in newsrooms.
CNN, which has emerged less as a news organization than as a spokesman for Progressive views, has called for the “blacklisting” of conservative news sites.
While corporate giants seek to portray the opposition to its censorship as a Trump-related phenomenon, opposition has been growing across the board.
Inside Sources reports that “The Left and the Right may have different specific complaints with the most-powerful sector in global business, but the concerns about the unintended consequences of monopolies are strangely similar…many conservatives plausibly believe that the liberal Silicon Valley-headquartered Facebook and Google discriminate against them and their viewpoints. They increasingly see it in corporate culture wars (the intolerance of diversity of thought at Google or Apple), and in complicated algorithms that pick what content is “OK to be viewed” (Twitter banning Marsha Blackburn’s pro-life campaign ad), among other things… growing number of liberals and progressives are fighting mad at Facebook and Google, along with Amazon, Apple and Microsoft, and maybe even Uber … they worry that a menacing and moneyed Big Tech is snuffing out competition and oversight.”
It gives the tadalafil prices cheap organ ability to get hard erection, satisfactory for penetration. Ladies may characterize sexual arousal in light of mental and enthusiastic, and in addition natural variables. cialis professional india More importantly, any woman should understand that the viagra discount prices medicine dose is consumable and remains safe when taken with the help of water and must be taken an hour before intercourse. It’s a complicated world levitra free out there in the UK.The corporate giants’ attempts to grab power away from elected officials and censor non-progressive voices has been made clear by startling examples.
The Federalist found that Rep Louie Gohmert R-TX was silenced for merely literally quoting Nancy Pelosi.
The New York Post found that Twitter…temporarily s suspended the account of new Georgia Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene after she posted a tweet questioning the results of the state’s runoff election for Senate.
Breitbart found that Amazon not only ended, in apparent violation of its contract. Its relationship with Parler—and even shut down the conservative-leaning sites’ servers. Despite Amazon’s allegations that some had posted violent language on Parler, Amazon continues to host The tech giant, however, hosts, on its own website such as a t-shirt reading, “Kill All Republicans,” and a mug that reads, “Where is Lee Harvey Oswald now that we really need him?”
Internet oligarchs are not alone in their bid to drown out voices that question progressive views. Thanks to Google, Twitter and Facebook bias, leftist politicians are freed from the fiery opposition that would certainly result from one group of politicians censoring others. Breitbart provides a number of examples. Matt Gaetz (R-FL) warned the incoming Biden administration is positioning itself to use national security tool against political opponents. Pennsylvania lt. Governor John Fetterman alleges that questioning the legitimacy of the 2020 election is not protected by the First Amendment.
The attacks on those challenging leftist views aren’t restricted to muzzling free speech. Some progressives openly seek to remove rival politicians from office. There are solutions to the growing power of internet giants to censor political views that oppose progressive-leftist orthodoxy. There are solutions to the growing power of internet giants to censor political views that oppose progressive-leftist orthodoxy.
Illustration: Pixabay